MaxMidnite
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 143
Merit: 0
|
|
May 06, 2018, 02:41:51 PM |
|
Claymore gone very quiet these days, hope everything is ok?
|
|
|
|
Claymore (OP)
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1325
Miners developer
|
|
May 06, 2018, 04:35:42 PM Last edit: May 06, 2018, 05:28:14 PM by Claymore |
|
One of users uploaded this log file: ...
Hmm, I don't see any problems in this log file. If it's a bug, it's difficult to catch it since I cannot reproduce it, the log is ok and it takes a lot of time to get it (about 80 hours in this log). It's not related to the running time directly since I have some systems running >200 hours completely stable. Another thing is that you can get this error if drivers fail due to some reason, in most cases OpenCL call just hangs so watchdog can catch it, but sometimes it can crash entire application or entire system. I will try to find the reason, but the best solution currently is to restart miner from .bat file automatically (or better reboot the system). As far as I remember Windows has a way to disable that dialog about crash... I will also put some rigs to your pool in "-esm 3" mode to check if I can see this error. BTW, tell to your user that the miner detected devfee cheating and works a bit slower as described in Readme. Some people ignore Readme or think that I'm not smart enough to detect public tools, private networks, local proxies, etc. Be smarter if it's really important for you, or use Linux version, it's free of any cheat detection. Claymore gone very quiet these days, hope everything is ok?
I'm fine, thanks, is v11.7 too old and you want v11.8 right now?
|
|
|
|
mettalmag
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1084
Merit: 1003
≡v≡
|
|
May 06, 2018, 04:46:49 PM |
|
is there any chance to add to monitoring software the ICMP/ping function? when remote restarting (in my case relay switches) the rig instead of RDPing in it or using VPN to monitor the rig is responding or not one just can simply use remote from HTTP and see if the rig appeared online or not after restarting, I hope this is not only my concern cheers
|
|
|
|
Claymore (OP)
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1325
Miners developer
|
|
May 06, 2018, 04:52:26 PM |
|
is there any chance to add to monitoring software the ICMP/ping function? when remote restarting (in my case relay switches) the rig instead of RDPing in it or using VPN to monitor the rig is responding or not one just can simply use remote from HTTP and see if the rig appeared online or not after restarting, I hope this is not only my concern cheers You can connect to miner via http or json to check if it's alive ("-mport" option). I think also about an option to start some .bat file from miner every X seconds, but not sure if it will be really useful.
|
|
|
|
Balthazar
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3108
Merit: 1359
|
|
May 06, 2018, 05:29:10 PM |
|
One of users uploaded this log file: ...
Hmm, I don't see any problems in this log file. If it's a bug, it's difficult to catch it since I cannot reproduce it, the log is ok and it takes a lot of time to get it (about 80 hours in this log). It's not related to the running time directly since I have some systems running >200 hours completely stable. Another thing is that you can get this error if drivers fail due to some reason, in most cases OpenCL call just hangs so watchdog can catch it, but sometimes it can crash entire application or entire system. I will try to find the reason, but the best solution currently is to restart miner from .bat file automatically (or better reboot the system). As far as I remember Windows has a way to disable that dialog about crash... I will also put some rigs to your pool in "-esm 3" mode to check if I can see this error. BTW, tell to your user that the miner detected devfee cheating and works a bit slower as described in Readme. Some people ignore Readme or think that I'm not smart enough to detect public tools, private networks, local proxies, etc. Be smarter if it's really important for you, or use Linux version, it's free of any cheat detection. Another report with log file: https://forum.bits.media/index.php?/topic/33998-eth-%D0%BF%D1%80%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%82%D0%BE%D0%B9-ethereum-%D0%BF%D1%83%D0%BB-pps-pot/&page=363&tab=comments#comment-1435514
|
|
|
|
Claymore (OP)
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1325
Miners developer
|
|
May 06, 2018, 05:51:42 PM |
|
Another report with log file: ...
More interesting because it took only an hour to crash, but still no details in the log file. I will test some rigs in "-esm 3" mode for 48 hours to check if I can reproduce this issue here. If I can I will fix it immediately, otherwise it can take a lot of time to find the reason.
|
|
|
|
DireWolfM14
Copper Member
Legendary
Online
Activity: 2324
Merit: 4526
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
|
|
May 06, 2018, 10:42:04 PM |
|
I just switched from Phoenix to see how dual mining will work for me. I'm fairly new to all this, I'm just starting out with a pair of MSI GTX GeForce 1070s (armor.) My ETH hash rate is 30.06MH/S per gpu. That's 2.1MH/S slower than it is with the Phoenix miner. I didn't turn the dev fee off. Is this normal?
Does dual mining make up for the difference in hash rate and dev fee over Phoenix? I'm mining ETH and DCR, and seeing results on my pools' dashboards, so it's working. I guess I'll run it for a couple of days and find out.
|
|
|
|
xunl
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 33
Merit: 0
|
|
May 07, 2018, 06:02:11 AM |
|
I also get these errors repeatedly on 11.7. Each time claymore miner will crash & restart when error occurs. Anything I can do to avoid them? The these errors are for gtx 1070/1060 6GB 23:42:31:285 668 em hbt: 15, fm hbt: 31, 23:42:31:285 668 watchdog - thread 0 (gpu0), hb time 234 23:42:31:285 668 watchdog - thread 1 (gpu0), hb time 109 23:42:32:769 8e4 GPU 0, GpuMiner cu_k1 failed 4, unspecified launch failure 23:42:32:769 8e4 GPU 0, GpuMiner kx failed 1 23:42:32:769 8e4 Set global fail flag, failed GPU0 23:42:32:769 8e4 GPU 0 failed 23:42:32:769 8e0 GPU 0, GpuMiner cu_k1 failed 4, unspecified launch failure 23:42:32:769 8e0 GPU 0, GpuMiner kx failed 1 23:42:32:769 8e0 Set global fail flag, failed GPU0 23:42:32:769 8e0 GPU 0 failed
GPU 0, GpuMiner cu_k1 failed 77, an illegal memory access was encountered GPU 0, GpuMiner kx failed 1 Set global fail flag, failed GPU0 GPU 0 failed GPU 0, GpuMiner cu_k1 failed 77, an illegal memory access was encountered GPU 0, GpuMiner kx failed 1 Set global fail flag, failed GPU0 GPU 0 failed
02:29:01:610 1390 GPU 0, GpuMiner cu_k1 failed 73, an illegal instruction was encountered 02:29:01:610 1390 GPU 0, GpuMiner kx failed 1 02:29:01:610 1390 Set global fail flag, failed GPU0 02:29:01:610 1390 GPU 0 failed 02:29:01:610 1160 GPU 0, GpuMiner cu_k1 failed 73, an illegal instruction was encountered 02:29:01:610 1160 GPU 0, GpuMiner kx failed 1 02:29:01:610 1160 Set global fail flag, failed GPU0 02:29:01:610 1160 GPU 0 failed
|
|
|
|
nitrobg
Member
Offline
Activity: 413
Merit: 17
|
|
May 07, 2018, 07:55:42 AM |
|
Is it normal to have a slightly lower hash on AMD cards with Linux(HiveOS) compared to Windows 10 on identical settings (-asm 2 -ethi 16) and overclock? Windows: GPU0 27.459 Mh/s, GPU1 29.877 Mh/s, GPU2 30.349 Mh/s, GPU3 28.585 Mh/s Linux: GPU0 27.101 Mh/s, GPU1 29.517 Mh/s, GPU2 29.930 Mh/s, GPU3 28.406 Mh/s
|
|
|
|
skaraud
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 1
Merit: 0
|
|
May 07, 2018, 08:43:54 AM |
|
Hi, I'm using Claymore on windows since a year, and recently I have a loss of my reported hashrate on NanoPool (ETH Pool) with the latest 11.7 version. Is anyone having the same issue ? I mean I have a correct reported hashrate during 5 or 6 hours, then it drops to zero but the rig continues mining at a stable hashrate. it's just that I have no reported hashrate on my pool monitoring interface.
|
|
|
|
Stoukie
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 30
Merit: 1
|
|
May 07, 2018, 08:50:18 AM |
|
Hi, I'm using Claymore on windows since a year, and recently I have a loss of my reported hashrate on NanoPool (ETH Pool) with the latest 11.7 version. Is anyone having the same issue ? I mean I have a correct reported hashrate during 5 or 6 hours, then it drops to zero but the rig continues mining at a stable hashrate. it's just that I have no reported hashrate on my pool monitoring interface.
Have exactly the same issue on Nanopool, not a Claymore issue but I suspect issues on the pool itself... Switched to Ethermine.org for now and everything is working 100%.
|
|
|
|
Stoukie
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 30
Merit: 1
|
|
May 07, 2018, 09:02:26 AM |
|
Good day guys,
Made an interesting observation yesterday after playing around with my .bat file, running 5 x RX580 8GB's and getting around 29 to 30 MH/s per card.
Example of the .bat file I have been using:
setx GPU_FORCE_64BIT_PTR 0 setx GPU_MAX_HEAP_SIZE 100 setx GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1 setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100 setx GPU_SINGLE_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
EthDcrMiner64.exe -epool <MyPoolAddress> -ewal <My ETH Address / My Email Address> -epsw x -allpools 1 -allcoins 1 -gser 3 -lidag 1 -cclock 1150 -cvddc 950 -mclock 2115 -mvddc 950 -ethi 15 -etht 20
Then I switched over to a vanila .bat file only specifying the minimal and my hashrate actually went up to around 30.5 MH/s:
setx GPU_FORCE_64BIT_PTR 0 setx GPU_MAX_HEAP_SIZE 100 setx GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1 setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100 setx GPU_SINGLE_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
EthDcrMiner64.exe -epool <MyPoolAddress> -ewal <My ETH Address / My Email Address> -epsw x
I have not checked yet but I presume the undervolting made a difference in electricity usage per card, but 'overclocking' did nothing for my hashrate.
Just an observation from my side...
|
|
|
|
ermis1975
Member
Offline
Activity: 198
Merit: 10
|
|
May 07, 2018, 12:33:53 PM |
|
If you mod bios, why you have to play with start bat file settings, of wattman, afterburner etc ? Or you dont mod bios and just change settings manually?
|
|
|
|
leonix007
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 1008
Merit: 297
Grow with community
|
|
May 07, 2018, 01:01:28 PM |
|
If you mod bios, why you have to play with start bat file settings, of wattman, afterburner etc ? Or you dont mod bios and just change settings manually?
Some modding bios are just simply copy and pasting straps from lower freq, and didn't play along with the settings there are pros and cons of it, depending on your usage some may prefer doing adjustments thru overclocking tools such as wattman, OD, MSI AB, as they could play it on different algos
|
|
|
|
Lunga Chung
Member
Offline
Activity: 277
Merit: 23
|
|
May 07, 2018, 01:07:33 PM |
|
is there any chance to add to monitoring software the ICMP/ping function? when remote restarting (in my case relay switches) the rig instead of RDPing in it or using VPN to monitor the rig is responding or not one just can simply use remote from HTTP and see if the rig appeared online or not after restarting, I hope this is not only my concern cheers which relay switch are you using?
|
|
|
|
Andre438
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 1
Merit: 0
|
|
May 07, 2018, 02:42:39 PM |
|
hello, tell me on which coin lutshe set up mined dcr but came out visibly ASIC on this algorithm and production stopped:( mined at decredpool.org the withdrawal from 1 coin I managed to get 0.38 I am writing through a translator. 2 gpu rx580 Rx460
|
|
|
|
jamfro
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 6
Merit: 0
|
|
May 07, 2018, 07:03:56 PM |
|
Was wondering if Claymore had a chance to look at this problem of not being able to use more than 6 amd gpus after 1803 upgrade. And hoping he can provide a projection of if and when he can work around whatever was borked by the "upgrade".
Thanks
|
|
|
|
Geniusvzla
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 36
Merit: 0
|
|
May 07, 2018, 07:17:38 PM |
|
Hi, I'm using Claymore on windows since a year, and recently I have a loss of my reported hashrate on NanoPool (ETH Pool) with the latest 11.7 version. Is anyone having the same issue ? I mean I have a correct reported hashrate during 5 or 6 hours, then it drops to zero but the rig continues mining at a stable hashrate. it's just that I have no reported hashrate on my pool monitoring interface.
hello, in fact it is also reporting 0 in my case, but it seems to be an inconvenience in the pool, let's hope to see if they fix it
|
|
|
|
mine_phun
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 208
Merit: 0
|
|
May 07, 2018, 10:25:34 PM |
|
Hello All,
As admin of NLpool i wonder how you guy's think about Dualmining with claymore after 9th May. As you probably all are aware XVG will halve around that date, @ block 2.124.000 to be precise. This means that when you dual mine XVG, your income for XVG will halve also.
From that date i think, with the current exchange rate, XVG dual mining will not be profitable anymore unless the price for XVG will double or half of the miners go out, something i personally don't see happening soon.
So my question is what are you guy's going to do? and what do you want us to do?
For now we have Shield as alternative for blake2S and Maxcoin / Smartcash with the Keccak algo.
However those coins cannot take the 250TH/s from Verge so if you guys have alternatives you would like to see, i would really like to know them if you can share. Perhaps someone can make a poll around here?
|
|
|
|
UnclWish
|
|
May 08, 2018, 12:51:04 AM |
|
Claymore gone very quiet these days, hope everything is ok?
I'm fine, thanks, is v11.7 too old and you want v11.8 right now? Claymore, I'm encountered problems with Win 10 1803 and 18.4.1 drivers. My 1st GPU (active - monitor connected) drops hashrate to 0 after several minites (sometimes even less minute) after start. Sometimes hasrate rises than drops again, sometimes drops until restart miner. 2nd card (inactive - nothing connected) works normal. Use modded bios and setting OC and voltages in your miner. RX 580 8Gb cards. Maybe it's need to add something in miner to compatibilty with new drivers? 1803 and old 18.3.4 driver works normal. But I'm afraid that it will be on all new drivers too...
|
|
|
|
|