szczur333
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 10
Merit: 0
|
|
May 21, 2018, 10:25:00 PM |
|
use abcd
a = gpu10 b = gpu11 that's it? Why i didnt think of that - haha thank you very much
|
|
|
|
kenron
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 34
Merit: 1
|
|
May 21, 2018, 11:23:56 PM |
|
Anyone else getting virus warning using claymore miner and AVG/virusprog? i get warning that api.infura.io was infected and have been stopped
|
|
|
|
jeremyismer
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 55
Merit: 0
|
|
May 21, 2018, 11:26:11 PM |
|
Anyone else getting virus warning using claymore miner and AVG/virusprog? i get warning that api.infura.io was infected and have been stopped Have you read the first post by Claymore? It covers the virus warning etc. You need to add an exception to your virus program. If you don't trust him/the miner, don't run it.
|
|
|
|
|
jeremyismer
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 55
Merit: 0
|
|
May 21, 2018, 11:35:55 PM |
|
Yeah, sorry, I see your point. Which version?
|
|
|
|
androstan1234
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 251
Merit: 6
|
|
May 21, 2018, 11:56:42 PM |
|
There was a virus using claymore to mine eth on my cpu today. I use -mport 0. I leave windows defender turned on.
|
|
|
|
iSuX
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 42
Merit: 8
|
|
May 22, 2018, 05:28:23 AM Last edit: May 22, 2018, 06:23:20 AM by iSuX |
|
There was a virus using claymore to mine eth on my cpu today. I use -mport 0. I leave windows defender turned on.
WOW, that would be quite a trick, as Claymore is not a CPU mining application to start with. Check your details, check your post, and suggest you correct the details, or better still, delete it.
|
KISS. Did you read the Readme.txt? Summarise/Itemise your hardware/versions/expectations/batchfile & results. The more specific, detailed, the better
|
|
|
kgminer
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 100
Merit: 6
|
|
May 22, 2018, 05:59:15 AM |
|
There was a virus using claymore to mine eth on my cpu today. I use -mport 0. I leave windows defender turned on.
lol
|
|
|
|
iSuX
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 42
Merit: 8
|
|
May 22, 2018, 06:59:11 AM |
|
use abcd
Minor correction here, you can use "abc" but not "d" This poses a problem, if you have a 13GPU rig, and use altnum -1 or altnum -3 to change from first GPU=0 to first GPU=1 You loose the ability in the console to toggle GPU 13 off/on, (you can still do this in ethman of course). Small bug for Mr Claymore. Happy mining everyone.
|
KISS. Did you read the Readme.txt? Summarise/Itemise your hardware/versions/expectations/batchfile & results. The more specific, detailed, the better
|
|
|
mine_phun
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 208
Merit: 0
|
|
May 22, 2018, 07:49:05 AM |
|
Sorry guys, but this now seems more relevant, since XVG mining is down at the moment, so i post again. Hi guys,which coin is worth in dual mining?
That depends on what coin you mine. XVG / XSH have both been halved, so the profit is a bit low. Your best options according to Whattomine are: 1st : ETH + SmartCash ( Keccak ) 2nd : ETH + Maxcoin ( Keccak ) 3rd : ETH + Verge / Blake2s NLPool.nl is currently the only Yiimp pool with a working Smartcash implementation, plus we have fixed the Keccak implementation on Yiimp, so no rejected shares. Also we are an autoexchange pool, so you can use an LTC wallet to mine the Smartcash or Maxcoin coins The only disadvantage of Keccak is that your powersupply needs to work a bit harder. It is a bit more intense then Blake2s, so not all rigs are capable of mining ..... or another option when you have 13 GPU's and limited power is to use 11 GPU's and leave 2 GPU's solo. If you need more help we are @ Telegram > t.me/nlpool
|
|
|
|
Snake33
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 34
Merit: 0
|
|
May 22, 2018, 09:26:09 AM |
|
@Claymore
Saw this today in my log file:
08:38:29:239 4304 checked ETH share on CPU, spent 4ms 08:38:48:975 43b8 checked ETH share on CPU, spent 3ms 08:39:09:055 43c0 checked ETH share on CPU, spent 3ms
Don`t think that is normal.
|
|
|
|
androstan1234
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 251
Merit: 6
|
|
May 22, 2018, 11:29:31 AM |
|
@Claymore
Saw this today in my log file:
08:38:29:239 4304 checked ETH share on CPU, spent 4ms 08:38:48:975 43b8 checked ETH share on CPU, spent 3ms 08:39:09:055 43c0 checked ETH share on CPU, spent 3ms
Don`t think that is normal.
That's what happened to me yesterday. I had a virus. A windows virus scan detected and removed it.
|
|
|
|
iSuX
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 42
Merit: 8
|
|
May 22, 2018, 01:01:24 PM Last edit: May 22, 2018, 01:41:48 PM by iSuX |
|
@Claymore
Saw this today in my log file:
08:38:29:239 4304 checked ETH share on CPU, spent 4ms 08:38:48:975 43b8 checked ETH share on CPU, spent 3ms 08:39:09:055 43c0 checked ETH share on CPU, spent 3ms
Don`t think that is normal.
Nothing to worry about, this is totally normal. Look back through your old logs, (use grep for example), and you'll see it's a regular event in the log. Mr Claymore would be the only person who can explain why he's programmed this, but no doubt there is a logical reason. Side note: Generally, (assuming the programmer is not a total moron), log entries will have some prefix, or suffix, "warning", "error", "OK", "good" etc etc, which makes life easier when searching logs for problem events, or notable events you might like to check on. Conversely, if you don't see such annotations, and the log entry is not self explanatory, you can generally ignore such entries. (as in they are not things you need to worry about). And No, it's not a virus either.
|
KISS. Did you read the Readme.txt? Summarise/Itemise your hardware/versions/expectations/batchfile & results. The more specific, detailed, the better
|
|
|
iSuX
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 42
Merit: 8
|
|
May 22, 2018, 01:02:31 PM |
|
@Claymore
Saw this today in my log file:
08:38:29:239 4304 checked ETH share on CPU, spent 4ms 08:38:48:975 43b8 checked ETH share on CPU, spent 3ms 08:39:09:055 43c0 checked ETH share on CPU, spent 3ms
Don`t think that is normal.
That's what happened to me yesterday. I had a virus. A windows virus scan detected and removed it. Jesus, let it go man.
|
KISS. Did you read the Readme.txt? Summarise/Itemise your hardware/versions/expectations/batchfile & results. The more specific, detailed, the better
|
|
|
crypsy
|
|
May 22, 2018, 01:02:42 PM |
|
EthDcrMiner64.exe -epool etc-eu1.nanopool.org:19999 -ewal 0xa572dd9dcbcbe537e65c740f27cbd6de5b42a514/3 -epsw x -dpool stratum+tcp://mine.nlpool.nl:5133 -dwal DGr37NMCTSEXZqqPk7gHhikCCd3Ar2Py2b -dpsw c=XVG -dcoin blake2s -allpools 1
hi , i have 100% rejected for xvg what I am doing wrong
|
btc: 183ZdPA9c5XkGgacaN9q7aJY93asV2BnKt eth: 0x144c3b9d9c3c6e465d4cfe136d318440e81bb39e
|
|
|
iSuX
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 42
Merit: 8
|
|
May 22, 2018, 01:17:05 PM |
|
I'm using windows 10 version 1803 and nvidia driver 397.64. My vgas all are gtx 1070.
I'm stuck with this error....everytime I start the mining...in about 5 minutes or less I got these messages. I already lowered the OC via MSI and tried with no OC at all, but no luck. These are the messages:
15:54:51:907 1098 ETH: 05/22/18-15:54:51 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 3) 15:54:52:360 1098 buf: {"id":13,"jsonrpc":"2.0","result":true}
15:54:52:365 1098 ETH: Share accepted (453 ms)!
15:54:52:579 c24 NVML: cannot get current temperature, error 15 15:54:52:594 c24 NVML: cannot get fan speed, error 15 15:54:54:688 1884 GPU 7, GpuMiner cu_k1 failed 6, the launch timed out and was terminated 15:54:54:692 1900 GPU 6, GpuMiner cu_k1 failed 6, the launch timed out and was terminated 15:54:54:751 1360 GPU 8, GpuMiner cu_k1 failed 6, the launch timed out and was terminated 15:54:54:754 1dcc GPU 4, GpuMiner cu_k1 failed 6, the launch timed out and was terminated 15:54:54:759 9a8 GPU 1, GpuMiner cu_k1 failed 6, the launch timed out and was terminated 15:54:54:761 b9c GPU 3, GpuMiner cu_k1 failed 6, the launch timed out and was terminated 15:54:54:767 1700 GPU 2, GpuMiner cu_k1 failed 6, the launch timed out and was terminated 15:54:54:799 140c GPU 0, GpuMiner cu_k1 failed 6, the launch timed out and was terminated 15:54:54:819 14e8 GPU 5, GpuMiner cu_k1 failed 6, the launch timed out and was terminated 15:54:54:834 12e0 GPU 10, GpuMiner cu_k1 failed 6, the launch timed out and was terminated 15:54:54:836 11a4 GPU 9, GpuMiner cu_k1 failed 6, the launch timed out and was terminated 15:54:54:929 1884 GPU 7, GpuMiner kx failed 1 15:54:54:935 1900 GPU 6, GpuMiner kx failed 1 15:54:54:945 1360 GPU 8, GpuMiner kx failed 1 15:54:54:976 1dcc GPU 4, GpuMiner kx failed 1 15:55:00:302 9a8 GPU 1, GpuMiner kx failed 1 15:55:00:389 b9c GPU 3, GpuMiner kx failed 1 15:55:00:536 1700 GPU 2, GpuMiner kx failed 1 15:55:01:637 140c GPU 0, GpuMiner kx failed 1 15:55:01:638 14e8 GPU 5, GpuMiner kx failed 1 15:55:01:639 12e0 GPU 10, GpuMiner kx failed 1 15:55:01:639 11a4 GPU 9, GpuMiner kx failed 1 15:55:01:639 11a4 Set global fail flag, failed GPU9 15:55:01:645 11a4 GPU 9 failed 15:54:54:935 1900 Set global fail flag, failed GPU6 15:55:01:647 1900 GPU 6 failed
After these error, there is notification on windows that say : "Display driver failed to start;using microsoft basic display driver instead; check windows update for newer display driver" I check it and all are updated what's the problem?
This looks like an Nvidia driver crash. I'm not mining with Nvidia, but if you look back through your log, you will probably see (prior to this), Claymore is querying the GPU temperatures, and is expecting an ACK, I expect your log will show something like a GPU number, followed by temperature value, and possibly fan speed. What you see here is a failure to read out that data, and as that is coming via the Nvidia driver, and looking at the following entries, that would support the theory the driver has unloaded or crashedout. Some things to try. Remove all your GPU except 1. Download DDU, http://www.guru3d.com/files-details/display-driver-uninstaller-download.htmlBoot Win10 to safemode, (CTRL+SHIFT+restart), select troubleshoot, advanced, (sad that ms see that as advanced, lol), startup options, and on restart, numeric key 4 will enable safemode boot. Run DDU, default options, it will remove your Nvida display drivers, reboot to windows, and install Nvidia. Select a custom install, and install only the display driver, (you can skip audio, and experience for example), Less crap to worry about if things don't run with stability later. After install, reboot, and run claymore, (single GPU), and see if that works. BTW: Windows will fallback on the basic display driver, and in cases where it does not know of, (have installed), the vendors driver. Because you are seeing this happen, AND you clearly DO HAVE the Nvidia driver installed, (otherwise Claymore would bombout early init), then I suspect you have a corrupt install, reg entry somewhere. It's a weird one though, usually windows doesn't gracefully unload a peripheral driver if it's being used, and you'll get some kind of BSOD. Interesting situation, please feedback how you get on. Good luck with it too btw. Cheers
|
KISS. Did you read the Readme.txt? Summarise/Itemise your hardware/versions/expectations/batchfile & results. The more specific, detailed, the better
|
|
|
iSuX
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 42
Merit: 8
|
|
May 22, 2018, 01:21:53 PM Last edit: May 22, 2018, 01:38:57 PM by iSuX |
|
EthDcrMiner64.exe -epool etc-eu1.nanopool.org:19999 -ewal 0xa572dd9dcbcbe537e65c740f27cbd6de5b42a514/3 -epsw x -dpool stratum+tcp://mine.nlpool.nl:5133 -dwal DGr37NMCTSEXZqqPk7gHhikCCd3Ar2Py2b -dpsw c=XVG -dcoin blake2s -allpools 1
hi , i have 100% rejected for xvg what I am doing wrong
Are you sure about your ETH address? That looks malformed to me. There should not be a /3 in that string. Update: looking at this some more, I don't recall "C=" or in fact that kind of method is being used by Mr Claymore. Note his syntax is a space and minus to indicate the next parameter, and I don't recall "C" in the documentation, nor the employment of the =. I could be wrong though, where did you get that config from? Ahh ok, sorry, are you meaning your password is actually c=XVG? That's a cheap hack I guess, kind of bizarre though, as the pool should do that via the address or the port. Anyway, some things to think about. Good luck.
|
KISS. Did you read the Readme.txt? Summarise/Itemise your hardware/versions/expectations/batchfile & results. The more specific, detailed, the better
|
|
|
Snake33
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 34
Merit: 0
|
|
May 22, 2018, 01:54:35 PM |
|
@Claymore
Saw this today in my log file:
08:38:29:239 4304 checked ETH share on CPU, spent 4ms 08:38:48:975 43b8 checked ETH share on CPU, spent 3ms 08:39:09:055 43c0 checked ETH share on CPU, spent 3ms
Don`t think that is normal.
Nothing to worry about, this is totally normal. Look back through your old logs, (use grep for example), and you'll see it's a regular event in the log. Mr Claymore would be the only person who can explain why he's programmed this, but no doubt there is a logical reason. Side note: Generally, (assuming the programmer is not a total moron), log entries will have some prefix, or suffix, "warning", "error", "OK", "good" etc etc, which makes life easier when searching logs for problem events, or notable events you might like to check on. Conversely, if you don't see such annotations, and the log entry is not self explanatory, you can generally ignore such entries. (as in they are not things you need to worry about). And No, it's not a virus either. Thanks for your reply iSuX. I was just wondering why is there CPU share
|
|
|
|
androstan1234
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 251
Merit: 6
|
|
May 22, 2018, 02:13:37 PM |
|
@Claymore
Saw this today in my log file:
08:38:29:239 4304 checked ETH share on CPU, spent 4ms 08:38:48:975 43b8 checked ETH share on CPU, spent 3ms 08:39:09:055 43c0 checked ETH share on CPU, spent 3ms
Don`t think that is normal.
Nothing to worry about, this is totally normal. Look back through your old logs, (use grep for example), and you'll see it's a regular event in the log. Mr Claymore would be the only person who can explain why he's programmed this, but no doubt there is a logical reason. Side note: Generally, (assuming the programmer is not a total moron), log entries will have some prefix, or suffix, "warning", "error", "OK", "good" etc etc, which makes life easier when searching logs for problem events, or notable events you might like to check on. Conversely, if you don't see such annotations, and the log entry is not self explanatory, you can generally ignore such entries. (as in they are not things you need to worry about). And No, it's not a virus either. Thanks for your reply iSuX. I was just wondering why is there CPU share Thanks iSuX. I checked old logs and see that this event is in all of them. I never noticed it before. I was experiencing system instability yesterday, checked the log, saw this event, assumed it was a virus, ran virus scanner, removed viruses, and system went back to stable. IDK how I got a virus, but thanks for pointing out that it's not related to the cpu share. Like Snake, I would appreciate an explanation from Claymore for why the program is checking for eth shares on the CPU. Maybe it's checking for a virus mining on the cpu?
|
|
|
|
iSuX
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 42
Merit: 8
|
|
May 22, 2018, 02:21:25 PM |
|
@Claymore
Saw this today in my log file:
08:38:29:239 4304 checked ETH share on CPU, spent 4ms 08:38:48:975 43b8 checked ETH share on CPU, spent 3ms 08:39:09:055 43c0 checked ETH share on CPU, spent 3ms
Don`t think that is normal.
Nothing to worry about, this is totally normal. Look back through your old logs, (use grep for example), and you'll see it's a regular event in the log. Mr Claymore would be the only person who can explain why he's programmed this, but no doubt there is a logical reason. Side note: Generally, (assuming the programmer is not a total moron), log entries will have some prefix, or suffix, "warning", "error", "OK", "good" etc etc, which makes life easier when searching logs for problem events, or notable events you might like to check on. Conversely, if you don't see such annotations, and the log entry is not self explanatory, you can generally ignore such entries. (as in they are not things you need to worry about). And No, it's not a virus either. Thanks for your reply iSuX. I was just wondering why is there CPU share No worries. I wondered the very same thing when I first saw those entries, but I don't think that means there was a CPU share as such. The CPU is not doing any mining computations in this Claymore, (note the subject header, "GPU miner". My guess was, Claymore has the CPU check the share was delivered, or check summed or against the pool. Purely a guess though, as I said, Mr Claymore would be the only person who can explain what his intentions are with this, so I could be totally wrong with that guess. What I can say, is those have been in logs since at least V11.2, although there is no mention of them in the readme or history. On the subject of Virus, sigh, if you take 2 milliseconds to think about that, and you can probably assume a virus is unlikely to have your best intentions to heart, ergo, it's going to do something you'd rather not have happen, well, it's hardly likely to have the moronic goal of hacking the claymore binary to make it mine with the CPU or advertise itself, by writing it's own log entries. Hahahaha.
|
KISS. Did you read the Readme.txt? Summarise/Itemise your hardware/versions/expectations/batchfile & results. The more specific, detailed, the better
|
|
|
|