I’m new to this so might be a silly question but why are some coins expensive from launch? Like from $1 an counting where as others launch at 0.000+. And some coins backed by so called “low rent rip off” companies (pancakeswap) have currencies that reflect the former coin and “respectable” companies (Cripto.com) have coins that reflect the latter.
Hope that makes sense apologies if it doesn’t
Simply answer! Demand, scarcity and great promises. This is the mix that causes many people to pay horrendous prices for new projects. Demand: Especially in times like these, many new investors come into the crypto space. Many are looking for the next Bitcoin where they can multiply their stake 100x or 1000x. Therefore, everything is bought that seems somehow exciting and "cheap". Scarcity: The quantity is often very scarce in new projects, which artificially increases the market capitalization and the coin price. For example, if there are max 100 million coins, then only 20 million are sold in the crowdsale, the rest then flows into any development, marketing funds, etc. Promise: It initially promised so much. With possible market shares in 10 years advertised etc.pp. which blinds many, although these are often simply fantasy figures or refers to unprofessional studies. |
|
|
|
|
Thanks a lot, I also got some offers of help via PN. I will take a closer look at them. @seoincoperation, I will contact you via PN as soon as I need help.
I close the thread here for now.
|
|
|
|
Me either. I do not believe in my eye and it is painful seeing Real fail the match. I thought they would perform better for this title. Zidane must be upset and irritated. 68% in possession and yet they can find a goal.
Congrats England fans. 2 of the 3 latest champion league finals belong to England. I will bet Chealsea for achieving this title even though MC is quite stronger. I love to support underdog team whenever my team is not qualified
It was a bit predictable. Real has had problems all season and has not been convincing in the league or the CL so far. Chelsea was in the same situation until Tuchel took over the team. Since then they have shown a continuous increase in their performance in the league as well as in the CL, which now deservedly results in the CL final. I am not a fan of clubs financed by billionaires, but in this case I would begrudge Chelsea the victory, for the reason that I would begrudge ManCity even less. By the way, Bayern Munich will win the CL for the next two years. Next year with the top scorer Lewandowski and the year after with the top scorer Haaland :-P |
|
|
|
Steuerberater 1 sagt:
Der NEM-Verkauf ist steuerfrei, da ja 6 Jahre gehalten. Der Erhalt der Symbol-Token ist nicht steuerbar, da es zum Zeitpunkt des Erhalts noch kein Preis gab und daher kein Wert bestand. Werden also als 0 Euro Wertzufluss gesehen.
Grundsätzlich richtig, aber: Die Symbol Token sind nur dann nicht steuerbar wenn ihr die Coins selbst über das Netzwerk geclaimt habt. Habt ihr die Coins zum Beispiel über eine Exchange wie Binance geclaimt ist der Zuflusszeitpunkt später (zu dem Zeitpunkt gabs schon einen Preis) entsprechend müsste man dann die Token versteuern. Man könnte hier natürlich auch die Auffassung vertreten, dass es ein Airdrop war und damit nicht steuerbare Windfall profits, aber da man ja explizit etwas "unternehmen" musste um den "Airdrop" zu erhalten gilt vermutlich die Versteuerung zum Zuflusszeitpunkt. Interessanter Punkt. Hab mir das Video von Philip Hornung von Winheller nochmal angeschaut. Er geht ja davon aus, dass Airdrops grundsätzlich mit 0 Euro angesetzt werden, egal ob sie zum Zeitpunkt des Zuflusses einen Wert haben oder nicht, da sie ohne zutun (obwohl es hier bei Symbol ein bisschen anders ist, immerhin hat man ein Optin machen müssen) zugeflossen sind und daher eher wie ein Lottogewinn gehandhabt werden müssen. Ich werde mir für den o.g. Fall noch eine dritte Meinung einholen. Mir war die Meinung des zweiten Steuerberaters eh ein wenig suspekt, obwohl beide explizit mit Krypto-Knowhow im Steuerrecht geworben haben  Steuerberater 1 sagt:
Der NEM-Verkauf ist steuerfrei, da ja 6 Jahre gehalten. Der Erhalt der Symbol-Token ist nicht steuerbar, da es zum Zeitpunkt des Erhalts noch kein Preis gab und daher kein Wert bestand. Werden also als 0 Euro Wertzufluss gesehen.
Was der zweite erzählt ist totaler Unsinn. Der hat wohl noch nie was vom Zuflussprinzip gehört. Verstehe auch nicht, weshalb er die 10-Jahres-Regel ins Spiel bringt. Also wenn total Unwissende an solche Berater kommen....dann gute Nacht. Also Steuerberater 1 sehe ich als richtig an. Mein Steuerberater übrigens auch. Danke für deine Meinung! Sehe ich genauso, wenn Neulinge in dem Thema an solche Steuerberater geraten, dann ist das kein Gewinn für diejenigen. |
|
|
|
Hello friends, I'm new to the world of altcoins
I see lately a lot of coins exploding by thousands of percent
What I need to know before having the explosion
What questions need to be asked to know that this is going to be the next explosion
Thank you so much everyone
My best tip at the moment: Wait with the entry until the market has corrected a little. Prices are way too high at the moment and it is only a matter of time until prices correct a little or even more. Then I would invest in a project and ask myself the question when choosing, which project has a specific purpose which is needed by companies and will this platform also be used by those companies? |
|
|
|
The goal for Chelsea canceled for offside.
Fast match.
I can see Real Madrid dominating the game so far and Chelsea playing by a counterattack.
This can be the right move for the English club with the result of 1-1 they will go to the final.
Well, now Werner got his goal. 1-0 for Chelsea. Beautiful counterattack and nice finish! Funnily enough, Real has 70% ball possession and has taken more and more control of the game in the last few minutes and then this one play and Chelsea takes the lead. Fast and entertaining game! |
|
|
|
|
So far an even game. Kroos and Modric had good chances for Real but the shots were not placed enough. Werner scored for Chelsea but it was cancelled. I'm not sure if that was the correct decision. In any case, very close.
|
|
|
|
US economy is finally booming and it is a big relief for all of us, but in a worrying sign people are yet not seeing that boom, and this makes me wonder what happens if the general masses can’t feel the boom, will the US economy once again slip downwards?. Furthermore what do you’ll feel is the key reason why people are missing seeing this boom in the economy, and I have read several reasons in the media but if someone has some personal perspective then please do share it. Source: https://edition.cnn.com/2021/05/03/economy/jobs-economy-covid-biden/index.htmlI recently read a report on MarketWatch. During Trump's administration, the stock market has increased by $9.96 trillion over those four years. Since the election of Biden (just over half a year ago), the stock market has increased by approx 8 trillion dollars. I mean the increase in value during Trump's time was already exaggerated, but the increase in value since Biden's election is just extreme. This is not reflective of the real economy and hence why there are different views on the state of the economy. Those who own stocks believe the economy is booming. Those who don't own stocks really see that the economy is not booming. |
|
|
|
Neo is a very powerful project. This project has been in the market for a long time. The project has been repeatedly failing to achieve the desired goal for a long time. At the present time, many are expressing hope that the rules will now be able to create a much better position in the market. The reason is that his marketing policy is so strong that many are hoping he will be able to surpass his maximum high. Many people think that Neo will go above $ 300 in a few days. Do you think so?
No, I don't think so. Simply because NEO is far too centralized. Currently, six out of eight consensus nodes are controlled by NEO. Another issue is the set goals that have been postponed and not met several times, you mentioned it yourself. And there is hardly any further development in the Github repository, which does not indicate that much is being done there. I have sold all my NEO. There are much more interesting projects. For example, Waves. Technologically 100 times better than NEO. |
|
|
|
Meine langjährige Steuerberaterin fällt leider krankheitsbedingt länger aus. Darum bin ich auf der Suche nach neuer Fachkompetenz. Ich hatte bisher zwei Gespräche und zu einem bestimmten Fall komplett zwei unterschiedliche Meinungen Der Fall:Es geht um NEM/Symbol. Die NEM-Token wurden 2015 gekauft und bis 2021 gehalten (keine Staking, nur gehalten). Im April diesen Jahres gab es nun einen Airdop/Fork (die Geister scheiden sich daran) in Form von Symbol-Token. Im Prinzip ist Symbol eine Weiterentwicklung von NEM und daher hat jeder NEM-Besitzer zu einem bestimmten Zeitpunkt die Anzahl von Symbol-Token erhalten wie man NEM-Token besaß. Zum Zeitpunkt X gab es also den Snapshot der NEM-Chain. Zum Zeitpunkt X+1 habe ich alle NEM verkauft. Zum Zeitpunkt X+7 gab es dann die neue Chain mit den Symbol-Token. Zum Zeitpunkt X+10 gab es die erste offizielle Preisbildung der Symbol-Token. So weit, so gut! Steuerberater 1 sagt:Der NEM-Verkauf ist steuerfrei, da ja 6 Jahre gehalten. Der Erhalt der Symbol-Token ist nicht steuerbar, da es zum Zeitpunkt des Erhalts noch kein Preis gab und daher kein Wert bestand. Werden also als 0 Euro Wertzufluss gesehen. Steuerberater 2 sagt:Der Verkauf der NEM-Token muss komplett versteuert werden, da aus dem Besitz der NEM-Token neue Werte (Symbol-Token) generiert wurden, die zwar zum Zeitpunkt des Erhalts (X+7) noch keinen Wert besaßen, aber zum Zeitpunkt X+10. Daher greift hier die 10-Jahres-Regel für die NEM-Token. Der Wertzufluss an Symbol-Token muss ebenfalls versteuert werden, und zwar mit dem ersten Preis zum Zeitpunkt X+10. So, nun habe ich zwei völlig konträre Meinungen. Im ersten Fall zahle ich überhaupt keine Steuern. Im zweiten dann quasi doppelt. Was sagt die Foren-Fachkompetenz hierzu? Die NEM/Symbol-Geschichte betrifft ja enige mehr hier. |
|
|
|
Is there a way that you can ensure being difficult to predict at Poker? For example, if you never bluff, people will eventually get to known that and it will reduce your ability to profit from good cards? Anyone there knows techniques or trick to avoid being easy to read?
No, because there is a reason why hardly any casinos use computerized poker opponents. Simply because they do not play according to feelings but only according to probabilities. A bluff of yours is immediately exposed when the computer calls. Then you have to go out. |
|
|
|
~
there is no personal matter but it's just a business~
Kill someone and say it was just a business. I believe he clearly knew what consequences this move was gonna lead to, he is not a college team player, he should have a personal lawyer who is in charge of such situations. Pretty inappropriate comparison, don't you think? I don't think it was that clear to him though he should have sought professional counseling help. I mean almost every football club is sponsored by a betting company, so in principle there is the same conflict of interest as with an individual player. |
|
|
|
Gerade den Tweet von Sasha gesehen:  Das die Liquidity Pools für einen weiteren Push sorgen (können), ist mir klar. Aber was meint er mit jeder Milliarde an gelockten WX (Waves Exchange?) wird die Marktkapitalisierung von Waves verdoppeln? |
|
|
|
|
I use Bash, sed and awk heavily in my daily work. Since I am advanced user but not a professional in this field, I struggle to get some tasks done from time to time. Therefore I am looking for a professional who can help me here and there with bash commands, especially with sed and awk.
So, I am looking for someone I can contact when I need some support. I will pay in crypto (Bitcoin, ETH etc) for every request / help. The price is a matter of negotiation.
|
|
|
|
Who exactly tracks us and how can you identify a person is that address from the other almost similar yet different address? Are you bitter because you sold your bitcoin when it was dipping and now the prices has gone up again and you don't have a bitcoin because you sold at lower prices so you spread FUD so you are not alone in that sad place?
Well, it's no secret that Bitcoin is easier to track than fiat money. No wonder even the CIA likes Bitcoin  Bitcoin Is a ‘Boon for Surveillance’, Says Former CIA Director
Blockchain technology is underutilized as a "forensic tool," argues Michael Morell in a new report. Source: https://decrypt.co/66411/cia-bitcoin-surveillanceThere are a number of ways to assign the transaction to a person. The most obvious is when you want to convert Bitcoin to fiat, but beyond that there are a few others. |
|
|
|
Der Gründer Sasha Ivanov kommt aus Russland, allerdings ist das Team mittlerweile über die Welt verstreut. In Dubai sitzen wohl auch mehrere sowie in verschiedenen Europäischen Ländern. Die Waves Association hat ihren Sitz in Frankfurt. Soweit ich informiert bin ist die einzige Verbindung zu Russland die geblieben ist die, das Sasha und andere vom Ursprungs-Team aus Russland kommen. Es macht Sinn die Verbindung zu Russland so gering wie möglich zu halten. Es gibt weltweite Sanktionen gegen Russland u.a. der USA. Jedes Unternehmen das Geschäfte in den USA machen will bzw. mit US-Bürgern, läuft Gefahr, dass diese verboten werden können, wenn sie mit einem in Russland ansässigen Unternehmen Geschäfte machen. Soweit ich das durchschaut habe, sitzt die Waves Association in Frankfurt. Diese gilt zuzusagen als rechtlicher Überbau. Wenn Waves verklagt werden sollte, dann müsste das in Deutschland gegen die Association stattfinden. Warum sie aber die Waves Exchange auf den Seychellen melden, lässt bei mir auch offene Fragen zurück. |
|
|
|
I really wonder whether PSG will manage to outplay Manchester City this time. It will be quite hard for them to do it certainly. City play really strong in their home matches in the end. And City would like to have the most ball possession too. Hence, PSG need to play really smart to be able to eliminate City. They did it to Bayern and can do against City as well.
I really don’t think PSG will try to outplay Man City, neither do I expect them to be successful even if they do, PSG best weapon against Man City will be to press very high and afford Man City no space to dictate the play, If that should happen then PSG might stand a good chance. In my opinion, the only way PSG can still make it to the next round is by outplaying ManCity. ManCity has a pretty solid defense. They showed that not only in the first leg against PSG, but throughout the season. It's not easy to score goals against this team. Therefore, the entire tactic must be aimed at that. Against Bayern, PSG's tactics just worked, but against ManCity, it didn't. |
|
|
|
Actually, this should be a clear thing for Dortmund. But that's what I also thought in the Bayern versus Kiel match Kiel plays a very good second division season but has not played quite so well in recent games. Dortmund, on the other hand, has regained its balance in recent weeks. That's why I think Dortmund will clearly advance today. |
|
|
|
Fiatwährungen sind alles andere als stabil. Hängt natürlich von der Definition von Stabilität ab. Du kannst dir ja nur mal anschauen wieviel Haus oder Wohnung du dir 2010 mit deinem Geld leisten konntest und wieviel 2021.
Glaube wenn du diesen Vergleich machst von 2010 zu 2021 was das Haus und Wohnung betrifft , hättest du damals 2010 wahrscheinlich 2 Häuser bekommen für das geld das du jetzt hinlegst für ein Haus , aber das ist mit fast allem so denk ich. Ja Ich mach noch ein anderes Beispiel aus eigener Erfahrung auf: Mein Großeltern haben 1986 ein kleines Reihenhäuschen (Baujahr 1982) für 150.000 DEM (75.000€) gekauft, nachdem die Kinder aus dem Haus waren. In einen kleinen Städtchen im nirgendwo. Die nächste Großstadt ist 160km entfernt, keine Industrie, eine handvoll Mittelständler im größeren Umkreis, insgesamt sehr ländlich geprägt. Nachdem mein Großvater kürzlich verstorben ist und meine Großmutter ins Altersheim ging, wurde das Haus zum Verkauf angeboten. Im März wurde es für 342.000 Euro (in DEM umgerechnet 684.000) verkauft!!! In den Jahren wurde an dem Haus nur wenig gemacht, es wurde also nichts aufgewertet, im Gegenteil, es hat noch eine alte Ölheizung, altmodisch Einrichtung etc. pp. Dennoch hat sich der Wert des Hauses in 35 Jahren fast verzehnfacht oder anderes ausgedrückt, das Fiatgeld hat stark an Wert verloren. |
|
|
|
Usually taking an investment advice from others is not the best idea. Everyone also pursues their own interests with advice, which do not always have to correspond to your interests. That's why I would always do my own research. And there is no way to get rich quickly, but only over time. Most here didn't get rich overnight with crypto either, but by holding their Bitcoins and other crypto for years, even when times were bad for crypto. That's the core of success, not which coin do I need to invest in to achieve financial freedom tomorrow.
And yet people in this space just seem to love doing it (same as forex and other regular trading though so maybe not fair to just say it's cryptoheads doing it). And then also, people think doing research makes them immune to losses (it doesn't). The real lesson is that you have to do things on your own to OWN your profits AS WELL AS losses. Then you really gain the experience from it. Yes, this is a typical pattern, unfortunately. I've read so many insider tips in threads like this over the years, most of these projects don't even exist anymore. I do not even want to know, how many millions of investment money from people who create such threads have already been lost, because they invest in such projects instead of known good ones like Bitcoin. I remember people saying when Bitcoin valued 2k, I want to have a project where I could get a 5 or 10x return and Bitcoin can't do this because it has so much value already. Well, as we know today they were wrong. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
