laik2
|
 |
July 09, 2017, 06:07:42 PM |
|
Hey Claymore, Nice 4% boost for Baffins, May be another nvidia 1060 boost in next version? Still a bit behind  Good work!
|
|
|
|
2xjO9M3P
|
 |
July 09, 2017, 06:09:55 PM |
|
I can't for the life of me get Siacoin to dual mine. Anything obvious I'm doing wrong? Ethereum runs fine, but SC never gets authorized, and my SC hash rate just sits at 0.000 MH/s and I just keep getting SC job timeouts. My startup script: ethdcrminer64.exe -epool eth-us-east1.nanopool.org:9999 -ewal ***my ethereum info*** -epsw x -dpool stratum+tcp://sia-us-west1.nanopool.org:7777 -dwal ***my siacoin address***/***miner name***/***email address*** -ftime 10 -dcoin sia
[....] Any thoughts? Drop the stratum+tcp part of the server name. From my own .bat file: -dpool sia-eu1.nanopool.org:7777
|
|
|
|
jimmykl
|
 |
July 09, 2017, 06:17:50 PM |
|
www.ubuntu.com, 1200W is definitely too little. 850W for mainboard and 3x cards. 850W for remaining 3x cards. Do you recommend getting a better psu or does changing to Ubuntu do any difference regarding the Power? Cant imagine that. But my wattman says 950 when they are all on 100% Power target, that is for the whole rig... it's like redlining your Porsche, you can go there but don't keep it there. At 950W your 1200W PSU is probably about to kick the bucket. 1200W should be plenty for 6x 1070s. My rigs are setup like that and with PL of 65-70% pull 775W at the wall and the psu doesn't even turn it's fan on most of the time. If his psu kicks the bucket there's something wrong with it! 80% utilisation should not tax a decent gold or platinum psu. I'd recommend unplugging all the cables and every riser, check them carefully and then add the cards back one at a time, mining on each for 1/2hr or so at stock before adding another. That should at least let you find out at what point things get unstable. If it gets unstable with one card then look to the software, reinstall from scratch or take a known working image from another machine if you have one.
|
|
|
|
cryptokizzy
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 5
Merit: 0
|
 |
July 09, 2017, 06:20:21 PM |
|
I can't for the life of me get Siacoin to dual mine. Anything obvious I'm doing wrong? Ethereum runs fine, but SC never gets authorized, and my SC hash rate just sits at 0.000 MH/s and I just keep getting SC job timeouts. My startup script: ethdcrminer64.exe -epool eth-us-east1.nanopool.org:9999 -ewal ***my ethereum info*** -epsw x -dpool stratum+tcp://sia-us-west1.nanopool.org:7777 -dwal ***my siacoin address***/***miner name***/***email address*** -ftime 10 -dcoin sia
[....] Any thoughts? Drop the stratum+tcp part of the server name. From my own .bat file: -dpool sia-eu1.nanopool.org:7777
Thanks--just tried that too, but got the same outcome.
|
|
|
|
syncis
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 16
Merit: 0
|
 |
July 09, 2017, 06:23:25 PM |
|
1200W should be plenty for 6x 1070s. My rigs are setup like that and with PL of 65-70% pull 775W at the wall and the psu doesn't even turn it's fan on most of the time. If his psu kicks the bucket there's something wrong with it! 80% utilisation should not tax a decent gold or platinum psu.
I'd recommend unplugging all the cables and every riser, check them carefully and then add the cards back one at a time, mining on each for 1/2hr or so at stock before adding another. That should at least let you find out at what point things get unstable. If it gets unstable with one card then look to the software, reinstall from scratch or take a known working image from another machine if you have one.
Ok good info, i will try that. Just to clarify, is it better to run each card alone for 30 mins or do you Think i should start with 1 card and every 30 min I add Another card, for testing.
|
|
|
|
gt_addict
|
 |
July 09, 2017, 06:39:46 PM |
|
So switched to the new v9.7 and now im getting GPU Error "gpuminer cu_k1 failed 77, an illegal memory access was encountered"
Ive got the latest drivers, win10 is upto date, even reduxed clocks (which were working fine on v9.5)
Also keep getting "ethdcrminer64 blocked from accessing graphics hardware" errors too even though windows defender virus & threat protection is disabled.
Can someone please help?
|
**SUPPORT SIDEHACK** Miner Development Donations to: 1BURGERAXHH6Yi6LRybRJK7ybEm5m5HwTr
Donations/Tips to:- 1GTADDicTXD1uachKKgW24DZDxDGhSMdRa
Join Bitconnect: https://bitconnect.co/?ref=gtaddict
|
|
|
BennyAndDeJets
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
|
 |
July 09, 2017, 07:13:18 PM |
|
Is there a way to identify multiple wallets and pools without using the epools file?
Thoughts on this?
|
|
|
|
notbatman
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2212
Merit: 1038
|
 |
July 09, 2017, 07:17:51 PM Last edit: July 09, 2017, 07:31:53 PM by notbatman |
|
Well I guess Nvida is just that much better 'cause I got a fried Corsair gold 1200W sitting next to me that tried to power 6x RX cards. (the modded RX cards do 30MH/s and cost $250 while the GTX1070 cost $750 for the same, this was a few months back of course)
edit:
Also, what's up with AMD lately? Are they trying to go out of business? ...and my local computer store only has expensive ultra gourmet Intel CPU's for those nice 7 slot boards, I want a nice $60 Pentium; my worker is doing menial labor not rendering the next Moon landing.
|
|
|
|
swisstrader
|
 |
July 09, 2017, 07:32:56 PM |
|
Something new with the droping hashrate on Radeon cards ?
yes, dump claymore use sgminer instead. Even if my Vega cards don't work with Claymore's Miner when they get here, I'll wait until they do before I use them to mine. Saturday I've tested the new Vega Frontier edition with the SGMiner-GM, got max. 10 MH/s at coinotron.com pool with ETH mining. Now I check my single GTX1060 with Claymore's new v9.7, be after 20 mins at 16 MH/s and I guess I'll reach the 19.9 MH/s as shown from Claymore's miner on my screen. I'm in the testing phase to decide which card I'll take to build a larger rig. Any suggestions from experienced miners here? I hope, that Claymore will tune his miner for the new Vega too. I expected 69 MH/s from this card when I decided to buy one card for tests.
|
|
|
|
jimmykl
|
 |
July 09, 2017, 07:49:22 PM |
|
1200W should be plenty for 6x 1070s. My rigs are setup like that and with PL of 65-70% pull 775W at the wall and the psu doesn't even turn it's fan on most of the time. If his psu kicks the bucket there's something wrong with it! 80% utilisation should not tax a decent gold or platinum psu.
I'd recommend unplugging all the cables and every riser, check them carefully and then add the cards back one at a time, mining on each for 1/2hr or so at stock before adding another. That should at least let you find out at what point things get unstable. If it gets unstable with one card then look to the software, reinstall from scratch or take a known working image from another machine if you have one.
Ok good info, i will try that. Just to clarify, is it better to run each card alone for 30 mins or do you Think i should start with 1 card and every 30 min I add Another card, for testing. Adding another card each time to see where things start to lose stability. Hopefully they don't though.
|
|
|
|
DefiantMiner
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 20
Merit: 0
|
 |
July 09, 2017, 07:57:58 PM |
|
@Claymore
Just wanted to say thanks for cleaning up the manager. Working well now, good job!
|
|
|
|
tsg
|
 |
July 09, 2017, 08:07:58 PM |
|
I would like to mine ethereum and some ethereum forks: etc, expanse, elementrem, ubiq.. Could I specify it in epools.txt to switch by pressing "e" key in miner?
|
|
|
|
rorschach1
|
 |
July 09, 2017, 08:16:44 PM Last edit: July 09, 2017, 08:43:56 PM by rorschach1 |
|
Just tried new version and I very glad  Really much faster startup miner. Also I have more stability in work. Thanks Claymore! Upd: have on my nvidia rig +2 Mh per card  Wow!
|
|
|
|
tsg
|
 |
July 09, 2017, 08:29:05 PM Last edit: September 12, 2017, 04:04:12 PM by tsg |
|
But no increase in hashrate after decrease in last period (over 1mhs a card)
|
|
|
|
skdsw
|
 |
July 09, 2017, 08:52:51 PM |
|
Hi Does -ttli option works with nvidia cards?
|
|
|
|
|
afm
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 12
Merit: 0
|
 |
July 09, 2017, 09:03:42 PM |
|
Hi all,
Using the same hardware, i get about 0.5 MH/s using Linux.
Is this normal? If so - why?
|
|
|
|
tutu_young
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 8
Merit: 0
|
 |
July 09, 2017, 09:52:26 PM |
|
I can't for the life of me get Siacoin to dual mine. Anything obvious I'm doing wrong? Ethereum runs fine, but SC never gets authorized, and my SC hash rate just sits at 0.000 MH/s and I just keep getting SC job timeouts. My startup script: ethdcrminer64.exe -epool eth-us-east1.nanopool.org:9999 -ewal ***my ethereum info*** -epsw x -dpool stratum+tcp://sia-us-west1.nanopool.org:7777 -dwal ***my siacoin address***/***miner name***/***email address*** -ftime 10 -dcoin sia
My output (edited slightly for compactness): ����������������������������������������������������������������ͻ � Claymore's Dual ETH + DCR/SC/LBC/PASC GPU Miner v9.7 � ����������������������������������������������������������������ͼ
ETH: 5 pools are specified Main Ethereum pool is eth-us-east1.nanopool.org:9999 SC: 5 pools are specified Main Siacoin pool is sia-us-west1.nanopool.org:7777 AMD OpenCL platform not found CUDA initializing... NVIDIA Cards available: 5 CUDA Driver Version/Runtime Version: 9.0/8.0 GPU #0: GeForce GTX 1070, 8192 MB available, 15 compute units, capability: 6.1 GPU #1: GeForce GTX 1070, 8192 MB available, 15 compute units, capability: 6.1 GPU #2: GeForce GTX 1070, 8192 MB available, 15 compute units, capability: 6.1 GPU #3: GeForce GTX 1070, 8192 MB available, 15 compute units, capability: 6.1 GPU #4: GeForce GTX 1070, 8192 MB available, 15 compute units, capability: 6.1 Total cards: 5 ETH: Stratum - connecting to 'eth-us-east1.nanopool.org' <158.69.85.38> port 9999 DUAL MINING MODE ENABLED: ETHEREUM+SIACOIN ETH: eth-proxy stratum mode ETH: Stratum - Connected (eth-us-east1.nanopool.org:9999) Watchdog enabled SC: Stratum - connecting to 'sia-us-west1.nanopool.org' <45.32.71.82> port 7777 Remote management (READ-ONLY MODE) is enabled on port 3333
SC: Stratum - Connected (sia-us-west1.nanopool.org:7777) ETH: Authorized Setting DAG epoch #133... Setting DAG epoch #133 for GPU0 [snip] Create GPU buffer for GPU0 [snip] GPU0 DAG creation time - 5327 ms Setting DAG epoch #133 for GPU0 done [snip] ETH: 07/09/17-20:52:04 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0) ETH: Share accepted (140 ms)! Socket was closed remotely (by pool) SC: Job timeout, disconnect, retry in 20 sec...
ETH - Total Speed: 155.754 Mh/s, Total Shares: 1(1+0+0+0+0), Rejected: 0, Time: 00:00 ETH: GPU0 32.165 Mh/s, GPU1 27.200 Mh/s, GPU2 31.693 Mh/s, GPU3 32.887 Mh/s, GPU4 31.810 Mh/s SC - Total Speed: 0.000 Mh/s, Total Shares: 0(0+0+0+0+0), Rejected: 0 SC: GPU0 0.000 Mh/s, GPU1 0.000 Mh/s, GPU2 0.000 Mh/s, GPU3 0.000 Mh/s, GPU4 0.000 Mh/s Notice in there that it says ETH: Authorized, but it never says anything about SC: Authorized? I think this is my problem, but I don't know what else to do about it. What I've tried so far, none of which have been successful: - Generating a new Siacoin wallet address
- Changing my email address to a Gmail address
- -dcri intensities from about 1 to 500
- switching from Nanopool to Miningpoolhub
- switching to different Nanopool servers
- Claymore 9.5 and 9.7
Any thoughts? Did you comment out the config file dpools.txt and\or epools.txt? the miner will go check those file first then the parameter in the .bat file.
|
|
|
|
delle54
|
 |
July 09, 2017, 10:08:27 PM |
|
Did you comment out the config file dpools.txt and\or epools.txt? the miner will go check those file first then the parameter in the .bat file.
Please learn to read the readme.txt. The miner only reads the dpools.txt and/or epools.txt if nothing is specified in the start.bat file.
|
|
|
|
skdsw
|
 |
July 09, 2017, 10:32:25 PM |
|
I can't for the life of me get Siacoin to dual mine. Anything obvious I'm doing wrong? Ethereum runs fine, but SC never gets authorized, and my SC hash rate just sits at 0.000 MH/s and I just keep getting SC job timeouts. My startup script: ethdcrminer64.exe -epool eth-us-east1.nanopool.org:9999 -ewal ***my ethereum info*** -epsw x -dpool stratum+tcp://sia-us-west1.nanopool.org:7777 -dwal ***my siacoin address***/***miner name***/***email address*** -ftime 10 -dcoin sia
Specify -allpools 1 -allcoins 1 in startup script
|
|
|
|
|