DiabloMiner GPU Miner

[DiabloD3]

Update: Improved speed 0.5%

[1713575213]

1713575213

[1713575213]

1713575213

[1713575213]

1713575213

[DiabloD3]

Newest version isn't working for me - is this due to recent lwjgl changes? The other copy I have, a few ~half dozen revisions old, works fine.

Code:

D:\Mining\DiabloMiner>DiabloMiner-Windows.exe -l http://us.eclipsemc.com:8337 -u xxx -p xxx -v 1 -D 2 -d -f 60
[1/20/12 12:54:14 AM] Started
[1/20/12 12:54:14 AM] Connecting to: http://us.eclipsemc.com:8337/
Exception in thread "main" java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError: org.lwjgl.opencl.CL.getFunctionAddress(Ljava/lang/String;)J
        at org.lwjgl.opencl.CL.getFunctionAddress(Native Method)
        at org.lwjgl.opencl.CLCapabilities.<clinit>(CLCapabilities.java:8)
        at org.lwjgl.opencl.CL.create(CL.java:123)
        at com.diablominer.DiabloMiner.DiabloMiner.execute(DiabloMiner.java:526)
        at com.diablominer.DiabloMiner.DiabloMiner.main(DiabloMiner.java:138)
[1/20/12 12:54:14 AM] DEBUG: us.eclipsemc.com: Enabling long poll support
[1/20/12 12:54:14 AM] DEBUG: us.eclipsemc.com: Enabling roll ntime support, expire after 60 seconds
Exception in thread "DiabloMiner GetWorkAsync for us.eclipsemc.com" java.lang.NoSuchMethodError: org.codehaus.jackson.JsonNode.asText()Ljava/lang/String;
        at com.diablominer.DiabloMiner.DiabloMiner$NetworkState.doJSONRPC(DiabloMiner.java:952)
        at com.diablominer.DiabloMiner.DiabloMiner$NetworkState$GetWorkAsync.run(DiabloMiner.java:1022)
        at java.lang.Thread.run(Unknown Source)

Are you building it yourself? Do mvn clean then mvn package if you are.

[DiabloD3]

Are you building it yourself? Do mvn clean then mvn package if you are.

No, binary build posted in the first post.

Weird, clear out your DM dir and redownload the zip again and try again, I think you're getting a version conflict

[DiabloD3]

Strange, working now. Reboot fixed it, I had the old and new versions in separate dirs, so it was clean.

lolwindows

[Roadhog2k5]

so how about those 7970 optimizations.

[BigBobo]

Roadhog2k5 7970 overclock GPU 925@1100-640mhash

[DiabloD3]

Update: Improve kernel mangling parser, fix accidental disabling of BFI_INT

[DiabloD3]

Update: Increased speed 0.5%, added alt array more (-aa)

[DiabloD3]

Update: Fix ozco.in specific bug

[jjiimm_64]

Roadhog2k5 7970 overclock GPU 925@1100-640mhash

Road,  what flags are you using for diablo?

I am getting ~670Mh  1125/1020  pulling about 240w/c   all defaults on diablo


edit:  i since changed to 925/1100  to compare.   getting: ~550   diablo defaults

edit2: wow, only pulling about 175w/c    2 cards:  479w total

mobo:  crosshair V
psu:     seasonic 650
cpu:    phenomII x4 830
HD:   western dig green power 500g
mem:  Kingston 4g 1600

nothing underclocked on mobo, all defaults pulls about 120w idle

[DiabloD3]

Hey 7970 users, could people check if -aa is faster at all on 7970? I'm getting reports that it actually is, which would be pretty amazing if its true.

[Roadhog2k5]

Hey 7970 users, could people check if -aa is faster at all on 7970? I'm getting reports that it actually is, which would be pretty amazing if its true.

It's about.. .5mh/s faster. Margin of error...

[Roadhog2k5]

Roadhog2k5 7970 overclock GPU 925@1100-640mhash

Road,  what flags are you using for diablo?

I am getting ~670Mh  1125/1020  pulling about 240w/c   all defaults on diablo


edit:  i since changed to 925/1100  to compare.   getting: ~550   diablo defaults

edit2: wow, only pulling about 175w/c    2 cards:  479w total

mobo:  crosshair V
psu:     seasonic 650
cpu:    phenomII x4 830
HD:   western dig green power 500g
mem:  Kingston 4g 1600

nothing underclocked on mobo, all defaults pulls about 120w idle

Those weren't my results. I think he was trying to tell me that's what he was getting.

[jjiimm_64]

Roadhog2k5 7970 overclock GPU 925@1100-640mhash

Road,  what flags are you using for diablo?

I am getting ~670Mh  1125/1020  pulling about 240w/c   all defaults on diablo


edit:  i since changed to 925/1100  to compare.   getting: ~550   diablo defaults

edit2: wow, only pulling about 175w/c    2 cards:  479w total

mobo:  crosshair V
psu:     seasonic 650
cpu:    phenomII x4 830
HD:   western dig green power 500g
mem:  Kingston 4g 1600

nothing underclocked on mobo, all defaults pulls about 120w idle

Those weren't my results. I think he was trying to tell me that's what he was getting.

i guess my question got lost in my results.  which are best so far for me with all defaults.  ( i tried -v 2, not better. v4 even worse)

what are the best flags for the 7970 ?

[Roadhog2k5]

i guess my question got lost in my results.  which are best so far for me with all defaults.  ( i tried -v 2, not better. v4 even worse)

what are the best flags for the 7970 ?

No flags is the best flags.

[DiabloD3]

Update: Shorten debug status line, fix kernel for layered vectors

[DiabloD3]

i guess my question got lost in my results.  which are best so far for me with all defaults.  ( i tried -v 2, not better. v4 even worse)

what are the best flags for the 7970 ?

Seems to be -v 1 -w 256 -aa

[bitlane]

Hey Diablo,
Since Diablominer obviously has 'staying power' as many users still prefer it over even CGMiner (and all cgminer features), have you considered adding card controls (Clock, Fan etc) to it and further develop it ?
Do you have a 'Roadmap' of where you would like to see Diablominer, say in a year ?

[DiabloD3]

Hey Diablo,
Since Diablominer obviously has 'staying power' as many users still prefer it over even CGMiner (and all cgminer features), have you considered adding card controls (Clock, Fan etc) to it and further develop it ?
Do you have a 'Roadmap' of where you would like to see Diablominer, say in a year ?

That requires ADL, something only C apps can use unless I develop a Java wrapper for that, which isn't something I particularly want to do. However, if someone else writes one and it works and its packaged in a jar sanely, I would use it.

I think we'd be all better off with a stand alone program that uses the cgminer-like code for that so ANY miner can use it. The python miners have the same issue I do, calling C functions suck.

As of roadmap, I dunno. I expect main DM development is basically finished unless I produce a web UI and/or cluster control. Some people have asked for that, but I'm not sure if its worth adding. Major GCN support is about the only thing thats concrete.

[chiropteran]

I've just switched to diablominer after using the simple guiminer for several months.  On this particular PC, I have a single 6970 and I have been getting around 380mhash typically with guiminer.  Somehow, with diablominer I am now getting an apparent 460mhash, and I am trying to figure out if this is for real.  It seems like too much of an increase. Is DiabloMiner really that much more efficient? Was  something wrong with my system earlier maybe?

This is with no special flags.  I tried playing around with -v and -w but found the best results came without any extra flags.

This is what I am seeing-

[1/23/12 11:51:45 PM] api2.bitcoin.cz accepted block 122 from Cayman (#1)
[1/23/12 11:52:06 PM] api2.bitcoin.cz accepted block 123 from Cayman (#1)
[1/23/12 11:52:25 PM] api2.bitcoin.cz accepted block 124 from Cayman (#1)
[1/23/12 11:52:38 PM] api2.bitcoin.cz accepted block 125 from Cayman (#1)
mhash: 463.4/462.7 | accept: 125 | reject: 0 | hw error: 0