kano
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4592
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
|
|
June 11, 2012, 11:07:14 AM |
|
Hi. I'm having some issues, I don't know if it's because of the miner or the pool. When my miner(cgminer 2.4.2) detects by longpoll a new block, the following shares are rejected(like 10). I'm having total 6% rejects because of this. Does anyone experiences that?(I'm with Slush)
What hardware and what worker hash rates? The hash rates matter coz on slush the lower your worker hash rate the later you get the LP. (so yes you will certainly get more stales if your worker hash rate is lower than average on slush)
|
|
|
|
fabrizziop
|
|
June 11, 2012, 05:28:07 PM |
|
Hi. I'm having some issues, I don't know if it's because of the miner or the pool. When my miner(cgminer 2.4.2) detects by longpoll a new block, the following shares are rejected(like 10). I'm having total 6% rejects because of this. Does anyone experiences that?(I'm with Slush)
What hardware and what worker hash rates? The hash rates matter coz on slush the lower your worker hash rate the later you get the LP. (so yes you will certainly get more stales if your worker hash rate is lower than average on slush) I have total 2300 MH/s working, I'm having troubles with my 1300 MH/s rig and both of my 500 MH/s rigs.
|
|
|
|
kano
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4592
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
|
|
June 11, 2012, 09:36:43 PM |
|
Hi. I'm having some issues, I don't know if it's because of the miner or the pool. When my miner(cgminer 2.4.2) detects by longpoll a new block, the following shares are rejected(like 10). I'm having total 6% rejects because of this. Does anyone experiences that?(I'm with Slush)
What hardware and what worker hash rates? The hash rates matter coz on slush the lower your worker hash rate the later you get the LP. (so yes you will certainly get more stales if your worker hash rate is lower than average on slush) I have total 2300 MH/s working, I'm having troubles with my 1300 MH/s rig and both of my 500 MH/s rigs. Try a different pool then. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=14085.0and see if that makes a difference.
|
|
|
|
Krak
|
|
June 11, 2012, 10:16:53 PM |
|
I'm liking MaxBTC a bit more right now. Lower ping for me and I just like supporting smaller pools. I am sending half of my Namecoins to Ozcoin though.
|
BTC: 1KrakenLFEFg33A4f6xpwgv3UUoxrLPuGn
|
|
|
dave3
|
|
June 12, 2012, 07:30:47 AM |
|
Do you know how long the primary pool has to be down before cgminer will switch to the backup pool in failover-only mode? And is there a setting somewhere to adjust it?
Thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
kano
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4592
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
|
|
June 12, 2012, 08:14:20 AM |
|
I have a pull request up to tidy this up and maybe fix your problem: https://github.com/ckolivas/cgminer/pull/215If you come to FreeNode IRC #cgminer I'll give you a windows executable compiled with that pull request My IRC name is kanoi (and I'm one of the two ops in #cgminer - ckolivas (aka conman) is the other of course) .. and we can see if it sorts it out for you
|
|
|
|
BitMinerN8
|
|
June 12, 2012, 11:09:52 AM |
|
I would verify that the BFL's are seen in device manager under ports and note what COM they are listed under. This is what is working for me with Win7 x64, cgminer 2.4.2, (1) 5870, & (4) BFL Singles. cgminer.exe -u worker -p pass -o site:8332 -S bitforce://./COM4 -S bitforce://./COM5 -S bitforce://./COM6 -S bitforce://./COM7 --intensity 9 --auto-fan --auto-gpu --gpu-engine 875 --gpu-memclock 500
|
|
|
|
|
bitpop
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2912
Merit: 1060
|
|
June 12, 2012, 11:20:22 AM |
|
BitMinerN8, that wont work for me until kanoi gave me a special patch. are you by chance using 32 bit?
|
|
|
|
BitMinerN8
|
|
June 12, 2012, 11:27:01 AM |
|
BitMinerN8, that wont work for me until kanoi gave me a special patch. are you by chance using 32 bit?
I am running Win 7 x64.
|
|
|
|
bitpop
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2912
Merit: 1060
|
|
June 12, 2012, 11:29:14 AM |
|
kanoi, why does his work?
|
|
|
|
kano
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4592
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
|
|
June 12, 2012, 12:34:11 PM |
|
kanoi, why does his work?
My guess is the problem depends on different 32bit implementations on the 64bit windows versions and the bug that I guess might be in different Windows 64bit->32bit Serial/USB code. e.g. in Win7-64bit there is a limit of 8 USB devices when running 32 bit (XP) mode (according to http://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/forum/windows_7-windows_programs/windows-7-xp-mode-usb-limit/ff50b790-6e6e-47e4-8f48-5727896f5aeb ) xDGDZEx had the problem when he hit 7 or 8 BFL's (not 9) https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=80852.0The first problem there actually suggests it may even be opening and closing valid devices multiple times (but it also happens on invalid devices) The only change relevant to FPGA in the versions he compared was that Icarus opened the devices first (and failed) then BFL opened the devices but ran out before it got to 8 devices. The previous version worked where it did the BFL code first so the BFL's all opened successfully I came to the uncertain conclusion that the problem was that the open code in windows seems to sometimes identify bitforce:\\.\COMn as a USB name and allocated some resource to it but then failed to open it (as expected) but returned an error without always releasing the resource I was hoping for xDGDZEx to test the change but I've not seen him in IRC since I last PM'd him. The code change was to not attempt to open the invalid device names (and hopefully solve the problem if it is a windows bug) That same code change worked for you bitpop so again I'm guessing it's related to a USB count issue in your different version of windows. Either way, the change isn't a problem in any way (it simply stops doing the "expected to fail" opens) and if that solves the problems for some people - good
|
|
|
|
bitpop
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2912
Merit: 1060
|
|
June 12, 2012, 12:35:17 PM |
|
Ok Thank you
|
|
|
|
P_Shep
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1795
Merit: 1208
This is not OK.
|
|
June 12, 2012, 04:14:45 PM |
|
Is the mod miner included in the build script yet? Nothing in the readme about the build option for the modminer, nor in ./configure --help.
Edit: Ah, needed to do a re-autogen.
|
|
|
|
P_Shep
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1795
Merit: 1208
This is not OK.
|
|
June 12, 2012, 04:44:54 PM |
|
MMQ isn't showing up in supported devices.
|
|
|
|
kano
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4592
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
|
|
June 12, 2012, 09:55:18 PM |
|
MMQ isn't showing up in supported devices.
At the top of the output, "cgminer -h" will tell you that when you compile in ModMiner (MMQ) support. e.g. for me on linux: cgminer 2.4.2b Built with GPU bitforce icarus mining support. but the git version would say cgminer 2.4.2 Built with GPU bitforce icarus modminer ztex mining support. If you compile in ModMiner and ZTex also (like the binary releases will have) If you mean the API - yeah I'll do that tonight.
|
|
|
|
P_Shep
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1795
Merit: 1208
This is not OK.
|
|
June 12, 2012, 11:04:45 PM |
|
The api... I suspected that was still todo after I posted
|
|
|
|
ddd1
|
|
June 13, 2012, 12:46:26 AM |
|
I recently reinstalled my windows 7 64bit, I have Catalyst 12.4 official and SDK 2.7 installed.
When I doubleclik cgminer.exe nothing happens, did I miss a step needed to install properly cgminer, it did work before reinstalling windows 7 but not anymore.
|
|
|
|
ancow
|
|
June 13, 2012, 12:54:29 AM |
|
When I doubleclik cgminer.exe nothing happens, did I miss a step needed to install properly cgminer, it did work before reinstalling windows 7 but not anymore.
Well, you could try executing cgminer from a command line window and see whether there is any useful output... Anyhow, there is no "installation" of cgminer, you just need to unzip the archive somewhere...
|
BTC: 1GAHTMdBN4Yw3PU66sAmUBKSXy2qaq2SF4
|
|
|
|