Bitcoin Forum
December 07, 2016, 10:53:47 AM *
News: To be able to use the next phase of the beta forum software, please ensure that your email address is correct/functional.
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: « 1 ... 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 [238] 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 ... 830 »
  Print  
Author Topic: OFFICIAL CGMINER mining software thread for linux/win/osx/mips/arm/r-pi 4.9.2  (Read 4821089 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic.
-ck
Moderator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2002


Ruu \o/


View Profile WWW
March 28, 2012, 07:16:02 AM
 #4741

Hi, I just wanted to report that with the latest git My Hashrate drops from 190 MH/s to 170 MH/s. When I check the git repository out from the date 3/3/2012 then I get again  190MH/s.
I use the default kernel and I use ubuntu 11.10 with a HD5770.  What changes made the hashrate drop so drastically?
I'm experimenting. It looks like you are on SDK 2.6. Try -k diablo and see what that does to your hashrate.
And then try -k poclbm.

Primary developer/maintainer for cgminer and ckpool/ckproxy.
Pooled mine at kano.is, solo mine at solo.ckpool.org
-ck
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1481108027
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481108027

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481108027
Reply with quote  #2

1481108027
Report to moderator
1481108027
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481108027

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481108027
Reply with quote  #2

1481108027
Report to moderator
manifold
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 62


View Profile
March 28, 2012, 07:23:21 AM
 #4742

yes...  know, but I prefer the default kernel (is it diabolo?) since I tested all of them a while ago and diabolo was the fastest. Therefore I prefer to work with the older git version...   but why did the hashrate drop?

Osiris Bitcoin Forum
This is a recursive text, if you restart reading from the beginning. And you will never get to this point informing you that it had no exit condition.
-ck
Moderator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2002


Ruu \o/


View Profile WWW
March 28, 2012, 07:25:27 AM
 #4743

yes...  know, but I prefer the default kernel (is it diabolo?) since I tested all of them a while ago and diabolo was the fastest. Therefore I prefer to work with the older git version...   but why did the hashrate drop?
The kernels have radically changed and I need to choose the right ones. I'm asking you because I need your feedback, i'm not telling you a workaround. You are running very experimental code by trying the git tree.

Primary developer/maintainer for cgminer and ckpool/ckproxy.
Pooled mine at kano.is, solo mine at solo.ckpool.org
-ck
manifold
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 62


View Profile
March 28, 2012, 07:43:07 AM
 #4744

yes...  know, but I prefer the default kernel (is it diabolo?) since I tested all of them a while ago and diabolo was the fastest. Therefore I prefer to work with the older git version...   but why did the hashrate drop?
The kernels have radically changed and I need to choose the right ones. I'm asking you because I need your feedback, i'm not telling you a workaround. You are running very experimental code by trying the git tree.
Ok, of course, sorry:
Current Git:
diablo: 175  MH/s
poclbm: 157 MH/s
phatk: 168 MH/s
poclbm: 160 MH/s

Git from 3/3/2012:
default/diablo: 190 MH/s


Everything on Ubuntu 11.10 64bit, with HD5770 , Intensity 9, no overclocking/underclocking ,
ADL SDK 3.0
APP SDK 2.6  RC3
Cataclyst 12.2

Should I test all the kernels with the older git, too?

Osiris Bitcoin Forum
This is a recursive text, if you restart reading from the beginning. And you will never get to this point informing you that it had no exit condition.
-ck
Moderator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2002


Ruu \o/


View Profile WWW
March 28, 2012, 08:30:23 AM
 #4745

yes...  know, but I prefer the default kernel (is it diabolo?) since I tested all of them a while ago and diabolo was the fastest. Therefore I prefer to work with the older git version...   but why did the hashrate drop?
The kernels have radically changed and I need to choose the right ones. I'm asking you because I need your feedback, i'm not telling you a workaround. You are running very experimental code by trying the git tree.
Ok, of course, sorry:
Current Git:
diablo: 175  MH/s
poclbm: 157 MH/s
phatk: 168 MH/s
poclbm: 160 MH/s

Git from 3/3/2012:
default/diablo: 190 MH/s


Everything on Ubuntu 11.10 64bit, with HD5770 , Intensity 9, no overclocking/underclocking ,
ADL SDK 3.0
APP SDK 2.6  RC3
Cataclyst 12.2

Should I test all the kernels with the older git, too?
No, that's cool thanks very much. What a pain. Fixing diablo on 7970 for the earlier 2.6 SDK seems to ruin vliw5. Oh well I guess I can just leave diablo kernel as is and just work with poclbm for 7970.

Primary developer/maintainer for cgminer and ckpool/ckproxy.
Pooled mine at kano.is, solo mine at solo.ckpool.org
-ck
tnkflx
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 346


View Profile
March 28, 2012, 08:30:44 AM
 #4746

Con,

ckvolias:using latest cgminer 2.3.1-2 win7 64x
after awhile I loose temps and fan speed displays both on screen and from API - a cgminer reboot fixes the issue
Windows driver ATI Display Library fsckage. I can't do anything about it. Does restarting cgminer fix it or rebooting the machine fix it? I could probably try working around the former by detecting "losing adl support" and re-initialising it.
Restarting cgminer always fixes it, no need to restart the whole box.

Is this still something you consider adding to cgminer?

| Operating electrum.be & us.electrum.be |
-ck
Moderator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2002


Ruu \o/


View Profile WWW
March 28, 2012, 09:03:57 AM
 #4747

Con,

ckvolias:using latest cgminer 2.3.1-2 win7 64x
after awhile I loose temps and fan speed displays both on screen and from API - a cgminer reboot fixes the issue
Windows driver ATI Display Library fsckage. I can't do anything about it. Does restarting cgminer fix it or rebooting the machine fix it? I could probably try working around the former by detecting "losing adl support" and re-initialising it.
Restarting cgminer always fixes it, no need to restart the whole box.

Is this still something you consider adding to cgminer?
Yes.

Primary developer/maintainer for cgminer and ckpool/ckproxy.
Pooled mine at kano.is, solo mine at solo.ckpool.org
-ck
-ck
Moderator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2002


Ruu \o/


View Profile WWW
March 28, 2012, 09:19:17 AM
 #4748

yes...  know, but I prefer the default kernel (is it diabolo?) since I tested all of them a while ago and diabolo was the fastest. Therefore I prefer to work with the older git version...   but why did the hashrate drop?
The kernels have radically changed and I need to choose the right ones. I'm asking you because I need your feedback, i'm not telling you a workaround. You are running very experimental code by trying the git tree.
Ok, of course, sorry:
Current Git:
diablo: 175  MH/s
poclbm: 157 MH/s
phatk: 168 MH/s
poclbm: 160 MH/s

Git from 3/3/2012:
default/diablo: 190 MH/s


Everything on Ubuntu 11.10 64bit, with HD5770 , Intensity 9, no overclocking/underclocking ,
ADL SDK 3.0
APP SDK 2.6  RC3
Cataclyst 12.2

Should I test all the kernels with the older git, too?
Try again please with the updated git now. (only diablo kernel has been changed this time).

Primary developer/maintainer for cgminer and ckpool/ckproxy.
Pooled mine at kano.is, solo mine at solo.ckpool.org
-ck
manifold
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 62


View Profile
March 28, 2012, 09:35:55 AM
 #4749

Try again please with the updated git now. (only diablo kernel has been changed this time).
Correction: it is on average 190 MH/s.
Therefore: Thanks! It works!

Osiris Bitcoin Forum
This is a recursive text, if you restart reading from the beginning. And you will never get to this point informing you that it had no exit condition.
-ck
Moderator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2002


Ruu \o/


View Profile WWW
March 28, 2012, 09:40:44 AM
 #4750

Try again please with the updated git now. (only diablo kernel has been changed this time).
no problem:
between 188 and 190 MH/s

Thanks! it works!

But in average it seems to be 2 MH/s lower...
It's the same kernel. Limitations of the goddamn annoying hashmeter over a small timeframe (hence why I introduced the benchmark parameter). Thanks for testing.

Primary developer/maintainer for cgminer and ckpool/ckproxy.
Pooled mine at kano.is, solo mine at solo.ckpool.org
-ck
Krak
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 591



View Profile WWW
March 28, 2012, 04:47:21 PM
 #4751

Just started getting this today after an update told me to restart.

Code:
[2012-03-28 12:40:03] Started cgminer 2.3.1X Error of failed request:  BadRequest (invalid request code or no such operation)
                                               Major opcode of failed request:  136 ()
        Minor opcode of failed request:  19
                                             Serial number of failed request:  8
  Current serial number in output stream:  8

Using cgminer 2.3.1-2 on Ubuntu 11.10.

BTC: 1KrakenLFEFg33A4f6xpwgv3UUoxrLPuGn
-ck
Moderator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2002


Ruu \o/


View Profile WWW
March 28, 2012, 07:47:52 PM
 #4752

Just started getting this today after an update told me to restart.

Code:
[2012-03-28 12:40:03] Started cgminer 2.3.1X Error of failed request:  BadRequest (invalid request code or no such operation)
                                               Major opcode of failed request:  136 ()
        Minor opcode of failed request:  19
                                             Serial number of failed request:  8
  Current serial number in output stream:  8

Using cgminer 2.3.1-2 on Ubuntu 11.10.
AMD  fail. Dodgy driver/SDK combo for your hardware. Downgrade your driver to a less bad one.

Primary developer/maintainer for cgminer and ckpool/ckproxy.
Pooled mine at kano.is, solo mine at solo.ckpool.org
-ck
Krak
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 591



View Profile WWW
March 28, 2012, 07:52:10 PM
 #4753

AMD  fail. Dodgy driver/SDK combo for your hardware. Downgrade your driver to a less bad one.
I would, but I haven't found a decent guide anywhere to downgrade properly. What was the optimal driver/SDK combo for 6000 series cards again anyway?

BTC: 1KrakenLFEFg33A4f6xpwgv3UUoxrLPuGn
-ck
Moderator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2002


Ruu \o/


View Profile WWW
March 28, 2012, 08:05:28 PM
 #4754

AMD  fail. Dodgy driver/SDK combo for your hardware. Downgrade your driver to a less bad one.
I would, but I haven't found a decent guide anywhere to downgrade properly. What was the optimal driver/SDK combo for 6000 series cards again anyway?
12.1 and sdk 2.5 is the least worst -recent- driver sdk combo. 11.6/2.5 is good but wont install on new linux versions.

Primary developer/maintainer for cgminer and ckpool/ckproxy.
Pooled mine at kano.is, solo mine at solo.ckpool.org
-ck
Krak
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 591



View Profile WWW
March 28, 2012, 08:10:28 PM
 #4755

12.1 and sdk 2.5 is the least worst -recent- driver sdk combo. 11.6/2.5 is good but wont install on new linux versions.
Alright, I'll have to look into it. I dunno why it would start messing up after a random system update though. Seems weird to me.

BTC: 1KrakenLFEFg33A4f6xpwgv3UUoxrLPuGn
-ck
Moderator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2002


Ruu \o/


View Profile WWW
March 28, 2012, 09:50:15 PM
 #4756

12.1 and sdk 2.5 is the least worst -recent- driver sdk combo. 11.6/2.5 is good but wont install on new linux versions.
Alright, I'll have to look into it. I dunno why it would start messing up after a random system update though. Seems weird to me.
That's because you're thinking "update" means better... I wish the world was like that. Likely xorg had some update which made the AMD driver weirdness become even weirder, or you got yourself a new AMD driver in the process.

Primary developer/maintainer for cgminer and ckpool/ckproxy.
Pooled mine at kano.is, solo mine at solo.ckpool.org
-ck
Krak
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 591



View Profile WWW
March 28, 2012, 09:52:37 PM
 #4757

Well, I tried installing 12.1/2.5, but now my computer won't boot past the Ubuntu loading screen. Kinda considering just going back to Windows now.

BTC: 1KrakenLFEFg33A4f6xpwgv3UUoxrLPuGn
-ck
Moderator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2002


Ruu \o/


View Profile WWW
March 28, 2012, 10:07:01 PM
 #4758

Well, I tried installing 12.1/2.5, but now my computer won't boot past the Ubuntu loading screen. Kinda considering just going back to Windows now.
Welcome to the AMD fail wagon  Tongue

Primary developer/maintainer for cgminer and ckpool/ckproxy.
Pooled mine at kano.is, solo mine at solo.ckpool.org
-ck
Krak
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 591



View Profile WWW
March 28, 2012, 10:09:42 PM
 #4759

Welcome to the AMD fail wagon  Tongue
Yeah. Second time this has happened since I switched to Ubuntu. So it's either boot fails on Ubuntu or registry corruption BSoDs on Windows. Why can't OS X be more efficient at mining? Ugh.

BTC: 1KrakenLFEFg33A4f6xpwgv3UUoxrLPuGn
jake262144
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 210


View Profile
March 28, 2012, 10:26:15 PM
 #4760

Yeah. Second time this has happened since I switched to Ubuntu. So it's either boot fails on Ubuntu or registry corruption BSoDs on Windows. Why can't OS X be more efficient at mining? Ugh.
If Windows falls flat on its face and Ubuntu dies in pain, what makes you think that the faildrivers won't take down OS X just as easily?

You need to learn some basic sysadmin tactics: never-ever deploy untested updates on production machines.
Your miners are your production machines, leave good enough alone - find a working driver/sdk combo and do yourself the favor of never touching it without a very good reason.

I've once seen my Debian systems "lose" the AMD driver following a slew of system updates. Fglrx module could no longer be found, manual reinstallation of the driver package helped.
Pages: « 1 ... 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 [238] 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 ... 830 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!