Blazed
Casascius Addict
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2128
Merit: 1119
|
 |
November 07, 2014, 01:09:03 AM |
|
Yep sorry the block erupter driver is absolutely submitted and maintained by AM and I don't have the hardware so I can't help you directly but I suspect the driver is buggy (it should never segfault for example). Hopefully they chime in here with support and fix the bugs.
"Hopefully they chime in here with support and fix the bugs" LOL not going to hold my breath on that one.
|
|
|
|
SVK
|
 |
November 07, 2014, 01:14:14 AM |
|
Downloaded 4 latest versions, created .bat file and nothing, just black window appeared for a split of a second. Same bat file works with 4.5.0 version.
I'm using Win 7 and I have habanero board. (I'm mining with 4.5.0 but wanted to try newer versions)
Open a command prompt and run cgminer directly with your commands (and add -T) instead of clicking on the bat file and it will tell you what's wrong instead of just disappearing taking the error with it. Many thanks for your help  I have noticed that there is missing Cgminer.exe in all of above mentioned versions. I will try it tomorrow morning. Open command prompt and paste everything from bat file and I will add -T at the end. Thank you very much
|
|
|
|
-ck (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4494
Merit: 1665
Ruu \o/
|
 |
November 07, 2014, 01:16:48 AM |
|
Yep sorry the block erupter driver is absolutely submitted and maintained by AM and I don't have the hardware so I can't help you directly but I suspect the driver is buggy (it should never segfault for example). Hopefully they chime in here with support and fix the bugs.
"Hopefully they chime in here with support and fix the bugs" LOL not going to hold my breath on that one. They did manage to submit the code to mainline cgminer which is infinitely more than I was expecting.
|
Developer/maintainer for cgminer, ckpool/ckproxy, and the -ck kernel 2% Fee Solo mining at solo.ckpool.org -ck
|
|
|
sdjernes
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 49
Merit: 0
|
 |
November 07, 2014, 05:44:20 PM |
|
The following is a questing from the Debian pkg-bitcoin-dev group and I am interested too: If you are familiar, could you explain this? Why should we not be using system libusb? - Added yet more warnings suggesting not to use the system libusb in configure.
Debian Jessie and Unstable (SID) libusb libusb-1.0-0 (2:1.0.19-1)
|
|
|
|
-ck (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4494
Merit: 1665
Ruu \o/
|
 |
November 07, 2014, 11:39:27 PM Last edit: November 07, 2014, 11:58:21 PM by ckolivas |
|
The following is a questing from the Debian pkg-bitcoin-dev group and I am interested too: If you are familiar, could you explain this? Why should we not be using system libusb? - Added yet more warnings suggesting not to use the system libusb in configure.
Debian Jessie and Unstable (SID) libusb libusb-1.0-0 (2:1.0.19-1) This is an annoying issue we've been dealing with for as long as we've been using libusb and the answer to your question is as frustrating as can be. Libusb had a hostile fork a few years back with libusbx and the main libusb development had slowed to a crawl. Virtually every distribution eventually moved to libusbx simply because it was the more actively developed branch. However at the time we found that every time we tried to migrate to libusbx it added substantial instability to the devices we were communicating with as most asic usb miners were actually pretty hastily slapped together and not very tolerant. Kano did a lot of investigation and found that there were numerous occasions where sending timeout based requests to libusb it simply would not return. The issue was amplified on windows and almost universal on usb1.1 devices which unfortunately many asic manufacturers decided to use (despite being a 15 year old protocol instead of usb2). Eventually the development of libusb was stopped and there was an alleged merge between the libusbx and libusb code and libusbx inherited the original libusb name with what appears to have been a somewhat strained truce between the original libusb developer and the libusbx devs. Unfortunately what happened was they built on the libusbx code and it appears that whatever it was that made the original libusb more stable never made it back into the maintained branch. We ended up finding the end of life libusb that we were using was still the most stable and none of the extra features in the newer libusbx based code were of any advantage and it conferred more instability. Here is the last time I tried moving to the merged libusbs: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=28402.msg4816354#msg4816354If you follow the few pages of testing (and ignore the pages of trolling) you'll see how I end up giving up on libusbx again. And here is where I reverted to our own included libusb code : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=28402.msg4989440#msg4989440The same problems still exist with the current libusb included in distributions. Now you're probably saying we should have submitted bug reports to libusbx instead of including libusb however we spent a ridiculous amount of time trying to find where the problem was in the first place and asic driver development was nothing short of frantic at the time and the amount of time we spent on it was far in excess of what we wanted already and it was detracting from further cgminer and driver development so I gave up and stuck to the libusb we included since it basically worked and was stable - what else can one ask? It also was not clear which was the real libusb... You'll also see that I was dependent on users to do the testing since I wasn't the one reproducing the problems so I couldn't do any cycle of test and report upstream. I doubt you'll be able to get any of those users with the old hardware engaged in that cycle of discussion now with libusb devs. EDIT: Here's where Kano first tracked down the problem: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=28402.msg2948402;topicseen#msg2948402https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=28402.msg2970018;topicseen#msg2970018Adding the --with-system-libusb was put there for platforms where there was no udev support and building would fail (eg openwrt) forcing them to use the system libusb instead of the included one. However I've since added a --disable-udev option which makes it build even there. If I removed the system-libusb option and silently built my own included libusb for the packagers they'd be none the wiser.
|
Developer/maintainer for cgminer, ckpool/ckproxy, and the -ck kernel 2% Fee Solo mining at solo.ckpool.org -ck
|
|
|
Buchi-88
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4214
Merit: 3015
Top-tier crypto casino and sportsbook
|
 |
November 08, 2014, 07:25:16 PM |
|
New release: Version 4.7.1, 4th November 2014
Minor bugfix release after dusk.
Human readable changelog:
- If different USB devices contain the same communication chip, provided the USB device has a product id set, cgminer will no longer try to use the wrong driver on it (eg LIN vs BFLSC).
THX for your efforts 
|
|
|
|
Xian01
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1652
Merit: 1067
Christian Antkow
|
 |
November 08, 2014, 09:27:34 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
-ck (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4494
Merit: 1665
Ruu \o/
|
 |
November 08, 2014, 09:55:18 PM |
|
Hah is there anything that guy won't attack? Now I'm really worried that my reputation will be tarnished by someone so esteemed in the bitcoin community.
|
Developer/maintainer for cgminer, ckpool/ckproxy, and the -ck kernel 2% Fee Solo mining at solo.ckpool.org -ck
|
|
|
knowndragon
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
|
 |
November 11, 2014, 01:36:47 AM |
|
I am very new to mining and want to try my luck solo mining. I can get the cgminer to run on a pool no problem. I plan on pool mining too. My problem is when I try and set up cgminer for solo mining I keep getting pool0 slow/down or url or credentials invalid. I am going to keep cgminer pool mining for now. What information do I need to supply in order to get help with fixing this issue? Thank you in advance. 
|
|
|
|
kano
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4676
Merit: 1858
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
|
 |
November 11, 2014, 02:45:43 AM |
|
I am very new to mining and want to try my luck solo mining. I can get the cgminer to run on a pool no problem. I plan on pool mining too. My problem is when I try and set up cgminer for solo mining I keep getting pool0 slow/down or url or credentials invalid. I am going to keep cgminer pool mining for now. What information do I need to supply in order to get help with fixing this issue? Thank you in advance.  Try solo.ckpool.org ... https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=763510.0The page there even explains how to mine there  Otherwise you'll need to setup a local bitcoind and learn all about doing that and also tuning it so you don't lose the block if you ever find one. Also, don't "expect" to find one very soon using solo, unless you have something like 400THs or more of mining.
|
|
|
|
knowndragon
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
|
 |
November 11, 2014, 04:08:44 AM |
|
I am very new to mining and want to try my luck solo mining. I can get the cgminer to run on a pool no problem. I plan on pool mining too. My problem is when I try and set up cgminer for solo mining I keep getting pool0 slow/down or url or credentials invalid. I am going to keep cgminer pool mining for now. What information do I need to supply in order to get help with fixing this issue? Thank you in advance.  Try solo.ckpool.org ... https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=763510.0The page there even explains how to mine there  Otherwise you'll need to setup a local bitcoind and learn all about doing that and also tuning it so you don't lose the block if you ever find one. Also, don't "expect" to find one very soon using solo, unless you have something like 400THs or more of mining. This is what I was afraid of. I did invest in some miners and have bitcoin-qt downloading and syncing transactions. I am running cgminer and have followed some strange guides. I know solo mining isn't the best and most of my hashing power is going to be involved in a pool. I want to set up some major hash for a lottery for none the less. bitcoin.conf in the appdata is has follows. server=1 gen=1 rpcuser=? rpcpassword=? rpcallowip=127.0.0.1 rpcport=8332 daemon=1 listen=1 cgminer.conf is has follows. { "pools" : [ { "url" : " http://127.0.0.1:8332", "user" : "?", "pass" : "?" } ], "intensity" : "15", "gpu-engine" : "0-1050,", "gpu-fan" : "0-85,", "gpu-memclock" : "1500,", "gpu-powertune" : "20,", "temp-cutoff" : "95,", "temp-overheat" : "85,", "temp-target" : "75,", "auto-fan" : true, "auto-gpu" : true, "expiry" : "120", "failover-only" : true, "gpu-threads" : "2", "log" : "5", "queue" : "1", "scan-time" : "30", "temp-hysteresis" : "3", "kernel-path" : "/usr/local/bin" } My deliveries don't start coming in till Wed. I would like to be able to have it sorted out and ready to go by then. Mining Bitcoin is not for the faint of heart. It isn't cheap but I believe I have the equipment coming to pay out my investment and keep me vested in it and bring a little profit. The equipment I speak of is not graphics cards either but some major hashing power. I am not trying to offend anyone but I am trying to take this serious. I will have two computer running five miners by the end of the month. I also have two computers sitting by idle and 4 800+ psu's. I will say this I was able to stratum proxy solo mine but I didn't do it for long because of still learning how to tune things. If I don't use the mining proxy I get the pool0 slow/down error. Any help would be appreciated and has well I know I am late to the game but still see a profit to be made. At least I know I don't want to buy a pizza with 10,000 bitcoins. Also any tuning tutorials for bitcoin-qt that way I don't destroy or burn any bitcoins. Thank you in advance for any help. It will be appreciated.
|
|
|
|
-ck (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4494
Merit: 1665
Ruu \o/
|
 |
November 11, 2014, 04:14:33 AM |
|
cgminer.conf is has follows. { "pools" : [ { "url" : "http://127.0.0.1:8332", "user" : "?", "pass" : "?" } ],
"intensity" : "15", "gpu-engine" : "0-1050,", "gpu-fan" : "0-85,", "gpu-memclock" : "1500,", "gpu-powertune" : "20,", "temp-cutoff" : "95,", "temp-overheat" : "85,", "temp-target" : "75,",
"auto-fan" : true, "auto-gpu" : true, "expiry" : "120", "failover-only" : true, "gpu-threads" : "2", "log" : "5", "queue" : "1", "scan-time" : "30", "temp-hysteresis" : "3",
"kernel-path" : "/usr/local/bin" }
Your cgminer configuration shouldn't even include any GPU commands whatsoever. This suggests to me that you're starting with some absolutely ancient version of cgminer. The solo mining component in cgminer was heavily rewritten a long time after GPU mining was removed. Please grab the latest cgminer and start again.
|
Developer/maintainer for cgminer, ckpool/ckproxy, and the -ck kernel 2% Fee Solo mining at solo.ckpool.org -ck
|
|
|
knowndragon
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
|
 |
November 11, 2014, 04:56:19 AM |
|
cgminer.conf is has follows. { "pools" : [ { "url" : "http://127.0.0.1:8332", "user" : "?", "pass" : "?" } ],
"intensity" : "15", "gpu-engine" : "0-1050,", "gpu-fan" : "0-85,", "gpu-memclock" : "1500,", "gpu-powertune" : "20,", "temp-cutoff" : "95,", "temp-overheat" : "85,", "temp-target" : "75,",
"auto-fan" : true, "auto-gpu" : true, "expiry" : "120", "failover-only" : true, "gpu-threads" : "2", "log" : "5", "queue" : "1", "scan-time" : "30", "temp-hysteresis" : "3",
"kernel-path" : "/usr/local/bin" }
Your cgminer configuration shouldn't even include any GPU commands whatsoever. This suggests to me that you're starting with some absolutely ancient version of cgminer. The solo mining component in cgminer was heavily rewritten a long time after GPU mining was removed. Please grab the latest cgminer and start again. Nice to meet you guys by the way. Yes I was using some old software. 3.3.1 I believe. I was following a guide off youtube. I was just hoping to get use to cgminer seeing has rockminer has a download of it. I plan on having a small farm though. I guess I am just chomping at the bit. I just download 4.7 don't know how to run it without the miners but atleast I will have it when the first one shows. Thank you guys for the help and hope you will be there in the future.
|
|
|
|
Askit2
|
 |
November 11, 2014, 10:57:06 AM |
|
Hah is there anything that guy won't attack? Now I'm really worried that my reputation will be tarnished by someone so esteemed in the bitcoin community. At this point I would say he won't attack his employers. Or should that be previous employers if the BTC wallet in the other thread belongs to a principal and they liquidated it while being under investigation. I'm glad you have a sense of humor.
|
|
|
|
knowndragon
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
|
 |
November 11, 2014, 03:48:47 PM |
|
Okay I have 4.6 installed and configuring it. I want to have it ready to setup. I actually had it running but without the usb it doesn't hash. My questions are... When I started it up I kept getting an error saying : No BTC address, unable to solo mine. I made edited the Bitcoin.conf and the cgminer.conf file. I added these commands. First the Bitcoin.conf I added this. btc=****************** put my wallet address where the stars are. Then with the cgminer.conf I added this. "btc-address" : "***************************", again put my wallet address where the stars are. When it starts up I get the following on the cgminer window. Loaded configuration file cgminer.conf No devices detected! waiting for usb hotplug devices probing for an alive pool. Solo mining to valid address: ***************** block change for 127.0.0.1:8332 detection via getbkcount polling network diff set to 39.6 API runnin in ip access mode on port 4028 <1424> If I am not mistaking all that is left to do is get my miners in and do the zidag update and plug them in and run the cgminer. Does this look right. Also I don't want to destroy any coins so is can anyone point me in the right direction to keep from losing any. This is for everyone's benefit. The probability of me finding a block with 25 is slim to none. But wouldn't want to lose them if I did. 
|
|
|
|
bbOOmm
|
 |
November 14, 2014, 04:25:10 AM |
|
Maybe this problem has been mentioned before, if it has, please point me to the solution-- I have no idea what to call this problem.
----------------
CGMINER is running and its hashing right along, BUT, I have ~ONLY~ text when something is accepted, there is a new block, etc and the 5s, avg, A, R, HW and WU line.
CGMINER is NOT showing the normal top of the window output... the miners, their individual outputs, pool info etc... the info that NORMALLY stay at the top of the terminal window while the accepted, new block and other info scroll below it.
I also do not have access to any of the menus, like (s)etup (d)isplay etc .. I press S or whatever and it just types an S in the terminal, no menu.
I've installed and re-installed CGMINER a few times, I've used the latest version of CGMINER even with this problem to mine SHA-256 as well as now, using 3.7.2 - GC3355 for scrypt mining using Gridseeds, still the same problem....
What am I doing wrong in installation? How to fix it so I can see what is going on with each miner etc?
I'm using Ubuntu 12.04LTS 64-bit desktop on a Dell PE850 server with 4gb ram CGMINER v.3.7.3-GC3355
Thanks
|
|
|
|
kano
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4676
Merit: 1858
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
|
 |
November 14, 2014, 04:48:13 AM |
|
your computer doesn't have curses devel - configure said that at the end when you ran it.
|
|
|
|
bbOOmm
|
 |
November 14, 2014, 04:58:42 AM |
|
anything special I need to do to compile cgminer to work with btcgarden asics?
Spiceminer15 --- If you are referring to the 8ghs blades... those are GETWORK only, they don't do STRATUM. However .... you can use Slush's Stratum mining proxy, it works great for the old GETWORK stuff. https://github.com/slush0/stratum-mining-proxyAs for mining software, none needed. Its has it own internal firmware that you configure via its IP address and I think you also have to include the port ... like 10.10.10.2:10000 (10000 was the default port) .... There is an important catch though. The blades need to have access to the internet, NOT JUST YOUR NETWORK, it needs the internet for some unknown reason for you to enter the blade config page. Sooo, if your blades have a different IP address range than your network with internet, Say your network with internet is on 192.168.1.x, and the blades are set up for a 10.10.10.x network, you'll need to set up a separate router with 10.10.10.1 as its address, ( this is just for changing the IP address to what you want it to be) then connect the miner to the router, and then the router to your network with the internet access. THEN -- you can access the configure page and set the miner IP addresses for each of the miners -SEPARATELY- so you can access them from your normal internet accessible network. DO NOT GET PUNCHY ... don't rush the settings. just because it says configuring on the screen, does not mean it has been already flashed... they are abit slow. I bricked 2 of the blades by being a little quick to close the page or reset the power etc.
|
|
|
|
bbOOmm
|
 |
November 14, 2014, 05:35:55 AM |
|
your computer doesn't have curses devel - configure said that at the end when you ran it.
Kano --- RIGHT ON THE MONEY !!! I must have missed it when copy n pasting the commands. NOW... its working  Thank you
|
|
|
|
os2sam
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3586
Merit: 1099
Think for yourself
|
 |
November 14, 2014, 01:38:28 PM |
|
will this work with ATI 7970 single card?
Q: What happened to CPU and GPU mining? A: Their efficiency makes them irrelevant in the bitcoin mining world today and the author has no interest in supporting alternative coins that are better mined by these devices.
|
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
|
|
|
|