This seems reasonable on their point of view especially considering that the realm of cryptocurrencies is starting to dominate our finances. Though the only problem that I see is that, this could either make or break the profit of the government since these BTCs will be converted as soon as the former receives it.

I do think that they are somehow missing the opportunity of at least investing 10-40% of the these BTCs for long-term. Given the fact that BTCs may soon takeover our finances, this move can spark the interest of other countries to do the same thing.

It definitely says a lot if a project is being managed by a trusted campaign manager in the forum. Not only does the campaign manager vouch for its legitimacy, but it also implies that the project has a good foundation, worthy to be reviewed and managed by a person who is arguably the best campaign manager.

Almost all projects that require exposure needs at least to have an ongoing signature campaign, if not, at least a promotional activity. This will definitely attract persons who are also not members of this forum due to the ongoing traffic that it receives daily.

Your statements are somehow confusing- one currency across all countries may seem impossible due to the fact that it would be prejudicial to all countries.

Imagine, the value of such currency would depend upon so many factors that a hegemonic country would be the total basis of such. Third-world countries would be heavily prejudiced in this kind of system especially if developed countries can somehow manipulate the price as they will be considered 'whales.'

As per BTC, it cannot become a currency due to its inflationary value and nature. Imagine that gold were to be come the currency of the world- a non-renewable resources; so its prices would obviously skyrocket.

As someone who has watched fights of Ryan Garcia on the ring, his explosiveness, accuracy, and long-reach is what makes him an exceptional fighter. Like what you have mentioned, De La Hoya is somehow making Garcia the next 'golden boy' on the ring as he is being promoted every time he fights.

According to boxrec, Emmanuel Tagoe is definitely an experienced fighter on the ring. With 32W (15KOs) and only 1 loss, he is someone that cannot be taken lightly, even if you are Ryan Garcia. Though experience would be key in this match, I do have my bet to Ryan Garcia primarily due to the fact that his punches are more explosive.

Pero grabe no, isipin niyo na even mga big and large institutions of cryptocurrencies ay talagang prone sa hacking. Even with the tightest security, talagang mga hackers ay nakakahanap ng loophole/butas para makapag scam and nakaw ng cryptocurrencies sa exchanges. I guess isa talaga ito sa mga risks ng cryptocurrencies- lahat ng nasa internet talaga ay prone to hacking; like lahat ng gamit sa mundo ay pwedeng manakaw.

Anyway, I do think na hindi fully marereimburse mga customers sa bitfinex given na sobrang laking halaga ang nanakaw. At best, baka only a certain percentage ang marerecover ng mga taong nawalan ng pera dito.

If you guys would observe the ongoing signature campaigns in the forum, most of them are gambling websites (with the exception of the almighty ChipMixer). I think from that fact alone, it speaks and implies the effect of having a continuous signature campaign running in the forum. Remember that the traffic also comes from visitors in the forum who do not have any account- so seeing signatures and custom avatars do help in promoting and advertising such project.

In the case of SandboxCasino, as they are a relatively new gambling website, they would of course exert all of the possible remedies in order to maximize exposure in the forum.

For the first question, the beauty behind signature campaigns that it is flexible enough for you to do them without compromising much of your time. For example, if you are required to do 25 posts/week, you can divide and allocate these posts (e.g. you can do 4-5 posts/day).

For the second question, it has not. Again, the beauty of these signature campaigns is that it is relatively easy compared to most works. You can freely finish and create quality posts as long as you meet the requirements. That is why, most people viewed signature campaigns as an "alternative way" of earning money due to its simplicity and convenience.

You have to check with your current laws if it is legal to pay your employees with BTC. As far as I remember, there are countries in which their law expressly provides that their payments should only be made with legal tender. Assuming that your country does not support BTC or view it as legal tender, you might face potential issues/consequences in the event that the employees sue you.

Personally, I would prefer this kind of setup. As someone who is an advocate of using BTC into our transactions, this would greatly improve and showcase the use of BTCs to my fellow colleagues as well.

This is one of those policies that could either make or break your gambling website. What are the reasons on why you decided to adopt a KYC policy in your withdrawals? Is this being regulated by the country you are setting up? To be honest, lots of potential customers are lost with this implementation alone; I do hope that you at least create a compromise where customers would be able to recover or at least receive a compensation for this.

Though every customer has the free will to decide which gambling website to pursue, with tons of online gambling websites also available in the internet, you are severely limiting your customers; thus reducing your potential profit.

I think this is considered one of the collateral effects of transacting into the blockchain- absolute anonymity especially if you use mixers along the way. Though there have been cases where criminals where able to purchase contraband items under the dark web, it is still without a doubt financial freedom on our end.

Similarly to fiat, anyone can purchase guns or any contraband stuff using it. In fact, fiat is the main currency where every country uses, so stating that transacting BTC is associated with criminal activities is just a speck of its total potential in the market.

Many seemed to compare these two since both can be associated and used as payment for services. There is this comparison which is also similar to gold, where people would debate on which is better. The difference is, BTC is relatively easier to earn compared to owning gold.
Personally, fiat will always be the better option compared to BTC. Like what you have mentioned, the recognition and utilization of BTC is yet to be globally accepted, given that most countries still prohibit the transaction of such due to the risks involved on their part (e.g. anonymity on transactions, etc.).

Since fiat can easily be regulated and controlled by the government institutions, BTC on the other hand, cannot be regulated without losing its function and essence.

Normally, these gambling websites will not disclose the reason behind their closing. The problem is, there is this fear associated when it comes to claiming payments since there are lots of gamblers who have big deposits on their accounts. Though advance notice was given by the company, there is certainly that risk of losing all of your resources from this transition.

To all gamblers who still have deposits under their accounts in luckyfish, it is superbly advisable that you should move your funds ASAP. Please do not wait until the last day before you move your money- you might encounter issues and problems regarding with your payments.

The idea behind the statue being an anonymous person is genius as no one really knows the identity/ies of Satoshi. Another thing, the statue also depicts the anonymity of transactions, in which BTC adheres and advocates. While its widespread recognition among certain countries is questionable, its effects are definitely useful as it totally changed on how people view their transactions.

While I do not wish to know the real identity/ies behind the pseudonym of "Satoshi", knowing his real face could probably make thank him for creating this revolutionary cryptocurrency and movement.

This is very informative! Last time na nakapag try ako ng crypto-online sabong, nandoon ako sa Facebook tapos directly nababawasan yung resources ko sa GCash pero mukhang mas convenient itong nilagay mo.

To be honest, mas maganda kung gumastos na lang tayo ng cash sa online sabong. I see cryptocurrencies as something that is too valuable para lang i-bet ko siya dito. Though ang nangyayari din naman is convertible siya sa cash, ang alam ko is may limit din si GCash sa pumapasok na pera sa account mo.

Imagine, these celebrities have the power to bet such amounts of money as if they were buying candy from a store.

Anyway, this is definitely a good exposure for cryptocurrencies as a whole. Since celebrities are sometimes viewed as 'idols' by some, this creates positive feedback from the public if they see their respective idols utilizing cryptocurrencies in different platforms (e.g. gambling, investing, etc.). I just really hope that other celebrities would also push this kind of initiative by using cryptocurrencies in their transactions (though this may be ironic).

I think importante din makita ng moderators na before sila mag accept ng bagong merit source, dapat relatively updated and active yung local boards natin. Pero totoo nga sinabe mo, ever since nawala si cabalism, medyo bumaba ang circulation ng merit dito sa atin sariling local boards. This really calls for a new merit source para mas madame din siguro mag cocontribute and gagawa ng useful threads dito.

Hopefully may mga qualified merit sources ang pwede mag apply. Kahit sino basta qualified, susuportahan natin since tayo din makikinabang dito!

There are two (2) approaches to failure: either you quit or you continue and learn from your mistake.

While this is easier said than done, most people have chosen to quit especially if they are unexperienced in this kind of field. Unfortunately, quitting is somehow the easier option based on them. But if you truly understand the kind of investment you entered into, no matter how many times you fail, you will strive to at least recover your losses. This is a normal occurrence in the cryptocurrency sphere especially that we deal with volatile investments.

I do not know where to start, but the game between the Warriors vs Lakers was something that is a must watch! We got to see a glimpse of the past especially in the last quarter where Lakers was able get their first lead of the game. Fortunately, Westbrook showed on why he was a previous MVP and LBJ was still the same dominant player in the league.

Fortunately, Klay exploded in the last quarter where he was able to drill 16 points on that quarter alone. Kuminga will be the next franchise player of the Warriors especially he played exceptionally well. To be honest, this was a perfect game where both teams showed their strengths.

Hmm, this actually depends on how rich I would be. If we are talking about Jeff Bezos level of richness, then I would not mind betting $500,000 three times in a single night. But, if I were rich but not as rich as Bezos, then I would never risk that much amount of money to begin with. Even if $500,000 does not mean a lot to these people, it says a lot on their expenditures and financial planning.

As someone also who had negative experiences with gambling, I doubt that I would also win if I risk even a small amount of money. I just really think that there are people who are born unlucky- and that is me!

I somehow disagree with your statement. While BTC may be considered as a valuable instrument as a means of transacting from one person to another without any third-party intervention, there are certain instances where fiat may be considered more convenient. For example, BTC is considered both as an asset and as an instrument of exchange but it requires a certain wallet that can only be accessed with the power of the internet. While in fiat, there is no need for any such technicality as you can purchase anything as long as you have it.