Bitcoin Forum
February 23, 2019, 05:52:13 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 0.17.1 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 [394] 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 ... 844 »
  Print  
Author Topic: OFFICIAL CGMINER mining software thread for linux/win/osx/mips/arm/r-pi 4.11.1  (Read 5776930 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic. (2 posts by 2 users deleted.)
juhakall
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 644
Merit: 250



View Profile WWW
November 08, 2012, 05:17:47 AM
 #7861

I am also getting that same long poll error when connecting to hashpower.com. With 2.8.7 long polling works there.

1550901133
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1550901133

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1550901133
Reply with quote  #2

1550901133
Report to moderator
Your Bitcoin transactions
The Ultimate Bitcoin mixer
made truly anonymous.
with an advanced technology.
Mix coins
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1550901133
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1550901133

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1550901133
Reply with quote  #2

1550901133
Report to moderator
1550901133
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1550901133

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1550901133
Reply with quote  #2

1550901133
Report to moderator
P_Shep
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1288
Merit: 1021


View Profile
November 08, 2012, 07:55:29 PM
 #7862

Working nicely.
Have GW, GBT & Stratum pools all up and running.

Something in the order of:
11,000% efficiency on Eclipse (GBT + Var Diff)
1,800% efficiency on MaxBTC (GW)
550% efficiency on Ozcoin (Stratum)

Get VERY large discards on GBT though, on the order of 1000%
Roughly 30% on Stratum and GW

Kano, did you said you're gonna add data counters to the pools? That'd be very interesting to see.


 
kano
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2730
Merit: 1105


Linux since 1997 RedHat 4


View Profile
November 08, 2012, 08:30:22 PM
 #7863

Working nicely.
Have GW, GBT & Stratum pools all up and running.

Something in the order of:
11,000% efficiency on Eclipse (GBT + Var Diff)
1,800% efficiency on MaxBTC (GW)
550% efficiency on Ozcoin (Stratum)

Get VERY large discards on GBT though, on the order of 1000%
Roughly 30% on Stratum and GW

Kano, did you said you're gonna add data counters to the pools? That'd be very interesting to see.
 
Yes I'll add data counters to the pools soon ...
I'm working on some MMQ stuff at the moment.

However ........ 11,000% efficiency?
What GH/s are you?
That seems too high ... though that is probably on a high hash rate?

I'm of course referring to the issue of work age and the negative affect on BTC.

Pool: https://kano.is Here on Bitcointalk: Forum BTC: 1KanoPb8cKYqNrswjaA8cRDk4FAS9eDMLU
FreeNode IRC: irc.freenode.net channel #kano.is Majority developer of the ckpool code
Help keep Bitcoin secure by mining on pools with full block verification on all blocks - and NO empty blocks!
-ck
Moderator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2800
Merit: 1154


Ruu \o/


View Profile WWW
November 08, 2012, 08:54:31 PM
 #7864

Working nicely.
Have GW, GBT & Stratum pools all up and running.

Something in the order of:
11,000% efficiency on Eclipse (GBT + Var Diff)
1,800% efficiency on MaxBTC (GW)
550% efficiency on Ozcoin (Stratum)

Get VERY large discards on GBT though, on the order of 1000%
Roughly 30% on Stratum and GW

Kano, did you said you're gonna add data counters to the pools? That'd be very interesting to see.


 
The switch between regular and GBT pools is still not ideal and the GBT work on switching to it can be stale for a while. There is a fix in git for this.

Developer/maintainer for cgminer and ckpool/ckproxy.
ZERO FEE Pooled mining at ckpool.org, 1% Fee Solo mining at solo.ckpool.org
-ck
P_Shep
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1288
Merit: 1021


View Profile
November 08, 2012, 09:48:20 PM
 #7865

Yes I'll add data counters to the pools soon ...
I'm working on some MMQ stuff at the moment.

However ........ 11,000% efficiency?
What GH/s are you?
That seems too high ... though that is probably on a high hash rate?

I'm of course referring to the issue of work age and the negative affect on BTC.

Yep, that high Smiley
It factors in the var diff shares (2.5 ish), so it's 'no of diff 1 equivalent shares'/'get block templates'*100.
Running at a little over 5GH/s.
P_Shep
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1288
Merit: 1021


View Profile
November 09, 2012, 12:01:36 AM
 #7866

Hmm, had this happen a couple of times now:

Code:
[2012-11-08 14:59:15] Switching to http://pool.maxbtc.com:8332
 [2012-11-08 15:02:47] LONGPOLL from pool 2 requested work restart
 [2012-11-08 15:06:21] LONGPOLL from pool 2 requested work restart
 [2012-11-08 15:14:16] LONGPOLL from pool 2 detected new block
 [2012-11-08 15:14:35] LONGPOLL from pool 2 requested work restart
 [2012-11-08 15:17:03] LONGPOLL from pool 2 requested work restart
 [2012-11-08 15:17:10] LONGPOLL from pool 2 detected new block
 [2012-11-08 15:18:16] LONGPOLL from pool 2 requested work restart
 [2012-11-08 15:18:16] New block detected on network before longpoll
 [2012-11-08 15:18:29] LONGPOLL from pool 2 requested work restart

Crashed with signal 11! Will attempt to restart
 [2012-11-08 15:18:29] Started cgminer 2.9.1
 [2012-11-08 15:18:29] Loaded configuration file /opt/etc/cgminer.conf
 [2012-11-08 15:18:29] Icarus Detect: Test failed at /dev/usb/tts/0: get 00000000, should: 000187a2
 [2012-11-08 15:18:29] Icarus Detect: Test failed at /dev/usb/tts/1: get 00000000, should: 000187a2
 [2012-11-08 15:18:29] Icarus Detect: Test failed at /dev/usb/tts/2: get 00000000, should: 000187a2
 [2012-11-08 15:18:29] Icarus Detect: Test failed at /dev/usb/tts/3: get 00000000, should: 000187a2
 [2012-11-08 15:18:29] Icarus Detect: Test failed at /dev/usb/tts/4: get 00000000, should: 000187a2
 [2012-11-08 15:18:29] Icarus Detect: Test failed at /dev/usb/tts/5: get 00000000, should: 000187a2
 [2012-11-08 15:18:30] Probing for an alive pool
 [2012-11-08 15:18:32] GBT longpoll ID activated for http://us2.eclipsemc.com:8337
 [2012-11-08 15:18:32] Pool 1 http://pool.maxbtc.com:8332 alive
 [2012-11-08 15:18:32] Pool 2 http://pool.maxbtc.com:8332 alive
 [2012-11-08 15:18:34] Pool 3 http://us3.eclipsemc.com:8337 alive
 [2012-11-08 15:18:34] Pool 4 http://us2.ozco.in:8332 alive
 [2012-11-08 15:18:35] BFL2: Garbled response probably throttling, clearing buffer
 [2012-11-08 15:18:35] BFL3: Garbled response probably throttling, clearing buffer
 [2012-11-08 15:18:36] Pool 5 http://us1.eclipsemc.com:8337 alive
 [2012-11-08 15:18:37] API bind to port 4028 failed - trying again in 30sec
 [2012-11-08 15:18:37] BFL1: invalid nonce - HW error
 [2012-11-08 15:18:37] BFL1: invalid nonce - HW error
 [2012-11-08 15:18:37] BFL1: Error: Send work reports: NONCE-FOUND:19BCCFAE,CD347D9C

 [2012-11-08 15:18:37] BFL1: Error: Get result reports: OK

 [2012-11-08 15:18:37] BFL1: Error: Send work reports: ERR:UNKNOWN!!!

 [2012-11-08 15:18:37] BFL4: invalid nonce - HW error
 [2012-11-08 15:18:37] BFL4: invalid nonce - HW error
 [2012-11-08 15:18:38] BFL1: Garbled response probably throttling, clearing buffer
 [2012-11-08 15:18:38] BFL1: Garbled response probably throttling, clearing buffer
 [2012-11-08 15:18:39] BFL1: Comms error
 [2012-11-08 15:18:42] BFL1: Comms error
 [2012-11-08 15:18:47] BFL1: invalid nonce - HW error
 [2012-11-08 15:18:47] BFL1: invalid nonce - HW error
 [2012-11-08 15:18:47] BFL1: invalid nonce - HW error
 [2012-11-08 15:18:51] BFL1: took 8495ms - longer than 7000ms
 [2012-11-08 15:18:51] BFL1: Error: Get result reports: USY
 . . .
From then on, all BFLs get garbled, never to kick back into sync. Still get some use out of them, seem to run about half speed.

The attempted restart seems to be a new thing... shame it doesn't work. The script I use already restarts cgminer if it quits, and generally works.
P_Shep
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1288
Merit: 1021


View Profile
November 09, 2012, 12:10:22 AM
 #7867

I see, you've added a sig handler for segmentation faults.

Maybe some resources/ports/handles/file pointers/whatevers aren't being closed cleanly and things get messed up?

I'll put the --no-restart in my cmd line.
P_Shep
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1288
Merit: 1021


View Profile
November 09, 2012, 12:21:05 AM
 #7868

Another thing...
The Stratum pool isn't be read correctly from the conf file.
I added it via the API, saved config and it correctly shows in conf file:

   {
      "url" : "stratum+tcp://stratum.ozco.in:3333",
      "user" : "xxxxx",
      "pass" : "xxxxx"
   }

But then when cgminer starts, it shows via the API as a disabled pool, without the 'stratum+tcp://' prefix or port suffix, just 'stratum.ozco.in'.
chewie
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 75
Merit: 10


View Profile
November 09, 2012, 01:35:20 AM
 #7869

Currently on 2.9.1 with all the same stats as in my previous post.  There has been several times where my GPU winds down(hash rate abruptly drops) after a block has been found, and then Cgminer crashes.  Fortunately, I was able to watch the crash occur, and there was nothing abnormal being displayed on the program  the moment before the crash happens.  I'm currently on a mining pool that uses GBT protocol.  Thanks, I thought I'd report this abnormality.
-ck
Moderator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2800
Merit: 1154


Ruu \o/


View Profile WWW
November 09, 2012, 02:47:23 AM
 #7870

Another thing...
The Stratum pool isn't be read correctly from the conf file.
I added it via the API, saved config and it correctly shows in conf file:

   {
      "url" : "stratum+tcp://stratum.ozco.in:3333",
      "user" : "xxxxx",
      "pass" : "xxxxx"
   }

But then when cgminer starts, it shows via the API as a disabled pool, without the 'stratum+tcp://' prefix or port suffix, just 'stratum.ozco.in'.
Leave the striked out bit out of the conf file. It's a bug in the configuration reading code.

Developer/maintainer for cgminer and ckpool/ckproxy.
ZERO FEE Pooled mining at ckpool.org, 1% Fee Solo mining at solo.ckpool.org
-ck
mdude77
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1540
Merit: 1001



View Profile
November 10, 2012, 03:43:45 AM
 #7871

cgminer 2.9.1 and 2.8.7 crash hard when mining on stratum pool and get disconnected.  I've seen it happen multiple times now.

windows 7 x64.

next time it happens I'll see if I can get some details from windows.

M

I mine at Kano's Pool because it pays the best and is completely transparent!  Come join me!
crazyates
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 952
Merit: 1000



View Profile
November 10, 2012, 04:06:06 AM
 #7872

cgminer 2.9.1 and 2.8.7 crash hard when mining on stratum pool and get disconnected.  I've seen it happen multiple times now.

windows 7 x64.

next time it happens I'll see if I can get some details from windows.

M

I'm on 2.8.7, and it crashed when I unplugged my wifi adapter. I didn't think anything of it, but it sounds similar.

Tips? 1crazy8pMqgwJ7tX7ZPZmyPwFbc6xZKM9
Previous Trade History - Sale Thread
jamesg
VIP
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1358
Merit: 1000


AKA: gigavps


View Profile
November 10, 2012, 03:49:15 PM
 #7873

Somewhere between 2.8.5 and 2.9.1 the mhs 5s fields changed from 5 to 3. What is the setting to change this back to 5s?

Thanks,
gigavps
Subo1977
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 344
Merit: 250


Flixxo - Watch, Share, Earn!


View Profile
November 10, 2012, 05:02:57 PM
 #7874

Somewhere between 2.8.5 and 2.9.1 the mhs 5s fields changed from 5 to 3. What is the setting to change this back to 5s?

Thanks,
gigavps

If you mean the Log interval then have a Look at the git in the section commits.

X       ▄▄█████████▄▄
    ▄██▀▀         ▀▀██▄
  ▄██▀              ▀██▄
 ▄██     ██▄▄          ██▄
▄██      █████▄▄        ██▄
██       ████████▄▄      ██
██       ███████████▄    ██
██       ██████████▀     ██
▀██      ███████▀       ██▀
 ▀██     ████▀         ██▀
  ▀██▄   █▀          ▄██▀
    ▀██▄▄         ▄▄██▀
       ▀▀█████████▀▀
.flixxo    X▄████████████████████▄
██████████████████████
██████████████████████
████████████▀▀███████
█████▀████░░░░░░▄████
█████░░░░░░░░░░▄█████
█████▄░░░░░░░░░░██████
██████░░░░░░░░░███████
███████░░░░░░▄████████
████▄▄░░░░▄▄██████████
██████████████████████
██████████████████████
▀████████████████████▀
▄████████████████████▄
██████████████████████
█████████▀█▀██████████
██████▀▀▀▀▀████████
██████▄▄░░▄▄▄░░███████
████████░░███░░███████
████████░░░░░░▀███████
████████░░███▄░░██████
██████▀▀░░▀▀▀░░░██████
██████▄▄▄▄▄▄███████
█████████▄█▄██████████
██████████████████████
▀████████████████████▀
X[[]]X
tnkflx
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 347
Merit: 250


View Profile
November 10, 2012, 07:33:37 PM
 #7875

Con,

2.9.1 is extremely unstable for me on Win7 64bit... I went back to 2.8.5.

Can I get you extra debugging info?

| Operating electrum.be & us.electrum.be |
mdude77
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1540
Merit: 1001



View Profile
November 10, 2012, 07:59:59 PM
 #7876

Con,

2.9.1 is extremely unstable for me on Win7 64bit... I went back to 2.8.5.

Can I get you extra debugging info?

2.9.1 is working fine here as long as the stratum pool I'm on is stable.  Otherwise it crashes.  2.8.7 does too.  Can you see if your instability issues are in 2.8.7?

M

I mine at Kano's Pool because it pays the best and is completely transparent!  Come join me!
tnkflx
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 347
Merit: 250


View Profile
November 10, 2012, 08:19:28 PM
 #7877

Con,

2.9.1 is extremely unstable for me on Win7 64bit... I went back to 2.8.5.

Can I get you extra debugging info?

2.9.1 is working fine here as long as the stratum pool I'm on is stable.  Otherwise it crashes.  2.8.7 does too.  Can you see if your instability issues are in 2.8.7?

Upgraded to 2.8.7, lets see how well it goes Smiley

| Operating electrum.be & us.electrum.be |
-ck
Moderator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2800
Merit: 1154


Ruu \o/


View Profile WWW
November 10, 2012, 09:27:10 PM
 #7878

Somewhere between 2.8.5 and 2.9.1 the mhs 5s fields changed from 5 to 3. What is the setting to change this back to 5s?

Thanks,
gigavps
--log|-l <arg>      Interval in seconds between log output (default: 3)

That change was after 2.9.1 in git only at the moment

Developer/maintainer for cgminer and ckpool/ckproxy.
ZERO FEE Pooled mining at ckpool.org, 1% Fee Solo mining at solo.ckpool.org
-ck
-ck
Moderator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2800
Merit: 1154


Ruu \o/


View Profile WWW
November 10, 2012, 09:43:14 PM
 #7879

Con,

2.9.1 is extremely unstable for me on Win7 64bit... I went back to 2.8.5.

Can I get you extra debugging info?
Yes you can. The instructions and debug versions required are here:
http://ck.kolivas.org/apps/cgminer/debug/

Same goes for any windows related crashes.

Developer/maintainer for cgminer and ckpool/ckproxy.
ZERO FEE Pooled mining at ckpool.org, 1% Fee Solo mining at solo.ckpool.org
-ck
-ck
Moderator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2800
Merit: 1154


Ruu \o/


View Profile WWW
November 11, 2012, 05:48:04 AM
Last edit: November 11, 2012, 06:47:00 AM by ckolivas
 #7880

OK I looked.. used the search function and even google but can't find an answer to this question...  I posted on a new thread and was directed to this one.  My question is why will cgminer running on ubuntu 12.04 64 bit will not submit shares (in a timely manner) for scrypt mining.  Hashrate in the cgminer console is ~310Kh/s but share submits are reporting 2Kh/s

Here is my post https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=120773.0

When I posted it I was running 2.7.5 and now I am running 2.8.7 and having the same problem.  Any ideas?
Any help is much appreciated.

Naelr

I think my post got trumped by release 2.9.0... anyone have any ideas?

Naelr
It didn't really get trumped. No one has any idea. Usually if nothing is being produced or lots of HW errors despite a high hashrate, the intensity is too high.

Developer/maintainer for cgminer and ckpool/ckproxy.
ZERO FEE Pooled mining at ckpool.org, 1% Fee Solo mining at solo.ckpool.org
-ck
Pages: « 1 ... 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 [394] 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 ... 844 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Bitcointalk.org is not available or authorized for sale. Do not believe any fake listings.
Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!