Bitcoin Forum
December 07, 2016, 04:22:49 PM *
News: To be able to use the next phase of the beta forum software, please ensure that your email address is correct/functional.
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: « 1 ... 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 [418] 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 ... 830 »
  Print  
Author Topic: OFFICIAL CGMINER mining software thread for linux/win/osx/mips/arm/r-pi 4.9.2  (Read 4821651 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic.
os2sam
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1918


Think for yourself


View Profile
December 02, 2012, 10:20:54 PM
 #8341

what's the CLI entry to add a 2nd backup pool miner (slush's stratum) in windoze?  

Check the examples in the Executive Summary in the first post.

A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
1481127769
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481127769

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481127769
Reply with quote  #2

1481127769
Report to moderator
1481127769
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481127769

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481127769
Reply with quote  #2

1481127769
Report to moderator
1481127769
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481127769

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481127769
Reply with quote  #2

1481127769
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1481127769
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481127769

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481127769
Reply with quote  #2

1481127769
Report to moderator
1481127769
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481127769

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481127769
Reply with quote  #2

1481127769
Report to moderator
1481127769
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481127769

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481127769
Reply with quote  #2

1481127769
Report to moderator
os2sam
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1918


Think for yourself


View Profile
December 02, 2012, 10:23:13 PM
 #8342

I've got 4  5830 cards mining on 1 PC

Before I switched to cgminer each was getting 270 MHash

Now with cgminer, and only using -w 128 and I-9 flags, 3 miners are getting normal MHash but when I start the 4th miner it's only getting 150 MHash

Any idea why?

What do you mean 4th miner?  Are you starting a separate CGMiner instance for each card in this one machine?  One instance of CGMiner will run all four GPU's.

A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
The00Dustin
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 806


View Profile
December 02, 2012, 10:31:12 PM
 #8343

It sure does. This bug should be fixed in git now, thanks!
And another (this in 2.9.6):
Code:
$ gdb cgminer core.29958
GNU gdb (GDB) Fedora (7.3-43.fc15)
Copyright (C) 2011 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later <http://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html>
This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it.
There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law.  Type "show copying"
and "show warranty" for details.
This GDB was configured as "x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu".
For bug reporting instructions, please see:
<http://www.gnu.org/software/gdb/bugs/>...
Reading symbols from /usr/local/bin/cgminer...done.
[New LWP 30058]
[New LWP 29958]
[New LWP 30005]
[New LWP 29961]
[New LWP 30032]
[New LWP 30016]
[New LWP 30018]
[New LWP 30019]
[New LWP 29960]
[New LWP 30014]
[New LWP 30017]
[New LWP 30022]
[New LWP 30015]
[New LWP 30006]
Missing separate debuginfo for
Try: yum --disablerepo='*' --enablerepo='*-debuginfo' install /usr/lib/debug/.build-id/3a/8fe6cb0063d56fc9be76ecd085c05f1b8a76e6
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
Core was generated by `cgminer -o http://GBTPOOL:GWPORT -O x:y'.
Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault.
#0  0x0000003c6f67abcc in free () from /lib64/libc.so.6
Missing separate debuginfos, use: debuginfo-install glibc-2.14.1-5.x86_64 krb5-libs-1.9.1-5.fc15.x86_64 libcurl-7.21.3-11.fc15.x86_64 libgcc-4.6.0-10.fc15.x86_64 libssh2-1.2.7-1.fc15.x86_64 libstdc++-4.6.0-10.fc15.x86_64 mesa-libGLU-7.11-1.fc15.x86_64 nspr-4.8.8-1.fc15.x86_64 nss-3.12.10-6.fc15.x86_64 nss-softokn-freebl-3.12.10-2.fc15.x86_64 nss-util-3.12.10-1.fc15.x86_64 openldap-2.4.24-3.fc15.x86_64 openssl-1.0.0g-1.fc15.x86_64 xorg-x11-drv-catalyst-libs-11.6-1.fc15.x86_64 zlib-1.2.5-3.fc15.x86_64
(gdb) bt full
#0  0x0000003c6f67abcc in free () from /lib64/libc.so.6
No symbol table info available.
#1  0x00000000004093d9 in submit_upstream_work (work=0x7fa534000b10,
    curl=0x7fa5340014a0, resubmit=false) at cgminer.c:2336
        gbt_block = 0x3966373762363563 <Address 0x3966373762363563 out of bounds>
        varint = 0x6663336638373135 <Address 0x6663336638373135 out of bounds>
        data = "\002\000\000\000H\005\321\\\207\366\271\256[\254\311A\200\251\372s\311\350S\234\246\264\345\322\337\003\000\000\000\000\000\000\232\313W\272\233 \r\203-\375P\006N\222\255\062\025\204\252Z\226\230\205\233s\254b1\002\251\367_UÕ»P\352\340\004\032\071\356\234\033"
        hexstr = 0x3739313030303030 <Address 0x3739313030303030 out of bounds>
        val = 0x3335363632353435
        res = 0x6634613266623831
        err = 0x3966376163613262
        s = "{\"id\": 0, \"method\": \"submitblock\", \"params\": [\"020000004805d15c87f6b9ae5bacc94180a9fa73c9e8539ca6b4e5d2df03", '0' <repeats 12 times>, "9acb57ba9b200d832dfd50064e92ad321584aa5a9698859b73ac623102a9f75f55d5bb50eae0041a39ee"...
        rc = 55
        thr_id = 808464481
        cgpu = 0x3135636361383833
        pool = 0x3435653636343365
        rolltime = 0
        hash32 = 0x3139613637393130
        tv_submit = {tv_sec = 0, tv_usec = 0}
        tv_submit_reply = {tv_sec = 0, tv_usec = 0}
        hashshow = '\000' <repeats 67 times>
        worktime = '\000' <repeats 199 times>
#2  0x6461393935383765 in ?? ()
No symbol table info available.
<snip>
#90 0x0000000000424eba in sha2_update (ctx=Cannot access memory at address 0x653561383730341d
) at sha2.c:259
        fill = <error reading variable fill (Cannot access memory at address 0x653561383730342d)>
        left = <error reading variable left (Cannot access memory at address 0x6535613837303431)>
Cannot access memory at address 0x653561383730343d
(gdb)
tealover
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 56


View Profile
December 02, 2012, 11:06:27 PM
 #8344

I've got 4  5830 cards mining on 1 PC

Before I switched to cgminer each was getting 270 MHash

Now with cgminer, and only using -w 128 and I-9 flags, 3 miners are getting normal MHash but when I start the 4th miner it's only getting 150 MHash

Any idea why?

What do you mean 4th miner?  Are you starting a separate CGMiner instance for each card in this one machine?  One instance of CGMiner will run all four GPU's.

4 GPUs on 1 computer, and I've got 1 instance of GPUMiner open using cgminer.

3 of the GPUS are getting 270mhash, and the 4th is only getting 145 MHash....before I switched to cgminer, all 4 were getting the 270mhash.

It's always the last (4th) GPU that I start mining that gets the lower MHash, so I know the GPU isn't broke because the same thing happens to them all depending on which order I start them

Whats wrong? Sad

tealover
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 56


View Profile
December 02, 2012, 11:38:33 PM
 #8345

Updated my ATI drivers and I'm getting better mhash now than ever before...I was using 11.6 drivers, updated to 12.10 now
os2sam
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1918


Think for yourself


View Profile
December 03, 2012, 12:45:47 AM
 #8346

4 GPUs on 1 computer, and I've got 1 instance of GPUMiner open using cgminer.

Well I have no idea what GPUMiner is.  But 5830's should be getting 300+Mhash/s though.

A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
-ck
Moderator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2002


Ruu \o/


View Profile WWW
December 03, 2012, 01:00:13 AM
 #8347

And another (this in 2.9.6):
Code:
$ gdb cgminer core.29958
GNU gdb (GDB) Fedora (7.3-43.fc15)
Copyright (C) 2011 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later <http://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html>
This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it.
There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law.  Type "show copying"
and "show warranty" for details.
This GDB was configured as "x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu".
For bug reporting instructions, please see:
<http://www.gnu.org/software/gdb/bugs/>...
Reading symbols from /usr/local/bin/cgminer...done.
Missing separate debuginfo for
Try: yum --disablerepo='*' --enablerepo='*-debuginfo' install /usr/lib/debug/.build-id/3a/8fe6cb0063d56fc9be76ecd085c05f1b8a76e6
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
Core was generated by `cgminer -o http://GBTPOOL:GWPORT -O x:y'.
Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault.
#0  0x0000003c6f67abcc in free () from /lib64/libc.so.6
Missing separate debuginfos, use: debuginfo-install glibc-2.14.1-5.x86_64 krb5-libs-1.9.1-5.fc15.x86_64 libcurl-7.21.3-11.fc15.x86_64 libgcc-4.6.0-10.fc15.x86_64 libssh2-1.2.7-1.fc15.x86_64 libstdc++-4.6.0-10.fc15.x86_64 mesa-libGLU-7.11-1.fc15.x86_64 nspr-4.8.8-1.fc15.x86_64 nss-3.12.10-6.fc15.x86_64 nss-softokn-freebl-3.12.10-2.fc15.x86_64 nss-util-3.12.10-1.fc15.x86_64 openldap-2.4.24-3.fc15.x86_64 openssl-1.0.0g-1.fc15.x86_64 xorg-x11-drv-catalyst-libs-11.6-1.fc15.x86_64 zlib-1.2.5-3.fc15.x86_64
(gdb) bt full
#0  0x0000003c6f67abcc in free () from /lib64/libc.so.6
No symbol table info available.
#1  0x00000000004093d9 in submit_upstream_work (work=0x7fa534000b10,
    curl=0x7fa5340014a0, resubmit=false) at cgminer.c:2336
        gbt_block = 0x3966373762363563 <Address 0x3966373762363563 out of bounds>
        varint = 0x6663336638373135 <Address 0x6663336638373135 out of bounds>
        data = "\002\000\000\000H\005\321\\\207\366\271\256[\254\311A\200\251\372s\311\350S\234\246\264\345\322\337\003\000\000\000\000\000\000\232\313W\272\233 \r\203-\375P\006N\222\255\062\025\204\252Z\226\230\205\233s\254b1\002\251\367_UÕ»P\352\340\004\032\071\356\234\033"
        hexstr = 0x3739313030303030 <Address 0x3739313030303030 out of bounds>
        val = 0x3335363632353435
        res = 0x6634613266623831
        err = 0x3966376163613262
        s = "{\"id\": 0, \"method\": \"submitblock\", \"params\": [\"020000004805d15c87f6b9ae5bacc94180a9fa73c9e8539ca6b4e5d2df03", '0' <repeats 12 times>, "9acb57ba9b200d832dfd50064e92ad321584aa5a9698859b73ac623102a9f75f55d5bb50eae0041a39ee"...
        rc = 55
        thr_id = 808464481
        cgpu = 0x3135636361383833
        pool = 0x3435653636343365
        rolltime = 0
        hash32 = 0x3139613637393130
        tv_submit = {tv_sec = 0, tv_usec = 0}
        tv_submit_reply = {tv_sec = 0, tv_usec = 0}
        hashshow = '\000' <repeats 67 times>
        worktime = '\000' <repeats 199 times>
#2  0x6461393935383765 in ?? ()
No symbol table info available.
<snip>
#90 0x0000000000424eba in sha2_update (ctx=Cannot access memory at address 0x653561383730341d
) at sha2.c:259
        fill = <error reading variable fill (Cannot access memory at address 0x653561383730342d)>
        left = <error reading variable left (Cannot access memory at address 0x6535613837303431)>
Cannot access memory at address 0x653561383730343d
(gdb)
Interesting. The only thing I can think of that could cause this is trying to submit a share even before gbt is fully set up, or the gbt structures sent by the pool are corrupt somehow. Does this happen shortly after startup? Is the GBT pool somewhere I can test it publicly or is this your custom pool? Thanks.

Primary developer/maintainer for cgminer and ckpool/ckproxy.
Pooled mine at kano.is, solo mine at solo.ckpool.org
-ck
The00Dustin
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 806


View Profile
December 03, 2012, 01:21:00 AM
 #8348

Interesting. The only thing I can think of that could cause this is trying to submit a share even before gbt is fully set up, or the gbt structures sent by the pool are corrupt somehow. Does this happen shortly after startup? Is the GBT pool somewhere I can test it publicly or is this your custom pool? Thanks.
This does happen shortly after startup, and I am only running one 5830, so trying to submit a share that quickly seems unlikely.  I only ran it once, though, so not impossible by any means.  The pool is the one previously run by he who shall not be named.  (aka eligius)

ETA, I was running in screen, so I don't know if this is the same error I was getting before.  I can tell you that on 2.9.4 it first ran quite a while before crashing, and then crashed on startup when I ran it again, at which point I went back to 2.8.7 (and then when 2.9.5 came out, I got the segfault instead of the error I was getting in 2.9.4 [which I quoted someone else mentioning a few pages back]).  That said, 2.9.5 crashed on startup more than once, and this is why I didn't go for a second test run when 2.9.6 crashed at startup.
tealover
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 56


View Profile
December 03, 2012, 01:35:36 AM
 #8349

4 GPUs on 1 computer, and I've got 1 instance of GPUMiner open using cgminer.

Well I have no idea what GPUMiner is.  But 5830's should be getting 300+Mhash/s though.

I spoke too soon...all 4 of my 5830s are averaging 220 MHash each now, and they aren't overheating because the temp is only 60c for each of them

Sigh...so frustrating, maybe its time to finally quit after mining for 1.5 years.

All because I decided to switch to new version of GUIminer with cgminer. I used to use old guiminer version + phoenix
-ck
Moderator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2002


Ruu \o/


View Profile WWW
December 03, 2012, 01:37:29 AM
 #8350

4 GPUs on 1 computer, and I've got 1 instance of GPUMiner open using cgminer.

Well I have no idea what GPUMiner is.  But 5830's should be getting 300+Mhash/s though.

I spoke too soon...all 4 of my 5830s are averaging 220 MHash each now, and they aren't overheating because the temp is only 60c for each of them

Sigh...so frustrating, maybe its time to finally quit after mining for 1.5 years.

All because I decided to switch to new version of GUIminer with cgminer. I used to use old guiminer version + phoenix
Can't really debug it with guiminer in front of it. Try cgminer direct.

Primary developer/maintainer for cgminer and ckpool/ckproxy.
Pooled mine at kano.is, solo mine at solo.ckpool.org
-ck
tealover
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 56


View Profile
December 03, 2012, 01:48:19 AM
 #8351

Ok I'm using cgminer.exe now

Using (4) 5830 overclocked to 945 mhz, and temps are at 60c

I'll see how it goes
tealover
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 56


View Profile
December 03, 2012, 02:01:49 AM
 #8352

GPU1: Invalid nonce HW error this is coming up infrequently.

Up above it says HW:12 next to GPU1

GPU1 is still getting me shares, but less than my other GPUs.
slush
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1358



View Profile WWW
December 03, 2012, 02:05:06 AM
 #8353

Up above it says HW:12 next to GPU1
GPU1 is still getting me shares, but less than my other GPUs.

Looks like hw issue with that GPU. I wouldn't be surprised if phoenix reported incorrect hashrate for that GPU...

tealover
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 56


View Profile
December 03, 2012, 02:09:43 AM
 #8354

Up above it says HW:12 next to GPU1
GPU1 is still getting me shares, but less than my other GPUs.

Looks like hw issue with that GPU. I wouldn't be surprised if phoenix reported incorrect hashrate for that GPU...

That GPU is only getting about half the shares as my other 3 GPUs now Sad
os2sam
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1918


Think for yourself


View Profile
December 03, 2012, 03:03:40 AM
 #8355

GPU1: Invalid nonce HW error this is coming up infrequently.

Up above it says HW:12 next to GPU1

GPU1 is still getting me shares, but less than my other GPUs.

I would lower the clock on that GPU till you don't get any hardware error's.  It has probably taken some stress and can't run that high anymore.  My 5830 used to do 975 till stratum support then I had to lower it to 960.

But I don't recall ever seeing an "invalid nonce" error??
Sam

A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
tealover
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 56


View Profile
December 03, 2012, 03:11:40 AM
 #8356

GPU1: Invalid nonce HW error this is coming up infrequently.

Up above it says HW:12 next to GPU1

GPU1 is still getting me shares, but less than my other GPUs.

I would lower the clock on that GPU till you don't get any hardware error's.  It has probably taken some stress and can't run that high anymore.  My 5830 used to do 975 till stratum support then I had to lower it to 960.

But I don't recall ever seeing an "invalid nonce" error??
Sam

Lowered overclock to default and still getting 1/2 HW Errors on that 1 GPU Sad Temps on it are good though, around 60c
os2sam
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1918


Think for yourself


View Profile
December 03, 2012, 03:20:24 AM
 #8357

GPU1: Invalid nonce HW error this is coming up infrequently.

Up above it says HW:12 next to GPU1

GPU1 is still getting me shares, but less than my other GPUs.

I would lower the clock on that GPU till you don't get any hardware error's.  It has probably taken some stress and can't run that high anymore.  My 5830 used to do 975 till stratum support then I had to lower it to 960.

But I don't recall ever seeing an "invalid nonce" error??
Sam

Lowered overclock to default and still getting 1/2 HW Errors on that 1 GPU Sad Temps on it are good though, around 60c

The default being 800Mhz right?  What's your memory clock set to?

I would say that GPU may have taken some damage/stress.  If you've been running it for a year and a half that's probably a pretty good run though.

I'd run it at stock clock till it died.
Sam

A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
tealover
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 56


View Profile
December 03, 2012, 03:39:26 AM
 #8358

GPU1: Invalid nonce HW error this is coming up infrequently.

Up above it says HW:12 next to GPU1

GPU1 is still getting me shares, but less than my other GPUs.

I would lower the clock on that GPU till you don't get any hardware error's.  It has probably taken some stress and can't run that high anymore.  My 5830 used to do 975 till stratum support then I had to lower it to 960.

But I don't recall ever seeing an "invalid nonce" error??
Sam

Lowered overclock to default and still getting 1/2 HW Errors on that 1 GPU Sad Temps on it are good though, around 60c

The default being 800Mhz right?  What's your memory clock set to?

I would say that GPU may have taken some damage/stress.  If you've been running it for a year and a half that's probably a pretty good run though.

I'd run it at stock clock till it died.
Sam

Yes 800 mhz and memory at 500
-ck
Moderator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2002


Ruu \o/


View Profile WWW
December 03, 2012, 04:23:48 AM
 #8359

Interesting. The only thing I can think of that could cause this is trying to submit a share even before gbt is fully set up, or the gbt structures sent by the pool are corrupt somehow. Does this happen shortly after startup? Is the GBT pool somewhere I can test it publicly or is this your custom pool? Thanks.
This does happen shortly after startup, and I am only running one 5830, so trying to submit a share that quickly seems unlikely.  I only ran it once, though, so not impossible by any means.  The pool is the one previously run by he who shall not be named.  (aka eligius)

ETA, I was running in screen, so I don't know if this is the same error I was getting before.  I can tell you that on 2.9.4 it first ran quite a while before crashing, and then crashed on startup when I ran it again, at which point I went back to 2.8.7 (and then when 2.9.5 came out, I got the segfault instead of the error I was getting in 2.9.4 [which I quoted someone else mentioning a few pages back]).  That said, 2.9.5 crashed on startup more than once, and this is why I didn't go for a second test run when 2.9.6 crashed at startup.
Well the crash is happening in the share submission path, so it must be trying to submit a share. That said, I found something else that might be a problem. Try current git master please.

Primary developer/maintainer for cgminer and ckpool/ckproxy.
Pooled mine at kano.is, solo mine at solo.ckpool.org
-ck
-ck
Moderator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2002


Ruu \o/


View Profile WWW
December 03, 2012, 04:53:29 AM
 #8360


I'm wondering if there is a way get get cgminer to use GBT with bitcoind (satoshi client), I know bitcoind doesn't support longpoll but it does support coinbase/append which should be enough to use GBT (i'm guessing) but it seems I can only get it to use getwork with bitcoind.

Any ideas? or is this just not possible at this point.
Nope, bitcoind does not support the extensions required by pool mining for cgminer to work with it at this time.

Primary developer/maintainer for cgminer and ckpool/ckproxy.
Pooled mine at kano.is, solo mine at solo.ckpool.org
-ck
Pages: « 1 ... 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 [418] 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 ... 830 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!