Claymore's Dual Ethereum AMD+NVIDIA GPU Miner v15.0 (Windows/Linux)

[farsky]

to Claymore
Tell me, please, what do you think of the recently appeared tablet for 1080 / 1080Ti ?
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3370685.0
I have not tested it for a long time, it seems this tool really increases the hash (on my 1080 increasing it was from 23 to 35 Mh/s in my Claymore's Dual Ethereum v11.

But I'm worried if this tool is not something else.
One user conducted an analysis through https: //www.hybrid-analysis.com and received this result:

https://www.hybrid-analysis.com/sample/1261052e34b3205dc04f5dd9e4b76d2649dbcda738dc8e2665b07f56d659e716/5ae113157ca3e11cac3236dc?lang=en

He writes that the program has a connection to 3 unknown IP addresses.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3370685.msg37007509#msg37007509

[prostor]

for me power limitation doesn t work. I tried adding -powlim -20 or -li or -gpow but
in my stats alwais at 100% the utlization. It makes my pc lag

I have a 1050 ti and w7 64 bit

What i have to write in the config? Sad

-ethi   Ethereum intensity. Default value is 8, you can decrease this value if you don't want Windows to freeze or if you have problems with stability. The most low GPU load is "-ethi 0". Also "-ethi" now can set intensity for every card individually, for example "-ethi 1,8,6".

[fittsy]

Hi friends! Can this be used with nvidia graphics cards? Will it work? Does 1080ti support? Will Nanopool work with this?

Yes, you can use 1080ti cards with Claymore.

Yes, if you read the very first post there are instructions for how to use Nanopool to mine with Claymore.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1433925.0

Also, if you go to Nanopool help page you will see instructions for Claymore:
https://eth.nanopool.org/help
https://etc.nanopool.org/help
https://sia.nanopool.org/help

[Nalut]

Trying to mine Ethereum on Nicehash pool but it keep on giving me this error
"Socket was closed remotely  (by pool)
Eth job timeout disconnected"

However it will start mining Decread using failover pool even thought i want it to mine Ethereum only.

What is the problem guys?
Bat file:
EthDcrMiner64.exe -epool stratum+tcp://daggerhashimoto.eu.nicehash.com:3353 -ewal 1LmMNkiEvjapn5PRY8A9wypcWJveRrRGWr -epsw x -esm 3 -allpools 1 -estale 0

[saucedaddy]

How do you close port 3333 remote management to make it secure

[Dmitry69]

How do you close port 3333 remote management to make it secure

Readme!!!.txt:

-mport   remote monitoring/management port. Default value is -3333 (read-only mode), specify "-mport 0" to disable remote monitoring/management feature.

[xunl]

Last 3 days I saw a lot of connection lost (drops) in the logs and it caused the miner to crash/restart. Can someone explain to me what are em (eminer) and fm (fminer)? Thanks

03:52:26:824   68   watchdog - eminer thread hangs
03:52:26:824   68   em hbt: 194234, fm hbt: 15,
03:52:26:824   68   Miner thread hangs, need to restart miner!

[Ursul0]

Don't expect much more from it.

I have several 570's ranging from 26,5 to 28,5Mhs.

I haven't seen more then 28.5 in any 570 to date, so yours is totaly normal performance wise.

really? even my old 470 refs are doing better then the numbers you state.

rx570 can go up to 31. Normally however it hashes around 29.5-30.5
I've got a rig of rx570 4gb MSI gaming with Elpida doing mere 29.4. And the only slower 570 I've got is ASUS Expedition hashing at 28.8

Of course it's possible if you are willing to deal with memory errors in HWinfo.
GPUs can have hundreds of errors and seem to work fine but you have a steady higher stale shares percentage and the ocasional rejected share so i cannot accept 30mh as a 570s normal number.

also fyi mem errors in HwInfo are both those that were corrected and those that were not.

can u say your asic quality of your card please ?
and can u share your mod bios rom

bios is polaris one click, asic quality is bs. all polaris are same. sometimes the 570 is shitty but very rare. and you can spot it if it is stable at 1180&1850-1900 @ 850mv but refuses to do 1180:2000@850 with appropriate straps ( fine tuning problematic ones - profiles in overdriven tool, for volts I don't use same phase values as claymore does.

[Bigdrago]

Don't expect much more from it.

I have several 570's ranging from 26,5 to 28,5Mhs.

I haven't seen more then 28.5 in any 570 to date, so yours is totaly normal performance wise.

really? even my old 470 refs are doing better then the numbers you state.

rx570 can go up to 31. Normally however it hashes around 29.5-30.5
I've got a rig of rx570 4gb MSI gaming with Elpida doing mere 29.4. And the only slower 570 I've got is ASUS Expedition hashing at 28.8

Of course it's possible if you are willing to deal with memory errors in HWinfo.
GPUs can have hundreds of errors and seem to work fine but you have a steady higher stale shares percentage and the ocasional rejected share so i cannot accept 30mh as a 570s normal number.

also fyi mem errors in HwInfo are both those that were corrected and those that were not.

can u say your asic quality of your card please ?
and can u share your mod bios rom

bios is polaris one click, asic quality is bs. all polaris are same. sometimes the 570 is shitty but very rare. and you can spot it if it is stable at 1180&1850-1900 @ 850mv but refuses to do 1180:2000@850 with appropriate straps ( fine tuning problematic ones - profiles in overdriven tool, for volts I don't use same phase values as claymore does.

Mine is at 1150@824 2225@825
Cant do them to do 2250 at overdriventtool. Think 2225 is max

[hyperpeek]

Since the fork of the SmartCash coin there seem to be an incompatibility with the submitted shares from claymore and pool/blockchain. What we get on the pool side (and also see in claymore log) is:

2018-07-07 18:35:06 [Pool]      [smartcash] (Thread 7) Share rejected: {"job":"1d","ip":"<ip_is_here>","worker":"<address_is_here>","difficulty":261.95348837,"error":"low difficulty share of 6.041715027996023e-7"}

2018-07-07 18:35:27 [Pool]      [smartcash] (Thread 1) Authorized <address_is_here>:x [<ip_is_here>]
2018-07-07 18:36:36 [Pool]      [smartcash] (Thread 1) Share rejected:

{"job":"21","ip":"<ip_is_here>","worker":"<address_is_here>","difficulty":2048,"error":"low difficulty share of 5.999277894752977e-8"}

It looks like, that the difficulty of shares are somewhat interpreted wrong. This results in a reject of virtually all shares submitted and potentially caused the significant drop in hashrate that we observed after the fork.

Mining works fine using other single miners.

Any ideas are welcome -- either here or in our discord.
https://discord.gg/7vxeZeg
Either #mining-and-pools or dm me there @HyperPeek#9099

[Kriss.Kross]

When start mining using claymore 11.8 and after a few minutes received a message :

" NVML: cannot get current temperature, error 15 and NVML: cannot get temperature, error 999 (an internal driver error occurred) "

and even with default clocks settings, still getting the issues. Already try with -tt 1 and -tt 0, but still no luck

Does anyone knows, how to fix this issue ??

[prostor]

When start mining using claymore 11.8 and after a few minutes received a message :

" NVML: cannot get current temperature, error 15 and NVML: cannot get temperature, error 999 (an internal driver error occurred) "

and even with default clocks settings, still getting the issues. Already try with -tt 1 and -tt 0, but still no luck

Does anyone knows, how to fix this issue ??

decrise OC.

[mehrdadb3]

Don't expect much more from it.

I have several 570's ranging from 26,5 to 28,5Mhs.

I haven't seen more then 28.5 in any 570 to date, so yours is totaly normal performance wise.

really? even my old 470 refs are doing better then the numbers you state.

rx570 can go up to 31. Normally however it hashes around 29.5-30.5
I've got a rig of rx570 4gb MSI gaming with Elpida doing mere 29.4. And the only slower 570 I've got is ASUS Expedition hashing at 28.8

Of course it's possible if you are willing to deal with memory errors in HWinfo.
GPUs can have hundreds of errors and seem to work fine but you have a steady higher stale shares percentage and the ocasional rejected share so i cannot accept 30mh as a 570s normal number.

also fyi mem errors in HwInfo are both those that were corrected and those that were not.

can u say your asic quality of your card please ?
and can u share your mod bios rom

bios is polaris one click, asic quality is bs. all polaris are same. sometimes the 570 is shitty but very rare. and you can spot it if it is stable at 1180&1850-1900 @ 850mv but refuses to do 1180:2000@850 with appropriate straps ( fine tuning problematic ones - profiles in overdriven tool, for volts I don't use same phase values as claymore does.

for me is 1150 : 1950 @ 900mv and cant over 1950 system go crash my cart is 570 gaming x 4gb elpida\hynix and i get 28.5mh overall And now with air warming I'm forced down memory to 1900

[Bigdrago]

Don't expect much more from it.

I have several 570's ranging from 26,5 to 28,5Mhs.

I haven't seen more then 28.5 in any 570 to date, so yours is totaly normal performance wise.

really? even my old 470 refs are doing better then the numbers you state.

rx570 can go up to 31. Normally however it hashes around 29.5-30.5
I've got a rig of rx570 4gb MSI gaming with Elpida doing mere 29.4. And the only slower 570 I've got is ASUS Expedition hashing at 28.8

Of course it's possible if you are willing to deal with memory errors in HWinfo.
GPUs can have hundreds of errors and seem to work fine but you have a steady higher stale shares percentage and the ocasional rejected share so i cannot accept 30mh as a 570s normal number.

also fyi mem errors in HwInfo are both those that were corrected and those that were not.

can u say your asic quality of your card please ?
and can u share your mod bios rom

bios is polaris one click, asic quality is bs. all polaris are same. sometimes the 570 is shitty but very rare. and you can spot it if it is stable at 1180&1850-1900 @ 850mv but refuses to do 1180:2000@850 with appropriate straps ( fine tuning problematic ones - profiles in overdriven tool, for volts I don't use same phase values as claymore does.

for me is 1150 : 1950 @ 900mv and cant over 1950 system go crash my cart is 570 gaming x 4gb elpida\hynix and i get 28.5mh overall And now with air warming I'm forced down memory to 1900

I use 1150@825 2225@825. No problemo.

[ushakov]

If you add more than 16 pools in a poolgroup, Awesome Miner is not showing statistics for miner, it displays "offline Interface", at this time mining work is normal. Maybe the reason in Claymore Dual Etherium Miner? As I understand it, after studying the description of the command "e", which you enter in the miner and then enter 0-9 (number of pool), it does not provide more than 10 failover pools.

[Andrey123]

Hello!
For experiments, I obtained several ASUS GT 210 video cards.
But when you run the miner, he writes that there is no CUDA driver.

On the site Nvidia did not find anything (
At least to check the entire system for a start.

[shap00]

hey guys, i am trying to run claymore on a 6x1080ti and it crashes when i start program. i have the same setup on others rigs and everything is fine. i changed the risers but it didn't solve the problem.
https://imgur.com/a/yWAACW5
There is no error on the miner. It stops after C:/Users(miner's location).
what should i do? thanks

[LucianoBM]

Since the fork of the SmartCash coin there seem to be an incompatibility with the submitted shares from claymore and pool/blockchain. What we get on the pool side (and also see in claymore log) is:

2018-07-07 18:35:06 [Pool]      [smartcash] (Thread 7) Share rejected: {"job":"1d","ip":"<ip_is_here>","worker":"<address_is_here>","difficulty":261.95348837,"error":"low difficulty share of 6.041715027996023e-7"}

2018-07-07 18:35:27 [Pool]      [smartcash] (Thread 1) Authorized <address_is_here>:x [<ip_is_here>]
2018-07-07 18:36:36 [Pool]      [smartcash] (Thread 1) Share rejected:

{"job":"21","ip":"<ip_is_here>","worker":"<address_is_here>","difficulty":2048,"error":"low difficulty share of 5.999277894752977e-8"}

It looks like, that the difficulty of shares are somewhat interpreted wrong. This results in a reject of virtually all shares submitted and potentially caused the significant drop in hashrate that we observed after the fork.

Mining works fine using other single miners.

Any ideas are welcome -- either here or in our discord.
https://discord.gg/7vxeZeg
Either #mining-and-pools or dm me there @HyperPeek#9099

Same here

[rgsnedds]

this folder naming system...  

Code:

Claymore's\ Dual\ Ethereum+Decred_Siacoin_Lbry_Pascal_Blake2s_Keccak\ AMD+NVIDIA\ GPU\ Miner\ v11.8\ -\ LINUX

needs fixing.

[numeratrix]

Is support for LBRY being dropped? We're past the hardfork block that happened today.