xiangfu
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 03, 2013, 03:10:44 AM |
|
Imho it's normal and you have little chance of changing anything. Don't give too much about the numbers....
Thanks. I guess I will leave it alone then. The only other thing I am noticing is that the slower one produces 5% HW errors, and the other two are around 2%. But even using avalon_auto doesn't change that, nor does running it at a lower frequency. This is because the chip have a lot of sha256 cores inside. as long as the chip passed hardware test, it's ok for product. pass hardware test not mean 100% core working. one or two may broken. So you are luck get a 82G machine. (I guess 100% cores passed hardware test). the 79G is also nice. :-) Xiangfu
|
|
|
|
xiangfu
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 03, 2013, 03:13:29 AM |
|
Also how would you manage to exchange modules on a board? Cut it?
The small miner (have 10 chips on it) was designed for cut.
|
|
|
|
Tesla71
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 03, 2013, 07:20:27 PM |
|
Is somebody selling clones of this control boards?
I would also be interested in this.. I think my control board have a problem or where does it come from when the avalon section of cgminer screen went sometimes empty after some time of hashing ? Any ideas? I don't think it is the router because I can access it normaly but the router seems to loose contact to the controller ? Where to look for bugs ? It is an avalon batch 2 with controller V 1.5 Tried already different firmware and another PSU ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww7.pic-upload.de%2F26.07.13%2Fmv7zs98qgrbl.jpg&t=665&c=i5MJuR0UIkjuyg) Flash your router newly, un-check the keep-settings box. Helped me with the same problem. already did that once, don't know if it was the same firmware. But will try it again. But I also cant get it get to work with a pie, if I plug the avalon in, cgminer says this after short time of hashing normally. I think it's the controller board for the asic modules, so maybee I will sell the modules individual for people who wants a fourth module in their avalon.. ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww10.pic-upload.de%2F03.08.13%2Fb12fyztsctc8.jpg&t=665&c=SCleXQ-pPqO_uw)
|
|
|
|
calmindifference
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 91
Merit: 10
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 03, 2013, 07:43:45 PM |
|
I need to get a PSU for Batch 3 4 module. I am thinking of OCZ 1250 as set out here https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Avalon#PowerDoes anyone know if the requirements have changed compared to previous batches? In particular max dimensions as I understand its important to keep the PSU in the case to promote airflow.
|
|
|
|
CoinHoarder
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1026
In Cryptocoins I Trust
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 03, 2013, 07:54:12 PM |
|
I need to get a PSU for Batch 3 4 module. I am thinking of OCZ 1250 as set out here https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Avalon#PowerDoes anyone know if the requirements have changed compared to previous batches? In particular max dimensions as I understand its important to keep the PSU in the case to promote airflow. I haven't measured the exact dimensions, but just know that the 1200w PSU I tried was too big to fit. I settled for a 1050w PSU which barely fit, and was still too large to put the top of the case back on.
|
|
|
|
|
kano
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4592
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 04, 2013, 12:50:54 AM |
|
My OCZ 1250 is 172mm http://ocz.com/consumer/psu/zx-series-850w-1250w-power-supply/specificationsSays 175mm but It is a little less. I bought mine about a month or so ago and it is definitely a bit under 175mm That ruler is flexible and not exactly straight, as you can see, so that would mean maybe up to 1mm less again. ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=http%3A%2F%2F198.245.60.111%2FPix%2F20130804103319OCZSize.jpg.200.jpg&t=665&c=f3eObwwpAcg9UA) Click for a bigger pic Edit: of course that isn't in an Avalon ![Tongue](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/tongue.gif)
|
|
|
|
CoinHoarder
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1026
In Cryptocoins I Trust
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 04, 2013, 01:04:05 AM |
|
Well... My 1250w PSU was less than 175mm also, and it still didn't fit. You need to take into consideration that you need to have room to plug in the PCIe & CPU power cables. My 1250w PSU would have fit if I didn't need to plug in the PCIe/CPU cables.
|
|
|
|
kano
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4592
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 04, 2013, 01:24:37 AM |
|
Yes the ATX connector is at the bottom - so if you mean that's required for the Avalon then that would be problematic ... http://eolref.ocztechnology.com/images/ZX_back_1.jpgThe PCI-e's are at the top and would not make a difference.
|
|
|
|
CoinHoarder
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1026
In Cryptocoins I Trust
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 04, 2013, 01:42:54 AM |
|
Well, my PCIe/CPU hookups were on the bottom, so mine was kind of opposite of yours. Shit, maybe I had it upside down... ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif) Anyways, an ATX connector is definitely needed. From memory.. (I could be a little off here on the PCIe connectors) it required an ATX connector, two 4 pin CPU connectors, and three PCIe connectors.
|
|
|
|
kano
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4592
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 04, 2013, 01:50:30 AM |
|
Well, my PCIe/CPU hookups were on the bottom, so mine was kind of opposite of yours. Shit, maybe I had it upside down... ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif) Anyways, an ATX connector is definitely needed. From memory.. (I could be a little off here on the PCIe connectors) it required an ATX connector, two 4 pin CPU connectors, and three PCIe connectors. Hmm ... though I'm assuming they haven't made the Avalon box upside down ... If it's not the same orientation as a normal PC case, then yes the ATX would be at the top and 3 of the 6 PCIe would be at the bottom. Edit: here's a picture from behind in my rig (a normal PC) ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=http%3A%2F%2F198.245.60.111%2FPix%2F20130731151006OCZOrientation.jpg.200.jpg&t=665&c=vmB5vZOH4xl60A) (Click for a readable version)
|
|
|
|
CoinHoarder
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1026
In Cryptocoins I Trust
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 04, 2013, 03:09:52 AM |
|
I calculated about 192mm to the PCIe/CPU connectors. So, if your ATX connector to the PSU has low clearance, it may not fit if the connector + the PSU is longer than 192mm. Measure from the bottom of your PSU to your ATX connector, then compare it to the height of a CPU female plug on a mobo. This is the amount of clearance needed to clear the PCIe/CPU connectors on the Avalon control board. Hopefully this explains my point better: ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fi1155.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fp558%2Frowtaree%2FXd6b9PK_zpse0545c39.jpg&t=665&c=cGo0i2LUALr4Hg)
|
|
|
|
CoinHoarder
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1026
In Cryptocoins I Trust
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 04, 2013, 03:16:42 AM |
|
I feel like I'm just confusing everyone... it's like I know what I want to say, but I can't explain it properly. Hopefully you can understand my diatribe. ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif)
|
|
|
|
kano
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4592
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 04, 2013, 03:17:47 AM |
|
CoinHoarder, which side is the fan on that PSU? (edit: that would normally face down into the PC case)
|
|
|
|
CoinHoarder
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1026
In Cryptocoins I Trust
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 04, 2013, 03:30:51 AM |
|
CoinHoarder, which side is the fan on that PSU? (edit: that would normally face down into the PC case)
On the top side in the orientation of that picture was taken.
|
|
|
|
Ghost of USD
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 31
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 04, 2013, 03:51:40 AM |
|
Also, the Batch 3 PDU has two EPS12V CPU connectors.
|
|
|
|
CoinHoarder
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1026
In Cryptocoins I Trust
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 04, 2013, 04:02:25 AM |
|
Also, the Batch 3 PDU has two EPS12V CPU connectors.
Ya my bad, one of my pcie connectors should of been a cpu connector in the picture.
|
|
|
|
kano
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4592
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 04, 2013, 07:49:31 AM |
|
CoinHoarder, which side is the fan on that PSU? (edit: that would normally face down into the PC case)
On the top side in the orientation of that picture was taken. OK since the fan is at the top, then indeed it is oriented in reverse of a normal PC So the PCIe connectors on a OCZ 1250 would be at the bottom and the ATX at the top ( from that picure I linked http://eolref.ocztechnology.com/images/ZX_back_1.jpg rotate 90 degrees left ) Though if you only needed 3 PCIe connectors then you could probably get the the top 3 of them without trouble. The CPU connectors are in the middle so should be OK also.
|
|
|
|
Bicknellski
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 04, 2013, 10:57:27 AM |
|
Paging Jgarzik. Party of one. Jgarzik, party of 1! Your seat at the ASIC table is ready. JGarzik, party of 1! I think this is one dinner you'll be happy to eat alone. ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) Oh the good old days.
|
|
|
|
Olly_K
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 04, 2013, 01:12:45 PM |
|
hey guys, need a little help here. So I picked up a B2 avalon today, saw it working and hashing away, all good.
Got it home, changed the IP subnet range and IP address and I seemed to have lost it.
I've run a scanner on both the 192.168.1.xxx and 192.168.0.xxx range but I can't find it.
Tried a reset - reset button in and turn avalon on, keep reset button pressed for 5 seconds. That should reset it to the 192.168.0.xxx range, correct ?
Thanks in advance !
|
|
|
|
|