kano
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4620
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
|
|
July 30, 2012, 11:49:20 PM |
|
I had to restart cgminer 2.6.1 on two different rigs because the API did no longer respond to any request (it did not even time out!?) Mining was still working and this has never happened with earlier versions.
Anyone experienced the same problem?
The API reports all incoming requests and out going replies when debug is turned on -D (of course turning on debug produces a whole heap of other stuff) What OS? (and version) Edit: of course you can turn on debug from the cgminer screen at any time ... i.e. when the problem occurs
|
|
|
|
ShadesOfMarble
Donator
Hero Member
Offline
Activity: 543
Merit: 500
|
|
July 30, 2012, 11:54:48 PM |
|
I'll turn debug on the next time this problem happens, thanks for the hint.
I'm using Windows 7 32-bit SP1. (Don't moan because of windows, my rigs are usually running for months witout interruption...)
|
|
|
|
-ck (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4298
Merit: 1645
Ruu \o/
|
|
July 31, 2012, 12:02:39 AM |
|
Does 2.60 not leak shares to backup pools anymore? Sam
It does, but likely less than before.
|
Developer/maintainer for cgminer, ckpool/ckproxy, and the -ck kernel 2% Fee Solo mining at solo.ckpool.org -ck
|
|
|
farfie
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 63
Merit: 0
|
|
July 31, 2012, 02:55:36 AM |
|
What are you running on?
There seems to be an ongoing bug fix on bug fix on bug fix for this at the moment (nothing to do with me)
The first bugfix pshep did was mostly to remove the 2 lines of luke-jr's commit (which has gone in the chain of bug fixes and not returned)
I might be able to make a version that just removes that commit and compile it for you until the mess is sorted out by the others. If it's windows - then yep that's OK also I can make one of them.
Let me know.
It is indeed Windows 7 x64.
|
|
|
|
-ck (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4298
Merit: 1645
Ruu \o/
|
|
July 31, 2012, 03:02:33 AM |
|
What are you running on?
There seems to be an ongoing bug fix on bug fix on bug fix for this at the moment (nothing to do with me)
The first bugfix pshep did was mostly to remove the 2 lines of luke-jr's commit (which has gone in the chain of bug fixes and not returned)
I might be able to make a version that just removes that commit and compile it for you until the mess is sorted out by the others. If it's windows - then yep that's OK also I can make one of them.
Let me know.
It is indeed Windows 7 x64. Here try this executable with that one change backed out: http://ck.kolivas.org/apps/cgminer/temp/cgminer.exe
|
Developer/maintainer for cgminer, ckpool/ckproxy, and the -ck kernel 2% Fee Solo mining at solo.ckpool.org -ck
|
|
|
farfie
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 63
Merit: 0
|
|
July 31, 2012, 03:41:33 AM |
|
What are you running on?
There seems to be an ongoing bug fix on bug fix on bug fix for this at the moment (nothing to do with me)
The first bugfix pshep did was mostly to remove the 2 lines of luke-jr's commit (which has gone in the chain of bug fixes and not returned)
I might be able to make a version that just removes that commit and compile it for you until the mess is sorted out by the others. If it's windows - then yep that's OK also I can make one of them.
Let me know.
It is indeed Windows 7 x64. Here try this executable with that one change backed out: http://ck.kolivas.org/apps/cgminer/temp/cgminer.exeHalf an hour so far with no problems on either machine. Going to bed soon, so I'll just lettem do their thing and report in the morning.
|
|
|
|
BlackPrapor
|
|
July 31, 2012, 04:13:04 AM Last edit: July 31, 2012, 04:31:43 AM by BlackPrapor |
|
I've got mini rigs hanging after some time with cgminer 2.6.1 so I switched back to bfgminer 2.5.1. It does produce almost 1% more rejects (cgminer had almost none 0.07%), but at least it works . Since my computer is running on Linux and I'm a noob in linux, please don't ask me to send you debug files or anything like that . I didn't have "bitforce:" line for every device btw, if that helps.
|
There is no place like 127.0.0.1 In blockchain we trust
|
|
|
-ck (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4298
Merit: 1645
Ruu \o/
|
|
July 31, 2012, 04:29:17 AM |
|
I've got mini rigs hanging after some time with cgminer 2.6.1 so I switched back to bfgminer 2.5.1. It does produce almost 1% more rejects, but at least it works . Since my computer is running on Linux and I'm a noob in linux, please don't ask me to send you debug files or anything like that . I didn't have "bitforce:" line for every device btw, if that helps. Um, why bfgminer 2.5.1 and not cgminer 2.5.0? EDIT: never mind that question, I suspect people actually believe luke-jr's FUD. I think the minirig is probably burnt by the same thing affecting the singles.
|
Developer/maintainer for cgminer, ckpool/ckproxy, and the -ck kernel 2% Fee Solo mining at solo.ckpool.org -ck
|
|
|
BlackPrapor
|
|
July 31, 2012, 04:35:15 AM |
|
I've got mini rigs hanging after some time with cgminer 2.6.1 so I switched back to bfgminer 2.5.1. It does produce almost 1% more rejects, but at least it works . Since my computer is running on Linux and I'm a noob in linux, please don't ask me to send you debug files or anything like that . I didn't have "bitforce:" line for every device btw, if that helps. Um, why bfgminer 2.5.1 and not cgminer 2.5.0? EDIT: never mind that question, I suspect people actually believe luke-jr's FUD. I think the minirig is probably burnt by the same thing affecting the singles. Well, I had 2.5.1 installed, so I run that one. Don't know how to update, and I guess since you guys share the code, I would've got the same issue with bfgminer 2.6.1. Maybe its a good thing I still have 2.5.1 ...but I do need to learn how to use linux
|
There is no place like 127.0.0.1 In blockchain we trust
|
|
|
kano
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4620
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
|
|
July 31, 2012, 06:22:42 AM |
|
Anyone who got 2.6.1a from my git downloads - I've made a 2.6.1b that has the problematic BFL commit removed (and deleted 2.6.1a) https://github.com/kanoi/cgminer/downloadscgminer-2.6.1b — cgminer-2.6.1b = Distro cgminer 2.6.1 executable file compiled on Xubuntu 11.04 with all device + scrypt support included - and the BFL bug removed Edit: FYI 2.6.1a didn't ever fail on my BFL (25.5 hours) - which is rather odd considering the problems with my BFL Anyway, I'm running 2.6.1b on all my 3 setups.
|
|
|
|
Luke-Jr
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2576
Merit: 1186
|
|
July 31, 2012, 08:37:40 AM |
|
I've got mini rigs hanging after some time with cgminer 2.6.1 so I switched back to bfgminer 2.5.1. It does produce almost 1% more rejects (cgminer had almost none 0.07%), but at least it works . No, CGMiner has them - it just hides them from you, along with other shares that would have been accepted...
|
|
|
|
BlackPrapor
|
|
July 31, 2012, 08:52:54 AM |
|
I've got mini rigs hanging after some time with cgminer 2.6.1 so I switched back to bfgminer 2.5.1. It does produce almost 1% more rejects (cgminer had almost none 0.07%), but at least it works . No, CGMiner has them - it just hides them from you, along with other shares that would have been accepted... So, you're saying that I should see a difference in U or shares accepted between cgminer and bfgminer? I'll check it. Atm I'm having 51.7Ghs very stable speed with cgminer 2.6.1b. Do you mind telling me how to update bfgminer from 2.5.1, so I can make a fair comparison of both up to date miners?
|
There is no place like 127.0.0.1 In blockchain we trust
|
|
|
-ck (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4298
Merit: 1645
Ruu \o/
|
|
July 31, 2012, 08:58:13 AM |
|
I've got mini rigs hanging after some time with cgminer 2.6.1 so I switched back to bfgminer 2.5.1. It does produce almost 1% more rejects (cgminer had almost none 0.07%), but at least it works . No, CGMiner has them - it just hides them from you, along with other shares that would have been accepted... So, you're saying that I should see a difference in U or shares accepted between cgminer and bfgminer? I'll check it. Atm I'm having 51.7Ghs very stable speed with cgminer 2.6.1b. Do you mind telling me how to update bfgminer from 2.5.1, so I can make a fair comparison of both up to date miners? His 2.5.1 should be enough to tell...
|
Developer/maintainer for cgminer, ckpool/ckproxy, and the -ck kernel 2% Fee Solo mining at solo.ckpool.org -ck
|
|
|
BlackPrapor
|
|
July 31, 2012, 10:25:14 AM |
|
Here are the results I've got for both miners running around 45k shares across 3 longpolls both:
|
There is no place like 127.0.0.1 In blockchain we trust
|
|
|
-ck (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4298
Merit: 1645
Ruu \o/
|
|
July 31, 2012, 10:32:54 AM |
|
Here are the results I've got for both miners running around 45k shares across 3 longpolls both: Unfortunately this is ONLY over 2 longpolls as can be seen by NB being 3, but that's enough to tell there's a difference. The more longpolls, the greater the difference. Summary: Jesusminer Hashrate 51.8GH (51.4U recognised) Rejects: 85 U: 718.3cgminer Hashrate 51.8GH Rejects: 30 U:719.5PLONK FUD DEBUNKED The fact is that cgminer discards half a work item on average across longpolls with BFL, and it does NOT count that half a work item artificially. So the reject rate is lower by not working on useless work and then submitting it. But the REAL KICKER is that it also does half a useful work item MORE at the same time which is why the utility was actually higher on cgminer. Now once again, luke-jr fuck off with your fud and seriously stay the fuck out of my thread with your horseshit.
|
Developer/maintainer for cgminer, ckpool/ckproxy, and the -ck kernel 2% Fee Solo mining at solo.ckpool.org -ck
|
|
|
farfie
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 63
Merit: 0
|
|
July 31, 2012, 12:32:20 PM |
|
Half an hour so far with no problems on either machine. Going to bed soon, so I'll just lettem do their thing and report in the morning.
Following up on this, everything seems to be great. Across 11 Singles nothing has hung over night, and all measurements seem to be up to par or better. Excellent work.
|
|
|
|
-ck (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4298
Merit: 1645
Ruu \o/
|
|
July 31, 2012, 12:33:43 PM |
|
Half an hour so far with no problems on either machine. Going to bed soon, so I'll just lettem do their thing and report in the morning.
Following up on this, everything seems to be great. Across 11 Singles nothing has hung over night, and all measurements seem to be up to par or better. Excellent work. Thanks for the feedback. I'm quite sure other bugs for BFL have crept in since 2.5.0 as well, but at least one major one was quashed.
|
Developer/maintainer for cgminer, ckpool/ckproxy, and the -ck kernel 2% Fee Solo mining at solo.ckpool.org -ck
|
|
|
farfie
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 63
Merit: 0
|
|
July 31, 2012, 12:45:46 PM |
|
Thanks for the feedback. I'm quite sure other bugs for BFL have crept in since 2.5.0 as well, but at least one major one was quashed.
I will keep a steady eye on the miners, and they will also be introduced to a couple mini rigs later today as well The timing is almost kind of creepy, but here's hoping to a smooth experience.
|
|
|
|
ddd1
|
|
July 31, 2012, 12:52:28 PM |
|
I'm on windows 7 and cgminer 2.5.0
Should I update to a newer cgminer?
|
|
|
|
-ck (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4298
Merit: 1645
Ruu \o/
|
|
July 31, 2012, 12:54:39 PM |
|
I'm on windows 7 and cgminer 2.5.0
Should I update to a newer cgminer?
Only if you don't have any BFLs at this stage.
|
Developer/maintainer for cgminer, ckpool/ckproxy, and the -ck kernel 2% Fee Solo mining at solo.ckpool.org -ck
|
|
|
|