Bitcoin Forum
April 19, 2024, 04:24:41 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 26.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 [266] 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 ... 843 »
  Print  
Author Topic: OFFICIAL CGMINER mining software thread for linux/win/osx/mips/arm/r-pi 4.11.1  (Read 5805205 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic. (3 posts by 1+ user deleted.)
-ck (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4088
Merit: 1630


Ruu \o/


View Profile WWW
May 03, 2012, 12:35:00 PM
 #5301

Darn, didn't try benchmark. Presumably that b0rk with the networking upgrade.

Developer/maintainer for cgminer, ckpool/ckproxy, and the -ck kernel
2% Fee Solo mining at solo.ckpool.org
-ck
1713543881
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1713543881

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1713543881
Reply with quote  #2

1713543881
Report to moderator
1713543881
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1713543881

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1713543881
Reply with quote  #2

1713543881
Report to moderator
The Bitcoin network protocol was designed to be extremely flexible. It can be used to create timed transactions, escrow transactions, multi-signature transactions, etc. The current features of the client only hint at what will be possible in the future.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1713543881
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1713543881

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1713543881
Reply with quote  #2

1713543881
Report to moderator
1713543881
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1713543881

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1713543881
Reply with quote  #2

1713543881
Report to moderator
1713543881
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1713543881

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1713543881
Reply with quote  #2

1713543881
Report to moderator
ancow
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 373
Merit: 100


View Profile WWW
May 03, 2012, 01:17:42 PM
 #5302

Yes but then that would make it hard for someone to do what this user just did: copy over the bin files from 2.3.6 to get the benefit from before they fucked up their SDK installation.

You're right.  You probably would need an SDK version in there as well.  Even then there might be people upgrading SDK and cgminer (without versioned bins) to one with versioned bins, and still get a mismatch.  But over time, SDK-cgminer versions in the bins might be the ticket.  Just an idea might be worth considering.

I don't think it is. After all, then you'd have an even harder time getting the precompiled bins ckolivas provides (assuming he still does) to run on a less optimal SDK version. This way, at least you can get a faster .bin without having to fuck up your system trying to install different SDKs.

BTC: 1GAHTMdBN4Yw3PU66sAmUBKSXy2qaq2SF4
-ck (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4088
Merit: 1630


Ruu \o/


View Profile WWW
May 03, 2012, 01:19:23 PM
 #5303

You're right.  You probably would need an SDK version in there as well.  Even then there might be people upgrading SDK and cgminer (without versioned bins) to one with versioned bins, and still get a mismatch.  But over time, SDK-cgminer versions in the bins might be the ticket.  Just an idea might be worth considering.
I've actually considered it in the past but the limitation was the way the SDK reported back its version: "OpenCL 1.1 AMD-APP (844.4)" for example. It's a rather long name to add to the filename and doesn't say anything about SDK 2.6, and each of linux, windows, 32, 64 bit have different versions as well (by the way cgminer tries to detect each of them but the list is getting longer every day). The only purpose it would serve is debugging for me on the forum when someone says their hashrate is slow. However, if their hashrate is slow, I can say with 101% certainty they're on SDK 2.6 or later.

Developer/maintainer for cgminer, ckpool/ckproxy, and the -ck kernel
2% Fee Solo mining at solo.ckpool.org
-ck
-ck (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4088
Merit: 1630


Ruu \o/


View Profile WWW
May 03, 2012, 01:26:47 PM
 #5304

I don't think it is. After all, then you'd have an even harder time getting the precompiled bins ckolivas provides (assuming he still does) to run on a less optimal SDK version. This way, at least you can get a faster .bin without having to fuck up your system trying to install different SDKs.
I stopped collecting these because the number of downloads was very small and I removed the directory. Part of the reason i was collecting them was that long term bug where it would fail to build the kernel .bin files (due to amazing AMD stupidity on a scale I could never have imagined). That bug has since been fixed.

Developer/maintainer for cgminer, ckpool/ckproxy, and the -ck kernel
2% Fee Solo mining at solo.ckpool.org
-ck
xzion
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 96
Merit: 10


View Profile
May 03, 2012, 02:34:42 PM
 #5305

I use cgminer-2.3.6 on my HD 5870 and received 460-462 Mh/s.
In the new version cgminer-2.4.0 was just 418 Mh/s.
Sys. Win7x64 + OpenCl from AMD Catalyst 12.5 Beta http://www.ngohq.com/home.php?page=Files&go=giveme&dwn_id=1624

Maybe, you should pay attention to the new drivers and optimize a new version of CGMINER
Wrong, you should downgrade your driver and read the FAQ.

the shit you go through for this software, man, i don't know how you do it.
have a couple more btc for your troubles.

Tips: 1xzionJBueq1AkPSmexA7suWkztAkNwSs
Epoch
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 922
Merit: 1003



View Profile
May 03, 2012, 02:36:22 PM
Last edit: May 03, 2012, 03:06:46 PM by Epoch
 #5306

NEW VERSION: 2.4.0 - May 3, 2012

Failing BFL won't cause cgminer to stop; it'll just disable the device, which an attempt may be made to re-enable it.

I'd like clarification on this point, please.

I understand that if cgminer is mining, a Single is unplugged, cgminer will continue mining. What isn't clear from the changelog is what happens when the Single is plugged back in. Will an automatic attempt be made to re-detected it? If so, will cgminer stop trying after some time limit, or will it continue the attempt indefinitely? Or is there something that needs to be done manually in the UI re-enable the device?
ancow
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 373
Merit: 100


View Profile WWW
May 03, 2012, 02:53:49 PM
 #5307

Darn, didn't try benchmark. Presumably that b0rk with the networking upgrade.

Since I'll be out for a while and haven't seen any more commits in a while here's the current git's backtrace:
Code:
Core was generated by `. cgminer -k poclbm --benchmark -I 4'.
Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault.
#0  __list_add (next=0x0, prev=0x1ce2bc0, new=0x40edcc8) at elist.h:37
37              next->prev = new;
(gdb) bt
#0  __list_add (next=0x0, prev=0x1ce2bc0, new=0x40edcc8) at elist.h:37
#1  list_add (head=0x1ce2bc0, new=0x40edcc8) at elist.h:53
#2  recruit_curl (pool=0x1ce2ac0) at cgminer.c:1991
#3  pop_curl_entry (pool=0x1ce2ac0) at cgminer.c:2005
#4  0x0000000000409785 in get_work_thread (userdata=0x4146770) at cgminer.c:2046
#5  0x00007fdfb8fa7b50 in start_thread (arg=<optimized out>) at pthread_create.c:304
#6  0x00007fdfb7fb690d in clone () at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/clone.S:112
#7  0x0000000000000000 in ?? ()

This includes https://github.com/ckolivas/cgminer/commit/852f6a0eb02f1c5a715a62e6b1142ca684aa4611 and a clean rebuild. Hopefully it'll help...

BTC: 1GAHTMdBN4Yw3PU66sAmUBKSXy2qaq2SF4
Inaba
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260
Merit: 1000



View Profile WWW
May 03, 2012, 02:56:32 PM
 #5308

It would be nice to have the ability to enable/disable a specific PGA unit.  I have a couple of slow units, but no clue which ones they are on the rack... if I could disable them, at least i could see which light switches off.

If you're searching these lines for a point, you've probably missed it.  There was never anything there in the first place.
fred0
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 349
Merit: 250


View Profile
May 03, 2012, 04:07:36 PM
 #5309

It would be nice to have the ability to enable/disable a specific PGA unit.  I have a couple of slow units, but no clue which ones they are on the rack... if I could disable them, at least i could see which light switches off.
You can do this using the API

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=28402.msg875407#msg875407
twmz
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 737
Merit: 500



View Profile
May 03, 2012, 04:19:54 PM
 #5310

NEW VERSION: 2.4.0 - May 3, 2012

Failing BFL won't cause cgminer to stop; it'll just disable the device, which an attempt may be made to re-enable it.

I'd like clarification on this point, please.

I understand that if cgminer is mining, a Single is unplugged, cgminer will continue mining. What isn't clear from the changelog is what happens when the Single is plugged back in. Will an automatic attempt be made to re-detected it? If so, will cgminer stop trying after some time limit, or will it continue the attempt indefinitely? Or is there something that needs to be done manually in the UI re-enable the device?

This wasn't about unplugging and plugging a device in.  It was about crashes.  If the BFL unit fails at some point (as is happening with one of mine), it used to just die and be dead forever.  Now, it goes into a disabled state and you can attempt to restart it from the API without having to completely restart cgminer.

I don't think anything has changed with hotplug support (i.e. it's still not supported).

Was I helpful?  1TwmzX1wBxNF2qtAJRhdKmi2WyLZ5VHRs
WoT, GPG

Bitrated user: ewal.
Epoch
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 922
Merit: 1003



View Profile
May 03, 2012, 04:34:44 PM
 #5311

This wasn't about unplugging and plugging a device in.  It was about crashes.  If the BFL unit fails at some point (as is happening with one of mine), it used to just die and be dead forever.  Now, it goes into a disabled state and you can attempt to restart it from the API without having to completely restart cgminer.

I don't think anything has changed with hotplug support (i.e. it's still not supported).
From your description I assume you are running Linux. I'm on Windows, where cgminer 2.3.6 quits to the command prompt if a BFL dies. I'll have to do some testing of 2.4.0 to characterize its new behavior before general deployment.

Currently I launch 2.3.6 from a (Windows) batch file containing a loop; if a BFL unit dies, 2.3.6 exists and the batch file simply restarts it automatically. Works well for me, which is why I hesitate to jump onto 2.4.0 without first understanding its changed behavior.

Regarding cgminer's API, anyone have experience using it under Windows?
jddebug
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 446
Merit: 250



View Profile
May 03, 2012, 04:48:24 PM
Last edit: May 03, 2012, 05:50:56 PM by jddebug
 #5312

Problem with version 2.4.0 that has been reported by one other than me.

If cgminer switches to your configured backup pool, it will not switch back on its own. At least for 2 of us.

FYI

EDIT: My config was set to --failover-only in case that has something to do with the bug.
DutchBrat
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 868
Merit: 1000


View Profile
May 03, 2012, 05:14:16 PM
 #5313

Problem with version 2.4.0 that has been reported by one other than me.

If cgminer switches to your configured backup pool, it will not switch back on its own. At least for 2 of us.

FYI

I experienced that on 1 of 7 mining rigs

All have the same setup, all were running 2.4.0.

So not sure what the trigger was for this to happen

All WinXp 12.4 58XX series
bulanula
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 518
Merit: 500



View Profile
May 03, 2012, 05:56:11 PM
 #5314

I use cgminer-2.3.6 on my HD 5870 and received 460-462 Mh/s.
In the new version cgminer-2.4.0 was just 418 Mh/s.
Sys. Win7x64 + OpenCl from AMD Catalyst 12.5 Beta http://www.ngohq.com/home.php?page=Files&go=giveme&dwn_id=1624

Maybe, you should pay attention to the new drivers and optimize a new version of CGMINER

How the hell are you getting 460 MHash/s on a 5870 Shocked ?

Cobra
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 289
Merit: 250



View Profile
May 03, 2012, 06:30:59 PM
 #5315

Very happy with 2.4 here.

For the longest time I had stuck to using 2.1.2 on a Win7 rig with (2) 5970's at 830/300. with -I 9, -w 256, -k phatk making 380 Mh/sec per core. It seemed as soon as I would upgrade past that version with no other changes it would drop me down to 330 Mh/sec per core. At first I thought it was because intensity of first gpu was dynamic (main daily driver PC) but changing to 9 on that had no effect.

On 2.4 simply using Diablo kernel instead I am up to 372/core which I am satisfied with. So many new changes since 2.1.2, if there are any holdouts out there I urge you to upgrade, it is worth it, you just may need to change kernels. On the old version BAMT would only see 1 of my cards via cgsnoop, that is now working properly and seeing both.

Time to donate again, 1BTC sent, keep up the great work.
DutchBrat
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 868
Merit: 1000


View Profile
May 03, 2012, 06:42:07 PM
 #5316

Just happened to another one of my rigs

My main pool shows as disabled, mining on my 1st backup pool, while the other rigs mine happily on my main pool

So second time today with 2 different rigs

Code:
 cgminer version 2.4.0 - Started: [2012-05-03 10:31:14]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 (5s):312.0 (avg):302.1 Mh/s | Q:4804  A:2429  R:149  HW:0  E:51%  U:4.0/m
 TQ: 1  ST: 3  SS: 50  DW: 1276  NB: 77  LW: 5384  GF: 26  RF: 26
 Connected to http://pool.ABCPool.co:8332 with LP as user XXXXXX
 Block: 000004aaff274ef6bfc969765f953f1a...  Started: [20:33:38]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 [P]ool management [G]PU management [S]ettings [D]isplay options [Q]uit
 GPU 0:  73.0C 2391RPM | 311.8/302.1Mh/s | A:2429 R:149 HW:0 U: 4.00/m I: 6
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

0: Disabled Alive Priority 0: http://pool.bonuspool.co.cc:80  User:XXXX
1: Enabled Alive Priority 1: http://pool.ABCPool.co:8332  User:XXX
2: Enabled Alive Priority 2: http://pit.deepbit.net:8332  User:XXXX
3: Enabled Alive Priority 3: http://mine2.btcguild.com:8332  User:XXXXX

Current pool management strategy: Failover
[A]dd pool [R]emove pool [D]isable pool [E]nable pool
[C]hange management strategy [S]witch pool [I]nformation
Or press any other key to continue


Any idea what's causing this CKolivas ?
MrTeal
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1274
Merit: 1004


View Profile
May 03, 2012, 08:05:17 PM
 #5317

Would it be possible to get an option to reset the stats (queued/accepted/stales and all that) without having to restart CGMiner?
-ck (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4088
Merit: 1630


Ruu \o/


View Profile WWW
May 03, 2012, 08:58:33 PM
 #5318

Just happened to another one of my rigs

My main pool shows as disabled, mining on my 1st backup pool, while the other rigs mine happily on my main pool

So second time today with 2 different rigs

Code:
 cgminer version 2.4.0 - Started: [2012-05-03 10:31:14]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 (5s):312.0 (avg):302.1 Mh/s | Q:4804  A:2429  R:149  HW:0  E:51%  U:4.0/m
 TQ: 1  ST: 3  SS: 50  DW: 1276  NB: 77  LW: 5384  GF: 26  RF: 26
 Connected to http://pool.ABCPool.co:8332 with LP as user XXXXXX
 Block: 000004aaff274ef6bfc969765f953f1a...  Started: [20:33:38]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 [P]ool management [G]PU management [S]ettings [D]isplay options [Q]uit
 GPU 0:  73.0C 2391RPM | 311.8/302.1Mh/s | A:2429 R:149 HW:0 U: 4.00/m I: 6
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

0: Disabled Alive Priority 0: http://pool.bonuspool.co.cc:80  User:XXXX
1: Enabled Alive Priority 1: http://pool.ABCPool.co:8332  User:XXX
2: Enabled Alive Priority 2: http://pit.deepbit.net:8332  User:XXXX
3: Enabled Alive Priority 3: http://mine2.btcguild.com:8332  User:XXXXX

Current pool management strategy: Failover
[A]dd pool [R]emove pool [D]isable pool [E]nable pool
[C]hange management strategy [S]witch pool [I]nformation
Or press any other key to continue


Any idea what's causing this CKolivas ?
Presumably that's the code that disables a pool if you get many sequential rejects in a row, suggesting something is wrong with the pool rather than at your end. You must have at least 10 shares rejected in a row and it must be more than your hashrate per minute and they must be sequential and all from the same pool for this to happen. So something bad must have happened for it to have shut it off. Note there is a -
--no-pool-disable   Do not automatically disable pools that continually reject shares

Developer/maintainer for cgminer, ckpool/ckproxy, and the -ck kernel
2% Fee Solo mining at solo.ckpool.org
-ck
-ck (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4088
Merit: 1630


Ruu \o/


View Profile WWW
May 03, 2012, 09:15:12 PM
 #5319

I use cgminer-2.3.6 on my HD 5870 and received 460-462 Mh/s.
In the new version cgminer-2.4.0 was just 418 Mh/s.
Sys. Win7x64 + OpenCl from AMD Catalyst 12.5 Beta http://www.ngohq.com/home.php?page=Files&go=giveme&dwn_id=1624

Maybe, you should pay attention to the new drivers and optimize a new version of CGMINER
Wrong, you should downgrade your driver and read the FAQ.

the shit you go through for this software, man, i don't know how you do it.
have a couple more btc for your troubles.
Thanks a lot.

So far the fallout for a fairly substantial version upgrade hasn't been too bad.

Developer/maintainer for cgminer, ckpool/ckproxy, and the -ck kernel
2% Fee Solo mining at solo.ckpool.org
-ck
DutchBrat
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 868
Merit: 1000


View Profile
May 03, 2012, 09:24:12 PM
 #5320

Just happened to another one of my rigs

My main pool shows as disabled, mining on my 1st backup pool, while the other rigs mine happily on my main pool

So second time today with 2 different rigs

Code:
 cgminer version 2.4.0 - Started: [2012-05-03 10:31:14]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 (5s):312.0 (avg):302.1 Mh/s | Q:4804  A:2429  R:149  HW:0  E:51%  U:4.0/m
 TQ: 1  ST: 3  SS: 50  DW: 1276  NB: 77  LW: 5384  GF: 26  RF: 26
 Connected to http://pool.ABCPool.co:8332 with LP as user XXXXXX
 Block: 000004aaff274ef6bfc969765f953f1a...  Started: [20:33:38]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 [P]ool management [G]PU management [S]ettings [D]isplay options [Q]uit
 GPU 0:  73.0C 2391RPM | 311.8/302.1Mh/s | A:2429 R:149 HW:0 U: 4.00/m I: 6
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

0: Disabled Alive Priority 0: http://pool.bonuspool.co.cc:80  User:XXXX
1: Enabled Alive Priority 1: http://pool.ABCPool.co:8332  User:XXX
2: Enabled Alive Priority 2: http://pit.deepbit.net:8332  User:XXXX
3: Enabled Alive Priority 3: http://mine2.btcguild.com:8332  User:XXXXX

Current pool management strategy: Failover
[A]dd pool [R]emove pool [D]isable pool [E]nable pool
[C]hange management strategy [S]witch pool [I]nformation
Or press any other key to continue


Any idea what's causing this CKolivas ?
Presumably that's the code that disables a pool if you get many sequential rejects in a row, suggesting something is wrong with the pool rather than at your end. You must have at least 10 shares rejected in a row and it must be more than your hashrate per minute and they must be sequential and all from the same pool for this to happen. So something bad must have happened for it to have shut it off. Note there is a -
--no-pool-disable   Do not automatically disable pools that continually reject shares


Ah thanks, that explains it !
Pages: « 1 ... 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 [266] 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 ... 843 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!