Buchi-88
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3906
Merit: 2624
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 25, 2014, 10:06:14 PM |
|
@choklivas THX for the new version, i will test and report ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) regards
|
|
|
|
tuanvie
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 26, 2014, 04:22:55 PM |
|
win 7 x86 if it works stable? I often have problems: (
|
|
|
|
os2sam
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3582
Merit: 1094
Think for yourself
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 26, 2014, 04:36:02 PM |
|
win 7 x86 if it works stable? I often have problems: (
Is that a question or a statement? If your asking if CGMiner works with 32 bit Windoze 7? The answer is yes.
|
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
|
|
|
tuanvie
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 26, 2014, 05:18:23 PM |
|
win 7 x86 if it works stable? I often have problems: (
Is that a question or a statement? If your asking if CGMiner works with 32 bit Windoze 7? The answer is yes. I mean, I often fail to use it on win 7 x86, and if you can help command for maximum performance?
|
|
|
|
os2sam
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3582
Merit: 1094
Think for yourself
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 26, 2014, 06:05:10 PM |
|
win 7 x86 if it works stable? I often have problems: (
Is that a question or a statement? If your asking if CGMiner works with 32 bit Windoze 7? The answer is yes. I mean, I often fail to use it on win 7 x86, and if you can help command for maximum performance? Hmm, works fine for me. There is no command to maximize performance for my setup, which is USB BE's and a Jalapeno. I just run CGMiner with the pool stuff and it detects and sets everything for me.
|
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
|
|
|
tadzio
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 26, 2014, 08:04:41 PM |
|
Im running 3x Bi*Furry on powered USB HUB - power is sufficient. Randomly (after 10m - 4h) I get: BXF 2 BXFWork usb write err:(-7) LIBUSB_ERROR_TIMEOUT and miner crushes (WIN 7). Any idea?
|
|
|
|
-ck (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4214
Merit: 1644
Ruu \o/
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 26, 2014, 09:33:04 PM Last edit: May 26, 2014, 10:23:25 PM by ckolivas |
|
Im running 3x Bi*Furry on powered USB HUB - power is sufficient. Randomly (after 10m - 4h) I get: BXF 2 BXFWork usb write err:(-7) LIBUSB_ERROR_TIMEOUT and miner crushes (WIN 7). Any idea? That is a sign of hardware instability, not software. If you're 100% sure you have enough power (and most people don't have as much as they think they have) then the next thing to do is actively cool them better. EDIT: Do you mean "crashes" when you say "crushes"? In that case you may be able to help by running a debug version and following the instructions in here: http://ck.kolivas.org/apps/cgminer/debug/Read the README-debug file.
|
Developer/maintainer for cgminer, ckpool/ckproxy, and the -ck kernel 2% Fee Solo mining at solo.ckpool.org -ck
|
|
|
tadzio
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 27, 2014, 05:10:27 AM |
|
Im running 3x Bi*Furry on powered USB HUB - power is sufficient. Randomly (after 10m - 4h) I get: BXF 2 BXFWork usb write err:(-7) LIBUSB_ERROR_TIMEOUT and miner crushes (WIN 7). Any idea? That is a sign of hardware instability, not software. If you're 100% sure you have enough power (and most people don't have as much as they think they have) then the next thing to do is actively cool them better. EDIT: Do you mean "crashes" when you say "crushes"? In that case you may be able to help by running a debug version and following the instructions in here: http://ck.kolivas.org/apps/cgminer/debug/Read the README-debug file. Hardware is actively cooled and working in air conditioned room - always below 42C. Here is the debug: cgminerBD.exe caused an Access Violation at location 74de9b60 in module msvcrt.dll Reading from location 02ec0000.
Registers: eax=02ebfa1c ebx=02ebff20 ecx=3ffffe87 edx=00000000 esi=02ec0000 edi=02ebf87c eip=74de9b60 esp=02ebf370 ebp=02ebf378 iopl=0 nv up ei pl nz na po nc cs=0023 ss=002b ds=002b es=002b fs=0053 gs=002b efl=00010206
Call stack: 74DE9B60 msvcrt.dll:74DE9B60 memcpy 00449697 cgminerBD.exe:00449697 cgminerBD.exe caused an Access Violation at location 7708e3be in module ntdll.dll Reading from location 2db62da2.
Registers: eax=01ea9058 ebx=01ec1dd8 ecx=003c0000 edx=01ec1dd8 esi=2db62d9e edi=01ec1dd0 eip=7708e3be esp=02a3fc30 ebp=02a3fc64 iopl=0 nv up ei pl nz na pe nc cs=0023 ss=002b ds=002b es=002b fs=0053 gs=002b efl=00010202
Call stack: 7708E3BE ntdll.dll:7708E3BE RtlInitUnicodeString 7708E023 ntdll.dll:7708E023 RtlFreeHeap 74DE98CD msvcrt.dll:74DE98CD free 004947D7 cgminerBD.exe:004947D7 00494FF2 cgminerBD.exe:00494FF2 00495072 cgminerBD.exe:00495072 00490C71 cgminerBD.exe:00490C71 004910C6 cgminerBD.exe:004910C6 00491114 cgminerBD.exe:00491114 004912BB cgminerBD.exe:004912BB 00489F9E cgminerBD.exe:00489F9E 0048A0FC cgminerBD.exe:0048A0FC 0042538D cgminerBD.exe:0042538D 004C015B cgminerBD.exe:004C015B 74DF1287 msvcrt.dll:74DF1287 _itow_s 74DF1328 msvcrt.dll:74DF1328 _endthreadex 759A336A kernel32.dll:759A336A BaseThreadInitThunk 77099F72 ntdll.dll:77099F72 RtlInitializeExceptionChain 77099F45 ntdll.dll:77099F45 RtlInitializeExceptionChain
|
|
|
|
-ck (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4214
Merit: 1644
Ruu \o/
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 27, 2014, 05:13:08 AM |
|
Hardware is actively cooled and working in air conditioned room - always below 42C. Here is the debug: Thanks. There's not much information in that. Did you use the debug cgminer.exe binary from that directory as well?
|
Developer/maintainer for cgminer, ckpool/ckproxy, and the -ck kernel 2% Fee Solo mining at solo.ckpool.org -ck
|
|
|
tadzio
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 27, 2014, 05:55:52 AM |
|
Hardware is actively cooled and working in air conditioned room - always below 42C. Here is the debug: Thanks. There's not much information in that. Did you use the debug cgminer.exe binary from that directory as well? Yes I did. I've run it again. On the miner console I get this: [2014-05-27 07:50:08] BXF 2 BXFWork usb write err:(-7) LIBUSB_ERROR_TIMEOUT [2014-05-27 07:50:14] BXF 2 attempted reset got err:(0) LIBUSB_SUCCESS [2014-05-27 07:50:14] BXF 2: Error 0 sending BXFWork sent 0 of 162
Debug: cgminerDebug.exe caused an Access Violation at location 74de9a24 in module msvcrt.dll Reading from location 7881399c.
Registers: eax=00000001 ebx=00000000 ecx=74616368 edx=00000003 esi=78813999 edi=78813d65 eip=74de9a24 esp=041fd4f0 ebp=041fd4f8 iopl=0 nv up ei pl nz na pe nc cs=0023 ss=002b ds=002b es=002b fs=0053 gs=002b efl=00010202
Call stack: 74DE9A24 msvcrt.dll:74DE9A24 memcpy 00449AB1 cgminerDebug.exe:00449AB1 00449F3C cgminerDebug.exe:00449F3C 00465685 cgminerDebug.exe:00465685 00468704 cgminerDebug.exe:00468704 004C015B cgminerDebug.exe:004C015B 74DF1287 msvcrt.dll:74DF1287 _itow_s 74DF1328 msvcrt.dll:74DF1328 _endthreadex 759A336A kernel32.dll:759A336A BaseThreadInitThunk 77099F72 ntdll.dll:77099F72 RtlInitializeExceptionChain 77099F45 ntdll.dll:77099F45 RtlInitializeExceptionChain cgminerDebug.exe caused an Access Violation at location 74de9b60 in module msvcrt.dll Reading from location 3429275a.
Registers: eax=02f9f8c2 ebx=02f9ff20 ecx=33b4345a edx=00000000 esi=3429275a edi=02f9f234 eip=74de9b60 esp=02f9f0f0 ebp=02f9f0f8 iopl=0 nv up ei pl nz na pe nc cs=0023 ss=002b ds=002b es=002b fs=0053 gs=002b efl=00010202
Call stack: 74DE9B60 msvcrt.dll:74DE9B60 memcpy 00449697 cgminerDebug.exe:00449697 0044A5AE cgminerDebug.exe:0044A5AE 004654E6 cgminerDebug.exe:004654E6 00469933 cgminerDebug.exe:00469933 00469A35 cgminerDebug.exe:00469A35 0046834A cgminerDebug.exe:0046834A 0046887C cgminerDebug.exe:0046887C 004C015B cgminerDebug.exe:004C015B 74DF1287 msvcrt.dll:74DF1287 _itow_s 74DF1328 msvcrt.dll:74DF1328 _endthreadex 759A336A kernel32.dll:759A336A BaseThreadInitThunk 77099F72 ntdll.dll:77099F72 RtlInitializeExceptionChain 77099F45 ntdll.dll:77099F45 RtlInitializeExceptionChain cgminerDebug.exe caused an Access Violation at location 74de9b60 in module msvcrt.dll Reading from location 77c75ae9.
Registers: eax=0365f822 ebx=0365ff20 ecx=22e7a74e edx=00000001 esi=77c75ae9 edi=0365f194 eip=74de9b60 esp=0365f050 ebp=0365f058 iopl=0 nv up ei pl nz na pe nc cs=0023 ss=002b ds=002b es=002b fs=0053 gs=002b efl=00010202
Call stack: 74DE9B60 msvcrt.dll:74DE9B60 memcpy 00449697 cgminerDebug.exe:00449697 0044A5AE cgminerDebug.exe:0044A5AE 004654E6 cgminerDebug.exe:004654E6 00469933 cgminerDebug.exe:00469933 00469A35 cgminerDebug.exe:00469A35 004691EA cgminerDebug.exe:004691EA 0046982E cgminerDebug.exe:0046982E 0041F641 cgminerDebug.exe:0041F641 0041F976 cgminerDebug.exe:0041F976 004C015B cgminerDebug.exe:004C015B 74DF1287 msvcrt.dll:74DF1287 _itow_s 74DF1328 msvcrt.dll:74DF1328 _endthreadex 759A336A kernel32.dll:759A336A BaseThreadInitThunk 77099F72 ntdll.dll:77099F72 RtlInitializeExceptionChain 77099F45 ntdll.dll:77099F45 RtlInitializeExceptionChain
|
|
|
|
mdude77
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1001
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 28, 2014, 01:17:50 AM |
|
I have two Antminer S2s. Both misbehave the same way with p2pool. Within minutes of pointing them at p2pool, my hashrate drops to 930gh/s or lower.
It shows this way on p2pool, on the S2 LCD, and on the S2 web UI.
It stays this way, or gets worse, as time goes by. I've run against p2pool for days this way trying different things, and the result is always the same. Yet running on a conventional pool (like Eligius), things run fine immediately and ongoing.
I've tried adjusting my pseudo share size.
I've tried running on a local node, my public node (other side of the country), and at least one other public p2pool node that was close to me.
Since S2s use cgminer, I was hoping a dev might be able to shed some light on this for me.
BTW, my S1s work fine with p2pool. At 1/5 the hashrate, but they do work fine.
I apologize if this has been mentioned already. I stopped following this thread a while ago.
Thanks.
M
|
I mine at Kano's Pool because it pays the best and is completely transparent! Come join me!
|
|
|
kano
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4592
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 28, 2014, 02:45:51 AM |
|
I have two Antminer S2s. Both misbehave the same way with p2pool. Within minutes of pointing them at p2pool, my hashrate drops to 930gh/s or lower.
It shows this way on p2pool, on the S2 LCD, and on the S2 web UI.
It stays this way, or gets worse, as time goes by. I've run against p2pool for days this way trying different things, and the result is always the same. Yet running on a conventional pool (like Eligius), things run fine immediately and ongoing.
I've tried adjusting my pseudo share size.
I've tried running on a local node, my public node (other side of the country), and at least one other public p2pool node that was close to me.
Since S2s use cgminer, I was hoping a dev might be able to shed some light on this for me.
BTW, my S1s work fine with p2pool. At 1/5 the hashrate, but they do work fine.
I apologize if this has been mentioned already. I stopped following this thread a while ago.
Thanks.
M
You are running bitmain's S2 driver. Don't do that on p2pool. Also don't do that with bitmain's S1 driver. Bitmain does some terrible things in their driver including ... discarding stale work in the driver before passing it to the work validation code. This means on p2pool that if you find a stale block that is still a valid network block, it will be discarded. Oh well. Use my driver for S1 if you don't want to throw such valid blocks away on p2pool. My S2 driver is still in development - I'm still trying to work out why the device thinks it's a good idea to have >8000 work items queued in it - more than 30s of work - and to work out how to reduce that without letting it get idle - so I'm still waiting on source code from bitmain. My blackarrow minion RPi driver is able to handle > 2TH/s of work at 1diff verifying every share returned at 1diff. The S2 driver, on a faster BBB, should be able to handle 1TH/s of work at 1diff also. It doesn't. So I need to work out how to fix that - but I need the SPI kernel driver code bitmain wrote, for me to work that out.
|
|
|
|
Killerloop
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 28, 2014, 07:02:34 AM |
|
Hi, I noticed a strange behaviour in my mining equipment: Sometimes out of a sudden I receive BTB: Idled 1 miners for no reason at all. No new block detected by stratum. http://imageshack.com/a/img841/5870/h19c.pngI am running BitBurner stacks with --avalon-auto on GHash.io What are the reasons for "idling" miners at such low temperatures and no block detected? Is something wrong with the equipment? However utility remains pretty high at 22,24 shares/min. Thanks in advance.
|
Loan request: "I need 7 BTC because We hired an archaelogist and asked him: Is there a treasure? And he said yes!"
|
|
|
mdude77
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1001
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 28, 2014, 10:57:58 AM |
|
You are running bitmain's S2 driver. Don't do that on p2pool. Also don't do that with bitmain's S1 driver.
Bitmain does some terrible things in their driver including ... discarding stale work in the driver before passing it to the work validation code. This means on p2pool that if you find a stale block that is still a valid network block, it will be discarded. Oh well.
Use my driver for S1 if you don't want to throw such valid blocks away on p2pool.
Thanks! I also get duplicates on p2pool when using my Ants. I think I only saw that with S2s, though. My S2 driver is still in development - I'm still trying to work out why the device thinks it's a good idea to have >8000 work items queued in it - more than 30s of work - and to work out how to reduce that without letting it get idle - so I'm still waiting on source code from bitmain.
My blackarrow minion RPi driver is able to handle > 2TH/s of work at 1diff verifying every share returned at 1diff. The S2 driver, on a faster BBB, should be able to handle 1TH/s of work at 1diff also. It doesn't. So I need to work out how to fix that - but I need the SPI kernel driver code bitmain wrote, for me to work that out.
I appreciate it! M
|
I mine at Kano's Pool because it pays the best and is completely transparent! Come join me!
|
|
|
kano
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4592
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 28, 2014, 11:10:13 AM |
|
Hi, I noticed a strange behaviour in my mining equipment: Sometimes out of a sudden I receive BTB: Idled 1 miners for no reason at all. No new block detected by stratum. http://imageshack.com/a/img841/5870/h19c.pngI am running BitBurner stacks with --avalon-auto on GHash.io What are the reasons for "idling" miners at such low temperatures and no block detected? Is something wrong with the equipment? However utility remains pretty high at 22,24 shares/min. Thanks in advance. Might mean your network connection had a hiccup. Otherwise, ignore it. I found that message in my cgminer logs 39,007 times with my one BTB board from 12-Sep-2013 until I permanently switched it off on 16-Apr-2014
|
|
|
|
Killerloop
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 28, 2014, 03:21:58 PM |
|
Might mean your network connection had a hiccup. Otherwise, ignore it. I found that message in my cgminer logs 39,007 times with my one BTB board from 12-Sep-2013 until I permanently switched it off on 16-Apr-2014
Hmm this is weird... I restarted CGMiner, the problem no longer shows up and hashrate has increased. Could be a memory leak? I'm taking a look.
|
Loan request: "I need 7 BTC because We hired an archaelogist and asked him: Is there a treasure? And he said yes!"
|
|
|
Taugeran
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 28, 2014, 04:01:02 PM |
|
Hi, I noticed a strange behaviour in my mining equipment: Sometimes out of a sudden I receive BTB: Idled 1 miners for no reason at all. No new block detected by stratum. http://imageshack.com/a/img841/5870/h19c.pngI am running BitBurner stacks with --avalon-auto on GHash.io What are the reasons for "idling" miners at such low temperatures and no block detected? Is something wrong with the equipment? However utility remains pretty high at 22,24 shares/min. Thanks in advance. Might mean your network connection had a hiccup. Otherwise, ignore it. I found that message in my cgminer logs 39,007 times with my one BTB board from 12-Sep-2013 until I permanently switched it off on 16-Apr-2014 Any interest in selling said bitburner fury?
|
Bitfury HW & Habañero : 1.625Th/s tips/Donations: 1NoS89H3Mr6U5CmP4VwWzU2318JEMxHL1 Come join Coinbase
|
|
|
kano
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4592
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 29, 2014, 01:08:46 AM |
|
Hi, I noticed a strange behaviour in my mining equipment: Sometimes out of a sudden I receive BTB: Idled 1 miners for no reason at all. No new block detected by stratum. http://imageshack.com/a/img841/5870/h19c.pngI am running BitBurner stacks with --avalon-auto on GHash.io What are the reasons for "idling" miners at such low temperatures and no block detected? Is something wrong with the equipment? However utility remains pretty high at 22,24 shares/min. Thanks in advance. Might mean your network connection had a hiccup. Otherwise, ignore it. I found that message in my cgminer logs 39,007 times with my one BTB board from 12-Sep-2013 until I permanently switched it off on 16-Apr-2014 Any interest in selling said bitburner fury? It's not a fury.
|
|
|
|
Killerloop
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 29, 2014, 06:29:03 AM |
|
It's not a fury.
Yes it is... BitBurner Fury Rev 1.1
|
Loan request: "I need 7 BTC because We hired an archaelogist and asked him: Is there a treasure? And he said yes!"
|
|
|
kano
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4592
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 29, 2014, 06:50:01 AM |
|
It's not a fury.
Yes it is... BitBurner Fury Rev 1.1 Mine isn't
|
|
|
|
|