SRBMiner Cryptonight AMD GPU Miner V1.9.3 - native algo switching

[gazu]

Who's got a hd 6950 and can test something for me?

I have, I do not speak English but I use the translator

[kostepanych2]

What location should I use in the pool file if I don't know where the pool is located?

[iwm]

Hi there!

Trying new 1.4.1 version and it have a strange bug - in pools.txt config I can't use DOT on the wallet string. Trying to make Nanopool <address>.<paymentID>.<rig_name>, but with DOT miner doesn't work. Devs, please, fix this bug! Thx!  

[cirlama]

thanks doktor for this miner (and I like the "iamagreedybastard" option, even if I don't use it!)

Mining heavy with 1xRX480 4 GB + 1xRX580 8 GB, the hashrate reported by the pool starts above 5000 H/S for the 2 cards when I launch the miner and decrease to 1600 H/S in something like 5 minutes... (Win 10, August blockchain driver, SRBMiner V1.4.1)

On the miner window, hashrate is always around 1600 H/S but I can clearly see that just after starting, it displays "pool accepted result xxxx" very fast corrsponding to higher hashrate and then the pace slowly decrease...

Any idea?

[Metroid]

After 7 hours I’ve got 9 hw errors and 17 block expires on nanopool. Is this normal? What’s most worrying are those hw errors. HWinfo reports no errors, though. Really appreciate your opinions.

expired block means the share you sent got old because the block expired in the meantime.
Hw error means gpu result did not pass cpu validation. So if you want try lowering intensity, or mem clock for ex.

Is it different than stale shares? I wonder what could be expired block, stales shares mean you send the work/share/result after the block was found.

[Boba_Fett]

There is a big problem since version 1.4.0, I have only pool rejected results (low difficulty share).

No problem with version 1.3.2

[alikait]

There is a big problem since version 1.4.0, I have only pool rejected results (low difficulty share).

No problem with version 1.3.2

I had the same problem but figured it out, it was because the information for pools has now moved to the pools file, the config file no long holds the pool information

[Boba_Fett]

There is a big problem since version 1.4.0, I have only pool rejected results (low difficulty share).

No problem with version 1.3.2

I had the same problem but figured it out, it was because the information for pools has now moved to the pools file, the config file no long holds the pool information

Ok thank you !

[ALEX_RAA]

is it possible to get same hashrate on HEAVY algo like normalV7?
for example: at normalv7 one of my rigs (5xRX570 4gb) do ~5000h/s +/- (SRBminer) but on heavy i get only ~3500h/s

[peterboy1]

is it possible to get same hashrate on HEAVY algo like normalV7?
for example: at normalv7 one of my rigs (5xRX570 4gb) do ~5000h/s +/- (SRBminer) but on heavy i get only ~3500h/s

no. its made and called heavy for a reason. everyone will experience the same, so you are not behind.

[typerc]

thanks doktor for this miner (and I like the "iamagreedybastard" option, even if I don't use it!)

So about the dev pool mining. My 3 Vega rig never gets to submit any shares in the minute it is donating. Does it even help the devs when that happens?

I've noticed the same thing... I'd rather use iamagreedybastard and just donate directly to make sure you end up with something...

doktor83 you should list all your wallet addresses in the first post.

[crocozino]

well, all read all replies  and reviews about hashrate carefully, it seems you did a god miner!
though I have a question, I'm mining now turtle coin and it seems it have a little different algo? will your miner support it?

p.s. just a small feedback, I have a rig basen on ryzen cpu and 5 x rx570 GPUs and it is very convenient that xmr stack can utilize all these units by one miner..
can you add CPU support?! ))

[CryptoPlay]

is it possible to get same hashrate on HEAVY algo like normalV7?
for example: at normalv7 one of my rigs (5xRX570 4gb) do ~5000h/s +/- (SRBminer) but on heavy i get only ~3500h/s

no. its made and called heavy for a reason. everyone will experience the same, so you are not behind.

It is expected lower hash but there are some RX580 8GB users reporting same hash....

[typerc]

well, all read all replies  and reviews about hashrate carefully, it seems you did a god miner!
though I have a question, I'm mining now turtle coin and it seems it have a little different algo? will your miner support it?

p.s. just a small feedback, I have a rig basen on ryzen cpu and 5 x rx570 GPUs and it is very convenient that xmr stack can utilize all these units by one miner..
can you add CPU support?! ))

Turtlecoin (TRTL) algo: CryptoNiteLite V1 which SRBminer already supports. Just input "lite" as the cryptonight_type in the config file for Turtlecoin

[Dmitry69]

hi all. Cтpaннaя cитyaция, y мeня pиг из 4xRX460(4GB)+1RX560(4GB)+1RX550(2GB). Ha Claymore 11.3 нa  4xRX460 - 430H/s, RX560 - 450H/s и RX550 - 417H/s. Ha SRBMiner RX550 - 468H/s, нo тpи из RX460 пo ~415H/s. Чтo зa?
Кoнфигypaция для вcex кapт "intensity" : 0, "worksize" : 8, "threads" : 2}
RX460 и RX560 интeнcивнocть выбpaнa - 54, для RX550 - 22.
Пoкa зaпycкaю нa pигe Claymore 11.3 для GPU 460 и 560, a RSB тoлькo для 550.

hi all. Strange situation, I have a rig of 4xRX460 (4GB) + 1RX560 (4GB) + 1RX550 (2GB). At Claymore 11.3 at 4xRX460 - 430H / s, RX560 - 450H / s and RX550 - 417H / s. The SRBMiner RX550 has 468H / s, but three of the RX460 have ~ 415H / s. What the?
The configuration for all maps is "intensity": 0, "worksize": 8, "threads": 2}
RX460 and RX560, the intensity is selected - 54, for the RX550 - 22.
So far I'm running Claymore 11.3 for the GPU 460 and 560, and RSB for only 550.
https://d.radikal.ru/d23/1804/f2/6a433f7c4d26.png
https://d.radikal.ru/d19/1804/5c/2dcd2f23153c.png

[crocozino]

well, all read all replies  and reviews about hashrate carefully, it seems you did a god miner!
though I have a question, I'm mining now turtle coin and it seems it have a little different algo? will your miner support it?

p.s. just a small feedback, I have a rig basen on ryzen cpu and 5 x rx570 GPUs and it is very convenient that xmr stack can utilize all these units by one miner..
can you add CPU support?! ))

Turtlecoin (TRTL) algo: CryptoNiteLite V1 which SRBminer already supports. Just input "lite" as the cryptonight_type in the config file for Turtlecoin

oh, I see! thank you!

[ALEX_RAA]

is it possible to get same hashrate on HEAVY algo like normalV7?
for example: at normalv7 one of my rigs (5xRX570 4gb) do ~5000h/s +/- (SRBminer) but on heavy i get only ~3500h/s

no. its made and called heavy for a reason. everyone will experience the same, so you are not behind.

thnx

[murgorx]

I dont know what to believe atm, but the miner is showing 4500h/s and the pool with 400h/s more and thats for the past 48 hours,  give or take a few! Nice work, doktore

[doktor83]

V1.4.2
- Double checked and prepared for IPBC coin fork on block 54881
- Small speedup on some RX series cards
- Small speedup on R9 380 cards

Tomorrow IPBC will fork to their new algo, called ultraheavy (which isn't really ultraheavy anymore, altough it was in the first test period).
Get prepared, you can test it on their testnet with this config :

config.txt:

{
"cryptonight_type" : "ultraheavy",
"intensity" : 0,
"double_threads" : false,
"target_temperature" : 0
}

pools.txt:

{
"pools" :
[
   {"pool_use_tls" : false, "pool" : "54.37.94.172:5555", "wallet" : "bxdSJiR35QuSDyjAmS1Ud1H8pzCzyFuuybWyFNv8nhFiKQhur6auKYSAe6UGv4XUfwPj1CcE6mZtKhW SATXzUf3o21poG9YH1", "password" : "x", "location" : "europe"}
]
}

[AcidKiss]

Im having problem with the miner while trying to connect to dev pool. It just seems to be stuck and only shows hash rate again and again and nothing else.
Also it seems to be happen randomly.