Bitcoin Forum
April 27, 2024, 07:22:11 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 [39] 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 ... 363 »
  Print  
Author Topic: SRBMiner Cryptonight AMD GPU Miner V1.9.3 - native algo switching  (Read 237203 times)
dragonmike
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1274
Merit: 556



View Profile
April 16, 2018, 04:17:51 PM
Last edit: April 16, 2018, 04:33:30 PM by dragonmike
 #761

Hi
I'm trying this on my rig of 570's (with ETH strap). Cards are clocked at 1220/1900.
Running these parameters on algo type litev7 (turtle coin)...

{ "id" : 0, "intensity" : 100, "worksize" : 8, "threads" : 2},

...I get quite low hashrates. The GPUs are hovering just over 1000 h/s. Isnt't that low for litev7? Am I not using the right parameters?

EDIT: looks like I found it myself: reduced intensity further to 54 (half of 108, which was automatically selected when setting it at "0"). Now getting hashrates just shy of 1850 per card. That's more like it, isn't it?  Smiley
"The nature of Bitcoin is such that once version 0.1 was released, the core design was set in stone for the rest of its lifetime." -- Satoshi
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1714245731
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714245731

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714245731
Reply with quote  #2

1714245731
Report to moderator
1714245731
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714245731

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714245731
Reply with quote  #2

1714245731
Report to moderator
sundownz
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 714
Merit: 512


View Profile WWW
April 16, 2018, 05:34:35 PM
 #762

Okay guys... I got it... the program at intensity "0" was setting all four cards to "118"

So... I changed GPU-0 to "100" manually and it's working now =)

12% faster than XMR-STAK.

Thanks for the assistance!

just wanted to tell you that set intensities by hand, you can get out probably more hash than just leaving on 0 (auto).
Not every gpu is same, and sometimes auto detected value works great for one, but not an other, same card.

Also try 2 threads per gpu, you will get better results Smiley

Thanks! Gained another 5% with 2 threads =)

For security, your account has been locked. Email acctcomp15@theymos.e4ward.com
cryptosize
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1624
Merit: 296


View Profile
April 16, 2018, 05:40:20 PM
 #763

Hello everyone!

Does this miner support TeraScale/VLIW Radeon GPUs?
christiano88
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 161
Merit: 10


View Profile
April 16, 2018, 06:28:40 PM
 #764

How do I put an address and paymentID for the wallet in this miner?
doktor83 (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 2520
Merit: 626


View Profile WWW
April 16, 2018, 07:41:24 PM
 #765

How do I put an address and paymentID for the wallet in this miner?

depends from pool.
you can find info on every pool how to mine with address and payment id.

For ex :

xmrpool.eu uses this format wallet@paymentid
nanopool uses this format wallet.paymentid

you set this in the wallet parameter in config file

SRBMiner-MULTI thread - HERE
http://www.srbminer.com
doktor83 (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 2520
Merit: 626


View Profile WWW
April 16, 2018, 07:48:11 PM
 #766

Hello everyone!

Does this miner support TeraScale/VLIW Radeon GPUs?

it should work, but you wont get speeds like on old claymore.
Which card do you have?

SRBMiner-MULTI thread - HERE
http://www.srbminer.com
Larvitar
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 196
Merit: 1


View Profile
April 16, 2018, 07:53:16 PM
 #767

Hi dorktor83. I'm stick at your miner, although have AwesomeMiner. Ya, SRBMiner is kicking asses!  Grin

But patrike spoke if SRBMiner has a working API he could add it in AwesomeMiner support (would be great). Do you have plans to make an API for SRBMiner?
doktor83 (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 2520
Merit: 626


View Profile WWW
April 16, 2018, 08:04:22 PM
 #768

Hi dorktor83. I'm stick at your miner, although have AwesomeMiner. Ya, SRBMiner is kicking asses!  Grin

But patrike spoke if SRBMiner has a working API he could add it in AwesomeMiner support (would be great). Do you have plans to make an API for SRBMiner?

thanks Smiley
yes , i have it in plan, smos dev is also waiting on me to make an API Smiley

SRBMiner-MULTI thread - HERE
http://www.srbminer.com
livada
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 417
Merit: 0


View Profile WWW
April 16, 2018, 08:16:22 PM
Last edit: April 16, 2018, 08:50:04 PM by livada
 #769

Good job.
3*Vega 56
Heavy = 4400hr
UltraHeavy = 10500hr
litev7 = 12300hr
v7 = 5850hr

IZVRSTAN posao majstore. Probao sma ga na moneru-sumu-trtl-stl i ipbc i daje bolje rezultate od casta i staka.
npr nikako nisaHAVEN uspio natjerat da mi daje preko 4100 sa 3 vege56 a s tvojim ide i na 4400:) i napokon da povuce malo vise struje Smiley

SUPER POSO si odradio samo nastavi tako..

poz

goodb
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 126
Merit: 0


View Profile
April 16, 2018, 09:06:38 PM
 #770

like some other person also said after 1.4.1 version there is a bug with paymentid.worker/pass   syntax .

Code:

/* Address of you wallet  */
"wallet" : "ExchangeXmrDepositwalletadress.PaymentID.workername/nanopoolpasswordforjsonsettings",


The above configuration is working with version 1.3.1..No problem.

But same config.txt file with same start.bat file in version 1.4.1 (just working start.bat and working config.txt is copied to 1.4.1 folder)..-->   NO HASH on nanopool (today I left opened 6 hours and mined for nothing, shares found in srbminer but , hash on nanopool and balance 0 = zero ! )
alczaty
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 38
Merit: 0


View Profile
April 16, 2018, 10:34:09 PM
 #771

like some other person also said after 1.4.1 version there is a bug with paymentid.worker/pass   syntax .

Code:

/* Address of you wallet  */
"wallet" : "ExchangeXmrDepositwalletadress.PaymentID.workername/nanopoolpasswordforjsonsettings",


The above configuration is working with version 1.3.1..No problem.

But same config.txt file with same start.bat file in version 1.4.1 (just working start.bat and working config.txt is copied to 1.4.1 folder)..-->   NO HASH on nanopool (today I left opened 6 hours and mined for nothing, shares found in srbminer but , hash on nanopool and balance 0 = zero ! )
you must set your wallet adress in pools.txt not in config Smiley
joaocha
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 254
Merit: 100


View Profile
April 16, 2018, 10:38:18 PM
 #772

No linux version?
livada
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 417
Merit: 0


View Profile WWW
April 16, 2018, 11:13:21 PM
 #773

what coin uses this ultraheavy algo?

IPBC will once it forks. Should be in the next few hours.

How is this UltraHeavy??
Results from my test rig IPBC Forked:

RX570/8G-RX570/8G-RX580/4G-RX560/4G-RX560/4G

[2018-04-16 14:12:06] GPU0:    1874.0 H/S [T: 54c, RPM: 1119]
[2018-04-16 14:12:06] GPU1:    1991.0 H/S [T: 55c, RPM: 837]
[2018-04-16 14:12:06] GPU2:    1932.0 H/S [T: 63c, RPM: 1092]
[2018-04-16 14:12:06] GPU3:    816.0 H/S [T: 59c, RPM: 1221]
[2018-04-16 14:12:06] GPU4:    913.0 H/S [T: 59c, RPM: 1195]
[2018-04-16 14:12:06] Total:   7526.0 H/S



4x Vega 56
[2018-04-16 14:19:33] GPU0:    2634.0 H/S [T: 49c, RPM: 2559]
[2018-04-16 14:19:33] GPU1:    2650.0 H/S [T: 49c, RPM: 2879]
[2018-04-16 14:19:33] GPU2:    2648.0 H/S [T: 51c, RPM: 2780]
[2018-04-16 14:19:33] GPU3:    2650.0 H/S [T: 49c, RPM: 2738]

@Bhaal1 - this is for ultra heavy? this is small hr

my 3* vega 56 have this result

lite 540W
https://image.prntscr.com/image/qLdvasSySru4m3Y7yIM2Hg.jpg
lite v7 555W
https://image.prntscr.com/image/z_H7yOz7QYqBMdCHI-Uvpw.jpg
heavy 500W
https://image.prntscr.com/image/fGgcpvG7Qzumfk7yOEB1CQ.jpg
ultraheavy 520W
https://image.prntscr.com/image/5jTb-eaBRNWCm_Aq67iUtw.jpg
oldgnom
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 5
Merit: 0


View Profile
April 16, 2018, 11:34:37 PM
 #774

https://prntscr.com/j66xpa
wtf??? IPBC
alczaty
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 38
Merit: 0


View Profile
April 16, 2018, 11:37:40 PM
 #775

change intensity.
which card ?
bigcoin99
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4
Merit: 0


View Profile
April 16, 2018, 11:44:11 PM
Last edit: April 17, 2018, 12:49:38 AM by bigcoin99
 #776



same problem ... right after dev fee ...
livada
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 417
Merit: 0


View Profile WWW
April 17, 2018, 12:18:31 AM
 #777

IPBC is ultraheavy and work fine
3*vega 56
"intensity" : 235,

ultraheavy 520W
https://image.prntscr.com/image/5jTb-eaBRNWCm_Aq67iUtw.jpg
Gadjan
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 9
Merit: 0


View Profile
April 17, 2018, 01:13:24 AM
 #778

How do I need to enter email address for nanopool notification, where exactly? In the password field password: x:mail... or address.worker/email?
cryptosize
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1624
Merit: 296


View Profile
April 17, 2018, 01:44:07 AM
 #779

Hello everyone!

Does this miner support TeraScale/VLIW Radeon GPUs?

it should work, but you wont get speeds like on old claymore.
Which card do you have?
Radeon 5770 1GB GDDR5.

And yeah, hashing speed is only half compared to Claymore v9.7...
marcos5872
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 107
Merit: 10


View Profile
April 17, 2018, 02:39:41 AM
 #780

hi, 740 h/s for RX 580 4 GB on CN Heavy is a good result???
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 [39] 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 ... 363 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!