solamentezeus
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 14
Merit: 0
|
|
January 02, 2019, 11:54:43 PM |
|
Hey guys, im a lil bit dumb, Im trying to configure OC values in Claymore so I don't use Afterburner, I have gotten everything right so far except for the core volt, lil bit confused, for example in Afterburner I used to set my core volt at "-66" but how do it make it be "-66" in claymore? should it be "-cvddc 340"? thanks in advance for ur replies
if you mean -0.66V than in Claymore's bat file you have to set -cvddc 660 No, do not do this. In claymore you set the voltage value, not the offset. A common setting is -cvddc 850 or -cvddc 900. What I am trying to say is, that in Afterburner the Core Volt standard is at +0, so after I moded my GPU's bios, I always used to place it at "-66" because it was stable for me and GPU's temps were also nice, currently since I'm not using Afterburner anymore I'm having high temps not sure if Claymore isn't recognizing the fan's values I set or the core volt that I didnt specified, so I'm using it at "-cvddc 900" atm but I feel like its not what I want, I'd to make it be the "-66 I set in afterburner" but in Claymore's values Take whatever voltage is set in the gpu's modded bios, subtract 66, and use that number as your claymore parameter. So if the bios sets the core voltage of your highest pstate to 900, you should do -cvddc 834. Alright, thanks a lot bro!
|
|
|
|
Breesus
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 50
Merit: 0
|
|
January 03, 2019, 12:13:20 PM |
|
Quick question: Afterburner doesn't allow me to overclock my rx 470s 4GB above 2100Mhz.
If I set the Memory clock in Claymore, can i go above these limits (I'm thinking ~2150mhz)?
|
|
|
|
big_daddy
|
|
January 03, 2019, 12:54:18 PM |
|
Quick question: Afterburner doesn't allow me to overclock my rx 470s 4GB above 2100Mhz.
If I set the Memory clock in Claymore, can i go above these limits (I'm thinking ~2150mhz)?
better not, your card will become unstable or broken, those clocks are too high for an 4GB card
|
If you don't believe it or don't get it, I don't have the time to try to convince you, sorry.
|
|
|
Breesus
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 50
Merit: 0
|
|
January 03, 2019, 01:43:08 PM |
|
Quick question: Afterburner doesn't allow me to overclock my rx 470s 4GB above 2100Mhz.
If I set the Memory clock in Claymore, can i go above these limits (I'm thinking ~2150mhz)?
better not, your card will become unstable or broken, those clocks are too high for an 4GB card Ok, thanks for the heads up !
|
|
|
|
androstan1234
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 251
Merit: 6
|
|
January 03, 2019, 02:15:34 PM |
|
Hey guys, im a lil bit dumb, Im trying to configure OC values in Claymore so I don't use Afterburner, I have gotten everything right so far except for the core volt, lil bit confused, for example in Afterburner I used to set my core volt at "-66" but how do it make it be "-66" in claymore? should it be "-cvddc 340"? thanks in advance for ur replies
if you mean -0.66V than in Claymore's bat file you have to set -cvddc 660 No, do not do this. In claymore you set the voltage value, not the offset. A common setting is -cvddc 850 or -cvddc 900. What I am trying to say is, that in Afterburner the Core Volt standard is at +0, so after I moded my GPU's bios, I always used to place it at "-66" because it was stable for me and GPU's temps were also nice, currently since I'm not using Afterburner anymore I'm having high temps not sure if Claymore isn't recognizing the fan's values I set or the core volt that I didnt specified, so I'm using it at "-cvddc 900" atm but I feel like its not what I want, I'd to make it be the "-66 I set in afterburner" but in Claymore's values Take whatever voltage is set in the gpu's modded bios, subtract 66, and use that number as your claymore parameter. So if the bios sets the core voltage of your highest pstate to 900, you should do -cvddc 834. Alright, thanks a lot bro! One other thing. You may need to set -mvddc 834. This can help on some cards in my experience.
|
|
|
|
br2459
|
|
January 04, 2019, 04:51:57 AM |
|
So question for you guys. Is anyone still mining ETH with a 3GB card or has that ship already sailed since DAG #231? Of course this is using Claymore V12.
|
|
|
|
thameur
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 30
Merit: 0
|
|
January 04, 2019, 10:03:25 AM |
|
My confid with Claymore 12.0 & Asus RX580 4GB 1 - AMD Driver 18.12.x (Newest) 2 - AMD ATI Pixel Clock Patcher atikmdag v1.4.6 3 - Claymore 12.0 4 - compute mod - on => AMD-Compute-Switcher for switch automatically to compute mode (at: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2815803.0) 5 - Reset computer and working fine now. Hi have you any idea about asus strix r9 390 8g
|
|
|
|
ildotoress
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 77
Merit: 0
|
|
January 04, 2019, 10:08:40 PM |
|
@Claymore, are you working on a ProgPow miner? As it seems it's coming to Ethereum in about 4 months if there will be no issues.
|
|
|
|
astraleureka
Member
Offline
Activity: 236
Merit: 16
|
|
January 04, 2019, 10:12:01 PM |
|
Yes, the ProgPoW thread confirmed that Claymore will be implementing support.
|
|
|
|
RuMiner
Member
Offline
Activity: 168
Merit: 15
|
|
January 04, 2019, 10:18:48 PM |
|
@astraleureka I've scrolled through Claymore's last posts and found no confirmation (
|
|
|
|
Set Ready Go
Member
Offline
Activity: 273
Merit: 17
|
|
January 05, 2019, 12:13:28 AM |
|
@astraleureka I've scrolled through Claymore's last posts and found no confirmation (
Yea. But im sure Mr Claymore will update his miner. Like Pele said; " Success is no accident. It is Hard work, perseverance, learning, studying, sacrifice and most of all, love of what you are doing."
|
|
|
|
Bojcha
|
|
January 05, 2019, 09:15:37 AM |
|
My confid with Claymore 12.0 & Asus RX580 4GB 1 - AMD Driver 18.12.x (Newest) 2 - AMD ATI Pixel Clock Patcher atikmdag v1.4.6 3 - Claymore 12.0 4 - compute mod - on => AMD-Compute-Switcher for switch automatically to compute mode (at: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2815803.0) 5 - Reset computer and working fine now. Hi have you any idea about asus strix r9 390 8g 390 does not support compute mode.
|
|
|
|
Claymore (OP)
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1325
Miners developer
|
|
January 05, 2019, 09:16:45 AM |
|
Yes I will update my miner to support ProgPow when ETH will be ready to switch to it.
|
|
|
|
dragonmike
|
|
January 05, 2019, 12:09:09 PM |
|
Yes I will update my miner to support ProgPow when ETH will be ready to switch to it.
Great news! Have we heard any more specifics about the date of the switch? It seems like they have finally come to an agreement about it, just haven't seen anything regarding timelines just yet.
|
|
|
|
j4rd4
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 41
Merit: 0
|
|
January 05, 2019, 02:53:46 PM |
|
Any current tips for using reduced dual-mining fees, i.e. second coin worth to mine today - at least speculatively? I have an electricity plan, where 1/3th of the day the price is pretty low, so I would like to give it a try again, intermittently leastwise.
|
|
|
|
Jonet
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 82
Merit: 3
|
|
January 05, 2019, 04:48:07 PM |
|
ProgPoW: Do anyone know how that will work out for us? Will it close the door on existing Ethash ASIC and force them to go to ETC and other coins? And will that be a significant benefit us? Is it known how much of the total hashrate that is produced on the different hardware platforms? It does not look like the RX580 has the most to gain from ProgPoW...
|
|
|
|
Breesus
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 50
Merit: 0
|
|
January 05, 2019, 04:49:03 PM |
|
Our rig is mining at a steady 175Mh/s hashrate on Claymore (that's the hashrate shown on the claymore miner). No GPU error, no internet connection issue, everything is super smooth. How is it possible that our current effective hashrate as shown on ethermine is ... over 200Mh/s ? More than 25Mh/s than our actual hashrate shown on Claymore. https://imgur.com/MHGqh2i
|
|
|
|
vapourminer
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4466
Merit: 4007
what is this "brake pedal" you speak of?
|
|
January 05, 2019, 05:45:03 PM |
|
Our rig is mining at a steady 175Mh/s hashrate on Claymore (that's the hashrate shown on the claymore miner). No GPU error, no internet connection issue, everything is super smooth. How is it possible that our current effective hashrate as shown on ethermine is ... over 200Mh/s ? More than 25Mh/s than our actual hashrate shown on Claymore. https://imgur.com/MHGqh2ilook at the 6 hour average hashrate.. 174.69 mhs. right in line with claymores estimate. you need the longer term average, the pool only estimates hashrate based on accepted shares. if your miner gets lucky in say a 10 minute period it will seem to the pool to be more powerful during that 10 minute period.
|
|
|
|
thameur
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 30
Merit: 0
|
|
January 05, 2019, 05:48:20 PM |
|
Our rig is mining at a steady 175Mh/s hashrate on Claymore (that's the hashrate shown on the claymore miner). No GPU error, no internet connection issue, everything is super smooth. How is it possible that our current effective hashrate as shown on ethermine is ... over 200Mh/s ? More than 25Mh/s than our actual hashrate shown on Claymore. https://imgur.com/MHGqh2iit's normal maybe you see 160 mhs next time , https://www.coinwarz.com/cryptocurrency
|
|
|
|
big_daddy
|
|
January 05, 2019, 06:18:28 PM |
|
ProgPoW: Do anyone know how that will work out for us? Will it close the door on existing Ethash ASIC and force them to go to ETC and other coins? And will that be a significant benefit us? Is it known how much of the total hashrate that is produced on the different hardware platforms? It does not look like the RX580 has the most to gain from ProgPoW... If will move away the hashrate from, lets call them, asic machines, all the gpu miners will have better revenue
|
If you don't believe it or don't get it, I don't have the time to try to convince you, sorry.
|
|
|
|