Claymore's Dual Ethereum AMD+NVIDIA GPU Miner v15.0 (Windows/Linux)

[Jonet]

ProgPoW: Do anyone know how that will work out for us? Will it close the door on existing Ethash ASIC and force them to go to ETC and other coins?
And will that be a significant benefit us? Is it known how much of the total hashrate that is produced on the different hardware platforms?
It does not look like the RX580 has the most to gain from ProgPoW...

[Breesus]

Our rig is mining at a steady 175Mh/s hashrate on Claymore (that's the hashrate shown on the claymore miner). No GPU error, no internet connection issue, everything is super smooth.

How is it possible that our current effective hashrate as shown on ethermine is ... over 200Mh/s ? More than 25Mh/s than our actual hashrate shown on Claymore.

https://imgur.com/MHGqh2i

[vapourminer]

Our rig is mining at a steady 175Mh/s hashrate on Claymore (that's the hashrate shown on the claymore miner). No GPU error, no internet connection issue, everything is super smooth.

How is it possible that our current effective hashrate as shown on ethermine is ... over 200Mh/s ? More than 25Mh/s than our actual hashrate shown on Claymore.

https://imgur.com/MHGqh2i

look at the 6 hour average hashrate.. 174.69 mhs. right in line with claymores estimate.

you need the longer term average, the pool only estimates hashrate based on accepted shares. if your miner gets lucky in say a 10 minute period it will seem to the pool to be more powerful during that 10 minute period.

[thameur]

Our rig is mining at a steady 175Mh/s hashrate on Claymore (that's the hashrate shown on the claymore miner). No GPU error, no internet connection issue, everything is super smooth.

How is it possible that our current effective hashrate as shown on ethermine is ... over 200Mh/s ? More than 25Mh/s than our actual hashrate shown on Claymore.

https://imgur.com/MHGqh2i

it's normal maybe you see 160 mhs next time ,   https://www.coinwarz.com/cryptocurrency

[big_daddy]

ProgPoW: Do anyone know how that will work out for us? Will it close the door on existing Ethash ASIC and force them to go to ETC and other coins?
And will that be a significant benefit us? Is it known how much of the total hashrate that is produced on the different hardware platforms?
It does not look like the RX580 has the most to gain from ProgPoW...

If will move away the hashrate from, lets call them, asic machines, all the gpu miners will have better revenue

[Set Ready Go]

ProgPoW: Do anyone know how that will work out for us? Will it close the door on existing Ethash ASIC and force them to go to ETC and other coins?
And will that be a significant benefit us? Is it known how much of the total hashrate that is produced on the different hardware platforms?
It does not look like the RX580 has the most to gain from ProgPoW...

Yea seems like rx 4/5 series wont be so good but vega 56/64 sure got some nice stats.

Rx 460 3-4 mh
Rx 580 9-10 mh
Rx vega 56/64 16-20 mh

Navi cards Will be intresting to see, recon progpow and navi around same time.

[jimmyD30]

I guess one indicator proving that GPU mining is almost dead is the lack of replies in this thread whenever Claymore released a new version of his software.

Been over 12 hours since V12 is released and I am counting only 7 replies.

If this was a year ago, I would of had to go thru 7 pages of replies instead of 7.

Either way, Claymore thanks for keeping up the developement and reduced fees.

#Truth

[ThienTruc]

My confid with Claymore 12.0 & Asus RX580 4GB

1 - AMD Driver 18.12.x (Newest)
2 - AMD ATI Pixel Clock Patcher atikmdag v1.4.6
3 - Claymore 12.0
4 - compute mod - on => AMD-Compute-Switcher for switch automatically to compute mode (at: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2815803.0)
5 - Reset computer and working fine now.

Dear all,
I have 02 rigs, one still work with 23Aug driver, but another one got error. I tried many ways, including reinstall Windows and tried some more drivers which worked before. Finally, I tried the same above method and it worked.
But there is another problem: the hashrate is significant lower than Fix DAG driver or 23Aug driver (~10% in my case, power consumption is 3% reduction only).
Anyway, I have no choice.
Good luck.

[br2459]

Just a heads up in case there is anyone who hasn't seen it, version 12 WILL work on 3GB cards but you have to use Win 7 in order to do so. Windows 10 takes an additional 20% of the ram which will not allow the GPU to mine. I have confirmed this with a 1060 3GB on a separate dedicated machine running windows 7. You have set the -eres value to 0 to make it work.

[mercury2005]

Dear all,
I have 02 rigs, one still work with 23Aug driver, but another one got error. I tried many ways, including reinstall Windows and tried some more drivers which worked before. Finally, I tried the same above method and it worked.
But there is another problem: the hashrate is significant lower than Fix DAG driver or 23Aug driver (~10% in my case, power consumption is 3% reduction only).
Anyway, I have no choice.
Good luck.

Me too use 23Aug driver, another version did the hashrate lower than Fix DAG driver, I don't know why.

[thameur]

Yes I will update my miner to support ProgPow when ETH will be ready to switch to it.

 you mean r9 390 8g will be supported on new clymore

[bitdag]

Hi all...I have linux Ubuntu 18.04
                           11 GB ram
                           Intel® Core™ i5-3330 CPU @ 3.00GHz × 4
                           500 GB harrdisk
                           1 4GB RX 550 AMD GPU

but I cant mine.here are the error messages.I was mining with w10 but i switced to linux i cant now.Also ubuntu says that my 4 GB  card is 3100 mb
i installed amd gpro drivers 18.50...i also cant write these settings too to the miner
GPU_FORCE_64BIT_PTR 0
GPU_MAX_HEAP_SIZE 100
GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1
GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
GPU_SINGLE_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
pls help guys,thx
https://i.postimg.cc/Fzy9JnfC/asd.png

https://i.postimg.cc/vHTqTxpf/asd2.png

[Dark Oopa]

Hello, is there a way in claymore to see wich GPU make the rejected shares like in phoenix miner?

thx

edit : rejected, not stale shares

[astraleureka]

Why is that important? The reason the share is stale is because there was latency between you and the pool, a function of your internet connection, not a specific GPU. Just because the state share originated from a particular GPU doesn't put that GPU at fault.

[Dark Oopa]

Why is that important? The reason the share is stale is because there was latency between you and the pool, a function of your internet connection, not a specific GPU. Just because the state share originated from a particular GPU doesn't put that GPU at fault.

i'm used to correct the rejected shares buy lowering the oc

[fredeq]

Why is that important? The reason the share is stale is because there was latency between you and the pool, a function of your internet connection, not a specific GPU. Just because the state share originated from a particular GPU doesn't put that GPU at fault.

i'm used to correct the rejected shares buy lowering the oc

Rejected and stale are a bit different things, but you are not that far off.
Cards on edge will produce more stales as well.

[laineux]

I can't find answers about constantinople ETH fork which will occur on 15 jan.
And nothing is announced in first page of this topic.

Is this Claymore's soft ready ?

[big_daddy]

I can't find answers about constantinople ETH fork which will occur on 15 jan.
And nothing is announced in first page of this topic.

Is this Claymore's soft ready ?

There is nothing to worry about
The current version will be compatible

[nick_fc]

should I use 'nofee" command in v12 for 3Gb cards or there is no fee by default?

[Raja_MBZ]

should I use 'nofee" command in v12 for 3Gb cards or there is no fee by default?

There is no fee by default in the last version for 2 GB and 3 GB cards; Claymore mentioned it earlier:

v12.0:

- zero devfee for all 2GB and 3GB cards in all operating systems.