|
Mr.merson
|
 |
May 17, 2019, 09:19:49 PM |
|
there will be support for graphics cards lower than 4GB vram? i mean memory timing
|
|
|
|
|
encycrypto
Member
 Offline
Activity: 294
Merit: 53
|
|
May 17, 2019, 09:41:49 PM |
|
my tests Claymore v14.4
1050 Ti ~ 17.7 strap 5
1060 6Gb ~ 26.5 to 27.6 strap 1 (depends on card)
1070 ~ 33.5 to 34.7 strap 1 (depends on card)
1080 ~ 44.3 strap 2 (without pill)
Any estimate of 1080 ti? I think it should be at about 48 if the basic 1080 is at 44. |
|
|
|
|
|
br2459
|
|
May 17, 2019, 09:51:58 PM |
|
my tests Claymore v14.4
1050 Ti ~ 17.7 strap 5
1060 6Gb ~ 26.5 to 27.6 strap 1 (depends on card)
1070 ~ 33.5 to 34.7 strap 1 (depends on card)
1080 ~ 44.3 strap 2 (without pill)
I have an EVGA 1080 but I can only get 29 out of that with strap 1. What is your mem clock set at? |
|
|
|
|
percy_tc
|
|
May 17, 2019, 09:53:42 PM |
|
I can confirm P106-100 getting more hashes. About 26-27Mh/s
P104-100 crashes for me with straps 1/2/3 (even in default clocks). Will see with different driver tomorrow.
You can try this (from Readme): -sintensity strap intensity for Nvidia cards, in %. Use this option to adjust strap intensity for Nvidia cards if even straps with lowest intensity ("-strap 1" and "-strap 4") are unstable on your cards.
To find best value, use "-strap 4 -sintensity 1" and see if it is stable. Then increase "-sintensity" value (maximum value is 100) to find best stable hashrate. Then try other "-strap" values.
You can also specify values for every card, for example "-sintensity 10,0,100,30".
Default value is "0" which means no changes in default strap settings.With "-strap 4 -sintensity 95" it runs perfectly. With some tweaking of mem oc, i'm getting 40,8Mh, previously it was 38.9 thanks! |
|
|
|
|
|
lexele
|
|
May 17, 2019, 09:59:46 PM |
|
my tests Claymore v14.4
1050 Ti ~ 17.7 strap 5
1060 6Gb ~ 26.5 to 27.6 strap 1 (depends on card)
1070 ~ 33.5 to 34.7 strap 1 (depends on card)
1080 ~ 44.3 strap 2 (without pill)
Any estimate of 1080 ti? I think it should be at about 48 if the basic 1080 is at 44. I did some quick tests and got 48/49 with 1080TI while Pill gives 52@160W. 1070 arround 34@100W. I wonder If it will be stable over night. |
|
|
|
|
wpayton34
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 9
Merit: 0
|
|
May 17, 2019, 10:42:49 PM |
|
anybody try dual mining yett?? I havent beable to get the no loss to eth. Im mining eth+keccek 10mh/300mh
|
|
|
|
|
weenkky
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 18
Merit: 5
|
|
May 17, 2019, 10:46:39 PM |
|
my tests Claymore v14.4
1050 Ti ~ 17.7 strap 5
1060 6Gb ~ 26.5 to 27.6 strap 1 (depends on card)
1070 ~ 33.5 to 34.7 strap 1 (depends on card)
1080 ~ 44.3 strap 2 (without pill)
I have an EVGA 1080 but I can only get 29 out of that with strap 1. What is your mem clock set at? -strap 2@+450 and 1544 Mhz GPU clock Gigabyte Aorus 11Gbps edition (gives ~ 42 at Phoenix + pill) |
|
|
|
|
encycrypto
Member
Offline
Activity: 294
Merit: 53
|
|
May 17, 2019, 10:57:16 PM |
|
my tests Claymore v14.4
1050 Ti ~ 17.7 strap 5
1060 6Gb ~ 26.5 to 27.6 strap 1 (depends on card)
1070 ~ 33.5 to 34.7 strap 1 (depends on card)
1080 ~ 44.3 strap 2 (without pill)
Any estimate of 1080 ti? I think it should be at about 48 if the basic 1080 is at 44. I did some quick tests and got 48/49 with 1080TI while Pill gives 52@160W. 1070 arround 34@100W. I wonder If it will be stable over night. That helps. Please don't forget to tell us about the stability of the hashrate and the card overnight if you're running it continuously. Thanks! |
|
|
|
|
weenkky
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 18
Merit: 5
|
|
May 17, 2019, 11:00:08 PM
Last edit: May 17, 2019, 11:10:26 PM by weenkky |
|
my tests Claymore v14.4
1050 Ti ~ 17.7 strap 5
1060 6Gb ~ 26.5 to 27.6 strap 1 (depends on card)
1070 ~ 33.5 to 34.7 strap 1 (depends on card)
1080 ~ 44.3 strap 2 (without pill)
Any estimate of 1080 ti? I think it should be at about 48 if the basic 1080 is at 44. I did some quick tests and got 48/49 with 1080TI while Pill gives 52@160W. 1070 arround 34@100W. I wonder If it will be stable over night. Are you sure about 34@100W on 1070? I mine Ethereum and one 1070 gives 33.6@110W, another 34.7@114W |
|
|
|
|
DBIXDBIX
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 231
Merit: 0
|
|
May 17, 2019, 11:30:16 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
evlo
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 155
Merit: 4
|
|
May 17, 2019, 11:37:22 PM
Last edit: May 18, 2019, 12:07:32 AM by evlo |
|
I think nvidia performance gains are just troll 12 1060 micron (no strap) @ 635mV (little bit more efficient then pl 70) ethminer about 275 14.4 clay about 274-devfee phoenix about 280-devfee, but it drops connections to the pool after about 26 hours and keeps mining, so totally unusuable reported hashrates - ie. for phoenix it would be about 272 on pool and for ethminer about 269 on pool clay "-strap 4 -sintensity 1" I need to do more research, but maybe claymore really can change timings on gddr5 nvidias - that would be very very unique and awesome functionality and I don't know of any other publicly available SW that can do that. Currently I wonder if miner will come back up after restart and still able to mine   Update: so I resterted and got ~284MH/s(-devfee) - I guess maybe in time there will be better straps for nvidias (seems like it is actually applying straps for 1060 and such! WOW). And I also suppose it could get better if cards would not run on 635mV - maybe there is more gain if we let cards bit more juice with better straps? With 700mV i'm getting 305mH/s per rig @ 900w - which for my power cost is about the same. But yes, i believe p106 samsung will do 27.5MHs on full power no problem Update 2: so from the description on first page it seems strap 2 or 3 should be the most intense, now i'm trying 3 and it does not even start minig, so probably I'm on square one and need to lower memory OC etc. Strap 2 even crashes whole system - nice. Very interesting and very nice work! |
|
|
|
|
|
laik2
|
|
May 17, 2019, 11:59:06 PM |
|
I think nvidia performance gains are just troll 12 1060 micron (no strap) @ 635mV (little bit more efficient then pl 70) ethminer about 275 14.4 clay about 274-devfee phoenix about 280-devfee, but it drops connections to the pool after about 26 hours and keeps mining, so totally unusuable reported hashrates - ie. for phoenix it would be about 272 on pool and for ethminer about 269 on pool clay "-strap 4 -sintensity 1" I need to do more research, but maybe claymore really can change timings on gddr5 nvidias - that would be very very unique and awesome functionality and I don't know of any other publicly available SW that can do that. Currently I wonder if miner will come back up after restart and still able to mine Update: so I resterted and got ~284MH/s(-devfee) - I guess maybe in time there will be better straps for nvidias (seems like it is actually applying straps for 1060 and such! WOW). And I also suppose it could get better if cards would not run on 635mV - maybe there is more gain if we let cards bit more juice with better straps? With 700mV i'm getting 305mH/s per rig @ 900w - I will need to calculate if it is better then 280 at 800w. They aren't troll, he really did something. I noted what could happen though in PM |
|
|
|
evlo
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 155
Merit: 4
|
|
May 18, 2019, 12:17:24 AM
Last edit: May 18, 2019, 12:33:56 AM by evlo |
|
So I'm playing with it and -strap 1 -sintensity 100 gives me less hashrate then -strap 1 -sintensity 80?  |
|
|
|
|
pr3fix
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 26
Merit: 0
|
|
May 18, 2019, 12:32:43 AM
Last edit: May 20, 2019, 09:22:24 AM by pr3fix |
|
So I'm playing with it and -strap 1 -sintensity 100 gives me less hashrate then -strap 1 -sintensity 80? Do DDU uninstall driver, delete the driver. Then, download the latest Nvidia driver, reboot win and try again. My score for now is 42.8 MH/s for P104-100 (-strap 4 -sintensity 95) Great job Claymore, thank you!  |
|
|
|
|
evlo
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 155
Merit: 4
|
|
May 18, 2019, 12:35:10 AM |
|
Much more testing needs to be done, but I will share what I got so far Micron 1060: 675mV, strap 1,100, mem +600 (on cards that can take it) - 300MHs@850w - so about 25MH/s on a good car, while remaining really restricted in power consumption (lower then PL70!!!). Tomorrow I will try to find some samsung cards. So let the finding of new ideal values for each memory type begin yet again. Yes, seriously awesome work - I mean - it was so hard to believe I thought it was just trolling, I think that speaks for itself |
|
|
|
|
dema777
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 2
Merit: 0
|
|
May 18, 2019, 01:40:38 AM |
|
Hi, I have 3 pieces of 1070 and 3 pieces of 1080 in my riga. 1070 work well on strap 1 and 1080 on strap 2, I can’t run all cards on version 14 at the same time, if it is not difficult to show the settings where strap 1 and 2 work simultaneously on different maps. The text is translated by Google. thank  |
|
|
|
|
|
br2459
|
|
May 18, 2019, 03:29:31 AM |
|
Ok I have an issue that has been driving me nuts for weeks. It all seemed to start when I upgraded my Desktop/Gaming PC from my Intel i7-3770K to a Ryzen 3 board. The cards are 2 X EVGA 1070 TI's in SLI while gaming and disabled while mining. Before I could run them at +750 Mem clock and they worked great for months without issue. Now I can even go back +600 to get any reliable time out of them. I am constantly having to reset the overclocks. When they crash with either of those two errors below I have to go back to Afterburner and set the Mem clock, power target, and fan. I am hoping someone has had a similar issue and resolved it.
GPU 1, GpuMiner kx failed 1
Set global fail flag, failed GPU1
GPU 1 failed
GPU 1, GpuMiner cu_k1 failed 77, an illegal memory access was encountered
GPU 1, GpuMiner kx failed 1
Set global fail flag, failed GPU1
GPU 1 failed
GPU 0, GpuMiner cu_k1 failed 77, an illegal memory access was encountered
GPU 0, GpuMiner kx failed 1
Set global fail flag, failed GPU0
GPU 0 failed
GPU 0, GpuMiner cu_k1 failed 77, an illegal memory access was encountered
GPU 0, GpuMiner kx failed 1
Set global fail flag, failed GPU0
GPU 0 failed
GPU 1, GpuMiner cu_k1 failed 4, unspecified launch failure
GPU 1, GpuMiner kx failed 1
1Set global fail flag, failed GPU1
GPU 1 failed
GPU 1, GpuMiner cu_k1 failed 4, unspecified launch failure
GPU 1, GpuMiner kx failed 1
Set global fail flag, failed GPU1
GPU 1 failed
GPU 0, GpuMiner cu_k1 failed 4, unspecified launch failure
GPU 0, GpuMiner kx failed 1
Set global fail flag, failed GPU0
GPU 0 failed
GPU 0, GpuMiner cu_k1 failed 4, unspecified launch failure
GPU 0, GpuMiner kx failed 1
Set global fail flag, failed GPU0
GPU 0 failed
|
|
|
|
mastercarlox
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 2
Merit: 0
|
|
May 18, 2019, 04:00:39 AM |
|
Hi. Thanks Claymore. I have achieved ~56MH with 1080TI's. Seems stable for now. I used Strap 4 with Pill and Memory 5700Mhz PL 75%-80% https://i.imgur.com/rJJiuKF.png |
|
|
|
|
|
br2459
|
|
May 18, 2019, 05:13:09 AM |
|
I removed the BIOS mod on my RX480, installed AMD drivers 19.4.3 and applied the strap. But I can't get more than 13MH/s out of it. Miner shows it applies the strap just fine but no results. With modified BIOS card runs 30MH/s with blockchain driver. Am I missing something to get back to the 30MH/s without a bios mod?
|
|
|
|
fluxy12
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 145
Merit: 1
|
|
May 18, 2019, 06:02:30 AM |
|
I removed the BIOS mod on my RX480, installed AMD drivers 19.4.3 and applied the strap. But I can't get more than 13MH/s out of it. Miner shows it applies the strap just fine but no results. With modified BIOS card runs 30MH/s with blockchain driver. Am I missing something to get back to the 30MH/s without a bios mod?
Be sure to apply compute mode : -y 1 |
|
|
|
|
|
