Bitcoin Forum
April 27, 2024, 07:26:37 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 [679] 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 ... 843 »
  Print  
Author Topic: OFFICIAL CGMINER mining software thread for linux/win/osx/mips/arm/r-pi 4.11.1  (Read 5805212 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic. (3 posts by 1+ user deleted.)
stridergt
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 9
Merit: 0


View Profile
November 29, 2013, 01:11:20 AM
 #13561

I am using minepeon (cgminer3.6.4) with a Jalapeno and observing that DAcc (Difficulty Accepted) is 60-85% when mining with the eligius pool and 100-105% when mining with BTCguild. (both pools had min difficulty set to auto, but even when I changed BTCguild to 8+GH/s, the difference in percentage roughly stayed the same)
Can someone elaborate a bit on the Dacc calculation and the difference I am observing between the two pools, does it affect my share contribution accordingly???
I checked github, but I was a bit lost. I also asked at the minepeon forum but the dev just parsed the DAcc value and could not elaborate on the calculation method.

Thank you in advance

Have I asked in the wrong thread? :-)
Please advise if so...
DA is the value in 1diff of all shares accepted.
If you submit 10 50diff shares and all are accepted then DA would be 500

I've no idea what you mean those % numbers are.

https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/109686709/minepeonstats.jpg

The percentage is DAcc / Diff1 as seen in the screenshot, so Diff1 are all shares counted in difficulty1.

Maybe Disc(arded) isn't displayed in difficulty1 so DAcc + DRej + (sum of Disc * difficulty) = Diff1

Am I getting this right? Which means that I had much lower stale percentage depending on the pool.
1714202797
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714202797

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714202797
Reply with quote  #2

1714202797
Report to moderator
You get merit points when someone likes your post enough to give you some. And for every 2 merit points you receive, you can send 1 merit point to someone else!
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1714202797
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714202797

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714202797
Reply with quote  #2

1714202797
Report to moderator
1714202797
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714202797

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714202797
Reply with quote  #2

1714202797
Report to moderator
1714202797
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714202797

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714202797
Reply with quote  #2

1714202797
Report to moderator
drewage
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 262
Merit: 10



View Profile
November 29, 2013, 01:21:43 AM
 #13562

Trying to run a bifury using the cgminer binary inside the unofficial OS X release.  The bifury shows up as /dev/cu.usbmodemfa131 and /dev/tty.usbmodemfa131.
Starting cgminer using these options:
Code:
./cgminer -d bxf:/dev/tty.usbmodemfa131 -o stratum.btcguild.com:3333 -u xxxx -p xxxx

results in this:
Code:
[2013-11-28 20:12:58] Started cgminer 3.8.3
[2013-11-28 20:12:58] bitfury detect (250:6) failed to initialize (incorrect device?)
[2013-11-28 20:13:00] Command line options set a device that doesn't exist

after which cgminer quits and drops back to the prompt.  Any ideas?

-ck (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4088
Merit: 1631


Ruu \o/


View Profile WWW
November 29, 2013, 01:39:12 AM
 #13563

Trying to run a bifury using the cgminer binary inside the unofficial OS X release.  The bifury shows up as /dev/cu.usbmodemfa131 and /dev/tty.usbmodemfa131.
Starting cgminer using these options:
Code:
./cgminer -d bxf:/dev/tty.usbmodemfa131 -o stratum.btcguild.com:3333 -u xxxx -p xxxx

results in this:
Code:
[2013-11-28 20:12:58] Started cgminer 3.8.3
[2013-11-28 20:12:58] bitfury detect (250:6) failed to initialize (incorrect device?)
[2013-11-28 20:13:00] Command line options set a device that doesn't exist

after which cgminer quits and drops back to the prompt.  Any ideas?
Need to unload the driver that osx installs. Instructions in the readme. There is no -d command like that in cgminer.

Developer/maintainer for cgminer, ckpool/ckproxy, and the -ck kernel
2% Fee Solo mining at solo.ckpool.org
-ck
kano
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4466
Merit: 1800


Linux since 1997 RedHat 4


View Profile
November 29, 2013, 01:40:18 AM
 #13564


https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/109686709/minepeonstats.jpg

The percentage is DAcc / Diff1 as seen in the screenshot, so Diff1 are all shares counted in difficulty1.

Maybe Disc(arded) isn't displayed in difficulty1 so DAcc + DRej + (sum of Disc * difficulty) = Diff1

Am I getting this right? Which means that I had much lower stale percentage depending on the pool.
No. You've pretty much got everything wrong.

"Discarded" counts for nothing in the amount of work you are doing.
It's simply work you could have used but didn't use due to an LP.
Ignore it.

"DAcc / Diff1" is random and pretty much meaningless.

As per the FAQ:
Code:
Q: Why don't the statistics add up: Accepted, Rejected, Stale, Hardware Errors,
Diff1 Work, etc. when mining greater than 1 difficulty shares?
A: As an example, if you look at 'Difficulty Accepted' in the RPC API, the number
of difficulty shares accepted does not usually exactly equal the amount of work
done to find them. If you are mining at 8 difficulty, then you would expect on
average to find one 8 difficulty share, per 8 single difficulty shares found.
However, the number is actually random and converges over time, it is an average,
not an exact value, thus you may find more or less than the expected average.

Multiplying ANYTHING by "Difficulty" is wrong.
Work difficulty can (and usually does) change.

Pool: https://kano.is - low 0.5% fee PPLNS 3 Days - Most reliable Solo with ONLY 0.5% fee   Bitcointalk thread: Forum
Discord support invite at https://kano.is/ Majority developer of the ckpool code - k for kano
The ONLY active original developer of cgminer. Original master git: https://github.com/kanoi/cgminer
drewage
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 262
Merit: 10



View Profile
November 29, 2013, 10:41:55 AM
 #13565


Need to unload the driver that osx installs. Instructions in the readme. There is no -d command like that in cgminer.

Unloaded the drivers, 4 of them now.  Cgminer started and ran for ~3mins before quitting.

Code:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 [P]ool management [S]ettings [D]isplay options [Q]uit
 BXF 0: 52.3C         | 3.178G/3.189Gh/s | A:96 R:8 HW:0 WU: 47.9Abort trap: 6
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


 [2013-11-29 05:36:56] Accepted 09e0c656 Diff 26/2 BXF 0
 [2013-11-29 05:36:58] Accepted d36a26fd Diff 310/2 BXF 0
 [2013-11-29 05:37:00] Accepted 11e59e40 Diff 14/2 BXF 0
 [2013-11-29 05:37:00] Accepted 2109293b Diff 8/2 BXF 0
 [2013-11-29 05:37:01] Accepted 4d4e337a Diff 3/2 BXF 0
 [2013-11-29 05:37:01] Accepted 7a846645 Diff 2/2 BXF 0
 [2013-11-29 05:37:01] Accepted 4bbd2386 Diff 3/2 BXF 0
 [2013-11-29 05:37:01] Accepted 3ede7686 Diff 4/2 BXF 0
 [2013-11-29 05:37:03] BXF 0 BXFWork usb write err:(-1) LIBUSB_ERROR_IO
 [2013-11-29 05:37:03] BXF 0: Error -1 sending BXFWork sent 0 of 161

-ck (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4088
Merit: 1631


Ruu \o/


View Profile WWW
November 29, 2013, 10:49:07 AM
 #13566


Need to unload the driver that osx installs. Instructions in the readme. There is no -d command like that in cgminer.

Unloaded the drivers, 4 of them now.  Cgminer started and ran for ~3mins before quitting.

Code:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 [P]ool management [S]ettings [D]isplay options [Q]uit
 BXF 0: 52.3C         | 3.178G/3.189Gh/s | A:96 R:8 HW:0 WU: 47.9Abort trap: 6
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


 [2013-11-29 05:36:56] Accepted 09e0c656 Diff 26/2 BXF 0
 [2013-11-29 05:36:58] Accepted d36a26fd Diff 310/2 BXF 0
 [2013-11-29 05:37:00] Accepted 11e59e40 Diff 14/2 BXF 0
 [2013-11-29 05:37:00] Accepted 2109293b Diff 8/2 BXF 0
 [2013-11-29 05:37:01] Accepted 4d4e337a Diff 3/2 BXF 0
 [2013-11-29 05:37:01] Accepted 7a846645 Diff 2/2 BXF 0
 [2013-11-29 05:37:01] Accepted 4bbd2386 Diff 3/2 BXF 0
 [2013-11-29 05:37:01] Accepted 3ede7686 Diff 4/2 BXF 0
 [2013-11-29 05:37:03] BXF 0 BXFWork usb write err:(-1) LIBUSB_ERROR_IO
 [2013-11-29 05:37:03] BXF 0: Error -1 sending BXFWork sent 0 of 161
Good progress. IO errors are problematic and suggest a hardware issue, but the latest git code is able to recover from them a little more gracefully.

Developer/maintainer for cgminer, ckpool/ckproxy, and the -ck kernel
2% Fee Solo mining at solo.ckpool.org
-ck
-ck (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4088
Merit: 1631


Ruu \o/


View Profile WWW
November 29, 2013, 11:01:11 AM
 #13567


Thanks for that. No you were getting the timer overruns previously as well. I saw them on your successful logging when you put it up so even when it's "fine" it's not entirely fine, it's just that it sort of recovers.

Next!
http://ck.kolivas.org/apps/cgminer/temp/cgminer-w00t.exe

EDIT: And one greater than 9000:
http://ck.kolivas.org/apps/cgminer/temp/cgminer-9001.exe

OK, tests done. Usual aside: Previous run of 3.5.1 stopped after 18 hours. No faults.

Test of cgminer-w00t started at 12:50. After about 5 minutes one LED (AMU 16) came on solid but no zombie was reported in the screen display.  I turned on debug and let it run for a few minutes, then I intended to re-plug the offending AMU and continue, but unfortunately I accidentally hit the power button on the hub and turned the whole thing off. D'oh! Test stopped at that point.  I'll run it again if you need more information.

Test of cgminer-9001 started at 13:01.  It ran for over 5 hours before a zombie (AMU27) appeared.  Turned on debug and let it run a bit more, then stopped the test at 18:45.  This one was looking quite promising until the fault popped up. Pity.

Logfiles are here:
  https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/44240170/logfile-w00t.txt
  https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/44240170/logfile-9001.txt

And.... Back to 3.5.1 Smiley

Very good. Now try this combining both and more please:

http://ck.kolivas.org/apps/cgminer/temp/cgminer-900t.exe

Developer/maintainer for cgminer, ckpool/ckproxy, and the -ck kernel
2% Fee Solo mining at solo.ckpool.org
-ck
jmc1517
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 56
Merit: 0


View Profile
November 29, 2013, 05:24:20 PM
 #13568


Very good. Now try this combining both and more please:

http://ck.kolivas.org/apps/cgminer/temp/cgminer-900t.exe

Stopped cgminer 35.1. after about 23 hours. No faults again Smiley

Tried cgminer-900t but it doesn't detect my devices. I get the following:

 [2013-11-29 17:13:30] Started cgminer 3.8.3
 [2013-11-29 17:13:30] Loaded configuration file cgminer.conf
 [2013-11-29 17:13:35] No devices detected!
 [2013-11-29 17:13:35] Waiting for USB hotplug devices or press q to quit
 [2013-11-29 17:13:35] Too many values passed to set temp cutoff

I did try it (I think) also with 3.5.1 already running and it gives me some messages "devices already in use."  So Something seems slightly confused.  I am loading my original 3.5.1 config file.  Is there something in that which would confuse it?  Sorry don't have time to investigate further now, but I'll come back and check it out a bit more thoroughly later if you think it may be my setup which needs tweeking for this build -- but then again, why should it?
stridergt
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 9
Merit: 0


View Profile
November 29, 2013, 05:47:22 PM
Last edit: November 29, 2013, 07:10:24 PM by stridergt
 #13569


https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/109686709/minepeonstats.jpg

The percentage is DAcc / Diff1 as seen in the screenshot, so Diff1 are all shares counted in difficulty1.

Maybe Disc(arded) isn't displayed in difficulty1 so DAcc + DRej + (sum of Disc * difficulty) = Diff1

Am I getting this right? Which means that I had much lower stale percentage depending on the pool.
No. You've pretty much got everything wrong.

"Discarded" counts for nothing in the amount of work you are doing.
It's simply work you could have used but didn't use due to an LP.
Ignore it.

"DAcc / Diff1" is random and pretty much meaningless.

As per the FAQ:
Code:
Q: Why don't the statistics add up: Accepted, Rejected, Stale, Hardware Errors,
Diff1 Work, etc. when mining greater than 1 difficulty shares?
A: As an example, if you look at 'Difficulty Accepted' in the RPC API, the number
of difficulty shares accepted does not usually exactly equal the amount of work
done to find them. If you are mining at 8 difficulty, then you would expect on
average to find one 8 difficulty share, per 8 single difficulty shares found.
However, the number is actually random and converges over time, it is an average,
not an exact value, thus you may find more or less than the expected average.

Multiplying ANYTHING by "Difficulty" is wrong.
Work difficulty can (and usually does) change.

LP=longpoll?
"This request is not answered by server until it wishes to expire current block data, and new data is ready. The answer is the same as getwork on the main connection. Upon receiving this answer, miner should drop current calculation in progress, discard its result, and start working on received data and make a new request to a long polling URI."

I think you misunderstood me DAcc + DRej + (sum of Disc * difficulty) = Diff1
With the parenthesis I meant a quantity "DDisc", like DAcc and DRej , so the sum of these three converging parameters would eventually converge to Diff1
In this light would DAcc / Diff1, as a ratio between the convergent quantities, give after some period of time an indication of the quality of the pool?

PS Maybe the luck of the pool could skew results but if there is some consistency in detecting a difference between the ratios of two  pools -all else equal- for a long time period, it could mean a better pool setup/efficiency/uptime, but I am beginning to get lost in all these.. :-)
hanti
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 126
Merit: 100


View Profile
November 29, 2013, 08:39:28 PM
 #13570

cgminer doesnt want switch back to pool 0..
just keep spaming every 30 sec Pool 0 xxxxx stable for 5 mins

pool 0 is working normally from a long time much more than 5mins :/

kano
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4466
Merit: 1800


Linux since 1997 RedHat 4


View Profile
November 29, 2013, 09:07:00 PM
 #13571

...
LP=longpoll?
"This request is not answered by server until it wishes to expire current block data, and new data is ready. The answer is the same as getwork on the main connection. Upon receiving this answer, miner should drop current calculation in progress, discard its result, and start working on received data and make a new request to a long polling URI."

I think you misunderstood me DAcc + DRej + (sum of Disc * difficulty) = Diff1
With the parenthesis I meant a quantity "DDisc", like DAcc and DRej , so the sum of these three converging parameters would eventually converge to Diff1
In this light would DAcc / Diff1, as a ratio between the convergent quantities, give after some period of time an indication of the quality of the pool?

PS Maybe the luck of the pool could skew results but if there is some consistency in detecting a difference between the ratios of two  pools -all else equal- for a long time period, it could mean a better pool setup/efficiency/uptime, but I am beginning to get lost in all these.. :-)
No to the above.

I have already said it in my last post so I am wasting my time repeating it but ...

Discarded is meaningless. Yes it is. Ignore it. OK?

Luck is ... luck.

Here, take a course to learn a bit about statistics.
Some important terms: sample, population, probability, variance.

No I don't give courses in statistics - I failed a statistics course at university ... twice Smiley

Pool: https://kano.is - low 0.5% fee PPLNS 3 Days - Most reliable Solo with ONLY 0.5% fee   Bitcointalk thread: Forum
Discord support invite at https://kano.is/ Majority developer of the ckpool code - k for kano
The ONLY active original developer of cgminer. Original master git: https://github.com/kanoi/cgminer
hanti
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 126
Merit: 100


View Profile
November 29, 2013, 09:33:35 PM
 #13572

cgminer doesnt want switch back to pool 0..
just keep spaming every 30 sec Pool 0 xxxxx stable for 5 mins

pool 0 is working normally from a long time much more than 5mins :/

after 1h still mining at pool 1 i had to restart cgminer and now its mining at pool 0 as it should

-ck (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4088
Merit: 1631


Ruu \o/


View Profile WWW
November 29, 2013, 09:45:49 PM
 #13573


Very good. Now try this combining both and more please:

http://ck.kolivas.org/apps/cgminer/temp/cgminer-900t.exe

Stopped cgminer 35.1. after about 23 hours. No faults again Smiley

Tried cgminer-900t but it doesn't detect my devices. I get the following:

 [2013-11-29 17:13:30] Started cgminer 3.8.3
 [2013-11-29 17:13:30] Loaded configuration file cgminer.conf
 [2013-11-29 17:13:35] No devices detected!
 [2013-11-29 17:13:35] Waiting for USB hotplug devices or press q to quit
 [2013-11-29 17:13:35] Too many values passed to set temp cutoff

I did try it (I think) also with 3.5.1 already running and it gives me some messages "devices already in use."  So Something seems slightly confused.  I am loading my original 3.5.1 config file.  Is there something in that which would confuse it?  Sorry don't have time to investigate further now, but I'll come back and check it out a bit more thoroughly later if you think it may be my setup which needs tweeking for this build -- but then again, why should it?
Nah I probably just screwed something up. Try this instead please:
http://ck.kolivas.org/apps/cgminer/temp/cgminer-tok.exe

Developer/maintainer for cgminer, ckpool/ckproxy, and the -ck kernel
2% Fee Solo mining at solo.ckpool.org
-ck
aigeezer
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1450
Merit: 1013


Cryptanalyst castrated by his government, 1952


View Profile
November 29, 2013, 09:52:26 PM
 #13574

For some reason my notifications for this thread stopped several days ago, so I've been running a version of 3.8.2 for about 12.5 days! It has done well, with occasional zombies that were always fixed with a replug. List now shows AMU89-95, 99, 100, 102, 103, 105 and 106 so there has been lots of reallocation along the way. Similar for my other machine, although the test has been a few days shorter.

I'll try to get back into the game with a 3.8.3 test shortly. Welcome back, jmc1517 - you're way ahead of me with Win7 testing now.

-ck (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4088
Merit: 1631


Ruu \o/


View Profile WWW
November 29, 2013, 10:07:46 PM
 #13575

This is the next set of tests please

then
http://ck.kolivas.org/apps/cgminer/temp/cgminer-cb5k.exe
http://ck.kolivas.org/apps/cgminer/temp/cgminer-t5cb5.exe
http://ck.kolivas.org/apps/cgminer/temp/cgminer-t20cb5.exe

Developer/maintainer for cgminer, ckpool/ckproxy, and the -ck kernel
2% Fee Solo mining at solo.ckpool.org
-ck
aigeezer
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1450
Merit: 1013


Cryptanalyst castrated by his government, 1952


View Profile
November 29, 2013, 10:22:19 PM
 #13576


I hear and obey.    Wink

Trying tok now (within 3.8.3 directory) after 1+ hours of uneventful vanilla 3.8.3 run.

drewage
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 262
Merit: 10



View Profile
November 30, 2013, 02:37:39 AM
 #13577


Good progress. IO errors are problematic and suggest a hardware issue, but the latest git code is able to recover from them a little more gracefully.
Compiled the latest on Ubuntu 12.04 32bit on old macmini.  Seems to have all the kids playing together, at least they have been for the last two hours.

crazyates
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 952
Merit: 1000



View Profile
November 30, 2013, 05:39:51 AM
 #13578

Hi there. I'm playing with the --sched-stop command. I'm not using the --sched-start command, and I want it to quit at a certain time.

I entered in a time into my .bat file (--sched-stop 00:20) and it doesn't seem to work. It mines, and then when it reaches 12:20am it says this:
Quote
[2013-11-30 00:20:00] Pausing execution as per stop time 00:20 scheduled
[2013-11-30 00:20:00] Terminating execution as planned
But it never actually closes. It just sits there, and I can hear the fans on my Singles continue to ramp up.

Then I closed the window manually, and re-ran my bat file. It never starts mining, saying the above two lines, but with whatever the current timestamp was. Example: I used (--sched-stop 00:20), but opened the .bat at 00:23, and it still says
Quote
[2013-11-30 00:23:27] Pausing execution as per stop time 00:20 scheduled
[2013-11-30 00:23:27] Terminating execution as planned

Win 8.1 64 bit, CGMiner 3.8.3, 3 SC Singles, 1 Little Single, and 2 AMUs.

I tried it without the AMUs, and it worked fine. One AMU on a USB 3.0 hub, and it works. One AMU on a USB 2.0 port, and it works. Both AMUs plugged in, and it fails. Consistently.

I have no problems just removing the AMUs; the AMUs aren't really earning my anything anyways, but I figured I'd report this in case it helped you identify whatever was not working.

Tips? 1crazy8pMqgwJ7tX7ZPZmyPwFbc6xZKM9
Previous Trade History - Sale Thread
-ck (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4088
Merit: 1631


Ruu \o/


View Profile WWW
November 30, 2013, 05:41:41 AM
 #13579

Hi there. I'm playing with the --sched-stop command. I'm not using the --sched-start command, and I want it to quit at a certain time.
It's not meant to shut down cgminer. It's meant to be given a start and stop time for when it should be mining during the day and when it should be idle.

Developer/maintainer for cgminer, ckpool/ckproxy, and the -ck kernel
2% Fee Solo mining at solo.ckpool.org
-ck
crazyates
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 952
Merit: 1000



View Profile
November 30, 2013, 06:01:05 AM
 #13580

--sched-start <arg> Set a time of day in HH:MM to start mining (a once off without a stop time)
--sched-stop <arg>  Set a time of day in HH:MM to stop mining (will quit without a start time)
Hi there. I'm playing with the --sched-stop command. I'm not using the --sched-start command, and I want it to quit at a certain time.
It's not meant to shut down cgminer. It's meant to be given a start and stop time for when it should be mining during the day and when it should be idle.
I'm not using it to start and stop cgminer, I'm using it to quit at a certain time every day. It does exactly this when I don't have any AMUs plugged in, but seems to hang when I have multiple AMUs.

Tips? 1crazy8pMqgwJ7tX7ZPZmyPwFbc6xZKM9
Previous Trade History - Sale Thread
Pages: « 1 ... 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 [679] 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 ... 843 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!