OFFICIAL CGMINER mining software thread for linux/win/osx/mips/arm/r-pi 4.11.1

[fcmatt]

Does anyone know how to patch stratum proxy so that cgminer 3.7.2, for example, does not get constant target-miss errors when submitting shares when connected to a stratum to stratum proxy? 3.1.1 works fine.

I would rather patch the proxy then cgminer. Anyone have any advice or can i provide more info to debug this?

[1714220740]

1714220740

[1714220740]

1714220740

[1714220740]

1714220740

[chek2fire]

Thanks again for your great work!

[-ck]

Raspberry PI Make Error:
...

...
  CCLD     cgminer

cgminer-libbitfury.o: In function `spi_reset':
/home/minepeon/cgminer/libbitfury.c:226: undefined reference to `mcp2210_set_gpio_settings'
/home/minepeon/cgminer/libbitfury.c:233: undefined reference to `mcp2210_spi_transfer'
/home/minepeon/cgminer/libbitfury.c:239: undefined reference to `mcp2210_set_gpio_settings'
cgminer-libbitfury.o: In function `spi_txrx':
/home/minepeon/cgminer/libbitfury.c:255: undefined reference to `mcp2210_spi_transfer'
/home/minepeon/cgminer/libbitfury.c:265: undefined reference to `mcp2210_spi_transfer'
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
make[2]: *** [cgminer] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/minepeon/cgminer'
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/minepeon/cgminer'
make: *** [all] Error 2

Confirmed building on a Beaglebone as well:

Code:

autogen.sh && ./configure --enable-bflsc && make

That will fail when linking as shown in netfun2000's dump. Adding --enable-bitfury to the configure command will workaround the bug and build successfully.

Code:

autogen.sh && ./configure --enable-bflsc --enable-bitfury && make

It would seem that without --enable-bitfury, there is some partial libbitfury leakage into the build process.

Fixed in git, thanks.

[Zich]

Don't forget I always create drivers for cgminer that report hashrate based on real shares generated, not some arbitrary amount of hashes done (that doesn't translate into meaningful hashrate). I can happily make you a build that shows you making 2.5TH if you like. Make sure you check your pool to see how many effective shares you're submitting with your other drivers... People don't like the truth.

I want to test again for more long interval but keep getting this error

[-ck]

Don't forget I always create drivers for cgminer that report hashrate based on real shares generated, not some arbitrary amount of hashes done (that doesn't translate into meaningful hashrate). I can happily make you a build that shows you making 2.5TH if you like. Make sure you check your pool to see how many effective shares you're submitting with your other drivers... People don't like the truth.

I want to test again for more long interval but keep getting this error

Looks like a real bug. Can you try a debug build following the directions here please:
http://ck.kolivas.org/apps/cgminer/debug/README-debug

[Zich]

Don't forget I always create drivers for cgminer that report hashrate based on real shares generated, not some arbitrary amount of hashes done (that doesn't translate into meaningful hashrate). I can happily make you a build that shows you making 2.5TH if you like. Make sure you check your pool to see how many effective shares you're submitting with your other drivers... People don't like the truth.

I want to test again for more long interval but keep getting this error

Looks like a real bug. Can you try a debug build following the directions here please:
http://ck.kolivas.org/apps/cgminer/debug/README-debug

Ok, i will try  

Update:
From bt full command

Code:

#0  0x00016504 in hash_pop () at cgminer.c:5736
        work = 0x0
        tmp = <optimized out>
        hc = <optimized out>
#1  get_work (thr=0x75838, thr_id=91372) at cgminer.c:5929
        work = 0x0
#2  0x0004154c in nf1_scan (info=0x93918, bitfury=0x75580, thr=0x75838)
    at driver-bitfury.c:910
        ret = 0
#3  bitfury_scanwork (thr=0x75838) at driver-bitfury.c:949
        bitfury = 0x75580
        info = 0x93918
#4  0x0001e4fc in hash_driver_work (mythr=0x75838) at cgminer.c:6551
        diff = {tv_sec = 0, tv_usec = 242146}
        hashes = <optimized out>
        tv_start = {tv_sec = 1389374622, tv_usec = 778640}
        tv_end = {tv_sec = 1389374622, tv_usec = 778640}
        cgpu = 0x75580
        drv = 0x75940
        thr_id = 1
        hashes_done = 0
#5  0x0001090c in miner_thread (userdata=0x75838) at cgminer.c:6605
        mythr = 0x75838
        thr_id = <optimized out>
        cgpu = <optimized out>
        drv = 0x75940
        threadname = "miner/1", '\000' <repeats 16 times>
        __func__ = "miner_thread"
#6  0x40267b04 in start_thread () from /lib/arm-linux-gnueabi/libpthread.so.0
No symbol table info available.
#7  0x4037965c in ?? () from /lib/arm-linux-gnueabi/libc.so.6
No symbol table info available.
#8  0x4037965c in ?? () from /lib/arm-linux-gnueabi/libc.so.6
No symbol table info available.
Backtrace stopped: previous frame identical to this frame (corrupt stack?)

[Zich]

I just test cgminer3.10.0 on raspi under wheezy without setting to USB 1(delete dwc_otg.speed=1)

Work fine except for the error when start cgminer. After several times restart,  cgminer run fine with nanofury
But after some minute one of nanofury off

Code:

[2014-01-10 19:01:50] NF1 1: Error -7 receiving MCPSPITransfer received 0 of 64
[2014-01-10 19:01:50] NF1 1 failure, disabling!

[Fletch]

Sorry if this has been addressed before, but I tried searching and came up empty. I'm trying to find out what the two hashrates for a particular GPU/ASIC/FPGA represent. The total hashrates shown at the top of the UI I understand - on the left a 5 second average and on the right the average since the app was started. For individual GPUs however, I'm confused.

One of my GPUs is currently showing 724.1K/728.7K. The value on the left is very stable and rarely changes, but the value on the right changes constantly (+-1K). It makes perfect sense to me that the value on the left is the 5s average for that particular card. However, if the value on the right is the "total" average since the card started mining, why isn't it even more stable than the value on the left?

Or have I missed anything?

[jborkl]

I have spent quite a bit of time with the Chilis figuring out why they do what they do, the best and solid solution is

1. I run them all off of powered USB hubs, none are plugged directly into the computer.
2. They do not like USB 1.1 or USB 3.0 - they will eventually have a problem and hang (to me this seems to be the root issue, but I do not know for sure)

I do not know the cause or why, I really only try to fix things so they don't do it again. This has solved the problem for me.

This also solved the Hex2bin scan failed error, which might be related- I don't know

[MrTeal]

I have spent quite a bit of time with the Chilis figuring out why they do what they do, the best and solid solution is

1. I run them all off of powered USB hubs, none are plugged directly into the computer.
2. They do not like USB 1.1 or USB 3.0 - they will eventually have a problem and hang (to me this seems to be the root issue, but I do not know for sure)

I do not know the cause or why, I really only try to fix things so they don't do it again. This has solved the problem for me.

This also solved the Hex2bin scan failed error, which might be related- I don't know

That's kind of strange, the 5V line on the USB connector isn't even terminated on the board so it's drawing 0mA of current from the USB connector. I can't say I've ever tried using a USB 1.1 hub though, I'm not sure I have one.
When you say eventually they will hang with USB3, how long does it usually take for you? I've had some running for days at a time on USB3.0 on my desktop, but obviously using the USB2.0 differential pair.

[jborkl]

Less than 12 hours normally, for 14 units on one host

It is associated with hex2bin scan failure I am pretty sure, but I do not really know what that is.

3.8.4 - it goes hex2bin scan failure and that unit hangs
3.8.5 or later cgminer will crash

I started debugging it, but ended up solving the problem by moving everything onto powered hubs and off USB 3.0

It has not crashed since, so I have not been able to debug it any further.

This was a problem on 2 different hosts, so I consolidated down to one host thinking the host was crashing/causing problems. I think the real problem is that host was a higher end and had more USB3.0 that were being used

I started noticing that the units on the USB hub were not  hanging, then just started figuring it out from there.

[-ck]

Con,

Do you use a 32 bit integer for block reward difficulty anywhere?  eleuthria has pointed out that we are rapidly approaching the point where difficulty will overflow.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=406420.0

No I don't.

[-ck]

Don't forget I always create drivers for cgminer that report hashrate based on real shares generated, not some arbitrary amount of hashes done (that doesn't translate into meaningful hashrate). I can happily make you a build that shows you making 2.5TH if you like. Make sure you check your pool to see how many effective shares you're submitting with your other drivers... People don't like the truth.

I want to test again for more long interval but keep getting this error

Looks like a real bug. Can you try a debug build following the directions here please:
http://ck.kolivas.org/apps/cgminer/debug/README-debug

Ok, i will try  

Update:
From bt full command

Code:

#0  0x00016504 in hash_pop () at cgminer.c:5736
        work = 0x0
        tmp = <optimized out>
        hc = <optimized out>

Thanks for that.

This actually looks like a bug with the stratum reconnect code in cgminer since it's happening shortly after btcguild is issuing a reconnect (i.e. change address request), and is coincidental that it's happening for you with the nanofury. Unfortunately I don't have the time to debug and fix this at the moment so a workaround would be to use the redirection address you see in your logs directly instead of the standard btcguild pool address (or a different pool). I've just pushed some generic changes to git which might help this but I don't imagine it will be enough.

[-ck]

Heads up to everyone: I will be travelling from today for just over a week, and while I'll be checking in on the forums, I will be relatively unavailable and unable to do any significant debugging, fixes or updates. Everyone behave while I'm away, mkay?

[rgr_rgr]

Yes Sir :-)

Happy Holidays !

[Zich]

Thanks for that.

This actually looks like a bug with the stratum reconnect code in cgminer since it's happening shortly after btcguild is issuing a reconnect (i.e. change address request), and is coincidental that it's happening for you with the nanofury. Unfortunately I don't have the time to debug and fix this at the moment so a workaround would be to use the redirection address you see in your logs directly instead of the standard btcguild pool address (or a different pool). I've just pushed some generic changes to git which might help this but I don't imagine it will be enough.

No problem 

And yes, changing to the redirect address work, less error now. Thanks ck & happy holiday 

[-ck]

Thanks

Pushed a quick fix to git for a bug that would make cgminer crash on removing some usb devices.

[chek2fire]

happy holiday and take a rest men

[loshia]

Yes Sir :-)

Happy Holidays !

+1

[Amph]

there is a command that let you see all your best shares?