playfast
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 131
Merit: 3
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 27, 2018, 11:27:46 AM |
|
"persistent_memory" : true is good for the Heavy algo, I was able to go a bit higher with intensities on my 2gb rx560's. I also notice Heavy can be tweaked with smaller intensity increments than v8. It can respond to 0.04 increments (like 12.60>12.64>12.68 and so on) to find best hashrates.
|
|
|
|
tanatana
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 50
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 27, 2018, 12:32:39 PM Last edit: November 27, 2018, 12:46:57 PM by tanatana |
|
MSI r9 390 default gpu/memory speed 632 H SRBMiner-CN-V1-7-1 { "cryptonight_type" : "normalv8", "intensity" : 0, "gpu_conf" : [ { "id" : 0, "intensity" : 64, "worksize" : 8, "threads" : 1}, { "id" : 1, "intensity" : 64, "worksize" : 8, "threads" : 1} ] }
Try Intesity 71 805H 1040/1500 "cryptonight_type" : "normalv8", "intensity" : 0, "gpu_conf" : [ { "id" : 0, "intensity" : 96, "worksize" : 12, "threads" : 1}, { "id" : 1, "intensity" : 96, "worksize" : 12, "threads" : 1} ] }
speed 755 H
|
|
|
|
Dripac
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 71
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 27, 2018, 01:58:54 PM |
|
@tanatana sorry i give you wrong setup for 390. This is my setup:
{ "cryptonight_type" : "normalv8", "intensity" : 48, "double_threads" : true }
|
|
|
|
abg00
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 288
Merit: 1
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 27, 2018, 05:54:14 PM |
|
on tube
rx470\480\570\580 4gb +50-60 h\s in heavy 3 mode 1.7.1 820-860 h\s
What's the value for Fragmets and Bralock for 470/570/580 4GB for Tube??? TNX I=29 W=8 F=1 bralock default heavy_mode=3 1150\2000-2050 so not good rig with different card [2018-11-27 20:53:02] GPU0 : 854 H/s [T: 53c, RPM: 2137, CC: 1150 MHz, MC: 2020 MHz][BUS:1] [2018-11-27 20:53:02] GPU1 : 846 H/s [T: 52c, RPM: 1761, CC: 1150 MHz, MC: 2020 MHz][BUS:2] [2018-11-27 20:53:02] GPU2 : 812 H/s [T: 53c, RPM: 1659, CC: 1150 MHz, MC: 2020 MHz][BUS:3] [2018-11-27 20:53:02] GPU3 : 820 H/s [T: 54c, RPM: 2188, CC: 1150 MHz, MC: 2000 MHz][BUS:4] [2018-11-27 20:53:02] GPU4 : 830 H/s [T: 60c, RPM: 1372, CC: 1150 MHz, MC: 2000 MHz][BUS:5] [2018-11-27 20:53:02] GPU5 : 858 H/s [T: 48c, RPM: 1279, CC: 1150 MHz, MC: 2020 MHz][BUS:7] [2018-11-27 20:53:02] GPU6 : 853 H/s [T: 51c, RPM: 1730, CC: 1150 MHz, MC: 2020 MHz][BUS:8] [2018-11-27 20:53:02] GPU7 : 856 H/s [T: 51c, RPM: 1848, CC: 1150 MHz, MC: 2020 MHz][BUS:9] [2018-11-27 20:53:02] GPU8 : 860 H/s [T: 57c, RPM: 2495, CC: 1150 MHz, MC: 2020 MHz][BUS:10] [2018-11-27 20:53:02] GPU9 : 852 H/s [T: 52c, RPM: 1376, CC: 1150 MHz, MC: 2020 MHz][BUS:11] [2018-11-27 20:53:02] GPU10: 818 H/s [T: 52c, RPM: 1376, CC: 1150 MHz, MC: 2020 MHz][BUS:12] [2018-11-27 20:53:02] GPU11: 826 H/s [T: 51c, RPM: 1567, CC: 1150 MHz, MC: 2020 MHz][BUS:13] [2018-11-27 20:53:02] Total: 10085 H/s
|
|
|
|
SauteedEntrails
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 22
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 27, 2018, 08:06:39 PM |
|
@doktor83 I just have to say thank you, 1.7.0 was great and very stable but 1.7.1 is by far the best miner out to date. running (4) 480 8gb incredible rock solid stability. after 24hrs no hangs no drops no issues. just amazing mining haven (Cryptonight-heavy/xhv)
(1.7.0) 1min avg 4629 h/s 5min avg 4650 h/s 30min avg 4645 h/s Max 4688 h/s
(1.7.1) 1min avg 4739 h/s 5min avg 4738 h/s 30min avg 4740 h/s Max 4749 h/s
Again thank you for your incredible work.
|
|
|
|
fenomenyaa
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 130
Merit: 2
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 27, 2018, 08:58:58 PM |
|
@doktor83 I just have to say thank you, 1.7.0 was great and very stable but 1.7.1 is by far the best miner out to date. running (4) 480 8gb incredible rock solid stability. after 24hrs no hangs no drops no issues. just amazing mining haven (Cryptonight-heavy/xhv)
(1.7.0) 1min avg 4629 h/s 5min avg 4650 h/s 30min avg 4645 h/s Max 4688 h/s
(1.7.1) 1min avg 4739 h/s 5min avg 4738 h/s 30min avg 4740 h/s Max 4749 h/s
Again thank you for your incredible work.
Could u share the settings of miner and core-memclock of gpu's.
|
|
|
|
tanatana
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 50
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 28, 2018, 06:35:43 AM |
|
@tanatana sorry i give you wrong setup for 390. This is my setup:
{ "cryptonight_type" : "normalv8", "intensity" : 48, "double_threads" : true }
speed 800H -> after 4-5 minut driver crash
|
|
|
|
Dripac
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 71
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 28, 2018, 07:22:44 AM |
|
1040/1500 -100mv 1080mv on load
|
|
|
|
tanatana
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 50
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 28, 2018, 07:52:37 AM Last edit: November 28, 2018, 08:59:52 AM by tanatana |
|
it crashes faster if the voltage drops by 100 millivolts My card two MSI R9 390, one Sapphire R9 390 - work on three computers { "cryptonight_type" : "normalv8", "intensity" : 48, "double_threads" : true } without reducing the voltage one card (MSI) works steadily just an hour, but the other two bugs speed 802 H/s
|
|
|
|
RuMiner
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 168
Merit: 15
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 28, 2018, 11:42:02 AM |
|
Doc, something strange happened after updating to 1.7.1. One of rigs (8xVega56) disappeared from nanopool 11 hours back like it's off, but it mines, consumes power and shows normal hashrate like it was when compiling kernels on fresh drivers. Reboot helped, rig is back online, but I doubt it couldn't occur again.
|
|
|
|
MaxHa$h
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 37
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 28, 2018, 02:31:12 PM |
|
Doc, something strange happened after updating to 1.7.1. One of rigs (8xVega56) disappeared from nanopool 11 hours back like it's off, but it mines, consumes power and shows normal hashrate like it was when compiling kernels on fresh drivers. Reboot helped, rig is back online, but I doubt it couldn't occur again.
Ive had the same thing happen on a vega rig with supportXMR, though it has to be on their side as my payout stayed the same... did you payout change?
|
|
|
|
djago
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 10
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 28, 2018, 07:45:51 PM |
|
Ok, wanted to make another report. For the past 12 hours both of my GPUs are mining at their full capability, both going above 1750H/s. But before I restarted the PC one of them was like 900-1100h/s. And I'm sure, as always, that the second GPU will drop to the cca 1000 at any moment. Everything seems so random, I cannot pinpoint at any setting or config to tweak and say I did this thing and it works properly now. I simply downloaded the latest 1.7.1 version and inserted my wallet into the config. It was mining with one GPU at 1750h/s, and the other one always started at 1100 and dropped to 900 eventually. So, yeah. Really not sure what I can do myself for that matter.
Edit: I'm also using the latest 18.11.2 driver.
Edit2: Ok, I just played a video on YouTube and it dropped to 1100h/s right off…. And it stays like that the whole time now. *sigh*
Try using --resetvega in the start.bat and "min_rig_speed" : 1700 (or something like that) in the config.txt of the algo you're mining (for example config-normalv8.txt). Then you must run the start.bat as administrator. Alternatively, you can suspend/resume Windows and start SRB right away. I'm too trying to identify the culprit, but I'm still looking. These parameters won't solve the hash drop as it will happen again, but it will remedy it every time it happens.
|
|
|
|
MinersRus
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 214
Merit: 24
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 28, 2018, 08:28:27 PM Last edit: November 30, 2018, 06:22:35 AM by MinersRus |
|
What are the opinions mining normalv8 with SRBminer v1.7.1 vs v1.7.0.
I am rock solid stable on v1.7.0 and was wondering for those who are on v1.7.1 if it gives extra hash rate and is stable.
Thanks
------------------
EDIT: To answer my own question I am now on v1.7.1 and on my 3x Vega 56 rig I am getting +29 H/s increase or about 10 H/s per Vega 56.
|
|
|
|
KhorneFlake
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 27
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 28, 2018, 08:47:05 PM |
|
Ok, I think I finally figured out what's happening…. As long I just restart my PC and don't run anything else both of my GPUs are mining at their highest hashrate. But as soon I start a video, or open a web browser the main one drops to like 1100h/s. Is there any way to prevent this, even if the price is a bit slugish system, I should at least be able to run a music player while mining. I know this was the case with the Cryptonote miner, bot of GPUs were at constant cca 1600h/s.
|
|
|
|
Spill
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 94
Merit: 5
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 29, 2018, 03:43:05 AM |
|
EX-Claymore user here. Love you're miner, but can you show the pool ping whenever you get an accepted Share to the pool. Yes I know I can see average ping when I hit stats, but i'm so used to seeing the ping all the time, Thanks.
|
|
|
|
RuMiner
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 168
Merit: 15
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 29, 2018, 09:43:57 AM Last edit: November 29, 2018, 10:13:51 AM by RuMiner |
|
Ive had the same thing happen on a vega rig with supportXMR, though it has to be on their side as my payout stayed the same... did you payout change? not sure about payout, but hashrate graph lowered at that moment. hope it was only once ) What are the opinions mining normalv8 with SRBminer v1.7.1 vs v1.7.0. I am rock solid stable on v1.7.0 and was wondering for those who are on v1.7.1 if it gives extra hash rate and is stable. I got extra ~60h/s per 8xVega rig after updating Vega56: "intensity" : 112, "worksize" : 16, "threads" : 2 Vega64: "intensity" : 124, "worksize" : 16, "threads" : 2
|
|
|
|
big_daddy
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 29, 2018, 11:41:24 AM |
|
anyone here using the 570 ITX 4GB (one vent) cards for XHV mining?
|
If you don't believe it or don't get it, I don't have the time to try to convince you, sorry.
|
|
|
alexcrys1
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 60
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 29, 2018, 12:04:21 PM |
|
anyone here using the 570 ITX 4GB (one vent) cards for XHV mining?
me, i have 4
|
|
|
|
big_daddy
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 29, 2018, 12:22:28 PM |
|
anyone here using the 570 ITX 4GB (one vent) cards for XHV mining?
me, i have 4 would You be so kind please to share the best results that are you getting, cause I cannot go over ~700 H/s per card (1320/2060)
|
If you don't believe it or don't get it, I don't have the time to try to convince you, sorry.
|
|
|
dudee
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 99
Merit: 10
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 29, 2018, 09:11:27 PM |
|
often 1-2gpu mutch slower then others ![Huh](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/huh.gif) conf all same i55, w8, rx580 [2018-11-29 23:05:11] GPU0 : 1101 H/s [T: 56c, RPM: 855, CC: 1290 MHz, MC: 2060 MHz][BUS:13] [2018-11-29 23:05:11] GPU1 : 1103 H/s [T: 56c, RPM: 1226, CC: 1290 MHz, MC: 2050 MHz][BUS:6] [2018-11-29 23:05:11] GPU2 : 1098 H/s [T: 57c, RPM: 892, CC: 1285 MHz, MC: 2050 MHz][BUS:12] [2018-11-29 23:05:11] GPU3 : 1018 H/s [T: 56c, RPM: 1108, CC: 1290 MHz, MC: 2045 MHz][BUS:15] [2018-11-29 23:05:11] GPU4 : 1103 H/s [T: 56c, RPM: 1122, CC: 1290 MHz, MC: 2050 MHz][BUS:10] [2018-11-29 23:05:11] GPU5 : 1030 H/s [T: 56c, RPM: 1148, CC: 1295 MHz, MC: 2050 MHz][BUS:5] [2018-11-29 23:05:11] GPU6 : 1099 H/s [T: 57c, RPM: 858, CC: 1285 MHz, MC: 2050 MHz][BUS:3] [2018-11-29 23:05:11] GPU7 : 1000 H/s [T: 56c, RPM: 762, CC: 1270 MHz, MC: 2040 MHz][BUS:1] [2018-11-29 23:05:11] GPU8 : 746 H/s [T: 56c, RPM: 800, CC: 1290 MHz, MC: 2050 MHz][BUS:11] [2018-11-29 23:05:11] GPU9 : 1107 H/s [T: 56c, RPM: 900, CC: 1295 MHz, MC: 2060 MHz][BUS:4] [2018-11-29 23:05:11] GPU10: 1105 H/s [T: 56c, RPM: 253, CC: 1285 MHz, MC: 2050 MHz][BUS:9] [2018-11-29 23:05:11] GPU11: 1099 H/s [T: 56c, RPM: 884, CC: 1285 MHz, MC: 2050 MHz][BUS:14] [2018-11-29 23:05:11] GPU12: 1103 H/s [T: 55c, RPM: 970, CC: 1290 MHz, MC: 2060 MHz][BUS:2] [2018-11-29 23:05:11] Total: 13712 H/s
|
|
|
|
|