smeads
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 17
Merit: 0
|
 |
December 23, 2018, 03:14:34 PM |
|
Until yesterday, I was running the previous version without any issues on 6 AMD rigs. I downloaded the newest copy, and it crashes when mining CN Fast. I'm trying to mine ETNXP. Like I said, previous version worked.... does it on all 6 rigs.
Faulting application name: SRBMiner-CN.exe, version: 1.7.3.0, time stamp: 0x00000000 Faulting module name: amdocl64.dll, version: 25.20.15003.5010, time stamp: 0x5c184c0e Exception code: 0xc0000005 Fault offset: 0x00000000002f15b9 Faulting process id: 0x8c8 Faulting application start time: 0x01d49ab2a731dd6b Faulting application path: C:\Profitbot_Pro\Miner-SRB\SRBMiner-CN.exe Faulting module path: C:\WINDOWS\System32\DriverStore\FileRepository\u0337288.inf_amd64_e18692686066629e\B337205\amdocl64.dll Report Id: 5aa0839b-b012-4198-9e08-6a53ec79ed4b Faulting package full name: Faulting package-relative application ID:
|
|
|
|
doktor83 (OP)
|
 |
December 23, 2018, 03:40:34 PM |
|
Until yesterday, I was running the previous version without any issues on 6 AMD rigs. I downloaded the newest copy, and it crashes when mining CN Fast. I'm trying to mine ETNXP. Like I said, previous version worked.... does it on all 6 rigs.
Faulting application name: SRBMiner-CN.exe, version: 1.7.3.0, time stamp: 0x00000000 Faulting module name: amdocl64.dll, version: 25.20.15003.5010, time stamp: 0x5c184c0e Exception code: 0xc0000005 Fault offset: 0x00000000002f15b9 Faulting process id: 0x8c8 Faulting application start time: 0x01d49ab2a731dd6b Faulting application path: C:\Profitbot_Pro\Miner-SRB\SRBMiner-CN.exe Faulting module path: C:\WINDOWS\System32\DriverStore\FileRepository\u0337288.inf_amd64_e18692686066629e\B337205\amdocl64.dll Report Id: 5aa0839b-b012-4198-9e08-6a53ec79ed4b Faulting package full name: Faulting package-relative application ID:
Are you doing algo switching? If yes, there is a bug i am aware of, and going to be fixed in the next version.
|
|
|
|
Vampire_sumy
Member

Offline
Activity: 110
Merit: 10
|
 |
December 23, 2018, 10:53:21 PM |
|
Hi, may be someone can help me. I try to mine normal v7 algo, but hashrate is very low on rx480 8Gb. Haven or any other heavy algo seems to work perfectly, hashrate is close to 1200H/s, but normal v7 is only 990 H/s. What am i doing wrong ? I am using old drivers (blockchain), but they always worked perfectly before. May be i need to make some tuning in config file? Same problem i have while trying to mine normal v7 on Vega56  P.S. SRBMiner 1.73
|
|
|
|
doktor83 (OP)
|
 |
December 24, 2018, 10:33:03 AM |
|
Hi, may be someone can help me. I try to mine normal v7 algo, but hashrate is very low on rx480 8Gb. Haven or any other heavy algo seems to work perfectly, hashrate is close to 1200H/s, but normal v7 is only 990 H/s. What am i doing wrong ? I am using old drivers (blockchain), but they always worked perfectly before. May be i need to make some tuning in config file? Same problem i have while trying to mine normal v7 on Vega56  P.S. SRBMiner 1.73 990hs on a 480 8g is low for v7 ? 
|
|
|
|
alucard20724
|
 |
December 24, 2018, 07:31:32 PM |
|
Hi, may be someone can help me. I try to mine normal v7 algo, but hashrate is very low on rx480 8Gb. Haven or any other heavy algo seems to work perfectly, hashrate is close to 1200H/s, but normal v7 is only 990 H/s. What am i doing wrong ? I am using old drivers (blockchain), but they always worked perfectly before. May be i need to make some tuning in config file? Same problem i have while trying to mine normal v7 on Vega56  P.S. SRBMiner 1.73 990hs on a 480 8g is low for v7 ?  my rhetorical question is why are they even mining v7? 
|
|
|
|
MingMining
Member

Offline
Activity: 204
Merit: 10
Eloncoin.org - Mars, here we come!
|
 |
December 24, 2018, 07:48:49 PM |
|
This is strange. I added a 580 in rig and one gpu is the rig just did not work well.
[2018-12-24 11:45:40] GPU0 : 915 H/s [T: 53c, RPM: 2105, CC: 1155 MHz, MC: 2050 MHz][BUS:1] [2018-12-24 11:45:40] GPU1 : 927 H/s [T: 56c, RPM: 2555, CC: 1155 MHz, MC: 2050 MHz][BUS:5] [2018-12-24 11:45:40] GPU2 : 939 H/s [T: 46c, RPM: 1801, CC: 1155 MHz, MC: 2050 MHz][BUS:7] [2018-12-24 11:45:41] GPU3 : 929 H/s [T: 57c, RPM: 2581, CC: 1155 MHz, MC: 2050 MHz][BUS:8] [2018-12-24 11:45:41] GPU4 : 601 H/s [T: 54c, RPM: 2539, CC: 1155 MHz, MC: 2050 MHz][BUS:11]
I set the compute mode and they are use the same driver. Anyone get any idea what is happening? TIA.
|
|
|
|
justoiurii
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 103
Merit: 0
|
 |
December 24, 2018, 08:00:04 PM |
|
This is strange. I added a 580 in rig and one gpu is the rig just did not work well.
[2018-12-24 11:45:40] GPU0 : 915 H/s [T: 53c, RPM: 2105, CC: 1155 MHz, MC: 2050 MHz][BUS:1] [2018-12-24 11:45:40] GPU1 : 927 H/s [T: 56c, RPM: 2555, CC: 1155 MHz, MC: 2050 MHz][BUS:5] [2018-12-24 11:45:40] GPU2 : 939 H/s [T: 46c, RPM: 1801, CC: 1155 MHz, MC: 2050 MHz][BUS:7] [2018-12-24 11:45:41] GPU3 : 929 H/s [T: 57c, RPM: 2581, CC: 1155 MHz, MC: 2050 MHz][BUS:8] [2018-12-24 11:45:41] GPU4 : 601 H/s [T: 54c, RPM: 2539, CC: 1155 MHz, MC: 2050 MHz][BUS:11]
I set the compute mode and they are use the same driver. Anyone get any idea what is happening? TIA.
better to restart win)
|
|
|
|
MingMining
Member

Offline
Activity: 204
Merit: 10
Eloncoin.org - Mars, here we come!
|
 |
December 24, 2018, 08:07:03 PM Last edit: December 24, 2018, 08:20:09 PM by MingMining |
|
This is strange. I added a 580 in rig and one gpu is the rig just did not work well.
[2018-12-24 11:45:40] GPU0 : 915 H/s [T: 53c, RPM: 2105, CC: 1155 MHz, MC: 2050 MHz][BUS:1] [2018-12-24 11:45:40] GPU1 : 927 H/s [T: 56c, RPM: 2555, CC: 1155 MHz, MC: 2050 MHz][BUS:5] [2018-12-24 11:45:40] GPU2 : 939 H/s [T: 46c, RPM: 1801, CC: 1155 MHz, MC: 2050 MHz][BUS:7] [2018-12-24 11:45:41] GPU3 : 929 H/s [T: 57c, RPM: 2581, CC: 1155 MHz, MC: 2050 MHz][BUS:8] [2018-12-24 11:45:41] GPU4 : 601 H/s [T: 54c, RPM: 2539, CC: 1155 MHz, MC: 2050 MHz][BUS:11]
I set the compute mode and they are use the same driver. Anyone get any idea what is happening? TIA.
better to restart win) I actually did. did not help. Update: I restarted the third time and everything is working now... Thanks a lot!
|
|
|
|
MingMining
Member

Offline
Activity: 204
Merit: 10
Eloncoin.org - Mars, here we come!
|
 |
December 24, 2018, 08:32:08 PM |
|
Here is my rig with 6x 470 4gb. Is this normal for a 470 at 800ish hashrate?
[2018-12-24 12:30:37] GPU0 : 818 H/s [T: 51c, RPM: 1916, CC: 1140 MHz, MC: 2050 MHz][BUS:8] [2018-12-24 12:30:37] GPU1 : 818 H/s [T: 52c, RPM: 1921, CC: 1140 MHz, MC: 2050 MHz][BUS:3] [2018-12-24 12:30:37] GPU2 : 816 H/s [T: 51c, RPM: 1982, CC: 1140 MHz, MC: 2050 MHz][BUS:7] [2018-12-24 12:30:37] GPU3 : 816 H/s [T: 47c, RPM: 1900, CC: 1140 MHz, MC: 2050 MHz][BUS:5] [2018-12-24 12:30:37] GPU4 : 818 H/s [T: 49c, RPM: 1870, CC: 1140 MHz, MC: 2050 MHz][BUS:6] [2018-12-24 12:30:37] GPU5 : 817 H/s [T: 44c, RPM: 1921, CC: 1140 MHz, MC: 2050 MHz][BUS:1]
|
|
|
|
UnclWish
|
 |
December 25, 2018, 04:47:10 AM |
|
Here is my rig with 6x 470 4gb. Is this normal for a 470 at 800ish hashrate?
[2018-12-24 12:30:37] GPU0 : 818 H/s [T: 51c, RPM: 1916, CC: 1140 MHz, MC: 2050 MHz][BUS:8] [2018-12-24 12:30:37] GPU1 : 818 H/s [T: 52c, RPM: 1921, CC: 1140 MHz, MC: 2050 MHz][BUS:3] [2018-12-24 12:30:37] GPU2 : 816 H/s [T: 51c, RPM: 1982, CC: 1140 MHz, MC: 2050 MHz][BUS:7] [2018-12-24 12:30:37] GPU3 : 816 H/s [T: 47c, RPM: 1900, CC: 1140 MHz, MC: 2050 MHz][BUS:5] [2018-12-24 12:30:37] GPU4 : 818 H/s [T: 49c, RPM: 1870, CC: 1140 MHz, MC: 2050 MHz][BUS:6] [2018-12-24 12:30:37] GPU5 : 817 H/s [T: 44c, RPM: 1921, CC: 1140 MHz, MC: 2050 MHz][BUS:1]
Depends on algo...
|
|
|
|
Skylptor
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 4
Merit: 0
|
 |
December 25, 2018, 01:09:46 PM |
|
Hello, when will you make SRB for Linux?
|
|
|
|
doktor83 (OP)
|
 |
December 27, 2018, 07:03:53 AM |
|
{ "cryptonight_type" : "stellitev8", "intensity" : 0, "double_threads" : true [ {“id”:0,“kernel”:1,“intensity”:60,“worksize”:16,“threads”:1,“ double_threads“:false,”target_temperature“:90,”target_fan_speed“:2500,”off_temperature“:90,”adl_type“:1}, ] }
这个格式怎么设置的,尝试了很久都没做出来 ,谢谢请帮忙,1.7.3可以通过参数设置自动本机名和风扇转速吗,请告诉我在哪里设置,格式
I am trying with google translator here, so not sure i understand you, what automatic name are you talking about? The one used in the API ? Also stellite hasn't forked yet  Your example should look like this : { "cryptonight_type" : "stellitev8", "intensity" : 0, "double_threads" : true, "gpu_conf" : [ { "id" : 0, "intensity" : 60, "worksize" : 16, "threads" : 1, "target_temperature" : 90, "target_fan_speed" : 2500, "off_temperature" : 90, "adl_type" : 1 } ] }
But some values in this config dont make any sense, like target_temperature = 90, but off_temperature is also 90, and set only fan_speed or target_temperature, not both.
|
|
|
|
sangraf
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 6
Merit: 0
|
 |
December 27, 2018, 07:45:47 AM |
|
I successfully used srbminer 1.6.8 on nanopool. I install v1.7.3, copy file pools of 1.6.8 in 1.7.3. srbminer works, but on nanopool worker no visible. Same 1.7.2 I mining XMR v8
|
|
|
|
doktor83 (OP)
|
 |
December 27, 2018, 07:47:48 AM |
|
I successfully used srbminer 1.6.8 on nanopool. I install v1.7.3, copy file pools of 1.6.8 in 1.7.3. srbminer works, but on nanopool worker no visible. Same 1.7.2
So you should check your start.bat , that it points to the right config & pool file.
|
|
|
|
sangraf
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 6
Merit: 0
|
 |
December 27, 2018, 07:54:26 AM |
|
I successfully used srbminer 1.6.8 on nanopool. I install v1.7.3, copy file pools of 1.6.8 in 1.7.3. srbminer works, but on nanopool worker no visible. Same 1.7.2
So you should check your start.bat , that it points to the right config & pool file. My start.bat setx GPU_MAX_HEAP_SIZE 100 setx GPU_MAX_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1 setx GPU_SINGLE_ALLOC_PERCENT 100 setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100 setx GPU_MAX_SINGLE_ALLOC_PERCENT 100 @echo off cd %~dp0
cls for /f "tokens=2 delims==" %%a in ('wmic OS Get localdatetime /value') do set "dt=%%a" set LOGTIME=%dt:~0,4%_%dt:~4,2%_%dt:~6,2%_%dt:~8,2%_%dt:~10,2%_%dt:~12,2% set LOGTIME=%LOGTIME: =% set LOGTIME=%LOGTIME:,=.%.txt
SRBMiner-CN.exe --config Config\config-normalv8.txt --pools pools.txt --logfile %LOGTIME% my pools { "pools" : [ { "pool" : "xmr-eu1.nanopool.org:14444", "wallet" : "85**w.550/sangraf@***.com", "password" : "x" }, { "pool" : "xmr-eu2.nanopool.org:14444", "wallet" : "85**w.550/sangraf@***.com", "password" : "x" } ] }
|
|
|
|
patmontes
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 8
Merit: 0
|
 |
December 27, 2018, 11:07:40 AM |
|
Hey everyone are these temps normal for Bittubev2? I'm using Rx580s and 480s at 900mv. Using version 1.7.2 algoswitching monero ocean http://i68.tinypic.com/2rcy7lu.jpg
|
|
|
|
doktor83 (OP)
|
 |
December 27, 2018, 11:25:50 AM |
|
V1.7.4- Added algo 'Webchain' - Added algo 'Turtle' - Tiny speed increase on some cards - Fixed bug with 'off_temperature' - Added --cgpuofftemperature to cmd parameters - Added --cgpuoldmode to cmd parameters - Added --nocache to cmd parameters - Added 'off_temperature' display to API - Added GPU temperature display in log - Added --cgpuoldmode to cmd parameters - Fixed auto setup for Hycon - Fixed a bug with algo switching that could crash miner + 'off_temperature' is now disabled by default (previous version was set to 85c). + added --nocache parameter to .bat, if used, no binaries will be saved to disk + there was a bug in 173 that could crash miner on algo change, hopefully it is fixed now + some cards got a tiny hashrate increase 
|
|
|
|
abg00
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 288
Merit: 1
|
 |
December 27, 2018, 12:45:05 PM |
|
V1.7.4
tube algo/ have error Error CL_INVALID_KERNEL_ARGS when calling clEnqueueNDRangeKernel for kernel 1 for DeviceID 1 (Thread 2) [Increase virtual mem] swap 92 gb two card only device 1 rx480 4 gb
|
|
|
|
doktor83 (OP)
|
 |
December 27, 2018, 12:49:16 PM |
|
V1.7.4
tube algo/ have error Error CL_INVALID_KERNEL_ARGS when calling clEnqueueNDRangeKernel for kernel 1 for DeviceID 1 (Thread 2) [Increase virtual mem] swap 92 gb two card only device 1 rx480 4 gb you just copied new version over the old one and haven't clear the cache folder didn't you
|
|
|
|
abg00
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 288
Merit: 1
|
 |
December 27, 2018, 12:51:27 PM |
|
V1.7.4
tube algo/ have error Error CL_INVALID_KERNEL_ARGS when calling clEnqueueNDRangeKernel for kernel 1 for DeviceID 1 (Thread 2) [Increase virtual mem] swap 92 gb two card only device 1 rx480 4 gb you just copied new version over the old one and haven't clear the cache folder didn't you need old cache? 
|
|
|
|
|