thenextdinosaur
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 13
Merit: 0
|
 |
February 19, 2019, 04:00:16 PM |
|
forget about cn-gpu crap. It is much better on nvidia. And will be easy for fpga/asic if have any volume
I agree and tend to believe in the same thing. I removed CN-GPU from my list. About the temperatures, what other AMD Vega miners are experiencing? Sometimes I think HBM at 75°C might be too hot, although it doesn't throttle at all.
|
|
|
|
heavyarms1912
|
 |
February 19, 2019, 09:37:13 PM |
|
forget about cn-gpu crap. It is much better on nvidia. And will be easy for fpga/asic if have any volume
Yup. it's much better on Nvidia but floating point math is not efficient on FPGAs and ASICs.
|
|
|
|
sgnl.dsrptr
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 2
Merit: 0
|
 |
February 20, 2019, 02:28:18 AM |
|
When is cn/wow implementation expected to be done?
|
|
|
|
maria3131
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 5
Merit: 0
|
 |
February 20, 2019, 04:07:28 AM |
|
hi dok! heavyx ready?
|
|
|
|
rednoW
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1510
Merit: 1003
|
 |
February 20, 2019, 05:52:29 AM |
|
forget about cn-gpu crap. It is much better on nvidia. And will be easy for fpga/asic if have any volume
Yup. it's much better on Nvidia but floating point math is not efficient on FPGAs and ASICs. Are you joking? I've read about fpgas doing scientific floating points math years ago )) It is what they are designed for ))
|
|
|
|
heavyarms1912
|
 |
February 20, 2019, 02:31:12 PM Last edit: February 20, 2019, 03:23:33 PM by heavyarms1912 |
|
forget about cn-gpu crap. It is much better on nvidia. And will be easy for fpga/asic if have any volume
Yup. it's much better on Nvidia but floating point math is not efficient on FPGAs and ASICs. Are you joking? I've read about fpgas doing scientific floating points math years ago )) It is what they are designed for )) never said they can't do. read; efficiency. EDIT: new FPGAs do come with loads of DSP blocks so perhaps that gap is quite narrow now. EDIT2: https://medium.com/@crypto_ryo/cryptonight-gpu-fpga-proof-pow-algorithm-based-on-floating-point-instructions-92524debf8e8
|
|
|
|
doktor83 (OP)
|
 |
February 20, 2019, 04:24:03 PM |
|
When is cn/wow implementation expected to be done?
I can't tell exactly, but new version will be released in max 10 days, all new algos added. that article was written by fireice so it shouldn't be taken seriously 
|
|
|
|
katar14
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 20
Merit: 0
|
 |
February 20, 2019, 07:08:49 PM |
|
algo heavyX?   when??
|
|
|
|
thenextdinosaur
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 13
Merit: 0
|
 |
February 20, 2019, 07:12:06 PM |
|
algo heavyX?   when?? He literally answered above your message.
|
|
|
|
|
katar14
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 20
Merit: 0
|
 |
February 21, 2019, 11:43:37 AM |
|
algo heavyX?   when?? He literally answered above your message.  ok
|
|
|
|
thenextdinosaur
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 13
Merit: 0
|
 |
February 21, 2019, 12:17:17 PM Last edit: February 21, 2019, 03:04:41 PM by thenextdinosaur |
|
One issue that I've been getting since earlier versions is that, while mining on a pool with multi-algo support (MO), sometimes the miner will just close without any apparent reason. The command prompt window just closes. When checking the log, nothing abnormal was happening. Sometimes the last line on the log is an algo change, sometimes is submitting a share. Miner just closes. Any idea of what may cause that or what else can I do to test more and provide more feedback?
|
|
|
|
doktor83 (OP)
|
 |
February 21, 2019, 02:48:27 PM |
|
I know about this issue, and i probably fixed it (khm, i really hope), so it will be available in the next version soon.
|
|
|
|
SpceGhst
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 269
Merit: 4
|
 |
February 21, 2019, 04:05:36 PM |
|
One issue that I've been getting since earlier versions is that, while mining on a pool with multi-algo support (MO), sometimes the miner will just close without any apparent reason. The command prompt window just closes. When checking the log, nothing abnormal was happening. Sometimes the last line on the log is an algo change, sometimes is submitting a share. Miner just closes. Any idea of what may cause that or what else can I do to test more and provide more feedback?
I was having the same issue without using profit switching, just a single coin. Tracked the problem down to the AMD driver crashing. The only solution I found was to lower the intensity setting by 10-20%. Yes, you get a lower hash rate, but the program doesn’t crash either.
|
|
|
|
doktor83 (OP)
|
 |
February 21, 2019, 04:39:54 PM |
|
One issue that I've been getting since earlier versions is that, while mining on a pool with multi-algo support (MO), sometimes the miner will just close without any apparent reason. The command prompt window just closes. When checking the log, nothing abnormal was happening. Sometimes the last line on the log is an algo change, sometimes is submitting a share. Miner just closes. Any idea of what may cause that or what else can I do to test more and provide more feedback?
I was having the same issue without using profit switching, just a single coin. Tracked the problem down to the AMD driver crashing. The only solution I found was to lower the intensity setting by 10-20%. Yes, you get a lower hash rate, but the program doesn’t crash either. This is different, yes driver can crash if you push the cards too much, that can happen with any miner. Also try to lower memory clock or give the gpu a little bit more voltage to the core, and maybe you wont have to lower the intensity at all.
|
|
|
|
t0lsty
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 3
Merit: 0
|
 |
February 22, 2019, 06:33:19 PM |
|
one of vega`s rig gives me such error after 10-20 minutes :
"Pool rejected result 0x000xxxx (invalid job id) "
when I lower the intensity - it works few hours, but then again this error.
it`s on turtle algo. but have same on stellite with newer srb
Whan can be a problem ??
|
|
|
|
Csouza
Member

Offline
Activity: 118
Merit: 10
|
 |
February 22, 2019, 06:34:25 PM |
|
What about hashrate on Vega56@64, RX580 4GB and RX570 4GB on CNGPU algo ?
SRB Miner 1.7.8 Core Mem HS GPU0 [7] Radeon RX 570 Series 1200 1850 620 GPU1 [5] Radeon RX 570 Series 1200 1850 608 GPU2 [6] Radeon RX 570 Series 1200 1850 618 GPU3 [1] Radeon RX 570 Series 1200 1850 652 GPU4 [3] Radeon RX 570 Series 1200 1850 645 GPU5 [4] Radeon RX 570 Series 1200 1850 607
GPU0 [1] Radeon RX 580 1150 2050 710 GPU1 [4] Radeon RX 580 1150 2050 710 GPU2 [9] Radeon RX Vega 1450 1000 1572 GPU3 [19] Radeon RX Vega 1450 1000 1580 GPU4 [12] Radeon RX Vega 1450 1000 1572 GPU5 [16] Radeon RX Vega 1450 1000 1576
|
|
|
|
ManDoneKTM
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 150
Merit: 0
|
 |
February 23, 2019, 12:33:57 AM |
|
What about hashrate on Vega56@64, RX580 4GB and RX570 4GB on CNGPU algo ?
SRB Miner 1.7.8 Core Mem HS GPU0 [7] Radeon RX 570 Series 1200 1850 620 GPU1 [5] Radeon RX 570 Series 1200 1850 608 GPU2 [6] Radeon RX 570 Series 1200 1850 618 GPU3 [1] Radeon RX 570 Series 1200 1850 652 GPU4 [3] Radeon RX 570 Series 1200 1850 645 GPU5 [4] Radeon RX 570 Series 1200 1850 607
GPU0 [1] Radeon RX 580 1150 2050 710 GPU1 [4] Radeon RX 580 1150 2050 710 GPU2 [9] Radeon RX Vega 1450 1000 1572 GPU3 [19] Radeon RX Vega 1450 1000 1580 GPU4 [12] Radeon RX Vega 1450 1000 1572 GPU5 [16] Radeon RX Vega 1450 1000 1576
GPU0 : 2534 H/s [T: 49c, RPM: 2100, CC: 1260 MHz, MC: 2100 MHz][BUS:7]
|
|
|
|
Csouza
Member

Offline
Activity: 118
Merit: 10
|
 |
February 23, 2019, 12:50:53 AM |
|
What about hashrate on Vega56@64, RX580 4GB and RX570 4GB on CNGPU algo ?
SRB Miner 1.7.8 Core Mem HS GPU0 [7] Radeon RX 570 Series 1200 1850 620 GPU1 [5] Radeon RX 570 Series 1200 1850 608 GPU2 [6] Radeon RX 570 Series 1200 1850 618 GPU3 [1] Radeon RX 570 Series 1200 1850 652 GPU4 [3] Radeon RX 570 Series 1200 1850 645 GPU5 [4] Radeon RX 570 Series 1200 1850 607
GPU0 [1] Radeon RX 580 1150 2050 710 GPU1 [4] Radeon RX 580 1150 2050 710 GPU2 [9] Radeon RX Vega 1450 1000 1572 GPU3 [19] Radeon RX Vega 1450 1000 1580 GPU4 [12] Radeon RX Vega 1450 1000 1572 GPU5 [16] Radeon RX Vega 1450 1000 1576
GPU0 : 2534 H/s [T: 49c, RPM: 2100, CC: 1260 MHz, MC: 2100 MHz][BUS:7] What VGA is?
|
|
|
|
doktor83 (OP)
|
 |
February 23, 2019, 05:15:07 AM |
|
What about hashrate on Vega56@64, RX580 4GB and RX570 4GB on CNGPU algo ?
SRB Miner 1.7.8 Core Mem HS GPU0 [7] Radeon RX 570 Series 1200 1850 620 GPU1 [5] Radeon RX 570 Series 1200 1850 608 GPU2 [6] Radeon RX 570 Series 1200 1850 618 GPU3 [1] Radeon RX 570 Series 1200 1850 652 GPU4 [3] Radeon RX 570 Series 1200 1850 645 GPU5 [4] Radeon RX 570 Series 1200 1850 607
GPU0 [1] Radeon RX 580 1150 2050 710 GPU1 [4] Radeon RX 580 1150 2050 710 GPU2 [9] Radeon RX Vega 1450 1000 1572 GPU3 [19] Radeon RX Vega 1450 1000 1580 GPU4 [12] Radeon RX Vega 1450 1000 1572 GPU5 [16] Radeon RX Vega 1450 1000 1576
You are probably using xmr stak settings here. well don't. Try out auto setup. Vega56 @ 1450/900 = 1750khs on 110/32/2 F0
|
|
|
|
|