Bitcoin Forum
July 17, 2025, 12:48:58 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 29.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 [301] 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 ... 362 »
  Print  
Author Topic: SRBMiner Cryptonight AMD GPU Miner V1.9.3 - native algo switching  (Read 237317 times)
thenextdinosaur
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 13
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 19, 2019, 04:00:16 PM
 #6001

forget about cn-gpu crap. It is much better on nvidia. And will be easy for fpga/asic if have any volume

I agree and tend to believe in the same thing. I removed CN-GPU from my list.
About the temperatures, what other AMD Vega miners are experiencing? Sometimes I think HBM at 75°C might be too hot, although it doesn't throttle at all.
heavyarms1912
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 729
Merit: 114



View Profile
February 19, 2019, 09:37:13 PM
 #6002

forget about cn-gpu crap. It is much better on nvidia. And will be easy for fpga/asic if have any volume

Yup. it's much better on Nvidia but floating point math is not efficient on FPGAs and ASICs.
sgnl.dsrptr
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 20, 2019, 02:28:18 AM
 #6003

When is cn/wow implementation expected to be done?
maria3131
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 5
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 20, 2019, 04:07:28 AM
 #6004

hi dok!
heavyx ready?
rednoW
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1510
Merit: 1003


View Profile
February 20, 2019, 05:52:29 AM
 #6005

forget about cn-gpu crap. It is much better on nvidia. And will be easy for fpga/asic if have any volume

Yup. it's much better on Nvidia but floating point math is not efficient on FPGAs and ASICs.
Are you joking? I've read about fpgas doing scientific floating points math years ago )) It is what they are designed for ))
heavyarms1912
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 729
Merit: 114



View Profile
February 20, 2019, 02:31:12 PM
Last edit: February 20, 2019, 03:23:33 PM by heavyarms1912
 #6006

forget about cn-gpu crap. It is much better on nvidia. And will be easy for fpga/asic if have any volume

Yup. it's much better on Nvidia but floating point math is not efficient on FPGAs and ASICs.
Are you joking? I've read about fpgas doing scientific floating points math years ago )) It is what they are designed for ))

never said they can't do. read; efficiency.

EDIT:  new FPGAs do come with loads of DSP blocks so perhaps that gap is quite narrow now.

EDIT2: https://medium.com/@crypto_ryo/cryptonight-gpu-fpga-proof-pow-algorithm-based-on-floating-point-instructions-92524debf8e8
doktor83 (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 2870
Merit: 626


View Profile WWW
February 20, 2019, 04:24:03 PM
 #6007

When is cn/wow implementation expected to be done?

I can't tell exactly, but new version will be released in max 10 days, all  new algos added.


that article was written by fireice so it shouldn't be taken seriously  Cool

SRBMiner-MULTI thread - HERE
http://www.srbminer.com
katar14
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 20
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 20, 2019, 07:08:49 PM
 #6008

algo heavyX?HuhHuh when??
thenextdinosaur
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 13
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 20, 2019, 07:12:06 PM
 #6009

algo heavyX?HuhHuh when??

He literally answered above your message.
heavyarms1912
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 729
Merit: 114



View Profile
February 21, 2019, 03:11:51 AM
 #6010

When is cn/wow implementation expected to be done?

I can't tell exactly, but new version will be released in max 10 days, all  new algos added.


that article was written by fireice so it shouldn't be taken seriously  Cool

I never trust one source but on paper fp math is slower on FPGAs unless they have lots of DSP slices.  
Now that's the question how many is available and for how much.  Efficiency wise they would be order of magnitude better than GPUs.

I got a source that mentions on the FPGAs capable of doing 10 TFLOPs but looks pretty expensive.  10 TFLOPs is what an RTX 2080 does.
https://www.intel.com/content/dam/www/programmable/us/en/pdfs/literature/pt/stratix-10-product-table.pdf

https://www.digikey.com/product-detail/en/intel/DK-SOC-1SSX-L-A/DK-SOC-1SSX-L-A-ND/9863681
and a 280K cell FPGA is priced at $7.5k
katar14
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 20
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 21, 2019, 11:43:37 AM
 #6011

algo heavyX?HuhHuh when??

He literally answered above your message.
Kiss ok
thenextdinosaur
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 13
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 21, 2019, 12:17:17 PM
Last edit: February 21, 2019, 03:04:41 PM by thenextdinosaur
 #6012

One issue that I've been getting since earlier versions is that, while mining on a pool with multi-algo support (MO), sometimes the miner will just close without any apparent reason. The command prompt window just closes. When checking the log, nothing abnormal was happening. Sometimes the last line on the log is an algo change, sometimes is submitting a share. Miner just closes. Any idea of what may cause that or what else can I do to test more and provide more feedback?
doktor83 (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 2870
Merit: 626


View Profile WWW
February 21, 2019, 02:48:27 PM
 #6013

I know about this issue, and i probably fixed it (khm, i really hope), so it will be available in the next version soon.

SRBMiner-MULTI thread - HERE
http://www.srbminer.com
SpceGhst
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 269
Merit: 4


View Profile
February 21, 2019, 04:05:36 PM
 #6014

One issue that I've been getting since earlier versions is that, while mining on a pool with multi-algo support (MO), sometimes the miner will just close without any apparent reason. The command prompt window just closes. When checking the log, nothing abnormal was happening. Sometimes the last line on the log is an algo change, sometimes is submitting a share. Miner just closes. Any idea of what may cause that or what else can I do to test more and provide more feedback?

I was having the same issue without using profit switching, just a single coin.  Tracked the problem down to the AMD driver crashing.  The only solution I found was to lower the intensity setting by 10-20%.  Yes, you get a lower hash rate, but the program doesn’t crash either.
doktor83 (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 2870
Merit: 626


View Profile WWW
February 21, 2019, 04:39:54 PM
 #6015

One issue that I've been getting since earlier versions is that, while mining on a pool with multi-algo support (MO), sometimes the miner will just close without any apparent reason. The command prompt window just closes. When checking the log, nothing abnormal was happening. Sometimes the last line on the log is an algo change, sometimes is submitting a share. Miner just closes. Any idea of what may cause that or what else can I do to test more and provide more feedback?

I was having the same issue without using profit switching, just a single coin.  Tracked the problem down to the AMD driver crashing.  The only solution I found was to lower the intensity setting by 10-20%.  Yes, you get a lower hash rate, but the program doesn’t crash either.


This is different, yes driver can crash if you push the cards too much, that can happen with any miner.
Also try to lower memory clock or give the gpu a little bit more voltage to the core, and maybe you wont have to lower the intensity at all.

SRBMiner-MULTI thread - HERE
http://www.srbminer.com
t0lsty
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 22, 2019, 06:33:19 PM
 #6016

one of vega`s rig gives me such error after 10-20 minutes :

"Pool rejected result 0x000xxxx  (invalid job id) "

when I lower the intensity  - it works few hours, but then again this error.

it`s on turtle algo. but have same on stellite with newer srb

Whan can be a problem ??
Csouza
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 118
Merit: 10


View Profile
February 22, 2019, 06:34:25 PM
 #6017

What about hashrate on Vega56@64, RX580 4GB and RX570 4GB on CNGPU algo ?

SRB Miner 1.7.8
                                                    Core   Mem       HS
GPU0 [7]   Radeon RX 570 Series   1200   1850      620
GPU1 [5]   Radeon RX 570 Series   1200   1850      608
GPU2 [6]   Radeon RX 570 Series   1200   1850      618
GPU3 [1]   Radeon RX 570 Series   1200   1850      652
GPU4 [3]   Radeon RX 570 Series   1200   1850      645
GPU5 [4]   Radeon RX 570 Series   1200   1850      607


GPU0 [1]   Radeon RX 580           1150   2050      710
GPU1 [4]   Radeon RX 580           1150   2050      710
GPU2 [9]   Radeon RX Vega         1450   1000      1572
GPU3 [19]   Radeon RX Vega       1450   1000      1580
GPU4 [12]   Radeon RX Vega       1450   1000      1572
GPU5 [16]   Radeon RX Vega       1450   1000      1576
ManDoneKTM
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 150
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 23, 2019, 12:33:57 AM
 #6018

What about hashrate on Vega56@64, RX580 4GB and RX570 4GB on CNGPU algo ?

SRB Miner 1.7.8
                                                    Core   Mem       HS
GPU0 [7]   Radeon RX 570 Series   1200   1850      620
GPU1 [5]   Radeon RX 570 Series   1200   1850      608
GPU2 [6]   Radeon RX 570 Series   1200   1850      618
GPU3 [1]   Radeon RX 570 Series   1200   1850      652
GPU4 [3]   Radeon RX 570 Series   1200   1850      645
GPU5 [4]   Radeon RX 570 Series   1200   1850      607


GPU0 [1]   Radeon RX 580           1150   2050      710
GPU1 [4]   Radeon RX 580           1150   2050      710
GPU2 [9]   Radeon RX Vega         1450   1000      1572
GPU3 [19]   Radeon RX Vega       1450   1000      1580
GPU4 [12]   Radeon RX Vega       1450   1000      1572
GPU5 [16]   Radeon RX Vega       1450   1000      1576
GPU0 :    2534 H/s [T: 49c, RPM: 2100, CC: 1260 MHz, MC: 2100 MHz][BUS:7]
Csouza
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 118
Merit: 10


View Profile
February 23, 2019, 12:50:53 AM
 #6019

What about hashrate on Vega56@64, RX580 4GB and RX570 4GB on CNGPU algo ?

SRB Miner 1.7.8
                                                    Core   Mem       HS
GPU0 [7]   Radeon RX 570 Series   1200   1850      620
GPU1 [5]   Radeon RX 570 Series   1200   1850      608
GPU2 [6]   Radeon RX 570 Series   1200   1850      618
GPU3 [1]   Radeon RX 570 Series   1200   1850      652
GPU4 [3]   Radeon RX 570 Series   1200   1850      645
GPU5 [4]   Radeon RX 570 Series   1200   1850      607


GPU0 [1]   Radeon RX 580           1150   2050      710
GPU1 [4]   Radeon RX 580           1150   2050      710
GPU2 [9]   Radeon RX Vega         1450   1000      1572
GPU3 [19]   Radeon RX Vega       1450   1000      1580
GPU4 [12]   Radeon RX Vega       1450   1000      1572
GPU5 [16]   Radeon RX Vega       1450   1000      1576
GPU0 :    2534 H/s [T: 49c, RPM: 2100, CC: 1260 MHz, MC: 2100 MHz][BUS:7]

What VGA is?
doktor83 (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 2870
Merit: 626


View Profile WWW
February 23, 2019, 05:15:07 AM
 #6020

What about hashrate on Vega56@64, RX580 4GB and RX570 4GB on CNGPU algo ?

SRB Miner 1.7.8
                                                    Core   Mem       HS
GPU0 [7]   Radeon RX 570 Series   1200   1850      620
GPU1 [5]   Radeon RX 570 Series   1200   1850      608
GPU2 [6]   Radeon RX 570 Series   1200   1850      618
GPU3 [1]   Radeon RX 570 Series   1200   1850      652
GPU4 [3]   Radeon RX 570 Series   1200   1850      645
GPU5 [4]   Radeon RX 570 Series   1200   1850      607


GPU0 [1]   Radeon RX 580           1150   2050      710
GPU1 [4]   Radeon RX 580           1150   2050      710
GPU2 [9]   Radeon RX Vega         1450   1000      1572
GPU3 [19]   Radeon RX Vega       1450   1000      1580
GPU4 [12]   Radeon RX Vega       1450   1000      1572
GPU5 [16]   Radeon RX Vega       1450   1000      1576

You are probably using xmr stak settings here. well don't. Try out auto setup.
Vega56 @ 1450/900 = 1750khs on 110/32/2 F0

SRBMiner-MULTI thread - HERE
http://www.srbminer.com
Pages: « 1 ... 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 [301] 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 ... 362 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!