Bitcoin Forum
September 17, 2021, 05:30:50 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 22.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 [232] 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 ... 366 »
  Print  
Author Topic: SRBMiner Cryptonight AMD GPU Miner V1.9.3 - native algo switching  (Read 235698 times)
Marvell2
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 1134
Merit: 132


View Profile
October 18, 2018, 07:11:06 AM
 #4621


i have a hostID variable which i use to auto pick the worker name using the rig ID

{
"pools" :
[
{
      "pool" : "pool.supportxmr.com:7777",
      "wallet" : "sssssssssssssssssssssssss",
      "password" : %hostid%":ola_lawal@yahoo.com",
                
      "cryptonight_type" : "normalv7"
},
{
      "pool" : "pool.supportxmr.com:7777",
      "wallet" : "gggggggggggggggggggg",
      "password" : %hostid%":ola_lawal@yahoo.com",
                
      "cryptonight_type" : "normalv8"
}
]
}

tried it with qoutes and it puts just %hostid% on the pool , any ideas how to fix this ?
I have the variable set in the batch file and it does echo so i know its avaiable , if i remove the qoutes i get an error parsing the pools file.

Any ideas ? or do i have to just use comand line and not the pools file ?

If so any examples ?
1631899850
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1631899850

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1631899850
Reply with quote  #2

1631899850
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
Fanpant
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 214
Merit: 100


View Profile
October 18, 2018, 08:25:54 AM
 #4622

What is the setting of R9 290/390 for the V8?
kostepanych2
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 1204
Merit: 105



View Profile
October 18, 2018, 08:37:15 AM
Last edit: October 18, 2018, 12:03:07 PM by kostepanych2
 #4623

Why the MD5 checksums on the website www.srbminer.com and in the first post of this thread are different?
On the website www.srbminer.com MD5: f5fa1db91d56ea63b09343e724bc82fc *SRBMiner-CN-V1-6-8.zip
On this thread: MD5: 9a88b36a8ef2d4116b158c25d06721f6 *SRBMiner-CN-V1-6-8.zip
GKumaran
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 199
Merit: 10


View Profile
October 18, 2018, 08:53:06 AM
 #4624

Hey Doc,

SRBMiner API call:
Code:
{    "rig_name": "GKMiner",    "cryptonight_type": "normalv7",    "miner_version": "1.6.8",    "driver_version": "24.20.11021.1000",    [u][b]"mining_time": 2[/b][/u],    "total_devices": 6,    "total_threads": 12,    "hashrate_total_now": 0,    "hashrate_total_1min": 0,    "hashrate_total_5min": 0,    "hashrate_total_30min": 0,    "hashrate_total_max": 0,    "pool": {        "pool": "asia.cryptonight-hub.miningpoolhub.com:20580",        "difficulty": 0,        [u][b]"time_connected": "1970-01-01 05:30:00",        "uptime": 1539850156[/b][/u],        "latency": 0,        "last_job_received": 1    },    "shares": {        "total": 0,        "accepted": 0,        "accepted_stale": 0,        "rejected": 0,        "avg_find_time": 0    },    "devices": [        {            "device": "GPU0",            "device_id": 0,            "model": "Radeon RX Vega",            "bus_id": 19,            "kernel_id": 1,            "hashrate": 0,            "core_clock": 1630,            "memory_clock": 1100,            "temperature": 41,            "fan_speed_rpm": 3795        },        {            "device": "GPU1",            "device_id": 1,            "model": "Radeon RX Vega",            "bus_id": 13,            "kernel_id": 1,            "hashrate": 0,            "core_clock": 1630,            "memory_clock": 1100,            "temperature": 40,            "fan_speed_rpm": 3743        },        {            "device": "GPU2",            "device_id": 2,            "model": "Radeon RX Vega",            "bus_id": 16,            "kernel_id": 1,            "hashrate": 0,            "core_clock": 1630,            "memory_clock": 1100,            "temperature": 40,            "fan_speed_rpm": 3819        },        {            "device": "GPU3",            "device_id": 3,            "model": "Radeon RX Vega",            "bus_id": 9,            "kernel_id": 1,            "hashrate": 0,            "core_clock": 1630,            "memory_clock": 1100,            "temperature": 38,            "fan_speed_rpm": 3833        },        {            "device": "GPU4",            "device_id": 4,            "model": "Radeon RX Vega",            "bus_id": 3,            "kernel_id": 1,            "hashrate": 0,            "core_clock": 1630,            "memory_clock": 1100,            "temperature": 38,            "fan_speed_rpm": 3760        },        {            "device": "GPU5",            "device_id": 5,            "model": "Radeon RX Vega",            "bus_id": 6,            "kernel_id": 1,            "hashrate": 0,            "core_clock": 1630,            "memory_clock": 1100,            "temperature": 39,            "fan_speed_rpm": 3809        }    ]}

This is an API call made after the miner has started("mining_time": 2), but before it is connected to the pool ("time_connected": "1970-01-01 05:30:00",        "uptime": 1539850156).
Can u fix this, so the Uptime shows 0 instead of the UNIX timestamp? Its throwing the charts crazy.
hesido
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 148
Merit: 5


View Profile
October 18, 2018, 08:54:32 AM
 #4625

Why the MD5 checksum on the website www.srbminer.com and in the first post of this thread is different?
On the website www.srbminer.com MD5: f5fa1db91d56ea63b09343e724bc82fc *SRBMiner-CN-V1-6-8.zip
On this thread: MD5: 9a88b36a8ef2d4116b158c25d06721f6 *SRBMiner-CN-V1-6-8.zip

There have been 4 minor updates to the 1.6.8, what is the latest md5 in the download?
doktor83
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1764
Merit: 611


View Profile WWW
October 18, 2018, 09:01:30 AM
Last edit: October 18, 2018, 09:37:46 AM by doktor83
 #4626

Why the MD5 checksum on the website www.srbminer.com and in the first post of this thread is different?
On the website www.srbminer.com MD5: f5fa1db91d56ea63b09343e724bc82fc *SRBMiner-CN-V1-6-8.zip
On this thread: MD5: 9a88b36a8ef2d4116b158c25d06721f6 *SRBMiner-CN-V1-6-8.zip

Oh, i forgot to change it on the site, MD5 of the latest release is : 9a88b36a8ef2d4116b158c25d06721f6 *SRBMiner-CN-V1-6-8.zip


Edit: Fixed

SRBMiner-MULTI thread - HERE
http://www.srbminer.com
jazz1984
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 378
Merit: 5


View Profile
October 18, 2018, 09:15:51 AM
 #4627

So there is no way to get it to work with older AMD drivers like 15.12 ? This is on Windows 7.

Basically starting the start.bat or the SRBMiner-CN.exe results in an instant exit and doesn't even provide an error. Checked the log file and nothing was created.

put a pause at the end of the start.bat so it won't close the window and you probably have a parse error in the config file.

Yes i've already tried this. Its basically completely blank. No error or anything. And there is no log file created either.

I am using AMD Drivers 15.12 on Windows 7. Wondering if anyone else has been succesful in getting these to work somehow.

are you using iGPU?

No its a headless  rig, doesn't even have iGPU on the motherboard.

did you try xmr-stak?  if that gets halted too then it's something messed up in drivers.  I had an issue with all miners stuck and it was due to Opencl/driver issue.

Yes I tried some odd version of XMR-stak and it works with V8 however the max I can get is around 400hs with an R9 280X.

Since a Vega gets like 2000hs and a RX 570 gets 900hs, it's a horrible speed. Might be time to pack up the GPUs unless the speeds improve.
Recommended drivers (for srbminer):
Adrenalin 18.5.1, Adrenalin 18.5.2, Adrenalin 18.6.1
I use 18.6.1 on win7x64. With some 17.xxx (dont remember exactly) was some troubles, after drivers updating works good. 7970 card (same as 280x).
Jitmad
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 59
Merit: 0


View Profile
October 18, 2018, 09:19:41 AM
 #4628

I try to run 1.6.8 with 6XR9 390. The driver version is 16.9.2 Windows 8.1
I try to benchmark the normal V8.
But it did not run. It has
error: Unknown attribute kind (45)

 Anybody can help?


---------------------------------------------------------
SRBMiner Cryptonight AMD GPU miner 1.6.8
DevFee ~0.85%
Press 's' to get some stats
Press 'h' to get some hashrate
Press 'r' to reload pools
Press 'p' to switch to the next pool
Press 'o' to switch to the previous pool
Press 0-9 to disable/enable GPU while mining
Give it a few minutes to reach maximum hashrate
---------------------------------------------------------
Please use : Adrenalin 18.5.1, 18.5.2 or 18.6.1 drivers
Total pools: 2

Please wait...

CryptonightV8 mode enabled

Benchmark mode


[2018-10-18 10:11:41] Heating up system, please wait...
[2018-10-18 10:11:42] Compiling kernel for DEVICE BUS ID 6 ...
error: Unknown attribute kind (45)
Press any key to continue . . .

cmd line
SRBMiner-CN.exe --config Config\config-normalv8.txt --runbenchmark

config-normalv8.txt
{
"cryptonight_type" : "normalv8",
"intensity" : 0,
"double_threads" : true,

}
doktor83
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1764
Merit: 611


View Profile WWW
October 18, 2018, 09:38:11 AM
 #4629

Hey Doc,

SRBMiner API call:
Code:
{    "rig_name": "GKMiner",    "cryptonight_type": "normalv7",    "miner_version": "1.6.8",    "driver_version": "24.20.11021.1000",    [u][b]"mining_time": 2[/b][/u],    "total_devices": 6,    "total_threads": 12,    "hashrate_total_now": 0,    "hashrate_total_1min": 0,    "hashrate_total_5min": 0,    "hashrate_total_30min": 0,    "hashrate_total_max": 0,    "pool": {        "pool": "asia.cryptonight-hub.miningpoolhub.com:20580",        "difficulty": 0,        [u][b]"time_connected": "1970-01-01 05:30:00",        "uptime": 1539850156[/b][/u],        "latency": 0,        "last_job_received": 1    },    "shares": {        "total": 0,        "accepted": 0,        "accepted_stale": 0,        "rejected": 0,        "avg_find_time": 0    },    "devices": [        {            "device": "GPU0",            "device_id": 0,            "model": "Radeon RX Vega",            "bus_id": 19,            "kernel_id": 1,            "hashrate": 0,            "core_clock": 1630,            "memory_clock": 1100,            "temperature": 41,            "fan_speed_rpm": 3795        },        {            "device": "GPU1",            "device_id": 1,            "model": "Radeon RX Vega",            "bus_id": 13,            "kernel_id": 1,            "hashrate": 0,            "core_clock": 1630,            "memory_clock": 1100,            "temperature": 40,            "fan_speed_rpm": 3743        },        {            "device": "GPU2",            "device_id": 2,            "model": "Radeon RX Vega",            "bus_id": 16,            "kernel_id": 1,            "hashrate": 0,            "core_clock": 1630,            "memory_clock": 1100,            "temperature": 40,            "fan_speed_rpm": 3819        },        {            "device": "GPU3",            "device_id": 3,            "model": "Radeon RX Vega",            "bus_id": 9,            "kernel_id": 1,            "hashrate": 0,            "core_clock": 1630,            "memory_clock": 1100,            "temperature": 38,            "fan_speed_rpm": 3833        },        {            "device": "GPU4",            "device_id": 4,            "model": "Radeon RX Vega",            "bus_id": 3,            "kernel_id": 1,            "hashrate": 0,            "core_clock": 1630,            "memory_clock": 1100,            "temperature": 38,            "fan_speed_rpm": 3760        },        {            "device": "GPU5",            "device_id": 5,            "model": "Radeon RX Vega",            "bus_id": 6,            "kernel_id": 1,            "hashrate": 0,            "core_clock": 1630,            "memory_clock": 1100,            "temperature": 39,            "fan_speed_rpm": 3809        }    ]}

This is an API call made after the miner has started("mining_time": 2), but before it is connected to the pool ("time_connected": "1970-01-01 05:30:00",        "uptime": 1539850156).
Can u fix this, so the Uptime shows 0 instead of the UNIX timestamp? Its throwing the charts crazy.

going to check it out Smiley

SRBMiner-MULTI thread - HERE
http://www.srbminer.com
jazz1984
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 378
Merit: 5


View Profile
October 18, 2018, 10:06:23 AM
 #4630

I try to run 1.6.8 with 6XR9 390. The driver version is 16.9.2 Windows 8.1
I try to benchmark the normal V8.
But it did not run. It has
error: Unknown attribute kind (45)

 Anybody can help?



Please use : Adrenalin 18.5.1, 18.5.2 or 18.6.1 drivers
Total pools: 2



At first try to use recommended driver. Don't use 18.3.4 and older drivers...
PS 87 blocks till fork.
abg00
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 284
Merit: 1


View Profile
October 18, 2018, 10:44:14 AM
 #4631

test rx550\2gb 12 gpu rig 1150\800 1800\820

v7 460 h\s each card  480 watt from wall
v8 380 h\s  520 watt
big_daddy
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1456
Merit: 550


xUSD - The PRIVATE stable coin - Haven Protocol


View Profile WWW
October 18, 2018, 12:20:17 PM
 #4632

Hello XHV - Haven miners

I'm running an 8gpu rig, MSI Armor RX570 8GB cards, on 1190/2200 clocks, and using the last version of SRBminer but can't reach the 1.000+ h/s on any of my cards  Sad
Is here anyone with the same/similar setup running stable on higher clocks?
the cards are not bios modded, using the last drivers & compute mode on & MSI afterburner


NCarter84
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 194
Merit: 3


View Profile
October 18, 2018, 12:28:30 PM
 #4633

Anyone have any issues with the API randomly crashing? I'm using it to remote back hash details to ETH Monitoring and it will just go flat. Restart of the miner typically fixes it, but doing that 3-5 times a day is troublesome.
doktor83
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1764
Merit: 611


View Profile WWW
October 18, 2018, 12:35:49 PM
 #4634

Auto switch worked like a charm  Cool
Guys, we are now mining V8 Smiley

@NCarter84 , if miner works then API web server works too. When you think it crashed, open the api port in the browser, to check does it return json.

SRBMiner-MULTI thread - HERE
http://www.srbminer.com
Bojcha
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 848
Merit: 500



View Profile
October 18, 2018, 12:41:04 PM
 #4635

Happy Fork  Grin
rinzlerus
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 11
Merit: 0


View Profile
October 18, 2018, 12:41:58 PM
 #4636

rx550 2G on 1.6.8:
v7 - 500 H/s
v8 - 400 H/s
Is it ok?
amxcs
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 24
Merit: 0


View Profile
October 18, 2018, 12:54:05 PM
 #4637

Somebody mining in NiceHash?
NCarter84
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 194
Merit: 3


View Profile
October 18, 2018, 12:55:46 PM
 #4638

Auto switch worked like a charm  Cool
Guys, we are now mining V8 Smiley

@NCarter84 , if miner works then API web server works too. When you think it crashed, open the api port in the browser, to check does it return json.

Would you be able to provide directions on how to do this?

Thanks
dragonmike
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1232
Merit: 556


VEIL - PRIVACY WITHOUT COMPROMISE


View Profile
October 18, 2018, 01:00:49 PM
 #4639

Auto switch worked like a charm  Cool
Guys, we are now mining V8 Smiley
Well, I'm on MoneroOcean and I'm still mining CNfast... So not too sure if they've implemented the fork correctly or whether they just havent't got enough profitability data for XMRv8 yet...



▄▄                                  ▄▄
 ███▄                            ▄███
  ██████                      ██████
   ███████                  ███████
    ███████                ███████
     ███████              ███████
      ███████            ███████
       ███████▄▄      ▄▄███████
        ██████████████████████
         ████████████████████
          ██████████████████
           ████████████████
            ██████████████
             ███████████
              █████████
               ███████
                █████
                 ██
                  █
veil|     PRIVACY     
     WITHOUT COMPROMISE.       
▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂
|   NO ICO. NO PREMINE. 
   X16RT GPU Mining. Fair distribution.   
|      The first Zerocoin-based Cryptocurrency       
   WITH ALWAYS-ON PRIVACY.   
|



                   ▄▄████
              ▄▄████████▌
         ▄▄█████████▀███
    ▄▄██████████▀▀ ▄███▌
▄████████████▀▀  ▄█████
▀▀▀███████▀   ▄███████▌
      ██    ▄█████████
       █  ▄██████████▌
       █  ███████████
       █ ██▀ ▀██████▌
       ██▀     ▀████
                 ▀█▌




   ▄███████
   ████████
   ███▀
   ███
██████████
██████████
   ███
   ███
   ███
   ███
   ███
   ███




     ▄▄█▀▀ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ▀▀█▄▄
   ▐██▄▄██████████████▄▄██▌
   ████████████████████████
  ▐████████████████████████▌
  ███████▀▀▀██████▀▀▀███████
 ▐██████     ████     ██████▌
 ███████     ████     ███████
▐████████▄▄▄██████▄▄▄████████▌
▐████████████████████████████▌
 █████▄▄▀▀▀▀██████▀▀▀▀▄▄█████
  ▀▀██████          ██████▀▀
      ▀▀▀            ▀▀▀
ripcurrent
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 160
Merit: 10


View Profile
October 18, 2018, 01:01:28 PM
 #4640

Doc,  Switch over worked great, thx for your continued support...

Do we need to tweak any of the setting for V8 or will the v7 work well?

meaning card settings..
Pages: « 1 ... 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 [232] 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 ... 366 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!