|
|
DJMinerOne
Newbie

Activity: 17
Merit: 0
|
 |
December 07, 2018, 01:36:46 PM |
|
Will try tonight. Thank you!
|
|
|
|
|
deimo
Newbie

Activity: 13
Merit: 0
|
 |
December 07, 2018, 01:54:58 PM |
|
Nicely done! miner 1.7.2 driver 18.3.2 algo heavy/haven RX 580 8GB 1185 h/s RX 470 4GB 940 h/s 9% more power 
|
|
|
|
|
rambetiko
Member


Activity: 189
Merit: 10
|
 |
December 07, 2018, 11:21:46 PM Last edit: December 08, 2018, 03:17:02 PM by rambetiko |
|
i have this error Error CL_BUILD_PROGRAM_FAILURE when calling clBuildProgram [ctx->Program] for DeviceID 0 (Thread 0)
18.6.1 1.7.2
vega 64 hash 1790-1800 ok?
|
|
|
|
|
Azzgard1980
Newbie

Activity: 15
Merit: 0
|
 |
December 08, 2018, 12:12:40 AM |
|
hi guys, please give good timings for micron, 777000000000000022AA1C0073626C41B0551016BA0D260B0060060004061420EA8940AA0300000 01914292EB22E3B16-on these timings max 950 on heavy algo rx578.... 
|
|
|
|
|
zeef
Newbie

Activity: 306
Merit: 0
|
 |
December 08, 2018, 02:55:06 AM |
|
Hi doktor, Notice that my system of 10 gpu is consuming more 5% power. Why consume differ from version 1.70 to 1.72 with same configs?  Changes in coding?  I have more 10% hashing too  Thanks
|
|
|
|
|
NCarter84
Jr. Member

Activity: 195
Merit: 4
|
 |
December 08, 2018, 05:01:39 AM |
|
Anyone using 8gb cards for CN Lite V7? I can get over 1700hs... My 4gb cards are running upwards of 2000hs.
|
|
|
|
|
GKumaran
Member


Activity: 204
Merit: 10
|
 |
December 08, 2018, 06:03:27 AM |
|
Hello Dok, I am having strange issues with Vega 64 and the Heavy algos. I have discovered the issue during testing and it seems like the Vega cards only hash at full potential immediately after they have been reset. If i run the benchmark again after running another algo, it drops down in hash. First run after device reset:Thread[0]: 0.0 H/s <- RX580 8GB Thread[1]: 0.0 H/s <- RX580 8GB Thread[2]: 1033.0 H/s <- Vega 64 Thread[3]: 1046.0 H/s <- Vega 64 Thread[4]: 973.0 H/s <- Vega 64 low clock Thread[5]: 980.0 H/s <- Vega 64 low clock Total: 4032.0 H/S Thread[0]: 555.0 H/s <- RX580 8GB Thread[1]: 555.0 H/s <- RX580 8GB Thread[2]: 1041.0 H/s <- Vega 64 Thread[3]: 1042.0 H/s <- Vega 64 Thread[4]: 980.0 H/s <- Vega 64 low clock Thread[5]: 979.0 H/s <- Vega 64 low clock Total: 5152.0 H/S Second run with no reset after running a Bittube bench:Thread[0]: 0.0 H/s <- RX580 8GB Thread[1]: 0.0 H/s <- RX580 8GB Thread[2]: 1035.0 H/s <- Vega 64 Thread[3]: 1027.0 H/s <- Vega 64 Thread[4]: 973.0 H/s <- Vega 64 low clock Thread[5]: 970.0 H/s <- Vega 64 low clock Total: 4005.0 H/S Thread[0]: 555.0 H/s <- RX580 8GB Thread[1]: 555.0 H/s <- RX580 8GB Thread[2]: 1032.0 H/s <- Vega 64 Thread[3]: 1030.0 H/s <- Vega 64 Thread[4]: 971.0 H/s <- Vega 64 low clock Thread[5]: 970.0 H/s <- Vega 64 low clock Total: 5113.0 H/S It seems like no mater what algo change happens after the first run, the Heavy algos ca not reach maximum potential again till the Vega`s are reset. I have also tested "heavy_mode" : 1 and 2 but has no effect on the issue. Can confirm this behaviour on even on CN v7 algos, but --resetvega fixes these Just waiting for th CN lite code rewrites
|
|
|
|
|
Anaykh
Newbie

Activity: 6
Merit: 0
|
 |
December 08, 2018, 07:31:25 AM |
|
Hello I do not have any memory errors in HWinfo, but I get SRBMiner Compute error, can someone help me? Widows: 10 x64 (1803) Driver: 18.5.1 VGA: Asus ROG Strix RX480 8G Samsung Memory Patched UBERMIX 3.1.1 Thanks
|
|
|
|
|
msTrix
Newbie

Activity: 12
Merit: 0
|
 |
December 08, 2018, 07:45:54 AM |
|
Hello I do not have any memory errors in HWinfo, but I get SRBMiner Compute error, can someone help me? Widows: 10 x64 (1803) Driver: 18.5.1 VGA: Asus ROG Strix RX480 8G Samsung Memory Patched UBERMIX 3.1.1 Thanks
maybe some Core clock issues, drop it 25 Mhz or try raising power by 12mV
|
|
|
|
|
abg00
Jr. Member

Activity: 288
Merit: 1
|
 |
December 08, 2018, 12:36:21 PM |
|
hi guys, please give good timings for micron, 777000000000000022AA1C0073626C41B0551016BA0D260B0060060004061420EA8940AA0300000 01914292EB22E3B16-on these timings max 950 on heavy algo rx578....  777000000000000022AA1C00EF615C41B0551016BA0D96060060060004061420EA8940AA030004C 01914292E692E3B16
|
|
|
|
|
zeef
Newbie

Activity: 306
Merit: 0
|
 |
December 08, 2018, 12:57:31 PM |
|
Hi again doktor, I use srbminer from months with no problem in my 9 vega 64 rig. I use v1.6x - v1.7.0 weeks with no restart or hang. But version 1.7.2, after 8 hours or so hangs. In log i got this: https://justpaste.it/4rctvAny ideia what could be? Regards
|
|
|
|
|
Kgonla
Newbie

Activity: 129
Merit: 0
|
 |
December 08, 2018, 01:00:41 PM |
|
Hello I do not have any memory errors in HWinfo, but I get SRBMiner Compute error, can someone help me? Widows: 10 x64 (1803) Driver: 18.5.1 VGA: Asus ROG Strix RX480 8G Samsung Memory Patched UBERMIX 3.1.1 Thanks
maybe some Core clock issues, drop it 25 Mhz or try raising power by 12mV HWinfo do not show correctly memory errors, you can have a lot & HWinfo say there is no one. Just set memory speed to lower value.
|
|
|
|
|
|
doktor83 (OP)
|
 |
December 08, 2018, 01:20:40 PM |
|
Hi again doktor, I use srbminer from months with no problem in my 9 vega 64 rig. I use v1.6x - v1.7.0 weeks with no restart or hang. But version 1.7.2, after 8 hours or so hangs. In log i got this: https://justpaste.it/4rctvAny ideia what could be? Regards [2018-12-08 03:21:02] watchdog: GPU1 [BUS: 32] hashing speed is 0 H/S [2018-12-08 03:21:13] watchdog: GPU1 [BUS: 32] hashing speed is 0 H/S [2018-12-08 03:21:24] watchdog: GPU crash detected, miner will try to restart [2018-12-08 03:50:02] Startup monitor detected that GPU's could not be initialised in 120 seconds Looks like this gpu crashed so badly that even after miner restart it won't start , and it can't be initialised on miner startup. Set a watchdog script to restart whole machine on crash, then on windows start set miner to start auto.
|
|
|
|
camchimonline
Newbie

Activity: 32
Merit: 0
|
 |
December 08, 2018, 02:52:31 PM |
|
Hello I do not have any memory errors in HWinfo, but I get SRBMiner Compute error, can someone help me? Widows: 10 x64 (1803) Driver: 18.5.1 VGA: Asus ROG Strix RX480 8G Samsung Memory Patched UBERMIX 3.1.1 Thanks
What is timing samsung ubernix 3.1.1?
|
|
|
|
|
rambetiko
Member


Activity: 189
Merit: 10
|
 |
December 08, 2018, 03:16:45 PM |
|
i have this error Error CL_BUILD_PROGRAM_FAILURE when calling clBuildProgram [ctx->Program] for DeviceID 0 (Thread 0)
18.6.1 1.7.2
vega 64 hash 1790-1800 ok?
please help this error. created one cache file "g1_XHV_w8_f1_hm1_ha.srb" i use 2x rx580 + 4x vega 64
|
|
|
|
|
korm
Member


Activity: 280
Merit: 10
|
 |
December 08, 2018, 03:39:10 PM |
|
hi guys, please give good timings for micron, 777000000000000022AA1C0073626C41B0551016BA0D260B0060060004061420EA8940AA0300000 01914292EB22E3B16-on these timings max 950 on heavy algo rx578....  777000000000000022AA1C00315A5436A0550F15B68C1506004082007C041420CA8980A9020004C 01712262B612B3715 
|
|
|
|
|
forceways
Newbie

Activity: 1
Merit: 0
|
 |
December 08, 2018, 03:59:09 PM Last edit: December 09, 2018, 12:08:01 PM by forceways |
|
777000000000000022AA1C00315A5436A0550F15B68C1506004082007C041420CA8980A9020004C 01712262B612B3715  Its Elpida timings good for micron ??
|
|
|
|
|
livada
Newbie

Activity: 417
Merit: 0
|
 |
December 08, 2018, 07:16:10 PM Last edit: December 08, 2018, 07:32:13 PM by livada |
|
Hi again doktor, I use srbminer from months with no problem in my 9 vega 64 rig. I use v1.6x - v1.7.0 weeks with no restart or hang. But version 1.7.2, after 8 hours or so hangs. In log i got this: https://justpaste.it/4rctvAny ideia what could be? Regards Hi Mate! Please try my Vega64 settings: Algo: BittubeV2 (Bittube Coin)Settings: { "id" : 0, "intensity" : 61, "worksize" : 9, "threads" : 2}, [2018-12-04 22:01:02] GPU0 : 2058 H/s [T: 31c, RPM: 2674, CC: 1408 MHz, MC: 1100 MHz][BUS:28] [2018-12-04 22:01:02] GPU1 : 2062 H/s [T: 30c, RPM: 2507, CC: 1408 MHz, MC: 1100 MHz][BUS:19] [2018-12-04 22:01:02] GPU2 : 2064 H/s [T: 30c, RPM: 2598, CC: 1408 MHz, MC: 1100 MHz][BUS:37] [2018-12-04 22:01:02] GPU3 : 2058 H/s [T: 37c, RPM: 3687, CC: 1408 MHz, MC: 1100 MHz][BUS:34] [2018-12-04 22:01:02] GPU4 : 2056 H/s [T: 38c, RPM: 3791, CC: 1408 MHz, MC: 1100 MHz][BUS:9] [2018-12-04 22:01:02] GPU5 : 2061 H/s [T: 25c, RPM: 2574, CC: 1408 MHz, MC: 1100 MHz][BUS:13] [2018-12-04 22:01:02] GPU6 : 2057 H/s [T: 34c, RPM: 3693, CC: 1408 MHz, MC: 1100 MHz][BUS:31] [2018-12-04 22:01:02] GPU7 : 2064 H/s [T: 32c, RPM: 2598, CC: 1408 MHz, MC: 1100 MHz][BUS:16] [2018-12-04 22:01:02] GPU8 : 2055 H/s [T: 39c, RPM: 3707, CC: 1408 MHz, MC: 1100 MHz][BUS:25] [2018-12-04 22:01:02] GPU9 : 2060 H/s [T: 33c, RPM: 2560, CC: 1408 MHz, MC: 1100 MHz][BUS:40] [2018-12-04 22:01:02] GPU10: 2057 H/s [T: 32c, RPM: 2621, CC: 1408 MHz, MC: 1100 MHz][BUS:22] [2018-12-04 22:01:02] GPU11: 2061 H/s [T: 27c, RPM: 2570, CC: 1408 MHz, MC: 1100 MHz][BUS:5] maybe that helps, but maybe CHIP´s from your cards are to hot in about 8 hours? check that too for sure. greetings Patrick  This is not true. Your setup and HR is FAKE. You not send any SS for this. i have 3000HR (125W) with vega 56 on tube algo you only 2050? your setup is bad  [2018-12-08 20:11:026] GPU0 : 3143 H/s [T: 21c, RPM: 2387, CC: 1380 MHz, MC: 1090 MHz][BUS:7] Settings: { "id" : 0, "intensity" : 63, "worksize" : 8, "threads" : 2}, for all other gys. This is not true. Vega 64 LE not have 3700 RPM(my have 3300RPM max) - all other card not have temp 30C i have vega 64LE and this temp have only or NORTH POLE normal TEMP for 64LE is 40C on 2000RPM
|
|
|
|
|
evlo
Jr. Member

Activity: 155
Merit: 4
|
 |
December 08, 2018, 08:14:36 PM |
|
11 gpus are nitro+ rx570 8g samsung 1 gpu is xfx rx580 8g samsung is this optimal config? cnv8 [2018-12-08 11:56:20] GPU0 : 986 H/s [T: 62c, RPM: 1902, CC: 1300 MHz, MC: 2040 MHz][BUS:7] [2018-12-08 11:56:20] GPU1 : 983 H/s [T: 57c, RPM: 1788, CC: 1300 MHz, MC: 2040 MHz][BUS:12] [2018-12-08 11:56:20] GPU2 : 976 H/s [T: 59c, RPM: 1809, CC: 1300 MHz, MC: 1970 MHz][BUS:10] [2018-12-08 11:56:20] GPU3 : 987 H/s [T: 57c, RPM: 1784, CC: 1300 MHz, MC: 2040 MHz][BUS:2] [2018-12-08 11:56:20] GPU4 : 978 H/s [T: 61c, RPM: 1898, CC: 1300 MHz, MC: 1970 MHz][BUS:8] [2018-12-08 11:56:20] GPU5 : 987 H/s [T: 54c, RPM: 1518, CC: 1300 MHz, MC: 2040 MHz][BUS:5] [2018-12-08 11:56:20] GPU6 : 987 H/s [T: 58c, RPM: 1855, CC: 1300 MHz, MC: 2040 MHz][BUS:1] [2018-12-08 11:56:20] GPU7 : 988 H/s [T: 60c, RPM: 1885, CC: 1300 MHz, MC: 2040 MHz][BUS:13] [2018-12-08 11:56:20] GPU8 : 1024 H/s [T: 66c, RPM: 1707, CC: 1300 MHz, MC: 2040 MHz][BUS:4] [2018-12-08 11:56:20] GPU9 : 987 H/s [T: 55c, RPM: 1780, CC: 1300 MHz, MC: 2040 MHz][BUS:3] [2018-12-08 11:56:20] GPU10: 986 H/s [T: 55c, RPM: 1776, CC: 1300 MHz, MC: 2040 MHz][BUS:9] [2018-12-08 11:56:20] GPU11: 978 H/s [T: 62c, RPM: 1852, CC: 1300 MHz, MC: 1970 MHz][BUS:11] [2018-12-08 11:56:20] Total: 11847 H/s ~1600w for whole rig
finally now, when profitability is low, i'm starting sw benchmarks - i mine with each miner sw for 48h and check consumption and real hasheshes on pool. Obviously clean boot before every sw switch. But unfortunately nothing to publish, as with srb miner i noticed i run eth OC (1200mhz) instead of 1300mhz on most cards. I still don't know if 1300mhz is optimal for XMR performance/consumption wise.
I hope at least now, I can get reasonable replies from people with experience and no bullshit about 70w consumption of 570 card etc. like there were people claiming in January.
I guess I have this on all the cards (i extracted from two different and verified all cards are samsung K4G80325FB ) 777000000000000022CC1C00CEE55C46C0590E1532CD66090060070014051420FA8900A00300000 012123442C3353C19
voltages obviously lowest stable without some extreme trying for each mV.
SRBbios editor setting is: 777000000000000022CC1C00EF695D49D0571016360D460B0060870014051420FA8900A00300000 01B11333DB4303A17
|
|
|
|
|
|