Eddo25
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 17
Merit: 0
|
 |
October 24, 2018, 04:33:47 PM |
|
How did you guys get the 18.6.1 drivers installed on your Vega FE? I have the 18.Q3.1 Pro driver installed but I can only install 18.4.1 or 18.7.1 and 18.8.1. There are no other options for the driver switch.
|
|
|
|
|
Eddo25
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 17
Merit: 0
|
 |
October 24, 2018, 06:02:44 PM |
|
I have the drivers thanks, but when I install them they default to the Pro drivers and you can't use overclocking/underclocking with them.
|
|
|
|
N2DCRYPT
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 148
Merit: 5
|
 |
October 24, 2018, 06:53:12 PM |
|
I have the drivers thanks, but when I install them they default to the Pro drivers and you can't use overclocking/underclocking with them. Why not just force the overclock/undervolt through PPT table and call it a day?
|
|
|
|
oxzhor
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 46
Merit: 0
|
 |
October 24, 2018, 07:15:45 PM |
|
How many h/s do you get with your vega56 at v8? And what is the power use?
I biosmod my vega56 to the 64 and have 1955h/s per card with v8 x4 at 840watt.
Thanks for your reply.
|
|
|
|
tg88
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2618
Merit: 1681
Top-tier crypto casino and sportsbook
|
 |
October 24, 2018, 07:22:48 PM |
|
Someone would tell me how much changes the speed between algorithms Heavy vs haven?
For example:
RX 580 4 GB - Heavy 700 h/s and what would be the speed in haven?
|
|
|
|
N2DCRYPT
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 148
Merit: 5
|
 |
October 24, 2018, 07:55:35 PM |
|
Someone would tell me how much changes the speed between algorithms Heavy vs haven?
For example:
RX 580 4 GB - Heavy 700 h/s and what would be the speed in haven?
Heavy and Haven are practically identical in terms of speed from my experience. CN Saber (Bittubev2) can vary depending on the driver used.
|
|
|
|
abg00
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 288
Merit: 1
|
 |
October 24, 2018, 07:58:28 PM |
|
Someone would tell me how much changes the speed between algorithms Heavy vs haven?
For example:
RX 580 4 GB - Heavy 700 h/s and what would be the speed in haven?
Heavy and Haven are practically identical in terms of speed from my experience. CN Saber (Bittubev2) can vary depending on the driver used. what driver version need for Bittubev2 ?
|
|
|
|
N2DCRYPT
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 148
Merit: 5
|
 |
October 24, 2018, 08:05:10 PM |
|
Depends on the cards. On my FEs and 480s/580s (8GB), 18.3.4 was fastest for Bittube.
|
|
|
|
carlo_0000
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1281
Merit: 1003
|
 |
October 24, 2018, 08:07:04 PM |
|
default intensity is to high for
Initializing OpenCL devices, please wait..
GPU0: AMD Radeon (TM) R7 370 Series [pitcairn] [4096 MB][Intensity 56.0][W: 8][T: 2][K: 2][BUS: 1] GPU1: AMD Radeon (TM) R7 370 Series [pitcairn] [4096 MB][Intensity 56.0][W: 8][T: 2][K: 2][BUS: 3]
it will fail , 55 works
|
|
|
|
abg00
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 288
Merit: 1
|
 |
October 24, 2018, 08:12:21 PM |
|
Depends on the cards. On my FEs and 480s/580s (8GB), 18.3.4 was fastest for Bittube.
470\480\570\580 8gb car work fine on 18.3.4 and 1.6.7 1.6.8 or new drivers low rate for heavy\bittube algo
|
|
|
|
tg88
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2618
Merit: 1681
Top-tier crypto casino and sportsbook
|
 |
October 24, 2018, 08:14:11 PM |
|
Heavy and Haven are practically identical in terms of speed from my experience. CN Saber (Bittubev2) can vary depending on the driver used.
thanks for the quick response. 
|
|
|
|
ViWe
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 57
Merit: 0
|
 |
October 24, 2018, 09:07:00 PM |
|
I'd like to share my latest windows clean install adventure: 8x 8MB Rx580's all OC settings the same for each try - Windows 10, build 1703 + 18.3.2 = very good on 1.6.7, good on 1.6.8 (CN-Heavy Hashrate maxes out at 8600 h/s) -Sometimes crashes on algo change, all cards maxes h/s
- Clean install of Windows 10, build 1803 + recommended driver 18.6.1 = shit (7600 h/s)
- Clean install of Windows Enterprise, build whatever + recommended driver 16.8.1 = somewhat shit (7800 h/s)
- Windows Enterprise + 18.3.2 = good (8200 h/s) -> This is what I'm doing right now. Seems to be stable on algo change, although randomly 2-4 cards would hash at shit speeds.
So the newer windows builds are shit, and Adrenalin 18.6.1 is not doing me any favors. Couldn't try 18.5.x with so much downtime biting my ass. I'm not hashing v8 anymore because I'm losing to much hash with the 18.6.1 drivers, even on clean windows installs. Anxiously waiting for the new version, I hope Doktor can do his magic once again. win 10 1803, radeon 18.6.1, srb 1.6.7 6xRX580 8mb CN-Heavy 6800 H/s. Good shit. "intensity" : 54, GPU 1340/1050, Mem 2065/880
|
|
|
|
ViWe
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 57
Merit: 0
|
 |
October 24, 2018, 09:10:30 PM |
|
is this ok to have stale share like this?
-------------------------STATS-------------------------
Miner version: 1.6.8 Driver version: 24.20.11021.1000 Mining time: 1 days, 15 hours, 44 minutes, 39 seconds
Algo: normalv8
Pool: asia.cryptonight-hub.miningpoolhub.com:20580 Connected since: 2018-10-21 18:00:25 Pool Difficulty: 60020 Pool latency: ~174 ms Last job received: 26 seconds ago
Accepted(Stale)/Total shares: 7819(587)/7819 (100.0%) Average time to find share: 18 seconds 1 min. average speed: 2771 H/s 5 min. average speed: 2768 H/s 30 min. average speed: 2770 H/s Max. speed: 2781 H/s
No, try to find a pool with better ping time (less latency).
|
|
|
|
Eddo25
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 17
Merit: 0
|
 |
October 25, 2018, 12:02:26 AM |
|
I have the drivers thanks, but when I install them they default to the Pro drivers and you can't use overclocking/underclocking with them. Why not just force the overclock/undervolt through PPT table and call it a day? I don't like the pro drivers they don't have wattman and a couple other settings I use. Anyway, I ran the 18.6.1 setup from the extracted AMD folder and they installed properly this time. I'm getting about 2120H/s with my Gpu @ 1407mhz Memory @ 1107mhz and 860mv on both. Config is pretty basic: { "cryptonight_type" : "normalv8", "intensity" : 124, "worksize" : 16, "double_threads" : true }
|
|
|
|
Ledaso
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 16
Merit: 0
|
 |
October 25, 2018, 04:44:12 AM |
|
Im getting this error Error Error CL_MEM_OBJECT_ALLOCATION_FAILURE when calling clEnqueueNDRangeKernel for kernel 0 for DeviceID 2 (Thread 5)
|
|
|
|
jazz1984
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 392
Merit: 5
|
 |
October 25, 2018, 05:03:58 AM |
|
default intensity is to high for
Initializing OpenCL devices, please wait..
GPU0: AMD Radeon (TM) R7 370 Series [pitcairn] [4096 MB][Intensity 56.0][W: 8][T: 2][K: 2][BUS: 1] GPU1: AMD Radeon (TM) R7 370 Series [pitcairn] [4096 MB][Intensity 56.0][W: 8][T: 2][K: 2][BUS: 3]
it will fail , 55 works
Had same problem on tahiti, default as i remember was 41 - max hashrate was on 31 with doublethreads on. What hashrate you got with i 55 on pitcairn?
|
|
|
|
wgestickley
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 76
Merit: 0
|
 |
October 25, 2018, 05:34:58 AM |
|
Im getting this error Error Error CL_MEM_OBJECT_ALLOCATION_FAILURE when calling clEnqueueNDRangeKernel for kernel 0 for DeviceID 2 (Thread 5)
Try to increse virtual Memomry in your Windows settings. Set it as a minimum of: Number of Cards x GB Memory each Card = Minimum VM for Windows
|
|
|
|
Demented247
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 15
Merit: 0
|
 |
October 25, 2018, 05:38:18 AM |
|
Hi Dok can we please please get a SMOS/Hive version of your miner
|
|
|
|
Ledaso
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 16
Merit: 0
|
 |
October 25, 2018, 06:24:40 AM |
|
Im getting this error Error Error CL_MEM_OBJECT_ALLOCATION_FAILURE when calling clEnqueueNDRangeKernel for kernel 0 for DeviceID 2 (Thread 5)
Try to increse virtual Memomry in your Windows settings. Set it as a minimum of: Number of Cards x GB Memory each Card = Minimum VM for Windows Thanks is working now
|
|
|
|
|