I know it's your thread. But my issue with stake is not resolved. You should make changes asap.
Uhh... what?
Like I said, though I put you on ignore, I have to see your post every now and then [in case you're curious, the only reason I realized you wrote to me on this thread is because I read it from tetaeridanus' post] to mark the status of the cases accordingly. Was below post not yours? You did not write it?
After much thought, I believe it's time to focus on peace and understanding. While I’ve shared my concerns about certain platforms and their impact, my intention now is to promote awareness and peace. There are many layers to the gambling world, and I’ve seen both good and bad through my experiences. However, it's essential to evaluate the consequences before diving in, especially with platforms that have complex operations and hidden agendas.
As we move forward, I hope others find peace in evaluating their choices and actions. While my path has led me away from these platforms, I wish everyone the best in their journeys. Peace and awareness are the first steps to creating a healthier mindset, both in gambling and life. Stay aware, stay strong, and remember to always take care of yourselves.
You moving forward does not mean you consider the case resolved? That is not moving forward, that is staying where you are. You should say "I am standing firm with both of my feet", not that touching elegy. Learn to own your words.
Selective Arbitration by Holydarkness Exposed:
Let’s not pretend here—Holydarkness is far from a neutral party. My allegation stands firm: he has a selective way of arbitrating scam threads that ultimately benefits him or aligns with his interests. The pattern is clear—threads or disputes that inconvenience him or his affiliates are conveniently “in progress” or brushed aside, while others that serve his narrative are handled promptly.
To date, he has failed to disprove this allegation, and the lack of transparency in his approach only reinforces it. If he’s truly impartial, he needs to address the double standards and provide clarity on his methods. Until then, his credibility remains under serious question.
What interests and benefits are these that you're referring here, if I may ask?
If a case inconvenience me or "my affiliates", the most convenient way is to mark it as "resolved", as it means the case is closed. Being "in progress" is the total opposite of what you accuse me of doing, since it means the case is still ongoing, open, being scrutinized, awaiting development, inquired, and all terms that encompass the sense of being... well, in progress. How is this convenience me and "my affiliates"? Having an accusation being active that can damage their reputation? SMH. Logic has left the brain.
And, to date,
you [amongst others who share similar mindset as you] have failed to disprove this allegation. I invited you to prove that I "sustain" myself from the service that is not "for free", so far I didn't see you prove it. And that's me failing to disprove the allegation? What prove to disprove? You haven't provide any...
Oh well, or perhaps you've provide it somewhere, but I didn't notice, since I put you on ignore.
If so, kindly send me the link that post that detailing my allegiances with casinos,
with proof, I'll try to disprove them once received.
[...]
How do you sustain yourself while supposedly offering this service “for free”?
Job. A work. Business.
But why don't I turn the table? Since you're all about "legitimate" and critical and statistical and all, I'll offer you the same question that I gave to others who [endlessly] questions my relation with casinos: prove it. The Blockchain is there, at your service. If I am at their payroll, you'll easily find them.
One thing that I can't help but wonder is what really crossed these people's head, those who think I am in bed with casinos. Just because I have their contacts and they answer to my summon, that does not mean we're friend.
Well, we are "friend" but we are not friend. I mean, for the love of all holy and dark being, what would you feel [I'll ask this to anyone, not just you] if I reach you on daily basis to tell you that you have an issue, and when you did not answer, I kept nudging your TG or through PM until you get it done? What would you feel if whenever you open your phone and got a notification that I messaged you, it means I brought you a problem and criticize you?
[...]
Holydarkness, I have PM’d you.
Since you left my thread, what will be your update about this situation? My situation shouldn’t be “in progress” it should be unresolved.
Best regards.
And why should it be marked as unresolved? Because the case didn't end well from your side? If we may turn the situation, shouldn't the case be marked as "resolved", given they've gave you explanation, got it retried, gave you an even longer explanation that justify their action?
I am still with "in progress" due to what I show you on my last post on your thread. Depending on Razer's reply [or no reply], I'll wait for a month [suppose
he stand firm with both of his feet] to see the general consensus of the DTs on your flag. And will mark the case according to their ruling. As I said, this thread is not authoritarian, it is not up to me to decide what status is on what case, nor the accuser's. It follows the forum's decision.
So, to make things simple, by January 31st, if the case is still open due to no-response from Razer, and your flag is active, which tell us that the DTs think you're the one being wronged here, I'll mark it as unresolved.
Hi there @holydarkness
This is some excellent voluntary job you are doing here, and any member who wishes to have scams and scam accusations get clear off the crypto industry should be handing you some flowers already
I have a suggestion. I am not sure if it's any easier, but let me mention it so that you can weigh it up.
Under status, especially for resolved or invalid cases, do you think it's a good idea to add a hyperlink showing where exactly the accusation was resolved or invalidated for easy follow up?
[...]
Thank you, it means a lot to me. Though... no flowers, please. Potted plants, alive, will be nice, LMAO.
Regarding the suggestion, I have to say that it crossed my mind a couple of times. I can see the merit of it, it'll bring a huge impact to understanding the case. But I am still doubtful about it because:
1. I've actually experimented with it in the past. What I had/have in mind was to have the status clickable, the status is the link itself. But that somehow will override the color-coding I assign to the cases and make them all hyperlink-blue. If I am not mistaken, there is [was?] a way to make hyperlink followed a color, but I somehow can't recreate this. [The fact that my knowledge about coding is as good as my cooking skill, certainly doesn't help]
2. On a latest occasion that offered itself to me, I assign a separate column assigned for notes, and I figure we can use this method if we want to apply that suggestion, but assigning extra column will make the table looks like this,
and it looks... bad. I have to mention that it's on tablet version, as I accessed this forum mostly on tablet and I barely on PC anymore these days, so I have not get a chance to look at it on PC version [looking at it with "desktop version" enabled from my browser will bring same result].
Do you mind to do me a favor and [if you happen to access the forum from PC] show me what does the table actually looks like from other member's screen?
edit: Oh? My bad. I checked the post after posting this one, as it turned out, I did not assign a new column for above screenshot, I simply add extra line to that column. I'll have to leave now, but let me see what will the table look like if I
do add an extra column for notes and link to conclusion.
