bigjme
|
 |
February 06, 2014, 11:07:35 AM |
|
Im unsure
|
Owner of: cudamining.co.uk
|
|
|
boy2k
|
 |
February 06, 2014, 11:14:53 AM |
|
would love a compiled 'keccak' windows version to test out my 2x 295 GTX's on 
|
|
|
|
instacalm
|
 |
February 06, 2014, 11:15:16 AM |
|
would love a compiled windows version to test out my 2x 295 GTX's on  Just go ahead and compile it 
|
|
|
|
sippsnapp
|
 |
February 06, 2014, 11:19:05 AM |
|
would love a compiled 'keccak' windows version to test out my 2x 295 GTX's on  or maybe a good time to settle for a solid os ^^.
|
Πάντα ῥεῖ Bitcoin + Altcoin node pool setup - pm
|
|
|
GordonSSS
Member

Offline
Activity: 63
Merit: 10
|
 |
February 06, 2014, 11:19:59 AM |
|
Getting lots of these 2 errors when trying to build on Windows: no suitable conversion function from "uint4" to "unsigned int" exists X:\X\CudaMiner-master\nv_kernel.cu 204 1 no operator "*" matches these operands X:\X\CudaMiner-master\nv_kernel.cu 312 1 Anyone know how to solve this?
|
XPM: AWFyioszN3vsyQsPbAtCybqu3j5v6FqQTE RIC: RDzYLbepJdGu5vZMwYe5GtiJYe417AWJJV BTC: 1LXgRb1F6KZmVQBzcKsfpAAL57Se9EKeT6
|
|
|
boy2k
|
 |
February 06, 2014, 11:21:26 AM |
|
lol ouch and ouch  All my clients use windows pcs so makes sense for me to do most of my stuff on it. Saves testing time later... Happy to give compiling a go if you guys wanna throw me a few hints to help smooth the learning process 
|
|
|
|
djm34
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050
|
 |
February 06, 2014, 11:30:00 AM |
|
Getting lots of these 2 errors when trying to build on Windows: no suitable conversion function from "uint4" to "unsigned int" exists X:\X\CudaMiner-master\nv_kernel.cu 204 1 no operator "*" matches these operands X:\X\CudaMiner-master\nv_kernel.cu 312 1 Anyone know how to solve this? Try to compile "Release" instead of "Debug" (only in debug mode, the compiler cares about that)
|
djm34 facebook pageBTC: 1NENYmxwZGHsKFmyjTc5WferTn5VTFb7Ze Pledge for neoscrypt ccminer to that address: 16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw
|
|
|
unsoindovo
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1932
Merit: 1042
https://locktrip.com/?refId=40964
|
 |
February 06, 2014, 11:32:17 AM |
|
hey!!! nothing for AMD cards???
|
|
|
|
AizenSou
|
 |
February 06, 2014, 11:33:57 AM |
|
yes but we're seeing 70Mhash/s, thats saying i am getting 1/3rd the performance of you which can not be right. Can you pm me a copy of your cudaminer to try? and perhaps post a screen shot of yours running benchmark as thats a huge achievement
x40 is over the warp limit so its showing values way too high
I won't mind sending you the binary but I don't think it will be runable due to library dependencies. But if you still want it PM me your email so I can attach it for you.
|
|
|
|
AizenSou
|
 |
February 06, 2014, 11:34:53 AM |
|
hey!!! nothing for AMD cards???
Who do you think you are? You come to nVidia threat and demand for AMD? It is laughable.
|
|
|
|
bigjme
|
 |
February 06, 2014, 11:35:59 AM |
|
Nopennothing for AMD, and if your running it on linux there are no dependences, you just send theough the cudaminer file
|
Owner of: cudamining.co.uk
|
|
|
unsoindovo
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1932
Merit: 1042
https://locktrip.com/?refId=40964
|
 |
February 06, 2014, 11:37:29 AM |
|
hey!!! nothing for AMD cards???
Who do you think you are? You come to nVidia threat and demand for AMD? It is laughable. just try to ask!!! 
|
|
|
|
djm34
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050
|
 |
February 06, 2014, 11:40:56 AM |
|
hey!!! nothing for AMD cards???
Who do you think you are? You come to nVidia threat and demand for AMD? It is laughable. yep, nvidia is now a threat to AMD lol
|
djm34 facebook pageBTC: 1NENYmxwZGHsKFmyjTc5WferTn5VTFb7Ze Pledge for neoscrypt ccminer to that address: 16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw
|
|
|
reRaise
|
 |
February 06, 2014, 11:44:12 AM |
|
So can you mine it with GPU right from the start now?
|
|
|
|
bigjme
|
 |
February 06, 2014, 11:46:04 AM |
|
Noone knows for sure.
|
Owner of: cudamining.co.uk
|
|
|
GordonSSS
Member

Offline
Activity: 63
Merit: 10
|
 |
February 06, 2014, 11:48:44 AM |
|
That worked, thanks!
[/quote] Try to compile "Release" instead of "Debug" (only in debug mode, the compiler cares about that) [/quote]
|
XPM: AWFyioszN3vsyQsPbAtCybqu3j5v6FqQTE RIC: RDzYLbepJdGu5vZMwYe5GtiJYe417AWJJV BTC: 1LXgRb1F6KZmVQBzcKsfpAAL57Se9EKeT6
|
|
|
Diamonds13
|
 |
February 06, 2014, 11:51:46 AM |
|
Can someone with the skills compile it for us poor windowers ? It will be very helpfull ! Thank you in advance 
|
|
|
|
boy2k
|
 |
February 06, 2014, 11:56:20 AM |
|
Can someone with the skills compile it for us poor windowers ? It will be very helpfull ! Thank you in advance  pretty please 
|
|
|
|
cbuchner1 (OP)
|
 |
February 06, 2014, 11:57:04 AM |
|
ok so i just tried to run ./cudaminer --algo=keccak -d gtx780 -L 16 -l K300x32 --benchmark
now thats using 2890MB memory of my 3GB, so all memory is being used, still only 34Mhash/s
you can increase the -L to 128 if need be. keccak doesn't need any memory, yet cudaminer still allocates the scratchpad as if we were mining scrypt coins. The -L argument reduces the scratchpad to sane sizes. with huge -L you can try stuff like -l K 2048x32 ;-) Christian
|
|
|
|
cbuchner1 (OP)
|
 |
February 06, 2014, 11:57:40 AM |
|
Can someone with the skills compile it for us poor windowers ? It will be very helpfull ! Thank you in advance  pretty please  check back 7 PM UTC for official binaries. That should give you half an hour for fine tuning the launch config.
|
|
|
|
|