jots
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 7
Merit: 0
|
 |
February 03, 2014, 09:27:50 AM |
|
I see people asking for pool fallback a bunch... Maybe someone else will find this useful. *shrug*  #!/usr/bin/env bash
pools=( "--url=stratum+tcp://mine.Hashbros.co.in:3333 --userpass=worker.name:x --retries=3 --algo=scrypt -l Y7x32 -C 1 -i 0 -m 0 -H 1" "--url=stratum+tcp://middlecoin.com:3333 --userpass=15wcm1ZxixUjjq3tKEoKT55qLttoCN2TBY:x --retries=3 --time-limit=3600 --algo=scrypt -l Y7x32 -C 1 -i 0 -m 0 -H 1" )
while true; do for i in $(seq 0 $((${#pools[*]} - 1))); do ./cudaminer ${pools[$i]} echo "Restarting in 3... CTRL-C to stop."; sleep 3 done done
In English: Mine on hashbros until there's a connection issue. At that point, switch to middlecoin for an hour. Repeat ad nauseam.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Even in the event that an attacker gains more than 50% of the network's
computational power, only transactions sent by the attacker could be
reversed or double-spent. The network would not be destroyed.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
subotai
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 9
Merit: 0
|
 |
February 03, 2014, 09:51:40 AM |
|
Winx64 pro GTX460 768MB @730MHz 18.12.13 02.02.14 120KHash/s 110KHash/s
GTX660 2GB@+60MHz 18.12.13 02.02.14 180KHash/s 215KHash/s - -C 2 -m 1 -i 0 -l Y5x32 -L 1
And autotune not working at all.I use "-l" from 18.12.2013/14.01.2014 build.
|
|
|
|
HolyHatred
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 26
Merit: 0
|
 |
February 03, 2014, 10:01:44 AM Last edit: February 03, 2014, 10:21:07 AM by HolyHatred |
|
Am i Supposed to have a username christian on my computer?
config -a scrypt-jane:Yacoin -H 0 -d 2 -i 0 -C 2 -l K8x32
What i am seeing? im trying this on a system with 3 gtx 770's
Switch from K to k. I still unfortunately get the same errors. ***update the -H 0 Tag is a issue changed to -H 2 and not my gpu results are not validating on cpu. now using -a scrypt-jane:Yacoin -H 2 -d 2 -i 0 -C 1 -l k8x32
|
|
|
|
kokes
Member

Offline
Activity: 66
Merit: 10
|
 |
February 03, 2014, 10:11:12 AM |
|
Christian, I don't know how, but this release gave me such a performance boost! GTX 660TI mining ultracoin on scrypt jane previously gave me around 280 kh/s Downloading the new version, changing NOTHING in the launch settings, gave me this:  Settings i use: cudaminer --algo=scrypt-jane:UTC -l Y7x28 -H 2 -i 10 -C 0 -m 1
|
|
|
|
djm34
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050
|
 |
February 03, 2014, 11:05:36 AM |
|
Hi Christian, I looked over the internet and it seems there is a more precise set of functions to get the time in windows (precision of the order of the microsecond) Using the fonctions QueryPerformanceFrequency(), QueryPerformanceCounter(). Here an example of how it is used: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1739259/how-to-use-queryperformancecounter
|
djm34 facebook pageBTC: 1NENYmxwZGHsKFmyjTc5WferTn5VTFb7Ze Pledge for neoscrypt ccminer to that address: 16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw
|
|
|
cbuchner1 (OP)
|
 |
February 03, 2014, 11:06:59 AM Last edit: February 03, 2014, 11:50:48 AM by cbuchner1 |
|
Hi,
Is it stable version win 2/2? Can I update my GUIMiner script fork with this build?
I need to push out a hotfix for incorrect default kernel selection tonight. The code on github already has this fixed now. Christian
|
|
|
|
cbuchner1 (OP)
|
 |
February 03, 2014, 11:08:59 AM |
|
None of this is in units of seconds I think and changes in CPU frequency (dynamic clocking) might also affect these counters. This is why I haven't touched them yet. Christian
|
|
|
|
cbuchner1 (OP)
|
 |
February 03, 2014, 11:11:18 AM |
|
config -a scrypt-jane:Yacoin -H 0 -d 2 -i 0 -C 2 -l K8x32
Switch from K to k. I still unfortunately get the same errors. now using -a scrypt-jane:Yacoin -H 2 -d 2 -i 0 -C 1 -l k8x32 k8x32 might require more memory cudaminer can allocate (in one piece). Does -C 0 fix it? Otherwise try using a lookup gap. -L 2 or -L 3 ... this reduces memory requirements. and autotune with -l k after changing the lookup gap. Christian
|
|
|
|
cbuchner1 (OP)
|
 |
February 03, 2014, 11:28:07 AM |
|
Also just ran a couple autotunes and pretty sure autotune is drunk and needs to go home...
I really shouldn't have gone to that pub... 
|
|
|
|
ghur
|
 |
February 03, 2014, 11:41:35 AM Last edit: February 03, 2014, 12:17:37 PM by ghur |
|
None of this is in units of seconds I think and changes in CPU frequency (dynamic clocking) might also affect these counters. This is why I haven't touched them yet. Christian That's where QueryPerformanceFrequency comes in, to get to seconds (or miliseconds). It's quite a common approach for high precision timing, afaik it handles dynamic clock changes just fine. I haven't found it misbehaving in all the projects I've used it in at least.
|
doge: D8q8dR6tEAcaJ7U65jP6AAkiiL2CFJaHah Automated faucet, pays daily: Qoinpro
|
|
|
sambiohazard
|
 |
February 03, 2014, 11:52:36 AM |
|
Hi all tried new version with old settings and went from 262(12-18-2013 x64) to 288-290(02-02-2014 x64). This on Asus 660Ti with reference clocks. Temp is 75-76C with 46% fan (ambient temp 32-33C) X64 works better for me, tried -C 1 and -C 2 but they lowered the hashrate. My config is cudaminer.exe -H 2 -m 1 -i 0 -l K7x32 -o stratum+tcp://asia.middlecoin.com:3333 -O 1AqywTTPox5W8Vk15JbPMfkXvXXCAztxxQ:123 Autotune is all wonky so I'll wait till christian is working on it. Thanks so much cbuchner1 for this. You da man. 
|
|
|
|
cbuchner1 (OP)
|
 |
February 03, 2014, 12:01:31 PM Last edit: February 03, 2014, 12:18:28 PM by cbuchner1 |
|
Christian, I don't know how, but this release gave me such a performance boost! GTX 660TI mining ultracoin on scrypt jane previously gave me around 280 kh/s
Downloading the new version, changing NOTHING in the launch settings, gave me this:
Settings i use: cudaminer --algo=scrypt-jane:UTC -l Y7x28 -H 2 -i 10 -C 0 -m 1
Oh, for me the MRC mining became a lot slower and dropped from 270 kHash/s to 224 kHash/s on my 660 Ti DirectCU2 from Asus. Ultracoin also has low N-factor like MRC. So why are you getting a boost and I am getting a slowdown? EDIT: I had /usr/local/cuda pointing to /usr/local/cuda-5.0. D'oh! I remain in the 270-280 kHash/s range when running interactive mode. So I am not seeing your speed boost. Why are you using -i 10 and not -i 1 ? Christian
|
|
|
|
ilostcoins
|
 |
February 03, 2014, 12:14:10 PM |
|
Thanks for the latest release. My 650ti can mine YACoin now.  My 650Ti only has 1 GB DDR5 RAM and is in a Windows XP PC with only 1 GB system RAM. Autotune seems to have chosen k35x3 for it to give about 1.45kh/s at lookup gap 4. I guess that's about the expected range for a card like this.
|
LTC: LSyqwk4YbhBRtkrUy8NRdKXFoUcgVpu8Qb NVC: 4HtynfYVyRYo6yM8BTAqyNYwqiucfoPqFW TAG id: 4313 CMC: CAHrzqveVm9UxGm7PZtT4uj6su4suxKzZv YAC: Y9m5S7M24sdkjdwxnA9GZpPez6k6EqUjUt
|
|
|
cbuchner1 (OP)
|
 |
February 03, 2014, 12:17:31 PM |
|
Thanks for the latest release. My 650ti can mine YACoin now.  Autotune seems to have chosen k35x3 for it to give about 1.45kh/s at lookup gap 4. I guess that's about the expected range for a card like this. Yeah a 660Ti would produce more than twice that hash rate. You get what you pay for  Christian
|
|
|
|
sambiohazard
|
 |
February 03, 2014, 12:25:42 PM |
|
I have tried all combinations now (each on for approx. 5 mins) I get 288-292 khash/s with my 660ti. My config is
cudaminer.exe -H 2 -m 1 -i 0 -l K7x32 -o stratum+tcp://asia.middlecoin.com:3333 -O 1AqywTTPox5W8Vk15JbPMfkXvXXCAztxxQ:123
|
|
|
|
atp1916
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 854
Merit: 1000
|
 |
February 03, 2014, 12:30:00 PM |
|
Very impressive. Perhaps this will take pressure off the top-end AMD cards.
|
|
|
|
cbuchner1 (OP)
|
 |
February 03, 2014, 01:12:08 PM |
|
I have tried all combinations now (each on for approx. 5 mins) I get 288-292 khash/s with my 660ti. My config is
cudaminer.exe -H 2 -m 1 -i 0 -l K7x32 -o stratum+tcp://asia.middlecoin.com:3333 -O 1AqywTTPox5W8Vk15JbPMfkXvXXCAztxxQ:123
-C 1 should help a bit...
|
|
|
|
Echostorm
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 5
Merit: 0
|
 |
February 03, 2014, 01:17:15 PM |
|
On my GeForce GTX 660 Ti, I used to get around 245 or so and now I'm pushing around 270. My config is cudaminer.exe -H 1 -m 1 -i 0 -l K7x32 I tried H2 but it shaved off about 10 k/h
I also tried C 1 and though it added about 9 kh it felt like it was pushing the card too hard. I can already hear the fans spinning up where before they were inaudible which makes sense but might be something I'll have to ease into and get more detailed temp reading about.
Thanks much bud, you're doing great work.
|
|
|
|
sambiohazard
|
 |
February 03, 2014, 01:19:39 PM |
|
I have tried all combinations now (each on for approx. 5 mins) I get 288-292 khash/s with my 660ti. My config is
cudaminer.exe -H 2 -m 1 -i 0 -l K7x32 -o stratum+tcp://asia.middlecoin.com:3333 -O 1AqywTTPox5W8Vk15JbPMfkXvXXCAztxxQ:123
-C 1 should help a bit... -C 1 adds 1-2 khash/s atmost.
|
|
|
|
kokes
Member

Offline
Activity: 66
Merit: 10
|
 |
February 03, 2014, 01:27:34 PM |
|
Oh, for me the MRC mining became a lot slower and dropped from 270 kHash/s to 224 kHash/s on my 660 Ti DirectCU2 from Asus.
Ultracoin also has low N-factor like MRC. So why are you getting a boost and I am getting a slowdown?
EDIT: I had /usr/local/cuda pointing to /usr/local/cuda-5.0. D'oh! I remain in the 270-280 kHash/s range when running interactive mode. So I am not seeing your speed boost.
Why are you using -i 10 and not -i 1 ?
Christian
I'm having the exact same card as you (but overclocked). I have no clue why you have a slowdown, and i get a boost :O Also that -i 10 was a typo in my config, but too lazy to change, but it does not give a difference. What if you try mining ultracoin, do you still only get 224 khash/s? These are my OC settings if someone is interested: 
|
|
|
|
|