Bitcoin Forum
June 18, 2024, 04:33:30 PM *
News: Voting for pizza day contest
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 [166] 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 ... 1135 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN] cudaMiner & ccMiner CUDA based mining applications [Windows/Linux/MacOSX]  (Read 3426876 times)
ManIkWeet
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 182
Merit: 100


View Profile
January 30, 2014, 09:13:28 PM
 #3301

Yeh mine dropped aswell

ok I will make that memory access scheme configurable...
Wait for a second, I decided to try out x86 instead of x64 and it seems to be almost as fast as x64 used to be before your revert. Figured that might be interesting to note.

BTC donations: 18fw6ZjYkN7xNxfVWbsRmBvD6jBAChRQVn (thanks!)
bathrobehero
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2002
Merit: 1051


ICO? Not even once.


View Profile
January 30, 2014, 09:18:24 PM
 #3302

Scrypt has always been faster on x86 for me since I ever compiled cudaMiner.

Not your keys, not your coins!
ManIkWeet
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 182
Merit: 100


View Profile
January 30, 2014, 09:47:42 PM
 #3303

Scrypt has always been faster on x86 for me since I ever compiled cudaMiner.
Not scrypt, scrypt-jane.
Though it has always been faster on x64 with the latest change it's faster on x86.

BTC donations: 18fw6ZjYkN7xNxfVWbsRmBvD6jBAChRQVn (thanks!)
cbuchner1 (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 756
Merit: 502


View Profile
January 30, 2014, 10:33:52 PM
Last edit: January 30, 2014, 10:46:39 PM by cbuchner1
 #3304

oops, mining MRC with -C 2 using the Z kernel is not validating for me. Some problem
in the kernel it appears... Nothing to do with yesterday's commit, as I haven't touched
that kernel lately...

Strictly speaking the Z kernel shouldn't need support for any -C flags, as a Compute 3.5
device is capable of running any read access through the texture cache...

With -a=scrypt-jane:MRC -H 2 -C 0 -l Z60x24  I get up to 1100 kHash/s per GTX 780Ti.

EDIT: hmmm, two out of 3 cards hit 90 deg C and ran into thermal throttling.

Christian
bigjme
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 350
Merit: 250


View Profile
January 30, 2014, 10:38:37 PM
 #3305

Have you had much of a return on it yet christian?

Owner of: cudamining.co.uk
cbuchner1 (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 756
Merit: 502


View Profile
January 30, 2014, 10:42:15 PM
 #3306

Have you had much of a return on it yet christian?

erm apart from 2 solo mined blocks, and a 5.05 million MRC donation there was not
much of a return. I can call myself a Micro-Millionaire now at least.

I only started throwing massive power at a pool just now. Will check my returns in 24h.

Christian
bigjme
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 350
Merit: 250


View Profile
January 30, 2014, 10:43:57 PM
 #3307

Please update us, I hope the return is better then yacoin. As right now im only breaking even on my electric bill

Owner of: cudamining.co.uk
cbuchner1 (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 756
Merit: 502


View Profile
January 30, 2014, 11:42:34 PM
 #3308


hey, I think I just spotted a bathrobe on easy-mining.net Wink
bathrobehero
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2002
Merit: 1051


ICO? Not even once.


View Profile
January 30, 2014, 11:51:59 PM
 #3309


hey, I think I just spotted a bathrobe on easy-mining.net Wink


Yeah, and I brought you some luck, you found 2 blocks Tongue

Was just curious what is the pool giving me as average coins/day for my hashrate. About 1.5 blocks/day.
Impressive hashrate you're packing!


Not your keys, not your coins!
djm34
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050


View Profile WWW
January 30, 2014, 11:57:08 PM
 #3310

N=9

djm34 facebook page
BTC: 1NENYmxwZGHsKFmyjTc5WferTn5VTFb7Ze
Pledge for neoscrypt ccminer to that address: 16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw
cbuchner1 (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 756
Merit: 502


View Profile
January 30, 2014, 11:58:06 PM
 #3311

N=9

oh, and suddenly the world ended. ALL my miners spewed out "does not validate on CPU". lol.
It was eerie.
bigjme
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 350
Merit: 250


View Profile
January 30, 2014, 11:58:51 PM
 #3312

Lmao

Owner of: cudamining.co.uk
bathrobehero
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2002
Merit: 1051


ICO? Not even once.


View Profile
January 30, 2014, 11:59:57 PM
 #3313

Yeah, I stayed up just so I can reconfigure and get back to shoving.
Hope to see some more shiny blocks after work tomorrow.

Not your keys, not your coins!
cbuchner1 (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 756
Merit: 502


View Profile
January 31, 2014, 12:13:23 AM
 #3314

Yeah, I stayed up just so I can reconfigure and get back to shoving.
Hope to see some more shiny blocks after work tomorrow.

One thing that sucks about N-factor changes is that the actual difficulty adjustment only takes place later (e.g in 615 blocks from now).. which means that the next 615 blocks will take 64 seconds to find - and not 32 as intended. Meh.

A good coin design could automatically downscale the difficulty at each N-factor change.

Also there is no good reason why the scrypt N parameter always has to grow in powers of 2 (apart from the tiny detail that in the code you can occasionally write &(N-1) instead of %N which is a tiny bit faster.

Thirtybird
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 693
Merit: 500



View Profile
January 31, 2014, 01:18:20 AM
 #3315


A good coin design could automatically downscale the difficulty at each N-factor change.


I suggested this for YAC quite some time ago - idea was denounced by Windmaster when he finally gave up the dev reigns.  In reality, the diff on YAC adjusts quick enough that it's only painful for a couple days, but I'm definitely with you on that.

YACMiner: https://github.com/Thirtybird/YACMiner  N-Factor information : https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0Aj3vcsuY-JFNdC1ITWJrSG9VeWp6QXppbVgxcm0tbGc&usp=drive_web#gid=0
BTC: 183eSsaxG9y6m2ZhrDhHueoKnZWmbm6jfC  YAC: Y4FKiwKKYGQzcqn3M3u6mJoded6ri1UWHa
13G
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 17
Merit: 0


View Profile
January 31, 2014, 01:32:58 AM
 #3316

oops, mining MRC with -C 2 using the Z kernel is not validating for me. Some problem
in the kernel it appears... Nothing to do with yesterday's commit, as I haven't touched
that kernel lately...

Strictly speaking the Z kernel shouldn't need support for any -C flags, as a Compute 3.5
device is capable of running any read access through the texture cache...

With -a=scrypt-jane:MRC -H 2 -C 0 -l Z60x24  I get up to 1100 kHash/s per GTX 780Ti.

EDIT: hmmm, two out of 3 cards hit 90 deg C and ran into thermal throttling.

Christian


Again the same - lame question - can you upload please binary win x64 please? ;-)
bigjme
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 350
Merit: 250


View Profile
January 31, 2014, 01:38:44 AM
 #3317

Would you recommend trying the Z kernel on my 780 to try it christian? For yacoin at the moment that is

I just read this over at multipool
"Bitcointalk admins are discussing the removal of all alt crypto forums."

Would this effect this forum topic?

Owner of: cudamining.co.uk
hammer24p
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 63
Merit: 4


View Profile
January 31, 2014, 02:20:15 AM
 #3318

does it matter how many connections you have with you wallet i have 4 on one comp 8 on the other
bigjme
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 350
Merit: 250


View Profile
January 31, 2014, 02:21:43 AM
 #3319

Not really no. My yacoin wallet has over 20. It just means your mined blocks are checked quicker and you get updates from the chain faster

Owner of: cudamining.co.uk
hammer24p
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 63
Merit: 4


View Profile
January 31, 2014, 02:30:46 AM
 #3320

thanks does overclocking you card help
Pages: « 1 ... 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 [166] 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 ... 1135 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!