Bitcoin Forum
April 25, 2024, 01:45:11 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 [302] 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 ... 363 »
  Print  
Author Topic: SRBMiner Cryptonight AMD GPU Miner V1.9.3 - native algo switching  (Read 237203 times)
heavyarms1912
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 729
Merit: 114



View Profile
February 20, 2019, 02:31:12 PM
Last edit: February 20, 2019, 03:23:33 PM by heavyarms1912
 #6021

forget about cn-gpu crap. It is much better on nvidia. And will be easy for fpga/asic if have any volume

Yup. it's much better on Nvidia but floating point math is not efficient on FPGAs and ASICs.
Are you joking? I've read about fpgas doing scientific floating points math years ago )) It is what they are designed for ))

never said they can't do. read; efficiency.

EDIT:  new FPGAs do come with loads of DSP blocks so perhaps that gap is quite narrow now.

EDIT2: https://medium.com/@crypto_ryo/cryptonight-gpu-fpga-proof-pow-algorithm-based-on-floating-point-instructions-92524debf8e8
1714052711
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714052711

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714052711
Reply with quote  #2

1714052711
Report to moderator
1714052711
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714052711

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714052711
Reply with quote  #2

1714052711
Report to moderator
1714052711
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714052711

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714052711
Reply with quote  #2

1714052711
Report to moderator
The trust scores you see are subjective; they will change depending on who you have in your trust list.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1714052711
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714052711

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714052711
Reply with quote  #2

1714052711
Report to moderator
1714052711
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714052711

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714052711
Reply with quote  #2

1714052711
Report to moderator
doktor83 (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 2520
Merit: 626


View Profile WWW
February 20, 2019, 04:24:03 PM
 #6022

When is cn/wow implementation expected to be done?

I can't tell exactly, but new version will be released in max 10 days, all  new algos added.


that article was written by fireice so it shouldn't be taken seriously  Cool

SRBMiner-MULTI thread - HERE
http://www.srbminer.com
katar14
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 20
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 20, 2019, 07:08:49 PM
 #6023

algo heavyX?HuhHuh when??
thenextdinosaur
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 13
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 20, 2019, 07:12:06 PM
 #6024

algo heavyX?HuhHuh when??

He literally answered above your message.
heavyarms1912
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 729
Merit: 114



View Profile
February 21, 2019, 03:11:51 AM
 #6025

When is cn/wow implementation expected to be done?

I can't tell exactly, but new version will be released in max 10 days, all  new algos added.


that article was written by fireice so it shouldn't be taken seriously  Cool

I never trust one source but on paper fp math is slower on FPGAs unless they have lots of DSP slices.  
Now that's the question how many is available and for how much.  Efficiency wise they would be order of magnitude better than GPUs.

I got a source that mentions on the FPGAs capable of doing 10 TFLOPs but looks pretty expensive.  10 TFLOPs is what an RTX 2080 does.
https://www.intel.com/content/dam/www/programmable/us/en/pdfs/literature/pt/stratix-10-product-table.pdf

https://www.digikey.com/product-detail/en/intel/DK-SOC-1SSX-L-A/DK-SOC-1SSX-L-A-ND/9863681
and a 280K cell FPGA is priced at $7.5k
katar14
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 20
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 21, 2019, 11:43:37 AM
 #6026

algo heavyX?HuhHuh when??

He literally answered above your message.
Kiss ok
thenextdinosaur
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 13
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 21, 2019, 12:17:17 PM
Last edit: February 21, 2019, 03:04:41 PM by thenextdinosaur
 #6027

One issue that I've been getting since earlier versions is that, while mining on a pool with multi-algo support (MO), sometimes the miner will just close without any apparent reason. The command prompt window just closes. When checking the log, nothing abnormal was happening. Sometimes the last line on the log is an algo change, sometimes is submitting a share. Miner just closes. Any idea of what may cause that or what else can I do to test more and provide more feedback?
doktor83 (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 2520
Merit: 626


View Profile WWW
February 21, 2019, 02:48:27 PM
 #6028

I know about this issue, and i probably fixed it (khm, i really hope), so it will be available in the next version soon.

SRBMiner-MULTI thread - HERE
http://www.srbminer.com
SpceGhst
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 269
Merit: 4


View Profile
February 21, 2019, 04:05:36 PM
 #6029

One issue that I've been getting since earlier versions is that, while mining on a pool with multi-algo support (MO), sometimes the miner will just close without any apparent reason. The command prompt window just closes. When checking the log, nothing abnormal was happening. Sometimes the last line on the log is an algo change, sometimes is submitting a share. Miner just closes. Any idea of what may cause that or what else can I do to test more and provide more feedback?

I was having the same issue without using profit switching, just a single coin.  Tracked the problem down to the AMD driver crashing.  The only solution I found was to lower the intensity setting by 10-20%.  Yes, you get a lower hash rate, but the program doesn’t crash either.
doktor83 (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 2520
Merit: 626


View Profile WWW
February 21, 2019, 04:39:54 PM
 #6030

One issue that I've been getting since earlier versions is that, while mining on a pool with multi-algo support (MO), sometimes the miner will just close without any apparent reason. The command prompt window just closes. When checking the log, nothing abnormal was happening. Sometimes the last line on the log is an algo change, sometimes is submitting a share. Miner just closes. Any idea of what may cause that or what else can I do to test more and provide more feedback?

I was having the same issue without using profit switching, just a single coin.  Tracked the problem down to the AMD driver crashing.  The only solution I found was to lower the intensity setting by 10-20%.  Yes, you get a lower hash rate, but the program doesn’t crash either.


This is different, yes driver can crash if you push the cards too much, that can happen with any miner.
Also try to lower memory clock or give the gpu a little bit more voltage to the core, and maybe you wont have to lower the intensity at all.

SRBMiner-MULTI thread - HERE
http://www.srbminer.com
t0lsty
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 22, 2019, 06:33:19 PM
 #6031

one of vega`s rig gives me such error after 10-20 minutes :

"Pool rejected result 0x000xxxx  (invalid job id) "

when I lower the intensity  - it works few hours, but then again this error.

it`s on turtle algo. but have same on stellite with newer srb

Whan can be a problem ??
Csouza
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 118
Merit: 10


View Profile
February 22, 2019, 06:34:25 PM
 #6032

What about hashrate on Vega56@64, RX580 4GB and RX570 4GB on CNGPU algo ?

SRB Miner 1.7.8
                                                    Core   Mem       HS
GPU0 [7]   Radeon RX 570 Series   1200   1850      620
GPU1 [5]   Radeon RX 570 Series   1200   1850      608
GPU2 [6]   Radeon RX 570 Series   1200   1850      618
GPU3 [1]   Radeon RX 570 Series   1200   1850      652
GPU4 [3]   Radeon RX 570 Series   1200   1850      645
GPU5 [4]   Radeon RX 570 Series   1200   1850      607


GPU0 [1]   Radeon RX 580           1150   2050      710
GPU1 [4]   Radeon RX 580           1150   2050      710
GPU2 [9]   Radeon RX Vega         1450   1000      1572
GPU3 [19]   Radeon RX Vega       1450   1000      1580
GPU4 [12]   Radeon RX Vega       1450   1000      1572
GPU5 [16]   Radeon RX Vega       1450   1000      1576
ManDoneKTM
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 150
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 23, 2019, 12:33:57 AM
 #6033

What about hashrate on Vega56@64, RX580 4GB and RX570 4GB on CNGPU algo ?

SRB Miner 1.7.8
                                                    Core   Mem       HS
GPU0 [7]   Radeon RX 570 Series   1200   1850      620
GPU1 [5]   Radeon RX 570 Series   1200   1850      608
GPU2 [6]   Radeon RX 570 Series   1200   1850      618
GPU3 [1]   Radeon RX 570 Series   1200   1850      652
GPU4 [3]   Radeon RX 570 Series   1200   1850      645
GPU5 [4]   Radeon RX 570 Series   1200   1850      607


GPU0 [1]   Radeon RX 580           1150   2050      710
GPU1 [4]   Radeon RX 580           1150   2050      710
GPU2 [9]   Radeon RX Vega         1450   1000      1572
GPU3 [19]   Radeon RX Vega       1450   1000      1580
GPU4 [12]   Radeon RX Vega       1450   1000      1572
GPU5 [16]   Radeon RX Vega       1450   1000      1576
GPU0 :    2534 H/s [T: 49c, RPM: 2100, CC: 1260 MHz, MC: 2100 MHz][BUS:7]
Csouza
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 118
Merit: 10


View Profile
February 23, 2019, 12:50:53 AM
 #6034

What about hashrate on Vega56@64, RX580 4GB and RX570 4GB on CNGPU algo ?

SRB Miner 1.7.8
                                                    Core   Mem       HS
GPU0 [7]   Radeon RX 570 Series   1200   1850      620
GPU1 [5]   Radeon RX 570 Series   1200   1850      608
GPU2 [6]   Radeon RX 570 Series   1200   1850      618
GPU3 [1]   Radeon RX 570 Series   1200   1850      652
GPU4 [3]   Radeon RX 570 Series   1200   1850      645
GPU5 [4]   Radeon RX 570 Series   1200   1850      607


GPU0 [1]   Radeon RX 580           1150   2050      710
GPU1 [4]   Radeon RX 580           1150   2050      710
GPU2 [9]   Radeon RX Vega         1450   1000      1572
GPU3 [19]   Radeon RX Vega       1450   1000      1580
GPU4 [12]   Radeon RX Vega       1450   1000      1572
GPU5 [16]   Radeon RX Vega       1450   1000      1576
GPU0 :    2534 H/s [T: 49c, RPM: 2100, CC: 1260 MHz, MC: 2100 MHz][BUS:7]

What VGA is?
doktor83 (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 2520
Merit: 626


View Profile WWW
February 23, 2019, 05:15:07 AM
 #6035

What about hashrate on Vega56@64, RX580 4GB and RX570 4GB on CNGPU algo ?

SRB Miner 1.7.8
                                                    Core   Mem       HS
GPU0 [7]   Radeon RX 570 Series   1200   1850      620
GPU1 [5]   Radeon RX 570 Series   1200   1850      608
GPU2 [6]   Radeon RX 570 Series   1200   1850      618
GPU3 [1]   Radeon RX 570 Series   1200   1850      652
GPU4 [3]   Radeon RX 570 Series   1200   1850      645
GPU5 [4]   Radeon RX 570 Series   1200   1850      607


GPU0 [1]   Radeon RX 580           1150   2050      710
GPU1 [4]   Radeon RX 580           1150   2050      710
GPU2 [9]   Radeon RX Vega         1450   1000      1572
GPU3 [19]   Radeon RX Vega       1450   1000      1580
GPU4 [12]   Radeon RX Vega       1450   1000      1572
GPU5 [16]   Radeon RX Vega       1450   1000      1576

You are probably using xmr stak settings here. well don't. Try out auto setup.
Vega56 @ 1450/900 = 1750khs on 110/32/2 F0

SRBMiner-MULTI thread - HERE
http://www.srbminer.com
ManDoneKTM
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 150
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 23, 2019, 10:49:20 AM
 #6036

What about hashrate on Vega56@64, RX580 4GB and RX570 4GB on CNGPU algo ?

SRB Miner 1.7.8
                                                    Core   Mem       HS
GPU0 [7]   Radeon RX 570 Series   1200   1850      620
GPU1 [5]   Radeon RX 570 Series   1200   1850      608
GPU2 [6]   Radeon RX 570 Series   1200   1850      618
GPU3 [1]   Radeon RX 570 Series   1200   1850      652
GPU4 [3]   Radeon RX 570 Series   1200   1850      645
GPU5 [4]   Radeon RX 570 Series   1200   1850      607


GPU0 [1]   Radeon RX 580           1150   2050      710
GPU1 [4]   Radeon RX 580           1150   2050      710
GPU2 [9]   Radeon RX Vega         1450   1000      1572
GPU3 [19]   Radeon RX Vega       1450   1000      1580
GPU4 [12]   Radeon RX Vega       1450   1000      1572
GPU5 [16]   Radeon RX Vega       1450   1000      1576
GPU0 :    2534 H/s [T: 49c, RPM: 2100, CC: 1260 MHz, MC: 2100 MHz][BUS:7]

What VGA is?
RX 580 8GB , own timmings and straps bios .
ivomm
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1850
Merit: 2829


All good things to those who wait


View Profile
February 23, 2019, 02:18:35 PM
 #6037

One issue that I've been getting since earlier versions is that, while mining on a pool with multi-algo support (MO), sometimes the miner will just close without any apparent reason. The command prompt window just closes. When checking the log, nothing abnormal was happening. Sometimes the last line on the log is an algo change, sometimes is submitting a share. Miner just closes. Any idea of what may cause that or what else can I do to test more and provide more feedback?
I confirm this issue for V8. My cards are running fine with 1.7.0. After I upgraded to 1.7.8 they work several hours and this happens. This is not related to a card crash, the voltage etc. settings remain intact and after restart everything works OK.
doktor83 (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 2520
Merit: 626


View Profile WWW
February 23, 2019, 10:10:12 PM
Last edit: February 24, 2019, 04:20:47 PM by doktor83
 #6038

V1.7.9
- Added new Monero algo 'Cryptonight R'
- Added algo 'Wownero'
- Added algo 'Conceal'
- Added algo 'Zelerius'
- Added algo 'Xcash'
- Replaced 'Mox' algo with new 'Mox V8' algo
- Added parameter 'maxnosharesent' in cmd
- Added parameter 'randomnonce' in cmd
- Added parameter 'enablecoinforking' in cmd
- Added algo switching info in json and on html stats page
- Lot of bug fixes

+ Monero will fork to a new algo 'Cryptonight R' soon. You can use for cryptonight_type 'normalv4', 'cryptonight_r' or just 'monero'.
+ Wownero already forked to a custom version of 'Cryptonight R'
+ Xcash can be mined by using 'xcash' or 'heavyx' for cryptonight_type
+ Conceal and Zelerius will fork too
+ Mox algo is now replaced with the new Mox V8 algo, so if you want to mine it until the fork, use previous version of SRBMiner

+ There was already a built in watchdog that restarted miner if no share was sent to the pool for 20 minutes. A new parameter was added so user can set this time : --maxnosharesent value in seconds (min. 1 min , max. 120 min)
+ Parameter --randomnonce creates totally random nonces for every gpu thread. This is like the 'i'm feeling lucky' button on Google
+ Json API and stats page now contains some info about algoswitching (if used)

+ Parameter --enablecoinforking allows miner to switch to an algo if the fork is predefined in the miner. If enabled it will auto switch for MONERO, CONCEAL AND ZELERIUS in this version (sorry Mox).
Don't use this parameter on a pool that does algoswitching, because it can think that wow is cn/r Smiley

How will this look for Monero fork:

start.bat
.
.
.
SRBMiner-CN.exe --enablecoinforking --config Config\config-normalv8.txt --pools pools.txt

Explained :
1. Start mining with normalv8 algo, because Monero still uses that algo
2. Add --enablecoinforking parameter so miner knows you want to use the built-in (predefined) fork informations
3. When pool sends a job for the new algo, miner will auto switch to the new algo, that must be defined in algos.txt
4. By default the new Monero algo 'normalv4' is already defined in algos.txt, so if you won't remove it everything will be fine

+ A big reorganisation happened in the miner code, so hopefully the misterious 'crashing out of nowhere' is fixed. I really hope.

Please guys who have this random crashing issue try the new version and report back.

SRBMiner-MULTI thread - HERE
http://www.srbminer.com
GKumaran
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 204
Merit: 10


View Profile
February 24, 2019, 01:53:51 AM
 #6039

Thank for the new version Doc !!  Cheesy Grin Cheesy

Can u explain --randomnonce for complete noobs like us, u mentioned its  Im lucky button, so does that mean we should use it?

P.S: That Coinforking was a great parameter in time saving Smiley
GKumaran
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 204
Merit: 10


View Profile
February 24, 2019, 02:47:05 AM
Last edit: February 24, 2019, 03:24:20 AM by GKumaran
 #6040

New algorithm Hashrates:
Run on 6 Vega 64 in 18.6.1, and averaged to single card numbers
All run using default SRB config files
All run in Same overclock setting -> stable
So lower power and higher HR can also be acheived

AlgorithmHashratePowerNotes
MoX41952154500 HR and 190 watt before fork is this drop extected? or cause of some 'old_mode'?
GPU1800230Intersting to note this algo isnt even using Memory like other CN variants
Zelerius2635210
Conceal4050195Power usage isnt stable, keeps fluctuating widely
Wownero1970210
Cryptonight R1965210Future XMR : Same clocks -> 2.25% drop in HR
NormalV82010210Current XMR : Same clocks
NormalV72120180Algo before current XMR : Same clocks
Xcash1020205
Pages: « 1 ... 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 [302] 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 ... 363 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!