Bitcoin Forum
April 27, 2018, 05:41:13 AM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.16.0  [Torrent]. (New!)
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: « 1 ... 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 [89] 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 ... 1147 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN] cudaMiner & ccMiner CUDA based mining applications [Windows/Linux/MacOSX]  (Read 3394472 times)
cbuchner1
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 756
Merit: 500


View Profile
December 23, 2013, 01:08:20 PM
 #1761

I've been googling for ages and I have read the "README" file at least five times but no one could I find the intensity setting K28x8 or similar actually mean.

I'm using the argument -l 28x8 but I might as well be burning my GPU right now because I have no actual idea what any of those numbers means and it is nowhere explained.

Could please, someone, explain how those numbers work so that I can use them properly on my GTX 660?

Thank you!

It would be a bit like explaining to a passenger how to land a plane. Wouldn't it be easier if I just showed him how to push the auto-land button? (yes, newer models have that feature).

To understand the terminology of launch configurations like -l K28x8  you would have to understand the CUDA programming model, what a launch grid is, what a thread block is, and how it consists of warps that are independently scheduled on your Kepler multiprocessor's for warp schedulers. And you would have to understand what parameters could make sense on your particular GPU architecture to achieve high occupancy. You would also have to know certain limits imposed by shared memory use and registers used by a given kernel.

Try auto-tuning first. Pass either -l auto, or no -l argument at all.

If that doesn't find a satisfactory configuration, we can talk about blocks and warps and the memory requirements.
the treatise linked to in my follow-up posting also has a bit of information.

Christian
1524807673
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1524807673

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1524807673
Reply with quote  #2

1524807673
Report to moderator
1524807673
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1524807673

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1524807673
Reply with quote  #2

1524807673
Report to moderator
1524807673
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1524807673

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1524807673
Reply with quote  #2

1524807673
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1524807673
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1524807673

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1524807673
Reply with quote  #2

1524807673
Report to moderator
1524807673
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1524807673

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1524807673
Reply with quote  #2

1524807673
Report to moderator
cbuchner1
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 756
Merit: 500


View Profile
December 23, 2013, 01:31:54 PM
 #1762


the GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT is snake-oil for nVidia CUDA devices. I am pretty sure the driver won't care about this flag.

Christian

Hi everyone, I wrote a small Treatise on Cuda Miner, mind helping me check it over? (Much updated! wow!)
http://www.reddit.com/r/Dogecoinmining/comments/1tguse/a_treatise_on_cuda_miner/
ak84
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 126
Merit: 100


View Profile
December 23, 2013, 01:44:49 PM
 #1763

I've been googling for ages and I have read the "README" file at least five times but no one could I find the intensity setting K28x8 or similar actually mean.

I'm using the argument -l 28x8 but I might as well be burning my GPU right now because I have no actual idea what any of those numbers means and it is nowhere explained.

Could please, someone, explain how those numbers work so that I can use them properly on my GTX 660?

Thank you!

Your GPU isn't gonna burn up dude. Relax. Hundreds of 660TI owners here have been mining away on a whole host of Kxxxx configurations. I myself have used K7x32, K12x16, K31x6, K14x8, K14x16, and K12x8 (recommended by -l auto)

and THEY BURNED MY GPU OH MY GOD


▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬ Edutainment.Tech ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
Double ICO: Games for smart and games for business
SmartGames    ◼ CorpEdu
69charger
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 173
Merit: 100


View Profile
December 23, 2013, 04:12:34 PM
 #1764

I've been googling for ages and I have read the "README" file at least five times but no one could I find the intensity setting K28x8 or similar actually mean.

I'm using the argument -l 28x8 but I might as well be burning my GPU right now because I have no actual idea what any of those numbers means and it is nowhere explained.

Could please, someone, explain how those numbers work so that I can use them properly on my GTX 660?

Thank you!

It would be a bit like explaining to a passenger how to land a plane. Wouldn't it be easier if I just showed him how to push the auto-land button? (yes, newer models have that feature).

To understand the terminology of launch configurations like -l K28x8  you would have to understand the CUDA programming model, what a launch grid is, what a thread block is, and how it consists of warps that are independently scheduled on your Kepler multiprocessor's for warp schedulers. And you would have to understand what parameters could make sense on your particular GPU architecture to achieve high occupancy. You would also have to know certain limits imposed by shared memory use and registers used by a given kernel.

Try auto-tuning first. Pass either -l auto, or no -l argument at all.

If that doesn't find a satisfactory configuration, we can talk about blocks and warps and the memory requirements.
the treatise linked to in my follow-up posting also has a bit of information.

Christian


Here's what I found as a noob... My card likes multiples of 160. Used to be 80x2, then 10x16, now 5x32 is the best. So find your "magic number" by running autotune several times and look at the first four digit hash number it gives you, mine was 5120, then divide by 32 to get your magic number. Then experiment with multiples. Has always worked out best for me and I have no idea why.  Grin
Valnurat
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 139
Merit: 100


View Profile
December 23, 2013, 06:45:30 PM
 #1765

How do you use cudaminer through a proxy?

Anyone? I can see there is a setting -x or --proxy. How do i use that?
dga
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 714
Merit: 500


View Profile WWW
December 23, 2013, 06:56:19 PM
 #1766

I've been googling for ages and I have read the "README" file at least five times but no one could I find the intensity setting K28x8 or similar actually mean.

I'm using the argument -l 28x8 but I might as well be burning my GPU right now because I have no actual idea what any of those numbers means and it is nowhere explained.

Could please, someone, explain how those numbers work so that I can use them properly on my GTX 660?

Thank you!

It would be a bit like explaining to a passenger how to land a plane. Wouldn't it be easier if I just showed him how to push the auto-land button? (yes, newer models have that feature).

To understand the terminology of launch configurations like -l K28x8  you would have to understand the CUDA programming model, what a launch grid is, what a thread block is, and how it consists of warps that are independently scheduled on your Kepler multiprocessor's for warp schedulers. And you would have to understand what parameters could make sense on your particular GPU architecture to achieve high occupancy. You would also have to know certain limits imposed by shared memory use and registers used by a given kernel.

Try auto-tuning first. Pass either -l auto, or no -l argument at all.

If that doesn't find a satisfactory configuration, we can talk about blocks and warps and the memory requirements.
the treatise linked to in my follow-up posting also has a bit of information.

Christian


Here's what I found as a noob... My card likes multiples of 160. Used to be 80x2, then 10x16, now 5x32 is the best. So find your "magic number" by running autotune several times and look at the first four digit hash number it gives you, mine was 5120, then divide by 32 to get your magic number. Then experiment with multiples. Has always worked out best for me and I have no idea why.  Grin

Step 1:  Figure out how many CUDA cores your device has by googling for it and looking at NVidia's page.  Example:  GTX 660
http://www.geforce.com/hardware/desktop-gpus/geforce-gtx-660/specifications

Has 960 CUDA cores.

Step 2:  Figure out how many of those cores are physically present on each execution unit.
  Step 2a:  Figure out your compute capability
   https://developer.nvidia.com/cuda-gpus
    Example, GTX 660, compute capability 3.0

  Step 2b:  For compute capability 3.0, each execution unit has 192 CUDA cores.

Step 3:  Divide #CUDA cores by number per execution unit.  Ex:  960 / 192 = 5.

  This tells you how many independent execution units you have ("SMXes" is the name for them in Kepler-based devices).
Setting the first number to the number of execution units is good.

Therefore:  5 is a very good choice for the first number in your tuning.  The second number depends on the amount of memory you have, but for compute capability 3.0 and 3.5 devices, 32 is a pretty good one.  So 5x32, as the follow-up poster suggested, is probably the right answer for you.  But trusting autotune in general is probably simpler. :-)

  -Dave

ajax3592
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 210
Merit: 100

Crypto News & Tutorials - Coinramble.com


View Profile
December 23, 2013, 07:38:47 PM
 #1767

That latest "GeForce 331.82 Driver" which is required to run this release hangs and BSODs my pc. Therefore, not able to run 18th DEC release  Cry

On GTS 450

Can you help out guys it's a bit urgent ?

Crypto news/tutorials >>CoinRamble<<                            >>Netcodepool<<                >>My graphics<<
y2kcamaross
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 227
Merit: 100


View Profile
December 24, 2013, 12:02:12 AM
 #1768

That latest "GeForce 331.82 Driver" which is required to run this release hangs and BSODs my pc. Therefore, not able to run 18th DEC release  Cry

On GTS 450

Can you help out guys it's a bit urgent ?

I'm having the same problem, 2 780's
Lacan82
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 247
Merit: 250


View Profile
December 24, 2013, 12:03:23 AM
 #1769

That latest "GeForce 331.82 Driver" which is required to run this release hangs and BSODs my pc. Therefore, not able to run 18th DEC release  Cry

On GTS 450

Can you help out guys it's a bit urgent ?

I'm having the same problem, 2 780's

Clean install?

Treggar
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 196
Merit: 100


View Profile
December 24, 2013, 12:49:42 AM
 #1770

I run 331.93 driver with this release and it works just fine, but wow do my two cards ever get hot.  

With 12/10 release they run at 85C ~399-402KH/s between the GTX570 and GTX465 and with 12/18 release they run at 93C ~402-410KH/s.

[2013-12-23 19:06:29] 2 miner threads started, using 'scrypt' algorithm.
[2013-12-23 19:06:30] Stratum detected new block
[2013-12-23 19:06:30] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 465 with compute capability 2.0
[2013-12-23 19:06:30] GPU #1: interactive: 0, tex-cache: 2D, single-alloc: 1
[2013-12-23 19:06:30] GPU #1: using launch configuration F11x16
[2013-12-23 19:06:30] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 570 with compute capability 2.0
[2013-12-23 19:06:30] GPU #0: interactive: 0, tex-cache: 2D, single-alloc: 1
[2013-12-23 19:06:30] GPU #0: using launch configuration F15x16
[2013-12-23 19:06:31] accepted: 1/1 (100.00%), 186.67 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2013-12-23 19:07:05] Stratum detected new block
[2013-12-23 19:07:07] accepted: 2/2 (100.00%), 404.98 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2013-12-23 19:07:08] accepted: 3/3 (100.00%), 407.63 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2013-12-23 19:07:09] accepted: 4/4 (100.00%), 403.10 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2013-12-23 19:07:20] accepted: 5/5 (100.00%), 402.91 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2013-12-23 19:07:27] accepted: 6/6 (100.00%), 410.95 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2013-12-23 19:07:33] accepted: 7/7 (100.00%), 410.43 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2013-12-23 19:07:35] accepted: 8/8 (100.00%), 408.76 khash/s (yay!!!)
hak8or
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 172
Merit: 100


View Profile
December 24, 2013, 07:01:12 AM
 #1771

Does anyone know how I can limit or slowdown the miner? It makes my 570 GTX sound like it will fly to the moon rather quickly, would love to be able to use my computer normally while it mines at like a 20% dip in performance.

Also, if anyone is interested here is the debug log for a 570 GTX.

Code:
$ cudaminer.exe -D --benchmark
[2013-12-24 06:57:28] 1 miner threads started, using 'scrypt' algorithm.
[2013-12-24 06:57:28] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 570 with compute capability 2.0
[2013-12-24 06:57:28] GPU #0: interactive: 1, tex-cache: 0 , single-alloc: 0
[2013-12-24 06:57:34] GPU #0: Performing auto-tuning (Patience...)
[2013-12-24 06:57:34] GPU #0: maximum warps: 290
[2013-12-24 06:57:35]        x1    x2    x3    x4    x5    x6    x7    x8    x9    x10   x11   x12   x13   x14   x15   x16
[2013-12-24 06:57:35]   1:  1.7|  3.4|  5.0|  6.4|  7.9|  9.0| 10.2| 11.3| 12.0| 13.1| 13.3| 14.0| 14.3| 14.7| 14.9| 15.3 kH/s
[2013-12-24 06:57:36]   2:  3.4|  6.6|  9.6| 12.8| 15.5| 18.0| 20.3| 22.2| 24.0| 25.6| 26.1| 28.4| 28.7| 29.8| 30.0| 31.4 kH/s
[2013-12-24 06:57:36]   3:  5.1| 10.3| 14.9| 19.2| 23.6| 27.4| 31.0| 33.9| 36.5| 37.6| 39.1| 41.9| 43.0| 45.5| 44.3| 46.3 kH/s
[2013-12-24 06:57:37]   4:  6.9| 13.2| 19.5| 25.2| 30.9| 34.9| 41.3| 43.8| 48.0| 51.2| 53.1| 55.8| 55.4| 59.7| 58.1| 62.0 kH/s
[2013-12-24 06:57:38]   5:  8.5| 16.5| 24.0| 31.4| 38.1| 42.9| 49.4| 55.6| 59.1| 63.9| 66.4| 68.5| 70.4| 74.6| 72.7| 76.4 kH/s
[2013-12-24 06:57:39]   6: 10.1| 19.5| 28.8| 38.4| 46.4| 52.3| 61.0| 63.9| 71.0| 76.7| 81.2| 83.7| 83.1| 89.5| 87.2| 90.3 kH/s
[2013-12-24 06:57:40]   7: 11.7| 22.4| 33.6| 42.6| 54.1| 60.1| 70.2| 74.6| 83.9| 87.8| 94.7| 99.5| 98.6|106.2|103.3|108.5 kH/s
[2013-12-24 06:57:41]   8: 13.7| 26.8| 39.0| 50.3| 62.9| 69.8| 81.4| 89.0| 94.6|102.3|108.2|113.7|112.7|121.4|118.1|122.2 kH/s
[2013-12-24 06:57:42]   9: 15.1| 30.2| 43.9| 56.6| 69.6| 78.5| 93.0|100.1|101.6|115.1|117.2|127.9|124.7|134.3|132.8|135.4 kH/s
[2013-12-24 06:57:43]  10: 16.8| 33.5| 47.2| 60.9| 77.4| 85.9|100.2|109.6|116.7|127.9|127.9|142.1|138.6|144.4|145.3|152.7 kH/s
[2013-12-24 06:57:44]  11: 18.5| 34.6| 53.4| 70.3| 82.4| 93.1|107.0|118.9|128.3|135.3|146.0|148.1|152.4|158.8|162.3|168.0 kH/s
[2013-12-24 06:57:45]  12: 20.2| 40.4| 58.3| 73.1| 91.4|103.1|118.5|133.5|141.9|153.5|156.3|170.5|169.1|176.1|177.1|180.6 kH/s
[2013-12-24 06:57:46]  13: 21.5| 40.9| 60.1| 81.8| 97.4|108.4|126.5|140.5|149.6|163.0|169.3|181.4|183.2|187.7|191.8|195.6 kH/s
[2013-12-24 06:57:47]  14: 23.6| 44.8| 62.7| 77.8|106.6|120.3|136.2|149.2|154.9|168.9|182.4|191.8|197.3|198.9|200.4|210.7 kH/s
[2013-12-24 06:57:48]  15: 24.8| 45.7| 67.0| 83.4| 95.9|127.0|146.0|159.9|172.7|188.1|199.1|205.5|204.4|220.1|214.7|216.2 kH/s
[2013-12-24 06:57:49]  16: 26.5| 50.3| 72.8| 89.0|102.3|109.6|117.4|120.4| 98.0|102.3|108.2|113.7|112.7|121.4|119.9|124.0 kH/s
[2013-12-24 06:57:50]  17: 28.6| 51.8| 74.1| 98.5|108.7|116.5|124.7|127.9|103.0|108.7|112.8|123.1|119.8|129.0|125.4| 91.5 kH/s
[2013-12-24 06:57:52]  18: 29.3| 56.6| 80.6|101.6|118.3|125.6|134.3|137.4|107.9|116.3|117.2|130.3|126.8|136.6|102.8| 38.3 kH/s
[2013-12-24 06:57:53]  19: 30.4| 57.9| 82.8|105.7|119.1|132.5|139.4|142.9|113.9|121.5|128.5|135.0|136.2|132.9| 46.9|      kH/s
[2013-12-24 06:57:54]  20: 31.4| 62.9| 87.2|109.6|127.9|142.1|144.4|150.5|119.9|127.9|132.7|142.1|143.3| 62.1|     |      kH/s
[2013-12-24 06:57:55]  21: 34.1| 63.9| 91.6|116.8|126.7|143.9|151.6|158.0|127.2|134.3|139.4|146.5| 85.6|     |     |      kH/s
[2013-12-24 06:57:55]  22: 36.4| 65.7| 95.9|124.1|140.7|150.7|161.4|163.1|133.3|137.9|146.0|150.7| 41.4|     |     |      kH/s
[2013-12-24 06:57:56]  23: 37.4| 73.5| 95.6|131.7|147.1|163.4|168.8|173.0|139.3|148.6|155.6| 79.5|     |     |     |      kH/s
[2013-12-24 06:57:57]  24: 37.7| 73.1|106.3|137.4|155.0|167.4|179.1|180.6|145.4|150.5|153.5| 38.9|     |     |     |      kH/s
[2013-12-24 06:57:58]  25: 40.6| 77.4|110.7|141.1|162.0|176.9|183.5|188.1|149.9|159.9| 83.0|     |     |     |     |      kH/s
[2013-12-24 06:57:59]  26: 40.9| 76.7|113.4|146.7|166.3|181.4|187.7|192.8|157.1|163.0| 43.5|     |     |     |     |      kH/s
[2013-12-24 06:58:00]  27: 38.7| 80.9|121.4|152.3|175.0|188.4|198.1|203.1|161.9|114.7|     |     |     |     |     |      kH/s
[2013-12-24 06:58:00]  28: 45.5| 85.3|125.9|158.0|179.1|191.8|202.2|204.6|167.9| 63.0|     |     |     |     |     |      kH/s
[2013-12-24 06:58:01]  29: 47.1| 85.6|117.5|158.4|185.4|198.7|209.4|206.1|173.9| 30.4|     |     |     |     |     |      kH/s
[2013-12-24 06:58:02]  30: 48.0| 87.2|119.9|134.6|188.1|204.7|216.6|213.2|115.1|     |     |     |     |     |     |      kH/s
[2013-12-24 06:58:02]  31: 50.4| 90.1|122.2|141.6|     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |      kH/s
[2013-12-24 06:58:02]  32: 51.2| 94.4|127.9|148.8|     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |      kH/s
[2013-12-24 06:58:03]  33: 53.7| 93.1|131.5|150.7|     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |      kH/s
[2013-12-24 06:58:03]  34: 53.5|100.3|132.2|155.3|     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |      kH/s
[2013-12-24 06:58:03]  35: 55.0|101.7|138.0|159.9|     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |      kH/s
[2013-12-24 06:58:04]  36: 57.6|104.6|141.5|164.4|     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |      kH/s
[2013-12-24 06:58:04]  37: 60.2|105.9|147.9|163.2|     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |      kH/s
[2013-12-24 06:58:04]  38: 60.8|113.9|151.9|173.6|     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |      kH/s
[2013-12-24 06:58:05]  39: 61.3|116.9|153.7|184.0|     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |      kH/s
[2013-12-24 06:58:05]  40: 62.9|118.1|155.5|182.7|     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |      kH/s
[2013-12-24 06:58:05]  41: 65.5|119.2|159.4|187.3|     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |      kH/s
[2013-12-24 06:58:06]  42: 66.0|120.3|161.1|195.3|     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |      kH/s
[2013-12-24 06:58:06]  43: 67.6|123.1|165.0|196.4|     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |      kH/s
[2013-12-24 06:58:06]  44: 69.2|124.1|168.8|201.0|     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |      kH/s
[2013-12-24 06:58:07]  45: 70.8|125.1|146.3|205.5|     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |      kH/s
[2013-12-24 06:58:07]  46: 70.9|126.1|154.8|     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |      kH/s
[2013-12-24 06:58:07]  47: 71.6|130.7|147.8|     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |      kH/s
[2013-12-24 06:58:07]  48: 75.5|133.5|158.8|     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |      kH/s
[2013-12-24 06:58:08]  49: 75.8|136.2|164.9|     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |      kH/s
[2013-12-24 06:58:08]  50: 77.4|139.0|168.3|     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |      kH/s
[2013-12-24 06:58:08]  51: 77.7|141.8|168.7|     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |      kH/s
[2013-12-24 06:58:08]  52: 79.2|144.6|172.0|     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |      kH/s
[2013-12-24 06:58:09]  53: 82.0|147.4|178.4|     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |      kH/s
[2013-12-24 06:58:09]  54: 83.5|150.1|178.6|     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |      kH/s
[2013-12-24 06:58:09]  55: 81.2|152.9|181.9|     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |      kH/s
[2013-12-24 06:58:10]  56: 85.3|155.7|188.5|     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |      kH/s
[2013-12-24 06:58:10]  57: 88.2|158.5|187.8|     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |      kH/s
[2013-12-24 06:58:10]  58: 88.3|148.4|191.8|     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |      kH/s
[2013-12-24 06:58:10]  59: 91.3|148.0|191.8|     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |      kH/s
[2013-12-24 06:58:11]  60: 89.9|153.5|198.5|     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |      kH/s
[2013-12-24 06:58:11]  61: 92.9|156.0|     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |      kH/s
[2013-12-24 06:58:11]  62: 94.4|158.6|     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |      kH/s
[2013-12-24 06:58:11]  63: 94.4|158.0|     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |      kH/s
[2013-12-24 06:58:11]  64: 90.3|160.5|     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |      kH/s
[2013-12-24 06:58:11]  65: 99.0|163.0|     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |      kH/s
[2013-12-24 06:58:12]  66:100.5|168.8|     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |      kH/s
[2013-12-24 06:58:12]  67:103.3|171.4|     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |      kH/s
[2013-12-24 06:58:12]  68:103.5|173.9|     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |      kH/s
[2013-12-24 06:58:12]  69:103.4|176.5|     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |      kH/s
[2013-12-24 06:58:12]  70:106.6|175.5|     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |      kH/s
[2013-12-24 06:58:13]  71:106.4|178.0|     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |      kH/s
[2013-12-24 06:58:13]  72:107.9|183.1|     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |      kH/s
[2013-12-24 06:58:13]  73:107.7|183.1|     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |      kH/s
[2013-12-24 06:58:13]  74:107.5|163.2|     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |      kH/s
[2013-12-24 06:58:13]  75:110.7|171.3|     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |      kH/s
[2013-12-24 06:58:14]  76:110.5|170.5|     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |      kH/s
[2013-12-24 06:58:14]  77:113.6|169.1|     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |      kH/s
[2013-12-24 06:58:14]  78:113.4|172.0|     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |      kH/s
[2013-12-24 06:58:14]  79:114.8|180.4|     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |      kH/s
[2013-12-24 06:58:14]  80:105.1|179.5|     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |      kH/s
[2013-12-24 06:58:14]  81:119.5|178.6|     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |      kH/s
[2013-12-24 06:58:15]  82:119.2|180.8|     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |      kH/s
[2013-12-24 06:58:15]  83:120.6|179.2|     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |      kH/s
[2013-12-24 06:58:15]  84:122.1|188.5|     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |      kH/s
[2013-12-24 06:58:15]  85:121.7|190.7|     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |      kH/s
[2013-12-24 06:58:15]  86:117.8|189.6|     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |      kH/s
[2013-12-24 06:58:16]  87:126.4|195.2|     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |      kH/s
[2013-12-24 06:58:16]  88:126.0|194.0|     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |      kH/s
[2013-12-24 06:58:16]  89:130.9|199.7|     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |      kH/s
[2013-12-24 06:58:16]  90:127.0|174.4|     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |      kH/s
[2013-12-24 06:58:16]  91:130.3|179.1|     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |      kH/s
[2013-12-24 06:58:17]  92:131.7|181.0|     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |      kH/s
[2013-12-24 06:58:17]  93:129.3|180.2|     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |      kH/s
[2013-12-24 06:58:17]  94:134.6|182.1|     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |      kH/s
[2013-12-24 06:58:17]  95:132.1|     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |      kH/s
[2013-12-24 06:58:18]  96:133.5|186.0|     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |      kH/s
[2013-12-24 06:58:18]  97:136.8|187.3|     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |      kH/s
[2013-12-24 06:58:18]  98:138.2|192.8|     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |      kH/s
[2013-12-24 06:58:18]  99:139.6|194.8|     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |      kH/s
[2013-12-24 06:58:18] 100:143.2|     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |      kH/s
[2013-12-24 06:58:18] 101:136.4|     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |      kH/s
[2013-12-24 06:58:18] 102:141.8|     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |      kH/s
[2013-12-24 06:58:19] 103:145.3|     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |      kH/s
[2013-12-24 06:58:19] 104:148.9|     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |      kH/s
[2013-12-24 06:58:19] 105:149.8|     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |      kH/s
[2013-12-24 06:58:19] 106:147.4|     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |      kH/s
[2013-12-24 06:58:19] 107:148.7|     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |      kH/s
[2013-12-24 06:58:19] 108:152.3|     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |      kH/s
[2013-12-24 06:58:19] 109:151.5|     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |      kH/s
[2013-12-24 06:58:20] 110:155.2|     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |      kH/s
[2013-12-24 06:58:20] 111:154.3|     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |      kH/s
[2013-12-24 06:58:20] 112:150.8|     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |      kH/s
[2013-12-24 06:58:20] 113:159.4|     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |      kH/s
[2013-12-24 06:58:20] 114:158.5|     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |      kH/s
[2013-12-24 06:58:20] 115:159.9|     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |      kH/s
[2013-12-24 06:58:20] 116:159.0|     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |      kH/s
[2013-12-24 06:58:21] 117:162.6|     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |      kH/s
[2013-12-24 06:58:21] 118:166.5|     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |      kH/s
[2013-12-24 06:58:21] 119:167.3|     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |      kH/s
[2013-12-24 06:58:21] 120:164.4|     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |      kH/s
[2013-12-24 06:58:21] GPU #0:  220.14 khash/s with configuration F15x14
[2013-12-24 06:58:21] GPU #0: using launch configuration F15x14
[2013-12-24 06:58:21] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 570, 6720 hashes, 0.13 khash/s
[2013-12-24 06:58:21] Total: 0.13 khash/s
[2013-12-24 06:58:21] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 570, 6720 hashes, 90.73 khash/s
[2013-12-24 06:58:21] Total: 90.73 khash/s
[2013-12-24 06:58:24] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 570, 456960 hashes, 195.67 khash/s
[2013-12-24 06:58:24] Total: 195.67 khash/s
[2013-12-24 06:58:29] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 570, 981120 hashes, 196.13 khash/s
[2013-12-24 06:58:29] Total: 196.13 khash/s
[2013-12-24 06:58:34] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 570, 981120 hashes, 195.74 khash/s
[2013-12-24 06:58:34] Total: 195.74 khash/s
GoldBit89
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 517
Merit: 500


Its all about the Gold


View Profile
December 24, 2013, 07:33:24 AM
 #1772

How do you use cudaminer through a proxy?

http://www.lpshowboat0099.com/Blog/how-to-mining-ltc-with-cudaminer-on-a-stratum-server/


this should help ya out


but with newest releases of cudaminer , you do not need a proxy to run.

FTC  6nvzqqaCEizThvgMeC86MGzhAxGzKEtNH8 |WDC WckDxipCes2eBmxrUYEhrUfNNRZexKuYjR  |BQC bSDm3XvauqWWnqrxfimw5wdHVDQDp2U8XU
BOT EjcroqeMpZT4hphY4xYDzTQakwutpnufQR |BTG geLUGuJkhnvuft77ND6VrMvc8vxySKZBUz |LTC  LhXbJMzCqLEzGBKgB2n73oce448BxX1dc4
BTC 1JPzHugtBtPwXgwMqt9rtdwRxxWyaZvk61
cbuchner1
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 756
Merit: 500


View Profile
December 24, 2013, 08:11:20 AM
 #1773

How do you use cudaminer through a proxy?

http://www.lpshowboat0099.com/Blog/how-to-mining-ltc-with-cudaminer-on-a-stratum-server/


this should help ya out

but with newest releases of cudaminer , you do not need a proxy to run.

a couple of pages back I tried to explain the -x proxy option. It supports http: https: and socks: proxies, as far as I determined. I did not write that code though, as it is inherited from the cpuminer project.

Christian
cbuchner1
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 756
Merit: 500


View Profile
December 24, 2013, 08:12:33 AM
 #1774


CUDA 5.5 does not require the release 331 driver. You can go back a few driver revisions also. Unfortunately I do not know what the exact requirements are.

Christian
cbuchner1
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 756
Merit: 500


View Profile
December 24, 2013, 04:22:57 PM
 #1775


Merry Christmas everyone. I hope Santa will bring you a lot of new nVidia cards.
69charger
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 173
Merit: 100


View Profile
December 24, 2013, 05:28:54 PM
 #1776


Merry Christmas everyone. I hope Santa will bring you a lot of new nVidia cards.


I hope Santa brings you visions of further optimizations that get all of us lowly nVidia users another 40% performance gain. Sleep well!  Cheesy
celeronjb
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 8
Merit: 0


View Profile
December 24, 2013, 06:03:27 PM
 #1777

650Ti Boost settings, pls?
amacar
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 546
Merit: 500


View Profile
December 24, 2013, 06:13:02 PM
 #1778

650Ti Boost settings, pls?

At first run cudaminer as cudaminer.exe -D --benchmark

Wait till the end and cudaminer will give you best configuration. I have 560ti 1280mb with core clock 822 and memory clock 1500, and using F22x8 configuration. This gives me 199khash/s.
celeronjb
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 8
Merit: 0


View Profile
December 24, 2013, 06:30:26 PM
 #1779

650Ti Boost settings, pls?

At first run cudaminer as cudaminer.exe -D --benchmark

Wait till the end and cudaminer will give you best configuration. I have 560ti 1280mb with core clock 822 and memory clock 1500, and using F22x8 configuration. This gives me 199khash/s.

so agression or intensity don't setup in this miner?
amacar
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 546
Merit: 500


View Profile
December 24, 2013, 06:33:37 PM
 #1780

650Ti Boost settings, pls?

At first run cudaminer as cudaminer.exe -D --benchmark

Wait till the end and cudaminer will give you best configuration. I have 560ti 1280mb with core clock 822 and memory clock 1500, and using F22x8 configuration. This gives me 199khash/s.

so agression or intensity don't setup in this miner?

No, the setup will look like this: cudaminer.exe -H 1 -i 0 -C 2 -l F22x8 -m 0 -o stratum+tcp://stratum.coinium.org:3336 -O amacar.1:x
but instead of F22x8 you write your best configuration.
Pages: « 1 ... 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 [89] 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 ... 1147 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!