SRBMiner Cryptonight AMD GPU Miner V1.9.3 - native algo switching

[livada]

How do you mean it disrespects it?

as you see in my bat file i expect it to taskkill sbrminer, restart gpu, apply overdriven ini and start sbrminer again. it never happens. if card goes off, sbrminer just restarts itself in the same window and hangs on loading kernels.

Does it start the .bat at all ? I see you have it in the config set.

Do you see something like "Reboot script reboot-windows.bat started..." before the miner restarts itself?

da . to sam ti zaboravio spomenut da imas bug u 1.6.4 a mozda i u 1.6.5

i ja koristim restart scriptu al miner ju ignorira. ja pozovem reset-fast.bat al kad watcdog prepozna HR 0 on pozove svejedno neki svoj kil i ide u restart a ne u rest minera kako sam mu ja reko.

Moj reset minera zove svaki svoj algo. npr u fast-config imam poziv reset-fast.bat a u tube ima poziv na reset-tube.bat itd. al miner uvjek pozove neki svoj reset cijelog kompa.

npr:

MSR SRB trade.bat starta minera
setx GPU_FORCE_64BIT_PTR 1
setx GPU_MAX_HEAP_SIZE 100
setx GPU_MAX_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1
setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
setx GPU_MAX_SINGLE_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
@echo off

cls
set EXE=SRBMiner-CN.exe
%EXE% --sendallstales --config config-v7fast.txt --pools pools-msr.txt --logfile log-msr.txt --gpureorder

config-v7fast.txt
"intensity" : 120,
"double_threads" : true,
"min_rig_speed" : 19000,
"min_rig_speed_duration" : 120,
"reboot_script" : "reset fast.bat",

reset fast.bat
@echo off
SET "version=01"
SET "title=%~nx0 - version %version%"
TITLE %title%

cd %~dp0
timeout /t 5
echo.

SET device1="Radeon RX Vega"

echo.
echo Uredjaj: %device1%
timeout 10
DevManView.exe /disable %device1%
echo Uredjaj: %device1% disablan
timeout 5
DevManView.exe /enable %device1%
echo Uredjaj: %device1% enablan

timeout 7

echo Palim Overdrive!!!
OverdriveNTool.exe -r1 -r2 -r3 -r4 -r5 -r6 -p1fast1 -p2fast2 -p3fast3 -p4fast4 -p5fast5 -p6fast6
echo OverdriveNTool.exe -r1 -r2 -r3 -r4 -r5 -r6 -p1fast1 -p2fast2 -p3fast3 -p4fast4 -p5fast5 -p6fast6
echo.

cd %~dp0
timeout /t 3
echo palim MSR SRB trade.bat - fast algo
timeout 7

cd\
cd SRBMiner
start "RESET MSR scripta" "C:\SRBMiner\MSR SRB trade.bat"

echo.
echo Kraj!!!
timeout 5

MSR SRB trade.bat je pocetni bat s kojim smo i krenuli u zvanje config scripte u kojoj je reset fast.bat i reset skripte se nalaze  u rooto od minera.
KAd nekakartica zbloka miner se pokrene al ne pokrene fast bat nego autostart bat koji koristim za pokretanje stroja. znaci resetiro se komp(to nisam100% siguran) i nastavio rudarid defaultni algo a ne algo na kojem sam ga ostavio. Mozda sam negdje nesto pogrijesio  posto imam vec previse tih configa i batova al kad pokrenem rucno taj reset fast.bat sve radi uredno i odradi proceduru. znaci po meni je greska bas u config.txt jer ne pozove  moj reset fast.bat nego tvoj reboot.

[1702235992]

1702235992

[1702235992]

1702235992

[1702235992]

1702235992

[1702235992]

1702235992

[dopper]

Does it start the .bat at all ? I see you have it in the config set.

Do you see something like "Reboot script reboot-windows.bat started..." before the miner restarts itself?

No, I don't see a message like this. Am I missing something? The file is in the same folder as SRB, quotes, comma in place...

Maybe you can add indication about scripts used in stats section on next release?

[wgestickley]

Hey Guys,

a bit oftopic, but does somebody know a got Web ressource or APP where the actual most profitable Coins are shown? I dont mean the whattomine overwiev cause they have less Coins.

I am searchng for a big overview with the actual diff and %ROI

Thank you

Oliver

[doktor83]

Does it start the .bat at all ? I see you have it in the config set.

Do you see something like "Reboot script reboot-windows.bat started..." before the miner restarts itself?

No, I don't see a message like this. Am I missing something? The file is in the same folder as SRB, quotes, comma in place...

Maybe you can add indication about scripts used in stats section on next release?

i will check it, maybe it's a bug. And good idea about the indication.

[bruslie]

blockchain driver still less than 1.6.2

[Mashy81]

Hey Guys,

a bit oftopic, but does somebody know a got Web ressource or APP where the actual most profitable Coins are shown? I dont mean the whattomine overwiev cause they have less Coins.

I am searchng for a big overview with the actual diff and %ROI

Thank you

Oliver

Doesn't that take the fun out of it? If everyone knows the coin then they will be all roughly the same profitability. All the noobs just mine the most profitable coin and keep switching

[ikyo]

I have been doing some testing on one of my rigs before changing over all of them to SRB.  The initial output I am getting is higher than what I have been getting with Cast, but I did notice something on one of my multi-card rigs.  The hash rate started around 12.5k (with 6 cards) and then it dropped down to all except 2 of the cards doing below 2k each.  I checked the temperature and everything was fine.  I also didn't notice anything else strange.  I stopped the miner and restarted it.  They all came back to the normal numbers.  Any idea what could have caused the issue?

Startup numbers:

Code:

[2018-08-05 18:43:27] GPU0 :    2086 H/s [T: 48c, RPM: 2312, CC: 1408 MHz, MC: 1100 MHz][BUS:7]
[2018-08-05 18:43:27] GPU1 :    2088 H/s [T: 47c, RPM: 2302, CC: 1408 MHz, MC: 1100 MHz][BUS:21]
[2018-08-05 18:43:27] GPU2 :    2086 H/s [T: 49c, RPM: 2333, CC: 1408 MHz, MC: 1100 MHz][BUS:10]
[2018-08-05 18:43:27] GPU3 :    2084 H/s [T: 48c, RPM: 2351, CC: 1408 MHz, MC: 1100 MHz][BUS:3]
[2018-08-05 18:43:27] GPU4 :    2089 H/s [T: 47c, RPM: 2373, CC: 1408 MHz, MC: 1100 MHz][BUS:18]
[2018-08-05 18:43:27] GPU5 :    2087 H/s [T: 44c, RPM: 2332, CC: 1408 MHz, MC: 1100 MHz][BUS:13]
[2018-08-05 18:43:27] Total:    12520 H/s

[doktor83]

blockchain driver still less than 1.6.2

cards, algo, settings, difference?

[Ballscack]

I have been doing some testing on one of my rigs before changing over all of them to SRB.  The initial output I am getting is higher than what I have been getting with Cast, but I did notice something on one of my multi-card rigs.  The hash rate started around 12.5k (with 6 cards) and then it dropped down to all except 2 of the cards doing below 2k each.  I checked the temperature and everything was fine.  I also didn't notice anything else strange.  I stopped the miner and restarted it.  They all came back to the normal numbers.  Any idea what could have caused the issue?

Startup numbers:

Code:

[2018-08-05 18:43:27] GPU0 :    2086 H/s [T: 48c, RPM: 2312, CC: 1408 MHz, MC: 1100 MHz][BUS:7]
[2018-08-05 18:43:27] GPU1 :    2088 H/s [T: 47c, RPM: 2302, CC: 1408 MHz, MC: 1100 MHz][BUS:21]
[2018-08-05 18:43:27] GPU2 :    2086 H/s [T: 49c, RPM: 2333, CC: 1408 MHz, MC: 1100 MHz][BUS:10]
[2018-08-05 18:43:27] GPU3 :    2084 H/s [T: 48c, RPM: 2351, CC: 1408 MHz, MC: 1100 MHz][BUS:3]
[2018-08-05 18:43:27] GPU4 :    2089 H/s [T: 47c, RPM: 2373, CC: 1408 MHz, MC: 1100 MHz][BUS:18]
[2018-08-05 18:43:27] GPU5 :    2087 H/s [T: 44c, RPM: 2332, CC: 1408 MHz, MC: 1100 MHz][BUS:13]
[2018-08-05 18:43:27] Total:    12520 H/s

try my settings for 2.1kh/s

overdrive p7: 1502mhz @ 950mv
              p3 mem: 1100 @ 950mv
              power target 50%
note: my cards are samsung memory


srb config is: { "id" : 0, "intensity" : 120, "worksize" : 8, "threads" : 2},

for each card.

[livada]

I have been doing some testing on one of my rigs before changing over all of them to SRB.  The initial output I am getting is higher than what I have been getting with Cast, but I did notice something on one of my multi-card rigs.  The hash rate started around 12.5k (with 6 cards) and then it dropped down to all except 2 of the cards doing below 2k each.  I checked the temperature and everything was fine.  I also didn't notice anything else strange.  I stopped the miner and restarted it.  They all came back to the normal numbers.  Any idea what could have caused the issue?

Startup numbers:

Code:

[2018-08-05 18:43:27] GPU0 :    2086 H/s [T: 48c, RPM: 2312, CC: 1408 MHz, MC: 1100 MHz][BUS:7]
[2018-08-05 18:43:27] GPU1 :    2088 H/s [T: 47c, RPM: 2302, CC: 1408 MHz, MC: 1100 MHz][BUS:21]
[2018-08-05 18:43:27] GPU2 :    2086 H/s [T: 49c, RPM: 2333, CC: 1408 MHz, MC: 1100 MHz][BUS:10]
[2018-08-05 18:43:27] GPU3 :    2084 H/s [T: 48c, RPM: 2351, CC: 1408 MHz, MC: 1100 MHz][BUS:3]
[2018-08-05 18:43:27] GPU4 :    2089 H/s [T: 47c, RPM: 2373, CC: 1408 MHz, MC: 1100 MHz][BUS:18]
[2018-08-05 18:43:27] GPU5 :    2087 H/s [T: 44c, RPM: 2332, CC: 1408 MHz, MC: 1100 MHz][BUS:13]
[2018-08-05 18:43:27] Total:    12520 H/s

try my settings for 2.1kh/s

overdrive p7: 1502mhz @ 950mv
              p3 mem: 1100 @ 950mv
              power target 50%
note: my cards are samsung memory


srb config is: { "id" : 0, "intensity" : 120, "worksize" : 8, "threads" : 2},

for each card.

this is vega 64? and how much electricity use ? 950mv is to much.

[Ballscack]

I have been doing some testing on one of my rigs before changing over all of them to SRB.  The initial output I am getting is higher than what I have been getting with Cast, but I did notice something on one of my multi-card rigs.  The hash rate started around 12.5k (with 6 cards) and then it dropped down to all except 2 of the cards doing below 2k each.  I checked the temperature and everything was fine.  I also didn't notice anything else strange.  I stopped the miner and restarted it.  They all came back to the normal numbers.  Any idea what could have caused the issue?

Startup numbers:

Code:

[2018-08-05 18:43:27] GPU0 :    2086 H/s [T: 48c, RPM: 2312, CC: 1408 MHz, MC: 1100 MHz][BUS:7]
[2018-08-05 18:43:27] GPU1 :    2088 H/s [T: 47c, RPM: 2302, CC: 1408 MHz, MC: 1100 MHz][BUS:21]
[2018-08-05 18:43:27] GPU2 :    2086 H/s [T: 49c, RPM: 2333, CC: 1408 MHz, MC: 1100 MHz][BUS:10]
[2018-08-05 18:43:27] GPU3 :    2084 H/s [T: 48c, RPM: 2351, CC: 1408 MHz, MC: 1100 MHz][BUS:3]
[2018-08-05 18:43:27] GPU4 :    2089 H/s [T: 47c, RPM: 2373, CC: 1408 MHz, MC: 1100 MHz][BUS:18]
[2018-08-05 18:43:27] GPU5 :    2087 H/s [T: 44c, RPM: 2332, CC: 1408 MHz, MC: 1100 MHz][BUS:13]
[2018-08-05 18:43:27] Total:    12520 H/s

try my settings for 2.1kh/s

overdrive p7: 1502mhz @ 950mv
              p3 mem: 1100 @ 950mv
              power target 50%
note: my cards are samsung memory


srb config is: { "id" : 0, "intensity" : 120, "worksize" : 8, "threads" : 2},

for each card.

this is vega 56 or 64? bios? and how much electricity use ? 950mv is to much.

vega 64.

950mv can be lowerd depending silicon lotery ;-p

i find 950mv the most stable with no stales or rejects and never any miner crash.

u can tune it depending ur cards and i would suggest to test each card with a lower voltage before putting them all lower than 950mv

[livada]

I have been doing some testing on one of my rigs before changing over all of them to SRB.  The initial output I am getting is higher than what I have been getting with Cast, but I did notice something on one of my multi-card rigs.  The hash rate started around 12.5k (with 6 cards) and then it dropped down to all except 2 of the cards doing below 2k each.  I checked the temperature and everything was fine.  I also didn't notice anything else strange.  I stopped the miner and restarted it.  They all came back to the normal numbers.  Any idea what could have caused the issue?

Startup numbers:

Code:

[2018-08-05 18:43:27] GPU0 :    2086 H/s [T: 48c, RPM: 2312, CC: 1408 MHz, MC: 1100 MHz][BUS:7]
[2018-08-05 18:43:27] GPU1 :    2088 H/s [T: 47c, RPM: 2302, CC: 1408 MHz, MC: 1100 MHz][BUS:21]
[2018-08-05 18:43:27] GPU2 :    2086 H/s [T: 49c, RPM: 2333, CC: 1408 MHz, MC: 1100 MHz][BUS:10]
[2018-08-05 18:43:27] GPU3 :    2084 H/s [T: 48c, RPM: 2351, CC: 1408 MHz, MC: 1100 MHz][BUS:3]
[2018-08-05 18:43:27] GPU4 :    2089 H/s [T: 47c, RPM: 2373, CC: 1408 MHz, MC: 1100 MHz][BUS:18]
[2018-08-05 18:43:27] GPU5 :    2087 H/s [T: 44c, RPM: 2332, CC: 1408 MHz, MC: 1100 MHz][BUS:13]
[2018-08-05 18:43:27] Total:    12520 H/s

try my settings for 2.1kh/s

overdrive p7: 1502mhz @ 950mv
              p3 mem: 1100 @ 950mv
              power target 50%
note: my cards are samsung memory


srb config is: { "id" : 0, "intensity" : 120, "worksize" : 8, "threads" : 2},

for each card.

this is vega 56 or 64? bios? and how much electricity use ? 950mv is to much.

vega 64.

950mv can be lowerd depending silicon lotery ;-p

i find 950mv the most stable with no stales or rejects and never any miner crash.

u can tune it depending ur cards and i would suggest to test each card with a lower voltage before putting them all lower than 950mv

my vega64LE use 900mv 1492GPU aand 1095mem . HR 2090.
If i put 950mv and1500GPU/1100mem  i have 2110HR but use 6-8W more from the wall and temp go up 1-2C.
And this is ok if you have free or cheap electricity.
but 20HR give only 0,3$ per month and use 5KW per month(0,5$)

[ikyo]

I have been doing some testing on one of my rigs before changing over all of them to SRB.  The initial output I am getting is higher than what I have been getting with Cast, but I did notice something on one of my multi-card rigs.  The hash rate started around 12.5k (with 6 cards) and then it dropped down to all except 2 of the cards doing below 2k each.  I checked the temperature and everything was fine.  I also didn't notice anything else strange.  I stopped the miner and restarted it.  They all came back to the normal numbers.  Any idea what could have caused the issue?

Startup numbers:

Code:

[2018-08-05 18:43:27] GPU0 :    2086 H/s [T: 48c, RPM: 2312, CC: 1408 MHz, MC: 1100 MHz][BUS:7]
[2018-08-05 18:43:27] GPU1 :    2088 H/s [T: 47c, RPM: 2302, CC: 1408 MHz, MC: 1100 MHz][BUS:21]
[2018-08-05 18:43:27] GPU2 :    2086 H/s [T: 49c, RPM: 2333, CC: 1408 MHz, MC: 1100 MHz][BUS:10]
[2018-08-05 18:43:27] GPU3 :    2084 H/s [T: 48c, RPM: 2351, CC: 1408 MHz, MC: 1100 MHz][BUS:3]
[2018-08-05 18:43:27] GPU4 :    2089 H/s [T: 47c, RPM: 2373, CC: 1408 MHz, MC: 1100 MHz][BUS:18]
[2018-08-05 18:43:27] GPU5 :    2087 H/s [T: 44c, RPM: 2332, CC: 1408 MHz, MC: 1100 MHz][BUS:13]
[2018-08-05 18:43:27] Total:    12520 H/s

try my settings for 2.1kh/s

overdrive p7: 1502mhz @ 950mv
              p3 mem: 1100 @ 950mv
              power target 50%
note: my cards are samsung memory


srb config is: { "id" : 0, "intensity" : 120, "worksize" : 8, "threads" : 2},

for each card.

this is vega 56 or 64? bios? and how much electricity use ? 950mv is to much.

vega 64.

950mv can be lowerd depending silicon lotery ;-p

i find 950mv the most stable with no stales or rejects and never any miner crash.

u can tune it depending ur cards and i would suggest to test each card with a lower voltage before putting them all lower than 950mv

my vega64LE use 900mv 1492GPU aand 1095mem . HR 2090.
If i put 950mv and1500GPU/1100mem  i have 2110HR but use 6-8W more from the wall and temp go up 1-2C.
And this is ok if you have free or cheap electricity.
but 20HR give only 0,3$ per month and use 5KW per month(0,5$)

I am using 1408/925 and 1100/905 for those numbers.  The electricity here isn't all that cheap so the small increase probably isn't worth it.  I also want to keep the temps as low as possible.  I have a dedicated AC unit in that room so the less I can tax it the better.

[livada]

I have been doing some testing on one of my rigs before changing over all of them to SRB.  The initial output I am getting is higher than what I have been getting with Cast, but I did notice something on one of my multi-card rigs.  The hash rate started around 12.5k (with 6 cards) and then it dropped down to all except 2 of the cards doing below 2k each.  I checked the temperature and everything was fine.  I also didn't notice anything else strange.  I stopped the miner and restarted it.  They all came back to the normal numbers.  Any idea what could have caused the issue?

Startup numbers:

Code:

[2018-08-05 18:43:27] GPU0 :    2086 H/s [T: 48c, RPM: 2312, CC: 1408 MHz, MC: 1100 MHz][BUS:7]
[2018-08-05 18:43:27] GPU1 :    2088 H/s [T: 47c, RPM: 2302, CC: 1408 MHz, MC: 1100 MHz][BUS:21]
[2018-08-05 18:43:27] GPU2 :    2086 H/s [T: 49c, RPM: 2333, CC: 1408 MHz, MC: 1100 MHz][BUS:10]
[2018-08-05 18:43:27] GPU3 :    2084 H/s [T: 48c, RPM: 2351, CC: 1408 MHz, MC: 1100 MHz][BUS:3]
[2018-08-05 18:43:27] GPU4 :    2089 H/s [T: 47c, RPM: 2373, CC: 1408 MHz, MC: 1100 MHz][BUS:18]
[2018-08-05 18:43:27] GPU5 :    2087 H/s [T: 44c, RPM: 2332, CC: 1408 MHz, MC: 1100 MHz][BUS:13]
[2018-08-05 18:43:27] Total:    12520 H/s

try my settings for 2.1kh/s

overdrive p7: 1502mhz @ 950mv
              p3 mem: 1100 @ 950mv
              power target 50%
note: my cards are samsung memory


srb config is: { "id" : 0, "intensity" : 120, "worksize" : 8, "threads" : 2},

for each card.

this is vega 56 or 64? bios? and how much electricity use ? 950mv is to much.

vega 64.

950mv can be lowerd depending silicon lotery ;-p

i find 950mv the most stable with no stales or rejects and never any miner crash.

u can tune it depending ur cards and i would suggest to test each card with a lower voltage before putting them all lower than 950mv

my vega64LE use 900mv 1492GPU aand 1095mem . HR 2090.
If i put 950mv and1500GPU/1100mem  i have 2110HR but use 6-8W more from the wall and temp go up 1-2C.
And this is ok if you have free or cheap electricity.
but 20HR give only 0,3$ per month and use 5KW per month(0,5$)

I am using 1408/925 and 1100/905 for those numbers.  The electricity here isn't all that cheap so the small increase probably isn't worth it.  I also want to keep the temps as low as possible.  I have a dedicated AC unit in that room so the less I can tax it the better.

You have very god HR for 1408GPU. 1408mhz  work with 890mv.

[Ballscack]

ANYONE TRIED THE NEW AMD 18.8.1 DRIVER !?

[bruslie]

blockchain driver still less than 1.6.2

cards, algo, settings, difference?

yes sir, sadly  everything the same 100 %

[P00P135]

ANYONE TRIED THE NEW AMD 18.8.1 DRIVER !?

NO! YOU USE KNOWN WORKING DRIVERS NOT THE NEWEST

[Ballscack]

ANYONE TRIED THE NEW AMD 18.8.1 DRIVER !?

NO! YOU USE KNOWN WORKING DRIVERS NOT THE NEWEST

That is a bit a lame answer mate.... i ask who has tested the newest driver to see what happens..

[dopper]

if i use "restart_devices_on_startup" after devcon restart i get CL_OUT_OF_HOST_MEMORY when creating clCreateCommandQueue for DeviceID 0 (Thread 0) error

i've tried the other version of devcon and it didn't help
if i use "restart_devices_on_startup" i get an error, if i remove this string from config then miner starts as usual

doc can you look at this too please?

[SpceGhst]

ANYONE TRIED THE NEW AMD 18.8.1 DRIVER !?

I think you should try it out and let us know how it works!  I didn’t even know there was an 18.8.1 driver.  I’m a big believer in the “if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it” theory...