SRBMiner Cryptonight AMD GPU Miner V1.9.3 - native algo switching

[bruslie]

blockchain driver still less than 1.6.2

[Mashy81]

Hey Guys,

a bit oftopic, but does somebody know a got Web ressource or APP where the actual most profitable Coins are shown? I dont mean the whattomine overwiev cause they have less Coins.

I am searchng for a big overview with the actual diff and %ROI

Thank you

Oliver

Doesn't that take the fun out of it? If everyone knows the coin then they will be all roughly the same profitability. All the noobs just mine the most profitable coin and keep switching

[ikyo]

I have been doing some testing on one of my rigs before changing over all of them to SRB.  The initial output I am getting is higher than what I have been getting with Cast, but I did notice something on one of my multi-card rigs.  The hash rate started around 12.5k (with 6 cards) and then it dropped down to all except 2 of the cards doing below 2k each.  I checked the temperature and everything was fine.  I also didn't notice anything else strange.  I stopped the miner and restarted it.  They all came back to the normal numbers.  Any idea what could have caused the issue?

Startup numbers:

Code:

[2018-08-05 18:43:27] GPU0 :    2086 H/s [T: 48c, RPM: 2312, CC: 1408 MHz, MC: 1100 MHz][BUS:7]
[2018-08-05 18:43:27] GPU1 :    2088 H/s [T: 47c, RPM: 2302, CC: 1408 MHz, MC: 1100 MHz][BUS:21]
[2018-08-05 18:43:27] GPU2 :    2086 H/s [T: 49c, RPM: 2333, CC: 1408 MHz, MC: 1100 MHz][BUS:10]
[2018-08-05 18:43:27] GPU3 :    2084 H/s [T: 48c, RPM: 2351, CC: 1408 MHz, MC: 1100 MHz][BUS:3]
[2018-08-05 18:43:27] GPU4 :    2089 H/s [T: 47c, RPM: 2373, CC: 1408 MHz, MC: 1100 MHz][BUS:18]
[2018-08-05 18:43:27] GPU5 :    2087 H/s [T: 44c, RPM: 2332, CC: 1408 MHz, MC: 1100 MHz][BUS:13]
[2018-08-05 18:43:27] Total:    12520 H/s

[doktor83]

blockchain driver still less than 1.6.2

cards, algo, settings, difference?

[Ballscack]

I have been doing some testing on one of my rigs before changing over all of them to SRB.  The initial output I am getting is higher than what I have been getting with Cast, but I did notice something on one of my multi-card rigs.  The hash rate started around 12.5k (with 6 cards) and then it dropped down to all except 2 of the cards doing below 2k each.  I checked the temperature and everything was fine.  I also didn't notice anything else strange.  I stopped the miner and restarted it.  They all came back to the normal numbers.  Any idea what could have caused the issue?

Startup numbers:

Code:

[2018-08-05 18:43:27] GPU0 :    2086 H/s [T: 48c, RPM: 2312, CC: 1408 MHz, MC: 1100 MHz][BUS:7]
[2018-08-05 18:43:27] GPU1 :    2088 H/s [T: 47c, RPM: 2302, CC: 1408 MHz, MC: 1100 MHz][BUS:21]
[2018-08-05 18:43:27] GPU2 :    2086 H/s [T: 49c, RPM: 2333, CC: 1408 MHz, MC: 1100 MHz][BUS:10]
[2018-08-05 18:43:27] GPU3 :    2084 H/s [T: 48c, RPM: 2351, CC: 1408 MHz, MC: 1100 MHz][BUS:3]
[2018-08-05 18:43:27] GPU4 :    2089 H/s [T: 47c, RPM: 2373, CC: 1408 MHz, MC: 1100 MHz][BUS:18]
[2018-08-05 18:43:27] GPU5 :    2087 H/s [T: 44c, RPM: 2332, CC: 1408 MHz, MC: 1100 MHz][BUS:13]
[2018-08-05 18:43:27] Total:    12520 H/s

try my settings for 2.1kh/s

overdrive p7: 1502mhz @ 950mv
              p3 mem: 1100 @ 950mv
              power target 50%
note: my cards are samsung memory


srb config is: { "id" : 0, "intensity" : 120, "worksize" : 8, "threads" : 2},

for each card.

[livada]

I have been doing some testing on one of my rigs before changing over all of them to SRB.  The initial output I am getting is higher than what I have been getting with Cast, but I did notice something on one of my multi-card rigs.  The hash rate started around 12.5k (with 6 cards) and then it dropped down to all except 2 of the cards doing below 2k each.  I checked the temperature and everything was fine.  I also didn't notice anything else strange.  I stopped the miner and restarted it.  They all came back to the normal numbers.  Any idea what could have caused the issue?

Startup numbers:

Code:

[2018-08-05 18:43:27] GPU0 :    2086 H/s [T: 48c, RPM: 2312, CC: 1408 MHz, MC: 1100 MHz][BUS:7]
[2018-08-05 18:43:27] GPU1 :    2088 H/s [T: 47c, RPM: 2302, CC: 1408 MHz, MC: 1100 MHz][BUS:21]
[2018-08-05 18:43:27] GPU2 :    2086 H/s [T: 49c, RPM: 2333, CC: 1408 MHz, MC: 1100 MHz][BUS:10]
[2018-08-05 18:43:27] GPU3 :    2084 H/s [T: 48c, RPM: 2351, CC: 1408 MHz, MC: 1100 MHz][BUS:3]
[2018-08-05 18:43:27] GPU4 :    2089 H/s [T: 47c, RPM: 2373, CC: 1408 MHz, MC: 1100 MHz][BUS:18]
[2018-08-05 18:43:27] GPU5 :    2087 H/s [T: 44c, RPM: 2332, CC: 1408 MHz, MC: 1100 MHz][BUS:13]
[2018-08-05 18:43:27] Total:    12520 H/s

try my settings for 2.1kh/s

overdrive p7: 1502mhz @ 950mv
              p3 mem: 1100 @ 950mv
              power target 50%
note: my cards are samsung memory


srb config is: { "id" : 0, "intensity" : 120, "worksize" : 8, "threads" : 2},

for each card.

this is vega 64? and how much electricity use ? 950mv is to much.

[Ballscack]

I have been doing some testing on one of my rigs before changing over all of them to SRB.  The initial output I am getting is higher than what I have been getting with Cast, but I did notice something on one of my multi-card rigs.  The hash rate started around 12.5k (with 6 cards) and then it dropped down to all except 2 of the cards doing below 2k each.  I checked the temperature and everything was fine.  I also didn't notice anything else strange.  I stopped the miner and restarted it.  They all came back to the normal numbers.  Any idea what could have caused the issue?

Startup numbers:

Code:

[2018-08-05 18:43:27] GPU0 :    2086 H/s [T: 48c, RPM: 2312, CC: 1408 MHz, MC: 1100 MHz][BUS:7]
[2018-08-05 18:43:27] GPU1 :    2088 H/s [T: 47c, RPM: 2302, CC: 1408 MHz, MC: 1100 MHz][BUS:21]
[2018-08-05 18:43:27] GPU2 :    2086 H/s [T: 49c, RPM: 2333, CC: 1408 MHz, MC: 1100 MHz][BUS:10]
[2018-08-05 18:43:27] GPU3 :    2084 H/s [T: 48c, RPM: 2351, CC: 1408 MHz, MC: 1100 MHz][BUS:3]
[2018-08-05 18:43:27] GPU4 :    2089 H/s [T: 47c, RPM: 2373, CC: 1408 MHz, MC: 1100 MHz][BUS:18]
[2018-08-05 18:43:27] GPU5 :    2087 H/s [T: 44c, RPM: 2332, CC: 1408 MHz, MC: 1100 MHz][BUS:13]
[2018-08-05 18:43:27] Total:    12520 H/s

try my settings for 2.1kh/s

overdrive p7: 1502mhz @ 950mv
              p3 mem: 1100 @ 950mv
              power target 50%
note: my cards are samsung memory


srb config is: { "id" : 0, "intensity" : 120, "worksize" : 8, "threads" : 2},

for each card.

this is vega 56 or 64? bios? and how much electricity use ? 950mv is to much.

vega 64.

950mv can be lowerd depending silicon lotery ;-p

i find 950mv the most stable with no stales or rejects and never any miner crash.

u can tune it depending ur cards and i would suggest to test each card with a lower voltage before putting them all lower than 950mv

[livada]

I have been doing some testing on one of my rigs before changing over all of them to SRB.  The initial output I am getting is higher than what I have been getting with Cast, but I did notice something on one of my multi-card rigs.  The hash rate started around 12.5k (with 6 cards) and then it dropped down to all except 2 of the cards doing below 2k each.  I checked the temperature and everything was fine.  I also didn't notice anything else strange.  I stopped the miner and restarted it.  They all came back to the normal numbers.  Any idea what could have caused the issue?

Startup numbers:

Code:

[2018-08-05 18:43:27] GPU0 :    2086 H/s [T: 48c, RPM: 2312, CC: 1408 MHz, MC: 1100 MHz][BUS:7]
[2018-08-05 18:43:27] GPU1 :    2088 H/s [T: 47c, RPM: 2302, CC: 1408 MHz, MC: 1100 MHz][BUS:21]
[2018-08-05 18:43:27] GPU2 :    2086 H/s [T: 49c, RPM: 2333, CC: 1408 MHz, MC: 1100 MHz][BUS:10]
[2018-08-05 18:43:27] GPU3 :    2084 H/s [T: 48c, RPM: 2351, CC: 1408 MHz, MC: 1100 MHz][BUS:3]
[2018-08-05 18:43:27] GPU4 :    2089 H/s [T: 47c, RPM: 2373, CC: 1408 MHz, MC: 1100 MHz][BUS:18]
[2018-08-05 18:43:27] GPU5 :    2087 H/s [T: 44c, RPM: 2332, CC: 1408 MHz, MC: 1100 MHz][BUS:13]
[2018-08-05 18:43:27] Total:    12520 H/s

try my settings for 2.1kh/s

overdrive p7: 1502mhz @ 950mv
              p3 mem: 1100 @ 950mv
              power target 50%
note: my cards are samsung memory


srb config is: { "id" : 0, "intensity" : 120, "worksize" : 8, "threads" : 2},

for each card.

this is vega 56 or 64? bios? and how much electricity use ? 950mv is to much.

vega 64.

950mv can be lowerd depending silicon lotery ;-p

i find 950mv the most stable with no stales or rejects and never any miner crash.

u can tune it depending ur cards and i would suggest to test each card with a lower voltage before putting them all lower than 950mv

my vega64LE use 900mv 1492GPU aand 1095mem . HR 2090.
If i put 950mv and1500GPU/1100mem  i have 2110HR but use 6-8W more from the wall and temp go up 1-2C.
And this is ok if you have free or cheap electricity.
but 20HR give only 0,3$ per month and use 5KW per month(0,5$)

[ikyo]

I have been doing some testing on one of my rigs before changing over all of them to SRB.  The initial output I am getting is higher than what I have been getting with Cast, but I did notice something on one of my multi-card rigs.  The hash rate started around 12.5k (with 6 cards) and then it dropped down to all except 2 of the cards doing below 2k each.  I checked the temperature and everything was fine.  I also didn't notice anything else strange.  I stopped the miner and restarted it.  They all came back to the normal numbers.  Any idea what could have caused the issue?

Startup numbers:

Code:

[2018-08-05 18:43:27] GPU0 :    2086 H/s [T: 48c, RPM: 2312, CC: 1408 MHz, MC: 1100 MHz][BUS:7]
[2018-08-05 18:43:27] GPU1 :    2088 H/s [T: 47c, RPM: 2302, CC: 1408 MHz, MC: 1100 MHz][BUS:21]
[2018-08-05 18:43:27] GPU2 :    2086 H/s [T: 49c, RPM: 2333, CC: 1408 MHz, MC: 1100 MHz][BUS:10]
[2018-08-05 18:43:27] GPU3 :    2084 H/s [T: 48c, RPM: 2351, CC: 1408 MHz, MC: 1100 MHz][BUS:3]
[2018-08-05 18:43:27] GPU4 :    2089 H/s [T: 47c, RPM: 2373, CC: 1408 MHz, MC: 1100 MHz][BUS:18]
[2018-08-05 18:43:27] GPU5 :    2087 H/s [T: 44c, RPM: 2332, CC: 1408 MHz, MC: 1100 MHz][BUS:13]
[2018-08-05 18:43:27] Total:    12520 H/s

try my settings for 2.1kh/s

overdrive p7: 1502mhz @ 950mv
              p3 mem: 1100 @ 950mv
              power target 50%
note: my cards are samsung memory


srb config is: { "id" : 0, "intensity" : 120, "worksize" : 8, "threads" : 2},

for each card.

this is vega 56 or 64? bios? and how much electricity use ? 950mv is to much.

vega 64.

950mv can be lowerd depending silicon lotery ;-p

i find 950mv the most stable with no stales or rejects and never any miner crash.

u can tune it depending ur cards and i would suggest to test each card with a lower voltage before putting them all lower than 950mv

my vega64LE use 900mv 1492GPU aand 1095mem . HR 2090.
If i put 950mv and1500GPU/1100mem  i have 2110HR but use 6-8W more from the wall and temp go up 1-2C.
And this is ok if you have free or cheap electricity.
but 20HR give only 0,3$ per month and use 5KW per month(0,5$)

I am using 1408/925 and 1100/905 for those numbers.  The electricity here isn't all that cheap so the small increase probably isn't worth it.  I also want to keep the temps as low as possible.  I have a dedicated AC unit in that room so the less I can tax it the better.

[livada]

I have been doing some testing on one of my rigs before changing over all of them to SRB.  The initial output I am getting is higher than what I have been getting with Cast, but I did notice something on one of my multi-card rigs.  The hash rate started around 12.5k (with 6 cards) and then it dropped down to all except 2 of the cards doing below 2k each.  I checked the temperature and everything was fine.  I also didn't notice anything else strange.  I stopped the miner and restarted it.  They all came back to the normal numbers.  Any idea what could have caused the issue?

Startup numbers:

Code:

[2018-08-05 18:43:27] GPU0 :    2086 H/s [T: 48c, RPM: 2312, CC: 1408 MHz, MC: 1100 MHz][BUS:7]
[2018-08-05 18:43:27] GPU1 :    2088 H/s [T: 47c, RPM: 2302, CC: 1408 MHz, MC: 1100 MHz][BUS:21]
[2018-08-05 18:43:27] GPU2 :    2086 H/s [T: 49c, RPM: 2333, CC: 1408 MHz, MC: 1100 MHz][BUS:10]
[2018-08-05 18:43:27] GPU3 :    2084 H/s [T: 48c, RPM: 2351, CC: 1408 MHz, MC: 1100 MHz][BUS:3]
[2018-08-05 18:43:27] GPU4 :    2089 H/s [T: 47c, RPM: 2373, CC: 1408 MHz, MC: 1100 MHz][BUS:18]
[2018-08-05 18:43:27] GPU5 :    2087 H/s [T: 44c, RPM: 2332, CC: 1408 MHz, MC: 1100 MHz][BUS:13]
[2018-08-05 18:43:27] Total:    12520 H/s

try my settings for 2.1kh/s

overdrive p7: 1502mhz @ 950mv
              p3 mem: 1100 @ 950mv
              power target 50%
note: my cards are samsung memory


srb config is: { "id" : 0, "intensity" : 120, "worksize" : 8, "threads" : 2},

for each card.

this is vega 56 or 64? bios? and how much electricity use ? 950mv is to much.

vega 64.

950mv can be lowerd depending silicon lotery ;-p

i find 950mv the most stable with no stales or rejects and never any miner crash.

u can tune it depending ur cards and i would suggest to test each card with a lower voltage before putting them all lower than 950mv

my vega64LE use 900mv 1492GPU aand 1095mem . HR 2090.
If i put 950mv and1500GPU/1100mem  i have 2110HR but use 6-8W more from the wall and temp go up 1-2C.
And this is ok if you have free or cheap electricity.
but 20HR give only 0,3$ per month and use 5KW per month(0,5$)

I am using 1408/925 and 1100/905 for those numbers.  The electricity here isn't all that cheap so the small increase probably isn't worth it.  I also want to keep the temps as low as possible.  I have a dedicated AC unit in that room so the less I can tax it the better.

You have very god HR for 1408GPU. 1408mhz  work with 890mv.

[Ballscack]

ANYONE TRIED THE NEW AMD 18.8.1 DRIVER !?

[bruslie]

blockchain driver still less than 1.6.2

cards, algo, settings, difference?

yes sir, sadly  everything the same 100 %

[P00P135]

ANYONE TRIED THE NEW AMD 18.8.1 DRIVER !?

NO! YOU USE KNOWN WORKING DRIVERS NOT THE NEWEST

[Ballscack]

ANYONE TRIED THE NEW AMD 18.8.1 DRIVER !?

NO! YOU USE KNOWN WORKING DRIVERS NOT THE NEWEST

That is a bit a lame answer mate.... i ask who has tested the newest driver to see what happens..

[dopper]

if i use "restart_devices_on_startup" after devcon restart i get CL_OUT_OF_HOST_MEMORY when creating clCreateCommandQueue for DeviceID 0 (Thread 0) error

i've tried the other version of devcon and it didn't help
if i use "restart_devices_on_startup" i get an error, if i remove this string from config then miner starts as usual

doc can you look at this too please?

[SpceGhst]

ANYONE TRIED THE NEW AMD 18.8.1 DRIVER !?

I think you should try it out and let us know how it works!  I didn’t even know there was an 18.8.1 driver.  I’m a big believer in the “if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it” theory...

[hamesh]

Anyone have download for 1.6.4?  I missed it.  1.6.5 won't initialize cards on half my rigs.  Some issue due to compiling everything into the .exe maybe.

[shgth]

Ok so just installed new Radeon 18.8.1 drivers.

Was using 18.7.1 drivers before with SRBMiner 1.6.4 as I play games on this system as well and wanted to use latest drivers for that. 1.6.5 gives slower speed on that driver(which is obvious as it wasn't recommend to use with it).

So now with 18.8.1 SRBMiner 1.6.5 still gives me slow speed with cryptonight but with 1.6.4 I get +10H/s higher hashrate with RX580. No changes for Vega 56.

[doktor83]

if i use "restart_devices_on_startup" after devcon restart i get CL_OUT_OF_HOST_MEMORY when creating clCreateCommandQueue for DeviceID 0 (Thread 0) error

i've tried the other version of devcon and it didn't help
if i use "restart_devices_on_startup" i get an error, if i remove this string from config then miner starts as usual

doc can you look at this too please?

Yes, this will be fixed in the next version, "restart_devices_on_startup" will be removed from the config and will be callable from the .bat, this way it runs before all the init and works OK every time.

[doktor83]

ANYONE TRIED THE NEW AMD 18.8.1 DRIVER !?

I got 1550h/s on Haven algo Vega64. Was 1450 with SBR 1.6.4 So +100h/s. Will try 1.6.5 soon.

Same h/s with 1.6.5

Fast algo - no share found with 18.8.1 and SBR 1.6.5!

These new drivers are really against CN mining, first 18.7.1 and CNV7 no shares found, now 18.8.1 and Fast algo..