|
doktor83 (OP)
|
 |
October 08, 2018, 10:05:22 AM |
|
thks for v8 dok.
intensity auto for rx 550 2GB : 30 intensity } blue screen for me .
Max 27 /32 Woksize
and rx 460 unlock 27/16 worksize
ill have to lower that then , 30 is good for 4gb  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The forum strives to allow free discussion of any ideas. All policies are built around this principle. This doesn't mean you can post garbage, though: posts should actually contain ideas, and these ideas should be argued reasonably.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
abg00
Jr. Member
 Offline
Activity: 288
Merit: 1
|
|
October 08, 2018, 10:45:42 AM |
|
ill have to lower that then , 30 is good for 4gb rate low for rx570\8 on cn-heavy was 1060 in 1.6.7 now 890-960 in 1.6.8 same config same drivers 18.3.4 in additional. remove kernel folder and recompile binary solve troublework 10 min and low rate again. back to 1.6.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
doktor83 (OP)
|
|
October 08, 2018, 10:57:45 AM |
|
ill have to lower that then , 30 is good for 4gb rate low for rx570\8 on cn-heavy was 1060 in 1.6.7 now 890-960 in 1.6.8 same config same drivers 18.3.4 in additional. remove kernel folder and recompile binary solve troublework 10 min and low rate again. back to 1.6.7 Wait 10-15 min for it to get to the max speed. Nothing has changed for heavy algos in the code. |
|
|
|
abg00
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 288
Merit: 1
|
|
October 08, 2018, 11:00:54 AM |
|
ill have to lower that then , 30 is good for 4gb rate low for rx570\8 on cn-heavy was 1060 in 1.6.7 now 890-960 in 1.6.8 same config same drivers 18.3.4 in additional. remove kernel folder and recompile binary solve troublework 10 min and low rate again. back to 1.6.7 Wait 10-15 min for it to get to the max speed. wait 27 min rate low. back to 1.6.7 check on two rig rx560\4 work stable with high rate on 1.6.8 cn-heavy |
|
|
|
|
|
doktor83 (OP)
|
|
October 08, 2018, 11:02:50 AM |
|
ill have to lower that then , 30 is good for 4gb rate low for rx570\8 on cn-heavy was 1060 in 1.6.7 now 890-960 in 1.6.8 same config same drivers 18.3.4 in additional. remove kernel folder and recompile binary solve troublework 10 min and low rate again. back to 1.6.7 Wait 10-15 min for it to get to the max speed. wait 27 min rate low. back to 1.6.7 check on two rig rx560\4 work stable with high rate on 1.6.8 cn-heavy interesting..and on 1.6.7 you get the 1000+ speed on all cards ? |
|
|
|
abg00
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 288
Merit: 1
|
|
October 08, 2018, 11:14:23 AM |
|
interesting..and on 1.6.7 you get the 1000+ speed on all cards ?
 |
|
|
|
|
|
doktor83 (OP)
|
|
October 08, 2018, 11:45:13 AM
Last edit: October 08, 2018, 11:57:05 AM by doktor83 |
|
interesting..and on 1.6.7 you get the 1000+ speed on all cards ?
Ok going to re-check and test. Can you test on bittube too? |
|
|
|
GKumaran
Member
Offline
Activity: 203
Merit: 10
|
|
October 08, 2018, 12:24:04 PM |
|
Hey Doc, thc for update !! Using Binary kernals on Vega 64: v7 : HR up from 2130 to 2145 v8 : HR is 580  Is that normal, only 580 H/s? Cause i think the devs said approx 7% drop so was expecting at least 1950 h/s I got the same HR result for v8 on both benchmark mode and mining on the test pools: "pool": "killallasics.moneroworld.com:7777", "difficulty": 10000, { "device": "GPU0", "device_id": 0, "model": "Radeon RX Vega", "bus_id": 19, "kernel_id": 1, "hashrate": 593, "core_clock": 1630, "memory_clock": 1100, "temperature": 54, "fan_speed_rpm": 4576 }, GPU was on dual thread and auto worksize, auto intensity |
|
|
|
|
|
doktor83 (OP)
|
|
October 08, 2018, 12:26:08 PM |
|
Hey Doc, thc for update !! Using Binary kernals on Vega 64: v7 : HR up from 2130 to 2145 v8 : HR is 580 Is that normal, only 580 H/s? Cause i think the devs said approx 7% drop so was expecting at least 1950 h/s I got the same HR result for v8 on both benchmark mode and mining on the test pools: "pool": "killallasics.moneroworld.com:7777", "difficulty": 10000, { "device": "GPU0", "device_id": 0, "model": "Radeon RX Vega", "bus_id": 19, "kernel_id": 1, "hashrate": 593, "core_clock": 1630, "memory_clock": 1100, "temperature": 54, "fan_speed_rpm": 4576 }, GPU was on dual thread and auto worksize, auto intensity Yes something not ok, try setting by hand for example 120/16 2 threads I really hurried to push the v8 version, so of course bugs are to be expected, and we still have time to fix them until the fork |
|
|
|
abg00
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 288
Merit: 1
|
|
October 08, 2018, 12:29:49 PM |
|
Can you test on bittube too?
check rx550\4g on cn-v7 same trouble in 1.6.8 low rate 420-450 in 1.6.7 370-390 in 1.6.8 rx550\2g rate high in 1.6.8 was 460 now 490 |
|
|
|
|
|
doktor83 (OP)
|
|
October 08, 2018, 12:31:40 PM |
|
Can you test on bittube too?
check rx550\4g on cn-v7 same trouble in 1.6.8 low rate 420-450 in 1.6.7 370-390 in 1.6.8 rx550\2g rate high in 1.6.8 was 460 now 490 have you tried auto intensity for 550? also it would be nice if you could write your settings |
|
|
|
abg00
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 288
Merit: 1
|
|
October 08, 2018, 01:13:32 PM |
|
have you tried auto intensity for 550?
also it would be nice if you could write your settings
no for 2gb 1.6.8 550 { "id" : 6, "intensity" : 27, "worksize" : 12, "double_threads" : true}, GPU6 : 504 H/s [T: 49c, RPM: 0, CC: 1050 MHz, MC: 1950 MHz][BUS:4] 560 { "id" : 7, "intensity" : 27, "worksize" : 12, "double_threads" : true}, GPU7 : 488 H/s [T: 53c, RPM: 2635, CC: 1050 MHz, MC: 1850 MHz][BUS:2] for 550 4gb 1.6.7 { "id" : 0, "intensity" : 54, "double_threads" : true, "worksize": 12}, GPU0 : 416 H/s [T: 51c, RPM: 2833, CC: 1090 MHz, MC: 2050 MHz][BUS:1] same 550\4 in 1.6.8 only 380-390 h\s |
|
|
|
|
GKumaran
Member
Offline
Activity: 203
Merit: 10
|
|
October 08, 2018, 01:14:04 PM |
|
Hey Doc, thc for update !! Using Binary kernals on Vega 64: v7 : HR up from 2130 to 2145 v8 : HR is 580 Is that normal, only 580 H/s? Cause i think the devs said approx 7% drop so was expecting at least 1950 h/s I got the same HR result for v8 on both benchmark mode and mining on the test pools: "pool": "killallasics.moneroworld.com:7777", "difficulty": 10000, { "device": "GPU0", "device_id": 0, "model": "Radeon RX Vega", "bus_id": 19, "kernel_id": 1, "hashrate": 593, "core_clock": 1630, "memory_clock": 1100, "temperature": 54, "fan_speed_rpm": 4576 }, GPU was on dual thread and auto worksize, auto intensity Yes something not ok, try setting by hand for example 120/16 2 threads I really hurried to push the v8 version, so of course bugs are to be expected, and we still have time to fix them until the fork No doc, still the same result. My v8 config: { "cryptonight_type" : "normalv8", "intensity" : 120, "worksize" : 16, "double_threads" : true } Benchmark results: Stopping benchmark (run for 180 seconds) Average speed: 2851.5 H/s Shares found: 21 Abv test is for 6 Vega 64s |
|
|
|
|
|
doktor83 (OP)
|
|
October 08, 2018, 01:36:49 PM |
|
have you tried auto intensity for 550?
also it would be nice if you could write your settings
no for 2gb 1.6.8 550 { "id" : 6, "intensity" : 27, "worksize" : 12, "double_threads" : true}, GPU6 : 504 H/s [T: 49c, RPM: 0, CC: 1050 MHz, MC: 1950 MHz][BUS:4] 560 { "id" : 7, "intensity" : 27, "worksize" : 12, "double_threads" : true}, GPU7 : 488 H/s [T: 53c, RPM: 2635, CC: 1050 MHz, MC: 1850 MHz][BUS:2] for 550 4gb 1.6.7 { "id" : 0, "intensity" : 54, "double_threads" : true, "worksize": 12}, GPU0 : 416 H/s [T: 51c, RPM: 2833, CC: 1090 MHz, MC: 2050 MHz][BUS:1] same 550\4 in 1.6.8 only 380-390 h\s Intensity 54 too much with 2 threads. Why not 27 ? |
|
|
|
|
doktor83 (OP)
|
|
October 08, 2018, 02:09:40 PM |
|
No doc, still the same result.
My v8 config:
{
"cryptonight_type" : "normalv8",
"intensity" : 120,
"worksize" : 16,
"double_threads" : true
}
Benchmark results:
Stopping benchmark (run for 180 seconds)
Average speed: 2851.5 H/s
Shares found: 21
Abv test is for 6 Vega 64s
Try maybe worksize 32. I don't have vega64 to test with, but i have a 56, and the best hash for it is at 120/16, it should be around the same for 64 too. |
|
|
|
abg00
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 288
Merit: 1
|
|
October 08, 2018, 02:39:20 PM |
|
have you tried auto intensity for 550?
also it would be nice if you could write your settings
no for 2gb 1.6.8 550 { "id" : 6, "intensity" : 27, "worksize" : 12, "double_threads" : true}, GPU6 : 504 H/s [T: 49c, RPM: 0, CC: 1050 MHz, MC: 1950 MHz][BUS:4] 560 { "id" : 7, "intensity" : 27, "worksize" : 12, "double_threads" : true}, GPU7 : 488 H/s [T: 53c, RPM: 2635, CC: 1050 MHz, MC: 1850 MHz][BUS:2] for 550 4gb 1.6.7 { "id" : 0, "intensity" : 54, "double_threads" : true, "worksize": 12}, GPU0 : 416 H/s [T: 51c, RPM: 2833, CC: 1090 MHz, MC: 2050 MHz][BUS:1] same 550\4 in 1.6.8 only 380-390 h\s Intensity 54 too much with 2 threads. Why not 27 ? 27 is ok for 1.6.8 rx550\4gb rate 440 h\s 30 is not ok. bad rate |
|
|
|
|
|
doktor83 (OP)
|
|
October 08, 2018, 02:53:33 PM |
|
have you tried auto intensity for 550?
also it would be nice if you could write your settings
no for 2gb 1.6.8 550 { "id" : 6, "intensity" : 27, "worksize" : 12, "double_threads" : true}, GPU6 : 504 H/s [T: 49c, RPM: 0, CC: 1050 MHz, MC: 1950 MHz][BUS:4] 560 { "id" : 7, "intensity" : 27, "worksize" : 12, "double_threads" : true}, GPU7 : 488 H/s [T: 53c, RPM: 2635, CC: 1050 MHz, MC: 1850 MHz][BUS:2] for 550 4gb 1.6.7 { "id" : 0, "intensity" : 54, "double_threads" : true, "worksize": 12}, GPU0 : 416 H/s [T: 51c, RPM: 2833, CC: 1090 MHz, MC: 2050 MHz][BUS:1] same 550\4 in 1.6.8 only 380-390 h\s Intensity 54 too much with 2 threads. Why not 27 ? 27 is ok for 1.6.8 rx550\4gb rate 440 h\s 30 is not ok. bad rate so what is the conclusion at the end? 1.6.8 hashing better on rx550 and rx560 cards ? also where did you get intensity 30 from? You are really confusing me here i don;t know even what algo are we talking about now. 550 4g should be ok on V7 with : 27/12/2 560 4g should be ok on V7 with : 27/8/2 550 4g should be ok on V8 with : 28/16/2 560 4g should be ok on V8 with : 29/32/2 |
|
|
|
abg00
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 288
Merit: 1
|
|
October 08, 2018, 03:10:26 PM |
|
so what is the conclusion at the end?
1.6.8 hashing better on rx550 and rx560 cards ?
also where did you get intensity 30 from?
You are really confusing me here i don;t know even what algo are we talking about now.
550 4g should be ok on V7 with : 27/12/2
560 4g should be ok on V7 with : 27/8/2
550 4g should be ok on V8 with : 28/16/2
560 4g should be ok on V8 with : 29/32/2
true. but have trouble on cn-heavy with rx470\480\570\580 8gb card. plz check my config { "id" : 1, "intensity" : 58, "double_threads" : true}, on 1.6.7 ok and rate 1060 GPU1 : 1027 H/s [T: 67c, RPM: 1465, CC: 1150 MHz, MC: 2030 MHz][BUS:2] on 1.6.8 low rate GPU1 : 875 H/s [T: 63c, RPM: 945, CC: 1150 MHz, MC: 2030 MHz][BUS:2] |
|
|
|
|
GKumaran
Member
Offline
Activity: 203
Merit: 10
|
|
October 08, 2018, 03:10:39 PM |
|
Yes something not ok, try setting by hand for example 120/16 2 threads
I really hurried to push the v8 version, so of course bugs are to be expected, and we still have time to fix them until the fork
Hey Doc, Vega 64 - Cryptonight v8 analysis:Using binary kernals : 583 h/s Not Using Binary Kernals, Kernals compiled on each run and deleted Driver: 18.5.1 GPU: 1600 Mem: 1100 Volt : 840mVIntensity : 119 Worksize : 16 : 2019 H/s (94.338% on cn7) Intensity : 119 Worksize : 32 : 1963 H/s (91.745% on cn7) Intensity : 120 Worksize : 16 : 2025 H/s (94.626% on cn7) Intensity : 120 Worksize : 32 : 1983 H/s (92.663% on cn7) Intensity : 121 Worksize : 16 : 2032 H/s (94.953% on cn7) Intensity : 121 Worksize : 32 : 1975 H/s (92.289% on cn7) Intensity : 122 Worksize : 16 : 2038 H/s (95.234% on cn7) Intensity : 122 Worksize : 32 : 1992 H/s (93.099% on cn7) Intensity : 123 Worksize : 16 : 2043 H/s (95.467% on cn7) Intensity : 123 Worksize : 32 : 1984 H/s (92.710% on cn7) Intensity : 124 Worksize : 16 : 2049 H/s (95.748% on cn7)Intensity : 124 Worksize : 32 : 2000 H/s (93.458% on cn7) Intensity : 125 Worksize : 16 : Failed Intensity : 125 Worksize : 32 : Failed The above are avg HR from a run of 6 Vega 64s and the highest HR setting were tries multiple times for consistency. Great work doc, so thats a 4.25% drop from v7 !! not bad considering devs said 7% drop  |
|
|
|
|
|
doktor83 (OP)
|
|
October 08, 2018, 03:15:35 PM |
|
Yes something not ok, try setting by hand for example 120/16 2 threads
I really hurried to push the v8 version, so of course bugs are to be expected, and we still have time to fix them until the fork
Hey Doc, Vega 64 - Cryptonight v8 analysis:Using binary kernals : 583 h/s Not Using Binary Kernals, Kernals compiled on each run and deleted Driver: 18.5.1 GPU: 1600 Mem: 1100 Volt : 840mVIntensity : 119 Worksize : 16 : 2019 H/s (94.338% on cn7) Intensity : 119 Worksize : 32 : 1963 H/s (91.745% on cn7) Intensity : 120 Worksize : 16 : 2025 H/s (94.626% on cn7) Intensity : 120 Worksize : 32 : 1983 H/s (92.663% on cn7) Intensity : 121 Worksize : 16 : 2032 H/s (94.953% on cn7) Intensity : 121 Worksize : 32 : 1975 H/s (92.289% on cn7) Intensity : 122 Worksize : 16 : 2038 H/s (95.234% on cn7) Intensity : 122 Worksize : 32 : 1992 H/s (93.099% on cn7) Intensity : 123 Worksize : 16 : 2043 H/s (95.467% on cn7) Intensity : 123 Worksize : 32 : 1984 H/s (92.710% on cn7) Intensity : 124 Worksize : 16 : 2049 H/s (95.748% on cn7)Intensity : 124 Worksize : 32 : 2000 H/s (93.458% on cn7) Intensity : 125 Worksize : 16 : Failed Intensity : 125 Worksize : 32 : Failed The above are avg HR from a run of 6 Vega 64s and the highest HR setting were tries multiple times for consistency. Great work doc, so thats a 4.25% drop from v7 !! not bad considering devs said 7% drop That's my man, i really love it when someone takes time and tries himself something So it looks like the binary kernel is faulty ? I will check that out. Thank you for your efforts edit: And YES, the binary IS faulty. Great that i pushed the 1.6.8 version 10 days before the fork so we can smooth these kind of things out |
|
|
|
|
