Bitcoin Forum
March 03, 2024, 01:34:55 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 26.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 [219] 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 ... 363 »
  Print  
Author Topic: SRBMiner Cryptonight AMD GPU Miner V1.9.3 - native algo switching  (Read 237147 times)
doktor83 (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 2478
Merit: 625


View Profile WWW
October 08, 2018, 12:31:40 PM
 #4361


Can you test on bittube too?

check rx550\4g on cn-v7
same trouble in 1.6.8
low rate
420-450 in 1.6.7
370-390 in 1.6.8


rx550\2g rate high in 1.6.8 was 460 now 490

have you tried auto intensity for 550?

also it would be nice if you could write your settings

SRBMiner-MULTI thread - HERE
http://www.srbminer.com
1709472895
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1709472895

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1709472895
Reply with quote  #2

1709472895
Report to moderator
1709472895
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1709472895

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1709472895
Reply with quote  #2

1709472895
Report to moderator
1709472895
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1709472895

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1709472895
Reply with quote  #2

1709472895
Report to moderator
"Bitcoin: the cutting edge of begging technology." -- Giraffe.BTC
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1709472895
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1709472895

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1709472895
Reply with quote  #2

1709472895
Report to moderator
1709472895
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1709472895

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1709472895
Reply with quote  #2

1709472895
Report to moderator
1709472895
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1709472895

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1709472895
Reply with quote  #2

1709472895
Report to moderator
abg00
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 288
Merit: 1


View Profile
October 08, 2018, 01:13:32 PM
 #4362


have you tried auto intensity for 550?

also it would be nice if you could write your settings
no
for 2gb 1.6.8
550
   { "id" : 6, "intensity" : 27,  "worksize" : 12, "double_threads" : true},
 GPU6 :    504 H/s [T: 49c, RPM: 0, CC: 1050 MHz, MC: 1950 MHz][BUS:4]
560
   { "id" : 7, "intensity" : 27,  "worksize" : 12, "double_threads" : true},
GPU7 :    488 H/s [T: 53c, RPM: 2635, CC: 1050 MHz, MC: 1850 MHz][BUS:2]

for 550 4gb 1.6.7
   { "id" : 0, "intensity" : 54, "double_threads" : true, "worksize": 12},
 GPU0 :    416 H/s [T: 51c, RPM: 2833, CC: 1090 MHz, MC: 2050 MHz][BUS:1]
same 550\4 in 1.6.8 only 380-390 h\s
GKumaran
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 204
Merit: 10


View Profile
October 08, 2018, 01:14:04 PM
 #4363

Hey Doc, thc for update !!

Using Binary kernals on Vega 64:
v7 : HR up from 2130 to 2145
v8 : HR is 580 Huh
Is that normal, only 580 H/s? Cause i think the devs said approx 7% drop so was expecting at least 1950 h/s

I got the same HR result for v8 on both benchmark mode and mining on the test pools:

"pool": "killallasics.moneroworld.com:7777",
"difficulty": 10000,

{
            "device": "GPU0",
            "device_id": 0,
            "model": "Radeon RX Vega",
            "bus_id": 19,
            "kernel_id": 1,
            "hashrate": 593,
            "core_clock": 1630,
            "memory_clock": 1100,
            "temperature": 54,
            "fan_speed_rpm": 4576
},

GPU was on dual thread and auto worksize, auto intensity

Yes something not ok, try setting by hand for example 120/16 2 threads

I really hurried to push the v8 version, so of course bugs are to be expected, and we still have time to fix them until the fork

No doc, still the same result.
My v8 config:
{
"cryptonight_type" : "normalv8",
"intensity" : 120,
"worksize" : 16,
"double_threads" : true
}

Benchmark results:
Stopping benchmark (run for 180 seconds)

Average speed: 2851.5 H/s
Shares found: 21

Abv test is for 6 Vega 64s
doktor83 (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 2478
Merit: 625


View Profile WWW
October 08, 2018, 01:36:49 PM
 #4364


have you tried auto intensity for 550?

also it would be nice if you could write your settings
no
for 2gb 1.6.8
550
   { "id" : 6, "intensity" : 27,  "worksize" : 12, "double_threads" : true},
 GPU6 :    504 H/s [T: 49c, RPM: 0, CC: 1050 MHz, MC: 1950 MHz][BUS:4]
560
   { "id" : 7, "intensity" : 27,  "worksize" : 12, "double_threads" : true},
GPU7 :    488 H/s [T: 53c, RPM: 2635, CC: 1050 MHz, MC: 1850 MHz][BUS:2]

for 550 4gb 1.6.7
   { "id" : 0, "intensity" : 54, "double_threads" : true, "worksize": 12},
 GPU0 :    416 H/s [T: 51c, RPM: 2833, CC: 1090 MHz, MC: 2050 MHz][BUS:1]
same 550\4 in 1.6.8 only 380-390 h\s

Intensity 54 too much with 2 threads. Why not 27 ?

SRBMiner-MULTI thread - HERE
http://www.srbminer.com
doktor83 (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 2478
Merit: 625


View Profile WWW
October 08, 2018, 02:09:40 PM
 #4365


No doc, still the same result.
My v8 config:
{
"cryptonight_type" : "normalv8",
"intensity" : 120,
"worksize" : 16,
"double_threads" : true
}

Benchmark results:
Stopping benchmark (run for 180 seconds)

Average speed: 2851.5 H/s
Shares found: 21

Abv test is for 6 Vega 64s

Try maybe worksize 32. I don't have vega64 to test with, but i have a 56, and the best hash for it is at 120/16, it should be around the same for 64 too.

SRBMiner-MULTI thread - HERE
http://www.srbminer.com
abg00
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 288
Merit: 1


View Profile
October 08, 2018, 02:39:20 PM
 #4366


have you tried auto intensity for 550?

also it would be nice if you could write your settings
no
for 2gb 1.6.8
550
   { "id" : 6, "intensity" : 27,  "worksize" : 12, "double_threads" : true},
 GPU6 :    504 H/s [T: 49c, RPM: 0, CC: 1050 MHz, MC: 1950 MHz][BUS:4]
560
   { "id" : 7, "intensity" : 27,  "worksize" : 12, "double_threads" : true},
GPU7 :    488 H/s [T: 53c, RPM: 2635, CC: 1050 MHz, MC: 1850 MHz][BUS:2]

for 550 4gb 1.6.7
   { "id" : 0, "intensity" : 54, "double_threads" : true, "worksize": 12},
 GPU0 :    416 H/s [T: 51c, RPM: 2833, CC: 1090 MHz, MC: 2050 MHz][BUS:1]
same 550\4 in 1.6.8 only 380-390 h\s

Intensity 54 too much with 2 threads. Why not 27 ?

27 is ok for 1.6.8 rx550\4gb rate 440 h\s
30 is not ok. bad rate
doktor83 (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 2478
Merit: 625


View Profile WWW
October 08, 2018, 02:53:33 PM
 #4367


have you tried auto intensity for 550?

also it would be nice if you could write your settings
no
for 2gb 1.6.8
550
   { "id" : 6, "intensity" : 27,  "worksize" : 12, "double_threads" : true},
 GPU6 :    504 H/s [T: 49c, RPM: 0, CC: 1050 MHz, MC: 1950 MHz][BUS:4]
560
   { "id" : 7, "intensity" : 27,  "worksize" : 12, "double_threads" : true},
GPU7 :    488 H/s [T: 53c, RPM: 2635, CC: 1050 MHz, MC: 1850 MHz][BUS:2]

for 550 4gb 1.6.7
   { "id" : 0, "intensity" : 54, "double_threads" : true, "worksize": 12},
 GPU0 :    416 H/s [T: 51c, RPM: 2833, CC: 1090 MHz, MC: 2050 MHz][BUS:1]
same 550\4 in 1.6.8 only 380-390 h\s

Intensity 54 too much with 2 threads. Why not 27 ?

27 is ok for 1.6.8 rx550\4gb rate 440 h\s
30 is not ok. bad rate


so what is the conclusion at the end?
1.6.8 hashing better on rx550 and rx560 cards ?

also where did you get intensity 30 from?
You are really confusing me here i don;t know even what algo are we talking about now.

550 4g should be ok on V7 with : 27/12/2
560 4g should be ok on V7 with : 27/8/2

550 4g should be ok on V8 with : 28/16/2
560 4g should be ok on V8 with : 29/32/2

SRBMiner-MULTI thread - HERE
http://www.srbminer.com
abg00
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 288
Merit: 1


View Profile
October 08, 2018, 03:10:26 PM
 #4368


so what is the conclusion at the end?
1.6.8 hashing better on rx550 and rx560 cards ?

also where did you get intensity 30 from?
You are really confusing me here i don;t know even what algo are we talking about now.

550 4g should be ok on V7 with : 27/12/2
560 4g should be ok on V7 with : 27/8/2

550 4g should be ok on V8 with : 28/16/2
560 4g should be ok on V8 with : 29/32/2


true.
but have trouble on cn-heavy with rx470\480\570\580 8gb card. plz check my config
   { "id" : 1, "intensity" : 58, "double_threads" : true},
on 1.6.7 ok and rate 1060
 GPU1 :    1027 H/s [T: 67c, RPM: 1465, CC: 1150 MHz, MC: 2030 MHz][BUS:2]
on 1.6.8 low rate
GPU1 :    875 H/s [T: 63c, RPM: 945, CC: 1150 MHz, MC: 2030 MHz][BUS:2]

GKumaran
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 204
Merit: 10


View Profile
October 08, 2018, 03:10:39 PM
 #4369


Yes something not ok, try setting by hand for example 120/16 2 threads

I really hurried to push the v8 version, so of course bugs are to be expected, and we still have time to fix them until the fork

Hey Doc,

Vega 64 - Cryptonight v8 analysis:

Using binary kernals : 583 h/s

Not Using Binary Kernals, Kernals compiled on each run and deleted
Driver: 18.5.1 GPU: 1600 Mem: 1100 Volt : 840mV
Intensity : 119 Worksize : 16 : 2019 H/s (94.338% on cn7)
Intensity : 119 Worksize : 32 : 1963 H/s (91.745% on cn7)
Intensity : 120 Worksize : 16 : 2025 H/s (94.626% on cn7)
Intensity : 120 Worksize : 32 : 1983 H/s (92.663% on cn7)
Intensity : 121 Worksize : 16 : 2032 H/s (94.953% on cn7)
Intensity : 121 Worksize : 32 : 1975 H/s (92.289% on cn7)
Intensity : 122 Worksize : 16 : 2038 H/s (95.234% on cn7)
Intensity : 122 Worksize : 32 : 1992 H/s (93.099% on cn7)
Intensity : 123 Worksize : 16 : 2043 H/s (95.467% on cn7)
Intensity : 123 Worksize : 32 : 1984 H/s (92.710% on cn7)
Intensity : 124 Worksize : 16 : 2049 H/s (95.748% on cn7)
Intensity : 124 Worksize : 32 : 2000 H/s (93.458% on cn7)
Intensity : 125 Worksize : 16 : Failed
Intensity : 125 Worksize : 32 : Failed
The above are avg HR from a run of 6 Vega 64s and the highest HR setting were tries multiple times for consistency.

Great work doc, so thats a 4.25% drop from v7 !! not bad considering devs said 7% drop  Cheesy Cheesy
doktor83 (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 2478
Merit: 625


View Profile WWW
October 08, 2018, 03:15:35 PM
 #4370


Yes something not ok, try setting by hand for example 120/16 2 threads

I really hurried to push the v8 version, so of course bugs are to be expected, and we still have time to fix them until the fork

Hey Doc,

Vega 64 - Cryptonight v8 analysis:

Using binary kernals : 583 h/s

Not Using Binary Kernals, Kernals compiled on each run and deleted
Driver: 18.5.1 GPU: 1600 Mem: 1100 Volt : 840mV
Intensity : 119 Worksize : 16 : 2019 H/s (94.338% on cn7)
Intensity : 119 Worksize : 32 : 1963 H/s (91.745% on cn7)
Intensity : 120 Worksize : 16 : 2025 H/s (94.626% on cn7)
Intensity : 120 Worksize : 32 : 1983 H/s (92.663% on cn7)
Intensity : 121 Worksize : 16 : 2032 H/s (94.953% on cn7)
Intensity : 121 Worksize : 32 : 1975 H/s (92.289% on cn7)
Intensity : 122 Worksize : 16 : 2038 H/s (95.234% on cn7)
Intensity : 122 Worksize : 32 : 1992 H/s (93.099% on cn7)
Intensity : 123 Worksize : 16 : 2043 H/s (95.467% on cn7)
Intensity : 123 Worksize : 32 : 1984 H/s (92.710% on cn7)
Intensity : 124 Worksize : 16 : 2049 H/s (95.748% on cn7)
Intensity : 124 Worksize : 32 : 2000 H/s (93.458% on cn7)
Intensity : 125 Worksize : 16 : Failed
Intensity : 125 Worksize : 32 : Failed
The above are avg HR from a run of 6 Vega 64s and the highest HR setting were tries multiple times for consistency.

Great work doc, so thats a 4.25% drop from v7 !! not bad considering devs said 7% drop  Cheesy Cheesy


That's my man, i really love it when someone takes time and tries himself something Smiley
So it looks like the binary kernel is faulty ? I will check that out.

Thank you for your efforts Smiley

edit:
And YES, the binary IS faulty. Great that i pushed the 1.6.8 version 10 days before the fork so we can smooth these kind of things out Smiley

SRBMiner-MULTI thread - HERE
http://www.srbminer.com
doktor83 (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 2478
Merit: 625


View Profile WWW
October 08, 2018, 03:16:55 PM
 #4371


so what is the conclusion at the end?
1.6.8 hashing better on rx550 and rx560 cards ?

also where did you get intensity 30 from?
You are really confusing me here i don;t know even what algo are we talking about now.

550 4g should be ok on V7 with : 27/12/2
560 4g should be ok on V7 with : 27/8/2

550 4g should be ok on V8 with : 28/16/2
560 4g should be ok on V8 with : 29/32/2


true.
but have trouble on cn-heavy with rx470\480\570\580 8gb card. plz check my config
   { "id" : 1, "intensity" : 58, "double_threads" : true},
on 1.6.7 ok and rate 1060
 GPU1 :    1027 H/s [T: 67c, RPM: 1465, CC: 1150 MHz, MC: 2030 MHz][BUS:2]
on 1.6.8 low rate
GPU1 :    875 H/s [T: 63c, RPM: 945, CC: 1150 MHz, MC: 2030 MHz][BUS:2]



i think i found something about the 570/580 8g cards and heavy algos. Going to check out a few more things then re-upload 1.6.8 with the fixes.

SRBMiner-MULTI thread - HERE
http://www.srbminer.com
GKumaran
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 204
Merit: 10


View Profile
October 08, 2018, 03:27:43 PM
Last edit: October 08, 2018, 03:47:48 PM by GKumaran
 #4372


Yes something not ok, try setting by hand for example 120/16 2 threads

I really hurried to push the v8 version, so of course bugs are to be expected, and we still have time to fix them until the fork

Hey Doc,

Vega 64 - Cryptonight v8 analysis:

Using binary kernals : 583 h/s

Not Using Binary Kernals, Kernals compiled on each run and deleted
Driver: 18.5.1 GPU: 1600 Mem: 1100 Volt : 840mV
Intensity : 119 Worksize : 16 : 2019 H/s (94.338% on cn7)
Intensity : 119 Worksize : 32 : 1963 H/s (91.745% on cn7)
Intensity : 120 Worksize : 16 : 2025 H/s (94.626% on cn7)
Intensity : 120 Worksize : 32 : 1983 H/s (92.663% on cn7)
Intensity : 121 Worksize : 16 : 2032 H/s (94.953% on cn7)
Intensity : 121 Worksize : 32 : 1975 H/s (92.289% on cn7)
Intensity : 122 Worksize : 16 : 2038 H/s (95.234% on cn7)
Intensity : 122 Worksize : 32 : 1992 H/s (93.099% on cn7)
Intensity : 123 Worksize : 16 : 2043 H/s (95.467% on cn7)
Intensity : 123 Worksize : 32 : 1984 H/s (92.710% on cn7)
Intensity : 124 Worksize : 16 : 2049 H/s (95.748% on cn7)
Intensity : 124 Worksize : 32 : 2000 H/s (93.458% on cn7)
Intensity : 125 Worksize : 16 : Failed
Intensity : 125 Worksize : 32 : Failed
The above are avg HR from a run of 6 Vega 64s and the highest HR setting were tries multiple times for consistency.

Great work doc, so thats a 4.25% drop from v7 !! not bad considering devs said 7% drop  Cheesy Cheesy


That's my man, i really love it when someone takes time and tries himself something Smiley
So it looks like the binary kernel is faulty ? I will check that out.

Thank you for your efforts Smiley

edit:
And YES, the binary IS faulty. Great that i pushed the 1.6.8 version 10 days before the fork so we can smooth these kind of things out Smiley

 Grin  Grin :)no prob mate !!
livada
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 417
Merit: 0


View Profile WWW
October 08, 2018, 04:33:06 PM
 #4373


Yes something not ok, try setting by hand for example 120/16 2 threads

I really hurried to push the v8 version, so of course bugs are to be expected, and we still have time to fix them until the fork

Hey Doc,

Vega 64 - Cryptonight v8 analysis:

Using binary kernals : 583 h/s

Not Using Binary Kernals, Kernals compiled on each run and deleted
Driver: 18.5.1 GPU: 1600 Mem: 1100 Volt : 840mV
Intensity : 119 Worksize : 16 : 2019 H/s (94.338% on cn7)
Intensity : 119 Worksize : 32 : 1963 H/s (91.745% on cn7)
Intensity : 120 Worksize : 16 : 2025 H/s (94.626% on cn7)
Intensity : 120 Worksize : 32 : 1983 H/s (92.663% on cn7)
Intensity : 121 Worksize : 16 : 2032 H/s (94.953% on cn7)
Intensity : 121 Worksize : 32 : 1975 H/s (92.289% on cn7)
Intensity : 122 Worksize : 16 : 2038 H/s (95.234% on cn7)
Intensity : 122 Worksize : 32 : 1992 H/s (93.099% on cn7)
Intensity : 123 Worksize : 16 : 2043 H/s (95.467% on cn7)
Intensity : 123 Worksize : 32 : 1984 H/s (92.710% on cn7)
Intensity : 124 Worksize : 16 : 2049 H/s (95.748% on cn7)
Intensity : 124 Worksize : 32 : 2000 H/s (93.458% on cn7)
Intensity : 125 Worksize : 16 : Failed
Intensity : 125 Worksize : 32 : Failed
The above are avg HR from a run of 6 Vega 64s and the highest HR setting were tries multiple times for consistency.

Great work doc, so thats a 4.25% drop from v7 !! not bad considering devs said 7% drop  Cheesy Cheesy


nice test. try Worksize 8
my vega64LE have better HR with 8 worksize
doktor83 (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 2478
Merit: 625


View Profile WWW
October 08, 2018, 04:34:23 PM
 #4374


nice test. try Worksize 8
my vega64LE have better HR with 8 worksize

V8 is not good with worksize 8 on any card.

SRBMiner-MULTI thread - HERE
http://www.srbminer.com
doktor83 (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 2478
Merit: 625


View Profile WWW
October 08, 2018, 04:35:00 PM
 #4375

V.1.6.8 is again up on Mega! Sorry for any inconvenience!

SRBMiner-MULTI thread - HERE
http://www.srbminer.com
abg00
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 288
Merit: 1


View Profile
October 08, 2018, 05:16:55 PM
 #4376


i think i found something about the 570/580 8g cards and heavy algos. Going to check out a few more things then re-upload 1.6.8 with the fixes.

check new version/ same trouble ((
also check without precompile binaries. same low rate 900-930 not 1000+ as on 1.6.7
possible need other drivers? use 18.3.4
tvukoman
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 69
Merit: 5


View Profile
October 08, 2018, 05:22:56 PM
 #4377

V.1.6.8 is again up on Mega! Sorry for any inconvenience!

Downloaded again and tested Maxi version with driver 18.3.4 and 2 Vega 56 Reference card, one Vega 64 Asus Strix and one Rx 570 GB.

Vega problem is still here. Low performance about 4100 H/s for cards (on V7 is 7070 H/s with same settings).

{
"cryptonight_type" : "normalv8",
"intensity" : 0,
"double_threads" : true,
"min_rig_speed" : 6500,
"gpu_conf" :
[
   { "id" : 0, "intensity" : 120, "worksize" : 16, "threads" : 1},
   { "id" : 0, "intensity" : 120, "worksize" : 16, "threads" : 1},
   { "id" : 1, "intensity" : 56, "worksize" : 8, "threads" : 1},
   { "id" : 1, "intensity" : 56, "worksize" : 8, "threads" : 1},
   { "id" : 2, "intensity" : 120, "worksize" : 8, "threads" : 1},
   { "id" : 2, "intensity" : 122, "worksize" : 8, "threads" : 1},
   { "id" : 3, "intensity" : 120, "worksize" : 16, "threads" : 1},
   { "id" : 3, "intensity" : 120, "worksize" : 16, "threads" : 1}
]
}

That is from benchmark test 60 sec, but problem is there.
doktor83 (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 2478
Merit: 625


View Profile WWW
October 08, 2018, 05:29:47 PM
 #4378

V.1.6.8 is again up on Mega! Sorry for any inconvenience!

Downloaded again and tested Maxi version with driver 18.3.4 and 2 Vega 56 Reference card, one Vega 64 Asus Strix and one Rx 570 GB.

Vega problem is still here. Low performance about 4100 H/s for cards (on V7 is 7070 H/s with same settings).

{
"cryptonight_type" : "normalv8",
"intensity" : 0,
"double_threads" : true,
"min_rig_speed" : 6500,
"gpu_conf" :
[
   { "id" : 0, "intensity" : 120, "worksize" : 16, "threads" : 1},
   { "id" : 0, "intensity" : 120, "worksize" : 16, "threads" : 1},
   { "id" : 1, "intensity" : 56, "worksize" : 8, "threads" : 1},
   { "id" : 1, "intensity" : 56, "worksize" : 8, "threads" : 1},
   { "id" : 2, "intensity" : 120, "worksize" : 8, "threads" : 1},
   { "id" : 2, "intensity" : 122, "worksize" : 8, "threads" : 1},
   { "id" : 3, "intensity" : 120, "worksize" : 16, "threads" : 1},
   { "id" : 3, "intensity" : 120, "worksize" : 16, "threads" : 1}
]
}

That is from benchmark test 60 sec, but problem is there.

what if you forget all that strange config and comment out the gpu_conf part?

SRBMiner-MULTI thread - HERE
http://www.srbminer.com
tvukoman
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 69
Merit: 5


View Profile
October 08, 2018, 05:58:16 PM
 #4379

V.1.6.8 is again up on Mega! Sorry for any inconvenience!

Downloaded again and tested Maxi version with driver 18.3.4 and 2 Vega 56 Reference card, one Vega 64 Asus Strix and one Rx 570 GB.

Vega problem is still here. Low performance about 4100 H/s for cards (on V7 is 7070 H/s with same settings).

That is from benchmark test 60 sec, but problem is there.

what if you forget all that strange config and comment out the gpu_conf part?

I don't understand you Doctor? That GPU_conf part is rock solid in V7 algorithm for 7 days with 7070 H/s.
Same settings in SrbMiner and overdrive settings in V8 results with 4100 H/s in benchmark mode.
Do you need some more specific test, i can test it?

And for commenting gpu_conf:
[
   { "id" : 0, "intensity" : 120, "worksize" : 16, "threads" : 1}, - Vega 56 Reference 1
   { "id" : 0, "intensity" : 120, "worksize" : 16, "threads" : 1}, - Vega 56 Reference 1
   { "id" : 1, "intensity" : 56, "worksize" : 8, "threads" : 1}, - RX 570 4GB 1
   { "id" : 1, "intensity" : 56, "worksize" : 8, "threads" : 1}, - RX 570 4GB 1
   { "id" : 2, "intensity" : 120, "worksize" : 8, "threads" : 1}, - Vega 64 Asus Strix 1 - better work with worksize 8, at least in V7
   { "id" : 2, "intensity" : 122, "worksize" : 8, "threads" : 1}, - Vega 64 Asus Strix 1
   { "id" : 3, "intensity" : 120, "worksize" : 16, "threads" : 1}, - Vega 56 Reference 2
   { "id" : 3, "intensity" : 120, "worksize" : 16, "threads" : 1} - Vega 56 Reference 2
]
doktor83 (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 2478
Merit: 625


View Profile WWW
October 08, 2018, 06:03:56 PM
 #4380

V.1.6.8 is again up on Mega! Sorry for any inconvenience!

Downloaded again and tested Maxi version with driver 18.3.4 and 2 Vega 56 Reference card, one Vega 64 Asus Strix and one Rx 570 GB.

Vega problem is still here. Low performance about 4100 H/s for cards (on V7 is 7070 H/s with same settings).

That is from benchmark test 60 sec, but problem is there.

what if you forget all that strange config and comment out the gpu_conf part?

I don't understand you Doctor? That GPU_conf part is rock solid in V7 algorithm for 7 days with 7070 H/s.
Same settings in SrbMiner and overdrive settings in V8 results with 4100 H/s in benchmark mode.
Do you need some more specific test, i can test it?

yes , rock solid in v7, but the settings for v8 are not same as for v7. V8 for example is good with worksize 16 and 32, and bad with 8. Why do you guys think the same settings need to be, when this is a different algo?

vega 56 120/16/2 , vega 64 124/16/2 is optimal

SRBMiner-MULTI thread - HERE
http://www.srbminer.com
Pages: « 1 ... 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 [219] 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 ... 363 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!