|
dragonmike
|
 |
October 17, 2018, 09:14:56 AM |
|
I just checked on my test machines i have win10 v1703 and v1709, also win7 x64. @hesido I will (re) introduce a parameter in 1.6.9, which will probably help you re-gain the hashrate you had. Just have to make the algo switching crash-free first  Well, hurry up, doc, you've got 24 hours! (well actually less 'cause we can't really test at night)... Can someone tell me how I can test CNv8 please? I need some kind of test-pool I can point my hash towards. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The trust scores you see are subjective; they will change depending on who you have in your trust list. |
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lio78
Newbie
 Offline
Activity: 35
Merit: 0
|
|
October 17, 2018, 09:15:43 AM |
|
Hi, I have this message from my pool.
"low difficulty share" if I use v8 instead v7
I use SRBMiner 1.6.8 with Vega64 and RX580.
Anyone can help me please?
|
|
|
|
|
BS0D
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 29
Merit: 0
|
|
October 17, 2018, 09:27:58 AM |
|
I just checked on my test machines i have win10 v1703 and v1709, also win7 x64. @hesido I will (re) introduce a parameter in 1.6.9, which will probably help you re-gain the hashrate you had. Just have to make the algo switching crash-free first Well, hurry up, doc, you've got 24 hours! (well actually less 'cause we can't really test at night)... Can someone tell me how I can test CNv8 please? I need some kind of test-pool I can point my hash towards. Try to mine Wownero. It is already at v8. |
|
|
|
|
|
doktor83 (OP)
|
|
October 17, 2018, 09:30:49 AM |
|
I just checked on my test machines i have win10 v1703 and v1709, also win7 x64. @hesido I will (re) introduce a parameter in 1.6.9, which will probably help you re-gain the hashrate you had. Just have to make the algo switching crash-free first Well, hurry up, doc, you've got 24 hours! (well actually less 'cause we can't really test at night)... Can someone tell me how I can test CNv8 please? I need some kind of test-pool I can point my hash towards. Test on http://killallasics.moneroworld.com |
|
|
|
|
doktor83 (OP)
|
|
October 17, 2018, 09:31:31 AM |
|
Hi, I have this message from my pool.
"low difficulty share" if I use v8 instead v7
I use SRBMiner 1.6.8 with Vega64 and RX580.
Anyone can help me please?
Dont use V8 yet, Monero still haven't switch |
|
|
|
Lio78
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 35
Merit: 0
|
|
October 17, 2018, 09:35:46 AM |
|
Hi, I have this message from my pool.
"low difficulty share" if I use v8 instead v7
I use SRBMiner 1.6.8 with Vega64 and RX580.
Anyone can help me please?
Dont use V8 yet, Monero still haven't switch Thank you Doctor  |
|
|
|
|
|
dragonmike
|
|
October 17, 2018, 09:49:26 AM |
|
Dok, is there a way to incorporate MoneroV8 into the pools-algoswitch file, i.e. moneroocean would switch to MoneroV8 automatically if it's included there? I'd like to keep using the normal algoswitching until the fork - and then, arguably, moneroocean would switch everyone to Monerov8 after the fork.
...or do I need to restrict mining to XMR and populate the pools-fork.txt file with the v7 and v8 pools for it to switch?
|
|
|
|
|
|
doktor83 (OP)
|
|
October 17, 2018, 10:02:23 AM |
|
Dok, is there a way to incorporate MoneroV8 into the pools-algoswitch file, i.e. moneroocean would switch to MoneroV8 automatically if it's included there? I'd like to keep using the normal algoswitching until the fork - and then, arguably, moneroocean would switch everyone to Monerov8 after the fork.
...or do I need to restrict mining to XMR and populate the pools-fork.txt file with the v7 and v8 pools for it to switch?
if you are using MO, and the pool sends you a new job that is V8, miner will restart automatically with the v8 settings, so you don't need the pools-fork.txt trick. |
|
|
|
|
dragonmike
|
|
October 17, 2018, 10:03:46 AM |
|
Dok, is there a way to incorporate MoneroV8 into the pools-algoswitch file, i.e. moneroocean would switch to MoneroV8 automatically if it's included there? I'd like to keep using the normal algoswitching until the fork - and then, arguably, moneroocean would switch everyone to Monerov8 after the fork.
...or do I need to restrict mining to XMR and populate the pools-fork.txt file with the v7 and v8 pools for it to switch?
if you are using MO, and the pool sends you a new job that is V8, miner will restart automatically with the v8 settings, so you don't need the pools-fork.txt trick. Fantastic! I'll just add the v8 settings and pool under the algoswitch and bob's my uncle. If profitability lives up to expectations MO should switch to V8 pretty much straight after the fork goes live. |
|
|
|
|
|
doktor83 (OP)
|
|
October 17, 2018, 10:15:30 AM |
|
Dok, is there a way to incorporate MoneroV8 into the pools-algoswitch file, i.e. moneroocean would switch to MoneroV8 automatically if it's included there? I'd like to keep using the normal algoswitching until the fork - and then, arguably, moneroocean would switch everyone to Monerov8 after the fork.
...or do I need to restrict mining to XMR and populate the pools-fork.txt file with the v7 and v8 pools for it to switch?
if you are using MO, and the pool sends you a new job that is V8, miner will restart automatically with the v8 settings, so you don't need the pools-fork.txt trick. Fantastic! I'll just add the v8 settings and pool under the algoswitch and bob's my uncle. If profitability lives up to expectations MO should switch to V8 pretty much straight after the fork goes live. We will see  I am working on algo switching without miner restart, and everything works when NOT using MO (manual pool switch, that has different algo), but i still have to find why app crashes badly with MO algo switching |
|
|
|
keksik
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 169
Merit: 1
|
|
October 17, 2018, 10:38:23 AM |
|
what is ste optimal frequency for rx 570 and voltage?
I would start testing with these clocks: Core: 2250/950 Mem: 1950/950 2250 core? Good way to blow up your 570  Probably meant 1250. yeah probably 1250MHz, but my asus rog strix rx 570 4g have maximum 1244, so i will rewrite the walue to 1250 and use 950mV,right? i had very stable cards for ethash, but not have much experience with CN:) also is there any difference what cards are good for which CN algo? like rx 570 g4 best for lite V7, rx 580 4g for V7 and RX 580 8g for heavy, etc..you know my point..just want to know on what to focus and not jump there and forth. i have more rigs with cards as said above. also is better to focus on auto intensity or use specific value? when i can consider card stable? for ethash it was when no mem error for lets say 2-5minutes in hwinfo. |
|
|
|
|
|
abudfv2008
|
|
October 17, 2018, 10:50:03 AM |
|
Doc. I was asking but maybe I missed an answer. Is it possible to fix the problem - when miner doesn't start after reboot if there is no active local or rdp session? (I mean local monitor connected, or rdp session activated)
It just hangs on "heating up system".
|
|
|
|
|
|
doktor83 (OP)
|
|
October 17, 2018, 11:37:18 AM |
|
Doc. I was asking but maybe I missed an answer. Is it possible to fix the problem - when miner doesn't start after reboot if there is no active local or rdp session? (I mean local monitor connected, or rdp session activated)
It just hangs on "heating up system".
I really don't know what could cause that, maybe someone here had the same issue and can help you. |
|
|
|
|
dragonmike
|
|
October 17, 2018, 02:33:47 PM |
|
Ok so I seem to get pretty much the same hashrate on v7 and v8 on my RX 570s.
59/8/2 for v7, 1225 core, 1940 mem = 955-960 h/s
57/16/2 for v8, 1225 core, 1940 mem = 955-960 h/s
Took me a while to achieve stability (one of my cards is starting to get flaky - EDIT: or is there any chance memory errors could be caused by bad risers?) but this seems to hold for now.
Next up: The Vega's.
Wish me luck...
|
|
|
|
|
|
alucard20724
|
|
October 17, 2018, 02:53:12 PM |
|
Ok so I seem to get pretty much the same hashrate on v7 and v8 on my RX 570s.
59/8/2 for v7, 1225 core, 1940 mem = 955-960 h/s
57/16/2 for v8, 1225 core, 1940 mem = 955-960 h/s
Took me a while to achieve stability (one of my cards is starting to get flaky - EDIT: or is there any chance memory errors could be caused by bad risers?) but this seems to hold for now.
Next up: The Vega's.
Wish me luck...
I would check the power connection... unplug it and check the connecter to make sure the connector hasn't started melting (a sign of high current draw) |
|
|
|
|
|
dragonmike
|
|
October 17, 2018, 03:35:45 PM |
|
Ok so I seem to get pretty much the same hashrate on v7 and v8 on my RX 570s.
59/8/2 for v7, 1225 core, 1940 mem = 955-960 h/s
57/16/2 for v8, 1225 core, 1940 mem = 955-960 h/s
Took me a while to achieve stability (one of my cards is starting to get flaky - EDIT: or is there any chance memory errors could be caused by bad risers?) but this seems to hold for now.
Next up: The Vega's.
Wish me luck...
I would check the power connection... unplug it and check the connecter to make sure the connector hasn't started melting (a sign of high current draw) Yeah makes sense. I haven't physically checked on this rig for a while now. But I've had a few melted power connectors in the past so I'll have a look. Talking about power... CNv2 (Monerov8) does use quite a bit more. Getting very close to the acceptable limit on my 1500W PSU on that 6x Vega rig. I need to undervolt a tad more. |
|
|
|
|
|
Bojcha
|
|
October 17, 2018, 03:41:25 PM |
|
Ok so I seem to get pretty much the same hashrate on v7 and v8 on my RX 570s.
59/8/2 for v7, 1225 core, 1940 mem = 955-960 h/s
57/16/2 for v8, 1225 core, 1940 mem = 955-960 h/s
Took me a while to achieve stability (one of my cards is starting to get flaky - EDIT: or is there any chance memory errors could be caused by bad risers?) but this seems to hold for now.
Next up: The Vega's.
Wish me luck...
I would check the power connection... unplug it and check the connecter to make sure the connector hasn't started melting (a sign of high current draw) Yeah makes sense. I haven't physically checked on this rig for a while now. But I've had a few melted power connectors in the past so I'll have a look. Talking about power... CNv2 (Monerov8) does use quite a bit more. Getting very close to the acceptable limit on my 1500W PSU on that 6x Vega rig. I need to undervolt a tad more. Vega uses about 170w on v8 with about 1950H/s, so for 6 of them it should not be more than 1100w |
|
|
|
|
|
P00P135
|
|
October 17, 2018, 03:41:42 PM |
|
Ok so I seem to get pretty much the same hashrate on v7 and v8 on my RX 570s.
59/8/2 for v7, 1225 core, 1940 mem = 955-960 h/s
57/16/2 for v8, 1225 core, 1940 mem = 955-960 h/s
Took me a while to achieve stability (one of my cards is starting to get flaky - EDIT: or is there any chance memory errors could be caused by bad risers?) but this seems to hold for now.
Next up: The Vega's.
Wish me luck...
I would check the power connection... unplug it and check the connecter to make sure the connector hasn't started melting (a sign of high current draw) Yeah makes sense. I haven't physically checked on this rig for a while now. But I've had a few melted power connectors in the past so I'll have a look. Talking about power... CNv2 (Monerov8) does use quite a bit more. Getting very close to the acceptable limit on my 1500W PSU on that 6x Vega rig. I need to undervolt a tad more. I'd suggest finding a good soft power play mod. You can really dial in wattage usage better than just power limiting in ntool. |
|
|
|
|
|
doktor83 (OP)
|
|
October 17, 2018, 03:42:49 PM |
|
Talking about power... CNv2 (Monerov8) does use quite a bit more. Getting very close to the acceptable limit on my 1500W PSU on that 6x Vega rig. I need to undervolt a tad more.
Bad decision from the Monero team, this new algo draws a lot more power, and gives less hashrate than the previous V7. Monero's price should go up if they want people to continue mining their coin. |
|
|
|
Shivoreun
Member
Offline
Activity: 130
Merit: 10
|
|
October 17, 2018, 03:47:04 PM |
|
tried new Algo CN Red today...works one hour but miner closed and now i get "EXCEPTION 90012. FAULTY HDMI DEVICE INT3H."
whats wrong?
Exactly the same problem now  v1.6.8 How to solve this?.. Thanks. |
P.S. Sorry for errors in English - it's not my native language...
|
|
|
|
