JuanHungLo
|
|
December 22, 2018, 12:32:10 PM |
|
Hi, I downloaded your last version of miner and I can't start mining on fast algo with new adrenalin 18.12.2 drivers (driver is crushing), but can't anymore mining on 1.6.9 version of your miner, the same problem. I tried to input 6 amd ocl files (amd_opencl32, amd_opencl64, amdocl, amdocl12cl, amdocl12cl64, amdocl64) from recommended drivers 18.5.2 and 18.6.1 into both versions of your miner and I can't start mining...What can be the problem and what is solution?? I have radeon r7 370 card and the same problem is on 470 cards. Thank you forward.
Dok, I never saw a reply to this. Does your miner work with the "old trick" of just putting the above listed AMD drivers into your software folder instead of reinstalling AMD drivers for the entire system?
|
Bull markets are born on pessimism, grow on skepticism, mature on optimism, and die on euphoria. - John Templeton
|
|
|
doktor83 (OP)
|
|
December 22, 2018, 12:38:25 PM |
|
Hi, I downloaded your last version of miner and I can't start mining on fast algo with new adrenalin 18.12.2 drivers (driver is crushing), but can't anymore mining on 1.6.9 version of your miner, the same problem. I tried to input 6 amd ocl files (amd_opencl32, amd_opencl64, amdocl, amdocl12cl, amdocl12cl64, amdocl64) from recommended drivers 18.5.2 and 18.6.1 into both versions of your miner and I can't start mining...What can be the problem and what is solution?? I have radeon r7 370 card and the same problem is on 470 cards. Thank you forward.
Dok, I never saw a reply to this. Does your miner work with the "old trick" of just putting the above listed AMD drivers into your software folder instead of reinstalling AMD drivers for the entire system? I never used/played with tricks to make something work the way it shouldn't, so i don't know.
|
|
|
|
mk111
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 230
Merit: 1
|
|
December 22, 2018, 01:13:38 PM |
|
Anyone mining UPX with Vega 56's?
I am using SRB V1.7.3 and Radeon 18.8.2.
I get 8700H/s per card but after a few minutes I start getting compute errors
Config: { "id" : 0, "intensity" : 230, "double_threads" : true, "old_mode" : true },
CC 1475 MC 1100
When I change the config to "old_mode : false" then I get no more compute errors but hashrate is only 6600H/s. Even dropping CC, MC and intensity much lower I still get compute errors when using "old_mode" : true
Any advice?
Old mode + new drivers are a no go. Old mode creates kernels well, the old way, which worked OK with drivers up to 18.6.1 + Added a gpu_conf only parameter 'old_mode'. With the changes i made in 1.7.2, that allow the creation of kernels on drivers newer than 18.6.1, algos that use a scratchpad <=1MB (litev7, mox, dark, upx) suffer from a hashrate drop on Vegas (maybe others too, i didn't test). So if you set this parameter to true, it will create kernel the old way, and the speed on these algos should be back. Don't forget, if you use old_mode : true, and compile the kernel on a driver newer than 18.6.1, you probably won't be finding any shares!
Thank Dok but even with the 18.6.1 I still get compute errors. I dropped the clocks and intensity lower and even upped the voltage without any luck. With "old_mode" : false" I get no compute errors but only have hashrate of 6600H/s Anything else I could try?
|
|
|
|
doktor83 (OP)
|
|
December 22, 2018, 01:18:44 PM |
|
Anyone mining UPX with Vega 56's?
I am using SRB V1.7.3 and Radeon 18.8.2.
I get 8700H/s per card but after a few minutes I start getting compute errors
Config: { "id" : 0, "intensity" : 230, "double_threads" : true, "old_mode" : true },
CC 1475 MC 1100
When I change the config to "old_mode : false" then I get no more compute errors but hashrate is only 6600H/s. Even dropping CC, MC and intensity much lower I still get compute errors when using "old_mode" : true
Any advice?
Old mode + new drivers are a no go. Old mode creates kernels well, the old way, which worked OK with drivers up to 18.6.1 + Added a gpu_conf only parameter 'old_mode'. With the changes i made in 1.7.2, that allow the creation of kernels on drivers newer than 18.6.1, algos that use a scratchpad <=1MB (litev7, mox, dark, upx) suffer from a hashrate drop on Vegas (maybe others too, i didn't test). So if you set this parameter to true, it will create kernel the old way, and the speed on these algos should be back. Don't forget, if you use old_mode : true, and compile the kernel on a driver newer than 18.6.1, you probably won't be finding any shares!
Thank Dok but even with the 18.6.1 I still get compute errors. I dropped the clocks and intensity lower and even upped the voltage without any luck. With "old_mode" : false" I get no compute errors but only have hashrate of 6600H/s Anything else I could try? Have you: 1. cleaned the cache folder in miner folder 2. remove old driver with ddu before installing new driver
|
|
|
|
mk111
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 230
Merit: 1
|
|
December 22, 2018, 01:58:20 PM |
|
Anyone mining UPX with Vega 56's?
I am using SRB V1.7.3 and Radeon 18.8.2.
I get 8700H/s per card but after a few minutes I start getting compute errors
Config: { "id" : 0, "intensity" : 230, "double_threads" : true, "old_mode" : true },
CC 1475 MC 1100
When I change the config to "old_mode : false" then I get no more compute errors but hashrate is only 6600H/s. Even dropping CC, MC and intensity much lower I still get compute errors when using "old_mode" : true
Any advice?
Old mode + new drivers are a no go. Old mode creates kernels well, the old way, which worked OK with drivers up to 18.6.1 + Added a gpu_conf only parameter 'old_mode'. With the changes i made in 1.7.2, that allow the creation of kernels on drivers newer than 18.6.1, algos that use a scratchpad <=1MB (litev7, mox, dark, upx) suffer from a hashrate drop on Vegas (maybe others too, i didn't test). So if you set this parameter to true, it will create kernel the old way, and the speed on these algos should be back. Don't forget, if you use old_mode : true, and compile the kernel on a driver newer than 18.6.1, you probably won't be finding any shares!
Thank Dok but even with the 18.6.1 I still get compute errors. I dropped the clocks and intensity lower and even upped the voltage without any luck. With "old_mode" : false" I get no compute errors but only have hashrate of 6600H/s Anything else I could try? Have you: 1. cleaned the cache folder in miner folder 2. remove old driver with ddu before installing new driver Dok is legend! No more compute errors after clearing the cache folder
|
|
|
|
UnclWish
|
|
December 22, 2018, 02:58:00 PM |
|
Anyone mining UPX with Vega 56's?
I am using SRB V1.7.3 and Radeon 18.8.2.
I get 8700H/s per card but after a few minutes I start getting compute errors
Config: { "id" : 0, "intensity" : 230, "double_threads" : true, "old_mode" : true },
CC 1475 MC 1100
When I change the config to "old_mode : false" then I get no more compute errors but hashrate is only 6600H/s. Even dropping CC, MC and intensity much lower I still get compute errors when using "old_mode" : true
Any advice?
Old mode + new drivers are a no go. Old mode creates kernels well, the old way, which worked OK with drivers up to 18.6.1 + Added a gpu_conf only parameter 'old_mode'. With the changes i made in 1.7.2, that allow the creation of kernels on drivers newer than 18.6.1, algos that use a scratchpad <=1MB (litev7, mox, dark, upx) suffer from a hashrate drop on Vegas (maybe others too, i didn't test). So if you set this parameter to true, it will create kernel the old way, and the speed on these algos should be back. Don't forget, if you use old_mode : true, and compile the kernel on a driver newer than 18.6.1, you probably won't be finding any shares!
Thank Dok but even with the 18.6.1 I still get compute errors. I dropped the clocks and intensity lower and even upped the voltage without any luck. With "old_mode" : false" I get no compute errors but only have hashrate of 6600H/s Anything else I could try? Have you: 1. cleaned the cache folder in miner folder 2. remove old driver with ddu before installing new driver Dok is legend! No more compute errors after clearing the cache folder You must take it as the rule - if you change drivers or miner version - you must clear cache folder.
|
|
|
|
zeef
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 301
Merit: 0
|
|
December 23, 2018, 03:13:07 AM |
|
Hi Dok,
My gpu was turned off incorrectly:
[2018-12-22 12:31:05] hashrate: GPU1: 1826 H/s [BUS:32] [2018-12-22 12:31:05] hashrate: GPU2: 1848 H/s [BUS:26] [2018-12-22 12:31:05] hashrate: GPU3: 1846 H/s [BUS:12] [2018-12-22 12:31:05] hashrate: GPU4: 1808 H/s [BUS:3] [2018-12-22 12:31:05] hashrate: GPU5: 1836 H/s [BUS:6] [2018-12-22 12:31:05] hashrate: GPU6: 1836 H/s [BUS:18] [2018-12-22 12:31:05] hashrate: GPU7: 1843 H/s [BUS:23] [2018-12-22 12:31:05] hashrate: GPU8: 1816 H/s [BUS:9] [2018-12-22 12:31:05] hashrate: Total: 16477 H/s [2018-12-22 12:31:57] json_receive: {"jsonrpc":"2.0","method":"job","params":{"blob":"0505bfddf8e005f44b2d06ca309e7d0bfaed93aac12756028fee4af5c41df8f4d77c881859d53f0 0000000e2a36e1e6d7d32f4bb3014285534182a8796c02547ee0e6aed0c288b539efb7a07","job_id":"485851644988486","target":"2f0b0000"}} [2018-12-22 12:31:57] pool_have_job: Pool sent a new job (ID: 485851644988486) [2018-12-22 12:32:16] GPU BUS_ID[32][t2] turned off [temperature > 85] [2018-12-22 12:32:16] GPU BUS_ID[32][t3] turned off [temperature > 85]
I Was monitoring and gpu is always in 50-55 C. What could have happened?
Can you put in your to-do-list the temp in log ?
Thanks
|
|
|
|
doktor83 (OP)
|
|
December 23, 2018, 05:46:58 AM |
|
Hi Dok,
My gpu was turned off incorrectly:
[2018-12-22 12:31:05] hashrate: GPU1: 1826 H/s [BUS:32] [2018-12-22 12:31:05] hashrate: GPU2: 1848 H/s [BUS:26] [2018-12-22 12:31:05] hashrate: GPU3: 1846 H/s [BUS:12] [2018-12-22 12:31:05] hashrate: GPU4: 1808 H/s [BUS:3] [2018-12-22 12:31:05] hashrate: GPU5: 1836 H/s [BUS:6] [2018-12-22 12:31:05] hashrate: GPU6: 1836 H/s [BUS:18] [2018-12-22 12:31:05] hashrate: GPU7: 1843 H/s [BUS:23] [2018-12-22 12:31:05] hashrate: GPU8: 1816 H/s [BUS:9] [2018-12-22 12:31:05] hashrate: Total: 16477 H/s [2018-12-22 12:31:57] json_receive: {"jsonrpc":"2.0","method":"job","params":{"blob":"0505bfddf8e005f44b2d06ca309e7d0bfaed93aac12756028fee4af5c41df8f4d77c881859d53f0 0000000e2a36e1e6d7d32f4bb3014285534182a8796c02547ee0e6aed0c288b539efb7a07","job_id":"485851644988486","target":"2f0b0000"}} [2018-12-22 12:31:57] pool_have_job: Pool sent a new job (ID: 485851644988486) [2018-12-22 12:32:16] GPU BUS_ID[32][t2] turned off [temperature > 85] [2018-12-22 12:32:16] GPU BUS_ID[32][t3] turned off [temperature > 85]
I Was monitoring and gpu is always in 50-55 C. What could have happened?
Can you put in your to-do-list the temp in log ?
Thanks
You left out an important part from the log where the gpu is turned back on, because if it really reached 85c then it would need some time to cool down to 70c to turn back on, but if it was a false temperature reading for a moment then it would turn it back on in a few seconds. The temp in log will be in the next version.
|
|
|
|
zeef
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 301
Merit: 0
|
|
December 23, 2018, 01:19:35 PM |
|
Hi Dok,
My gpu was turned off incorrectly:
[2018-12-22 12:31:05] hashrate: GPU1: 1826 H/s [BUS:32] [2018-12-22 12:31:05] hashrate: GPU2: 1848 H/s [BUS:26] [2018-12-22 12:31:05] hashrate: GPU3: 1846 H/s [BUS:12] [2018-12-22 12:31:05] hashrate: GPU4: 1808 H/s [BUS:3] [2018-12-22 12:31:05] hashrate: GPU5: 1836 H/s [BUS:6] [2018-12-22 12:31:05] hashrate: GPU6: 1836 H/s [BUS:18] [2018-12-22 12:31:05] hashrate: GPU7: 1843 H/s [BUS:23] [2018-12-22 12:31:05] hashrate: GPU8: 1816 H/s [BUS:9] [2018-12-22 12:31:05] hashrate: Total: 16477 H/s [2018-12-22 12:31:57] json_receive: {"jsonrpc":"2.0","method":"job","params":{"blob":"0505bfddf8e005f44b2d06ca309e7d0bfaed93aac12756028fee4af5c41df8f4d77c881859d53f0 0000000e2a36e1e6d7d32f4bb3014285534182a8796c02547ee0e6aed0c288b539efb7a07","job_id":"485851644988486","target":"2f0b0000"}} [2018-12-22 12:31:57] pool_have_job: Pool sent a new job (ID: 485851644988486) [2018-12-22 12:32:16] GPU BUS_ID[32][t2] turned off [temperature > 85] [2018-12-22 12:32:16] GPU BUS_ID[32][t3] turned off [temperature > 85]
I Was monitoring and gpu is always in 50-55 C. What could have happened?
Can you put in your to-do-list the temp in log ?
Thanks
You left out an important part from the log where the gpu is turned back on, because if it really reached 85c then it would need some time to cool down to 70c to turn back on, but if it was a false temperature reading for a moment then it would turn it back on in a few seconds. The temp in log will be in the next version. Hi Dok, After that the system freeze, and i have no log after that, with log will be more easy to see the problem. Thanks
|
|
|
|
smeads
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 17
Merit: 0
|
|
December 23, 2018, 03:14:34 PM |
|
Until yesterday, I was running the previous version without any issues on 6 AMD rigs. I downloaded the newest copy, and it crashes when mining CN Fast. I'm trying to mine ETNXP. Like I said, previous version worked.... does it on all 6 rigs.
Faulting application name: SRBMiner-CN.exe, version: 1.7.3.0, time stamp: 0x00000000 Faulting module name: amdocl64.dll, version: 25.20.15003.5010, time stamp: 0x5c184c0e Exception code: 0xc0000005 Fault offset: 0x00000000002f15b9 Faulting process id: 0x8c8 Faulting application start time: 0x01d49ab2a731dd6b Faulting application path: C:\Profitbot_Pro\Miner-SRB\SRBMiner-CN.exe Faulting module path: C:\WINDOWS\System32\DriverStore\FileRepository\u0337288.inf_amd64_e18692686066629e\B337205\amdocl64.dll Report Id: 5aa0839b-b012-4198-9e08-6a53ec79ed4b Faulting package full name: Faulting package-relative application ID:
|
|
|
|
doktor83 (OP)
|
|
December 23, 2018, 03:40:34 PM |
|
Until yesterday, I was running the previous version without any issues on 6 AMD rigs. I downloaded the newest copy, and it crashes when mining CN Fast. I'm trying to mine ETNXP. Like I said, previous version worked.... does it on all 6 rigs.
Faulting application name: SRBMiner-CN.exe, version: 1.7.3.0, time stamp: 0x00000000 Faulting module name: amdocl64.dll, version: 25.20.15003.5010, time stamp: 0x5c184c0e Exception code: 0xc0000005 Fault offset: 0x00000000002f15b9 Faulting process id: 0x8c8 Faulting application start time: 0x01d49ab2a731dd6b Faulting application path: C:\Profitbot_Pro\Miner-SRB\SRBMiner-CN.exe Faulting module path: C:\WINDOWS\System32\DriverStore\FileRepository\u0337288.inf_amd64_e18692686066629e\B337205\amdocl64.dll Report Id: 5aa0839b-b012-4198-9e08-6a53ec79ed4b Faulting package full name: Faulting package-relative application ID:
Are you doing algo switching? If yes, there is a bug i am aware of, and going to be fixed in the next version.
|
|
|
|
Vampire_sumy
Member
Offline
Activity: 110
Merit: 10
|
|
December 23, 2018, 10:53:21 PM |
|
Hi, may be someone can help me. I try to mine normal v7 algo, but hashrate is very low on rx480 8Gb. Haven or any other heavy algo seems to work perfectly, hashrate is close to 1200H/s, but normal v7 is only 990 H/s. What am i doing wrong ? I am using old drivers (blockchain), but they always worked perfectly before. May be i need to make some tuning in config file? Same problem i have while trying to mine normal v7 on Vega56 P.S. SRBMiner 1.73
|
|
|
|
doktor83 (OP)
|
|
December 24, 2018, 10:33:03 AM |
|
Hi, may be someone can help me. I try to mine normal v7 algo, but hashrate is very low on rx480 8Gb. Haven or any other heavy algo seems to work perfectly, hashrate is close to 1200H/s, but normal v7 is only 990 H/s. What am i doing wrong ? I am using old drivers (blockchain), but they always worked perfectly before. May be i need to make some tuning in config file? Same problem i have while trying to mine normal v7 on Vega56 P.S. SRBMiner 1.73 990hs on a 480 8g is low for v7 ?
|
|
|
|
alucard20724
|
|
December 24, 2018, 07:31:32 PM |
|
Hi, may be someone can help me. I try to mine normal v7 algo, but hashrate is very low on rx480 8Gb. Haven or any other heavy algo seems to work perfectly, hashrate is close to 1200H/s, but normal v7 is only 990 H/s. What am i doing wrong ? I am using old drivers (blockchain), but they always worked perfectly before. May be i need to make some tuning in config file? Same problem i have while trying to mine normal v7 on Vega56 P.S. SRBMiner 1.73 990hs on a 480 8g is low for v7 ? my rhetorical question is why are they even mining v7?
|
|
|
|
MingMining
Member
Offline
Activity: 202
Merit: 10
Eloncoin.org - Mars, here we come!
|
|
December 24, 2018, 07:48:49 PM |
|
This is strange. I added a 580 in rig and one gpu is the rig just did not work well.
[2018-12-24 11:45:40] GPU0 : 915 H/s [T: 53c, RPM: 2105, CC: 1155 MHz, MC: 2050 MHz][BUS:1] [2018-12-24 11:45:40] GPU1 : 927 H/s [T: 56c, RPM: 2555, CC: 1155 MHz, MC: 2050 MHz][BUS:5] [2018-12-24 11:45:40] GPU2 : 939 H/s [T: 46c, RPM: 1801, CC: 1155 MHz, MC: 2050 MHz][BUS:7] [2018-12-24 11:45:41] GPU3 : 929 H/s [T: 57c, RPM: 2581, CC: 1155 MHz, MC: 2050 MHz][BUS:8] [2018-12-24 11:45:41] GPU4 : 601 H/s [T: 54c, RPM: 2539, CC: 1155 MHz, MC: 2050 MHz][BUS:11]
I set the compute mode and they are use the same driver. Anyone get any idea what is happening? TIA.
|
|
|
|
justoiurii
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 103
Merit: 0
|
|
December 24, 2018, 08:00:04 PM |
|
This is strange. I added a 580 in rig and one gpu is the rig just did not work well.
[2018-12-24 11:45:40] GPU0 : 915 H/s [T: 53c, RPM: 2105, CC: 1155 MHz, MC: 2050 MHz][BUS:1] [2018-12-24 11:45:40] GPU1 : 927 H/s [T: 56c, RPM: 2555, CC: 1155 MHz, MC: 2050 MHz][BUS:5] [2018-12-24 11:45:40] GPU2 : 939 H/s [T: 46c, RPM: 1801, CC: 1155 MHz, MC: 2050 MHz][BUS:7] [2018-12-24 11:45:41] GPU3 : 929 H/s [T: 57c, RPM: 2581, CC: 1155 MHz, MC: 2050 MHz][BUS:8] [2018-12-24 11:45:41] GPU4 : 601 H/s [T: 54c, RPM: 2539, CC: 1155 MHz, MC: 2050 MHz][BUS:11]
I set the compute mode and they are use the same driver. Anyone get any idea what is happening? TIA.
better to restart win)
|
|
|
|
MingMining
Member
Offline
Activity: 202
Merit: 10
Eloncoin.org - Mars, here we come!
|
|
December 24, 2018, 08:07:03 PM Last edit: December 24, 2018, 08:20:09 PM by MingMining |
|
This is strange. I added a 580 in rig and one gpu is the rig just did not work well.
[2018-12-24 11:45:40] GPU0 : 915 H/s [T: 53c, RPM: 2105, CC: 1155 MHz, MC: 2050 MHz][BUS:1] [2018-12-24 11:45:40] GPU1 : 927 H/s [T: 56c, RPM: 2555, CC: 1155 MHz, MC: 2050 MHz][BUS:5] [2018-12-24 11:45:40] GPU2 : 939 H/s [T: 46c, RPM: 1801, CC: 1155 MHz, MC: 2050 MHz][BUS:7] [2018-12-24 11:45:41] GPU3 : 929 H/s [T: 57c, RPM: 2581, CC: 1155 MHz, MC: 2050 MHz][BUS:8] [2018-12-24 11:45:41] GPU4 : 601 H/s [T: 54c, RPM: 2539, CC: 1155 MHz, MC: 2050 MHz][BUS:11]
I set the compute mode and they are use the same driver. Anyone get any idea what is happening? TIA.
better to restart win) I actually did. did not help. Update: I restarted the third time and everything is working now... Thanks a lot!
|
|
|
|
MingMining
Member
Offline
Activity: 202
Merit: 10
Eloncoin.org - Mars, here we come!
|
|
December 24, 2018, 08:32:08 PM |
|
Here is my rig with 6x 470 4gb. Is this normal for a 470 at 800ish hashrate?
[2018-12-24 12:30:37] GPU0 : 818 H/s [T: 51c, RPM: 1916, CC: 1140 MHz, MC: 2050 MHz][BUS:8] [2018-12-24 12:30:37] GPU1 : 818 H/s [T: 52c, RPM: 1921, CC: 1140 MHz, MC: 2050 MHz][BUS:3] [2018-12-24 12:30:37] GPU2 : 816 H/s [T: 51c, RPM: 1982, CC: 1140 MHz, MC: 2050 MHz][BUS:7] [2018-12-24 12:30:37] GPU3 : 816 H/s [T: 47c, RPM: 1900, CC: 1140 MHz, MC: 2050 MHz][BUS:5] [2018-12-24 12:30:37] GPU4 : 818 H/s [T: 49c, RPM: 1870, CC: 1140 MHz, MC: 2050 MHz][BUS:6] [2018-12-24 12:30:37] GPU5 : 817 H/s [T: 44c, RPM: 1921, CC: 1140 MHz, MC: 2050 MHz][BUS:1]
|
|
|
|
UnclWish
|
|
December 25, 2018, 04:47:10 AM |
|
Here is my rig with 6x 470 4gb. Is this normal for a 470 at 800ish hashrate?
[2018-12-24 12:30:37] GPU0 : 818 H/s [T: 51c, RPM: 1916, CC: 1140 MHz, MC: 2050 MHz][BUS:8] [2018-12-24 12:30:37] GPU1 : 818 H/s [T: 52c, RPM: 1921, CC: 1140 MHz, MC: 2050 MHz][BUS:3] [2018-12-24 12:30:37] GPU2 : 816 H/s [T: 51c, RPM: 1982, CC: 1140 MHz, MC: 2050 MHz][BUS:7] [2018-12-24 12:30:37] GPU3 : 816 H/s [T: 47c, RPM: 1900, CC: 1140 MHz, MC: 2050 MHz][BUS:5] [2018-12-24 12:30:37] GPU4 : 818 H/s [T: 49c, RPM: 1870, CC: 1140 MHz, MC: 2050 MHz][BUS:6] [2018-12-24 12:30:37] GPU5 : 817 H/s [T: 44c, RPM: 1921, CC: 1140 MHz, MC: 2050 MHz][BUS:1]
Depends on algo...
|
|
|
|
Skylptor
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 4
Merit: 0
|
|
December 25, 2018, 01:09:46 PM |
|
Hello, when will you make SRB for Linux?
|
|
|
|
|