SRBMiner Cryptonight AMD GPU Miner V1.9.3 - native algo switching

[UnclWish]

I use 1.6.4 with --sendallstales option since 1.6.4 was released with nicehash heavy algo. No one stale share for all this time. It's normal? Recieved speed on nicehash less than speed in miner about 10-11%. It's abnormal I think. I look at period close to 24 hours.

Another one question: installing new drivers needs to rebuild srb kernel files?

You can use nicehash+heavy way before 1.6.4, i don't know where do you get this info from. Stale shares are not sent when using nicehash cause nicehash rejects ALL stale shares, so no point in sending them. 10-11% is much i agree.

Don't have to rebuild kernels after changing drivers, miner will work, but i would suggest you to rebuild them to be sure you are totally compatible with the drivers.

Ok, thanks. I got it.

1.6.4. builds other heavy srb kernels. It have size about 2Mb as for cn-v7. And speed is some lower. If use srb builded 1.6.3 speed good, and size of srb kernel about 4Mb.

[1642862388]

1642862388

[1642862388]

1642862388

[1642862388]

1642862388

[doktor83]

Ok, thanks. I got it.

1.6.4. builds other heavy srb kernels. It have size about 2Mb as for cn-v7. And speed is some lower. If use srb builded 1.6.3 speed good, and size of srb kernel about 4Mb.

i did not touch cl kernels from 1.6.3 to 1.6.4, so probably you built on one driver , now with another, and maybe the compiler unrolls differently, that would explain the increased size.

[livada]

1.6.2 BC driver vs 1.64 with 18.3.4 driver
HEAVY and TUBE algo

GPU 0-1-4 = vega 56(64bios)samsung (56/8/2)setup
gpu 2 = vega 64 Liquid (60/8/2)setup
With BC driver 1.6.4 have more error
With 18.3.4 gpu go more overclock:)
1.6.4 have more HR
18.3.4 driver not need disable/enable vega , and not need start with 60int first.
but if use v7 algo and back to heavy  HBC memory not work.(need restart)

1.6.2 BC driver- this is maximal setup wtihout error
https://image.prntscr.com/image/14SysMMOQOS7zviWPlF-Yg.jpg

1.6.4. 18.43.4 driver without error
https://image.prntscr.com/image/A3SjEnciQ4C0yPzjnPuWPQ.jpg

we continue the test

This is NITRO+ vega 56 (hynix) stock bios. 1.8.34 driver not need enable/diable and not need first start with 60 int.

setup: 56/8/2.
With BC driver and 1.6.2  6*vega56 have 9000HR on heavya/tubethis is MAX setup without error.
https://image.prntscr.com/image/OZprQNZnRZeaKANVQADGkw.jpg
With 1.8.34 and 1.6.2 6*vega56 have 8250HR on heavya/tube
https://image.prntscr.com/image/nD9l8_AMTeqwAO1PQlHFGA.jpg
With 1.8.34 and 1.6.4 6*vega56 have 9150HR on heavya/tube
https://image.prntscr.com/image/Q0uhuB_qR5iIgC1oZW2v_Q.jpg
With 1.8.34 and 1.6.4 6*vega56 have 9230HR on heavya/tube MAX setup without error
https://image.prntscr.com/image/_5i2Iwj5SxmhLrd4gsN3fQ.jpg

and i try castXMR 1.2.5 with 1.8.34 driver. Setup is identical . i try int 7-8-9-19 but 8 is best for nitro vega 64.
https://image.prntscr.com/image/BTdIslYRQwqhOQVFwf9mwQ.jpg

[livada]

Hi doktor,

We can see the stale shares in statistics pressing s in your miner right?

yes,
Accepted(Stale)/Total shares: 42(1)/42 (100.0%)

yes. cryptoknight.cc accept stale shares

https://image.prntscr.com/image/eXbF2LQYQ3izJv78mZsUgw.jpg

[Art Gar]

DAMN
saw the post of new version..downloaded from first page = version 1.6.3 = to fast action from me
not it works...THX

You probably downloaded in those few minutes between when i uploaded it and updated the post here

What is Latency in json? Is it ping?

[UnclWish]

Ok, thanks. I got it.

1.6.4. builds other heavy srb kernels. It have size about 2Mb as for cn-v7. And speed is some lower. If use srb builded 1.6.3 speed good, and size of srb kernel about 4Mb.

i did not touch cl kernels from 1.6.3 to 1.6.4, so probably you built on one driver , now with another, and maybe the compiler unrolls differently, that would explain the increased size.

Size decreases. On 1.6.4 kernels builded with 18.7.1 are buggy. Speed is low, many compute errors. Now use 1.6.4 with srb kernels builded by 1.6.3 on 18.6 drivers...

[chris718]

can SRBMiner support HYCON? a modified V7 algo, https://github.com/Team-Hycon,thanks!

plz support HYCON mining,THX!

[Sharpeich]

can SRBMiner support HYCON? a modified V7 algo, https://github.com/Team-Hycon,thanks!

plz support HYCON mining,THX!

where did you see a word about minerable HYCON ?

[doktor83]

Ok, thanks. I got it.

1.6.4. builds other heavy srb kernels. It have size about 2Mb as for cn-v7. And speed is some lower. If use srb builded 1.6.3 speed good, and size of srb kernel about 4Mb.

i did not touch cl kernels from 1.6.3 to 1.6.4, so probably you built on one driver , now with another, and maybe the compiler unrolls differently, that would explain the increased size.

Size decreases. On 1.6.4 kernels builded with 18.7.1 are buggy. Speed is low, many compute errors. Now use 1.6.4 with srb kernels builded by 1.6.3 on 18.6 drivers...

If you take 1.6.4 and install 18.6.1 and let the miner build the binaries it would work good. The problem here is the 18.7.1 drivers.

[doktor83]

can SRBMiner support HYCON? a modified V7 algo, https://github.com/Team-Hycon,thanks!

plz support HYCON mining,THX!

I missed your previous post, sorry. I will look into it.

edit : it's cryptonight v7, so you can use 'normalv7' to mine it.

[UnclWish]

Ok, thanks. I got it.

1.6.4. builds other heavy srb kernels. It have size about 2Mb as for cn-v7. And speed is some lower. If use srb builded 1.6.3 speed good, and size of srb kernel about 4Mb.

i did not touch cl kernels from 1.6.3 to 1.6.4, so probably you built on one driver , now with another, and maybe the compiler unrolls differently, that would explain the increased size.

Size decreases. On 1.6.4 kernels builded with 18.7.1 are buggy. Speed is low, many compute errors. Now use 1.6.4 with srb kernels builded by 1.6.3 on 18.6 drivers...

If you take 1.6.4 and install 18.6.1 and let the miner build the binaries it would work good. The problem here is the 18.7.1 drivers.

Yes, I understand it. Just wanted all to know that on 18.7.1 new builded kernels not optimal, but old kernels works fine.

[chris718]

can SRBMiner support HYCON? a modified V7 algo, https://github.com/Team-Hycon,thanks!

plz support HYCON mining,THX!

I missed your previous post, sorry. I will look into it.

edit : it's cryptonight v7, so you can use 'normalv7' to mine it.

It's V7 fork, something modified,normal V7 miner can not work,the modified xmrig miner work fine,but...i like SRBminer more

[zeef]

Hi guys,

For cryptonight fast what should be the optimal settings for vega 56 and 64?

Double of heavy settings in intensity?

Thanks

[SpceGhst]

Just started using SRBMiner and have a quick question...
If I change algos, say from CN7 to CNHeavy, do I need to delete the .srb files and let program recompile, or will the old .srb files work fine?

Thanks

[MaxHa$h]

Does SRB have any issues running 13 gpu's. Try to switch over a rig with the Asus b250ME w/ 13 rx550's it does the intial load, but then the screen where it would show all the cards then load kernals stays black with a blinking cursor

[MaxHa$h]

Does SRB have any issues running 13 gpu's. Try to switch over a rig with the Asus b250ME w/ 13 rx550's it does the intial load, but then the screen where it would show all the cards then load kernals stays black with a blinking cursor

have you try old version srb ? i thing new version any bug with rx550 series

No just the current, I'll try 1.6.0 and see

[UnclWish]

Just started using SRBMiner and have a quick question...
If I change algos, say from CN7 to CNHeavy, do I need to delete the .srb files and let program recompile, or will the old .srb files work fine?

Thanks

If srb files created by version 1.6.3 or 1.6.4 it's no need to delete them.

[lebuawu2]

Hi Dok,

Just curious why bittubev2 got higher hashrate than heavy for RX Vega 56 but it lower hashrate for RX 580 8GB?
my expectation heavy should get higher hashrate than bittubev2 for RX Vega 56.

Driver 18.3.4 and SRB 1.6.4.

RX Vega 56 Samsung cclock 1480 and mclock 950
bittubev2 56/8/2 1610 h/s
heavy 56/8/2 1575 h/s

RX 580 8GB Micron cclock 1250 mclock 2200
bittubev2 54/8/2 1110 h/s
heavy 54/8/2 1125 h/s

Thanks.

[lebuawu2]

Hi guys,

For cryptonight fast what should be the optimal settings for vega 56 and 64?

Double of heavy settings in intensity?

Thanks

CN-Fast should be the same settings with CN-V7.

[zeef]

Hi guys,

For cryptonight fast what should be the optimal settings for vega 56 and 64?

Double of heavy settings in intensity?

Thanks

CN-Fast should be the same settings with CN-V7.

yeah, tested that and that auto too. Its clever this miner