Bitcoin Forum
January 23, 2020, 10:23:15 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 0.19.0.1 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 [171] 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 ... 367 »
  Print  
Author Topic: SRBMiner Cryptonight AMD GPU Miner V1.9.3 - native algo switching  (Read 232529 times)
jsphshi
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1
Merit: 0


View Profile
July 13, 2018, 10:49:44 AM
 #3401

Hello
I have a few rigs & have tried SRB miner for a few days now ,the hashrate is high compared to XMR-STAK & xmring .The only problem is that on the pool side its showing a reduced hashrate of 10-15% .What till be the reason for this ?.
I have used the same port as XMR stak
Thanks
1579774995
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1579774995

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1579774995
Reply with quote  #2

1579774995
Report to moderator
1579774995
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1579774995

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1579774995
Reply with quote  #2

1579774995
Report to moderator
1579774995
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1579774995

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1579774995
Reply with quote  #2

1579774995
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1579774995
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1579774995

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1579774995
Reply with quote  #2

1579774995
Report to moderator
1579774995
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1579774995

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1579774995
Reply with quote  #2

1579774995
Report to moderator
doktor83
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1246
Merit: 611


View Profile WWW
July 13, 2018, 10:58:29 AM
 #3402

Hello
I have a few rigs & have tried SRB miner for a few days now ,the hashrate is high compared to XMR-STAK & xmring .The only problem is that on the pool side its showing a reduced hashrate of 10-15% .What till be the reason for this ?.
I have used the same port as XMR stak
Thanks

You probably got a lot stale shares, download latest 1.6.4 v and use --sendallstales parameter in bat, it will probably increase your effective hashrate

SRBPolaris thread - HERE   |   SRBMiner-CN thread - HERE    |   SRBMiner-MULTI thread - HERE
http://www.srbminer.com
duyquang06
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 155
Merit: 0


View Profile
July 13, 2018, 11:06:04 AM
 #3403

Hello
I have a few rigs & have tried SRB miner for a few days now ,the hashrate is high compared to XMR-STAK & xmring .The only problem is that on the pool side its showing a reduced hashrate of 10-15% .What till be the reason for this ?.
I have used the same port as XMR stak
Thanks

You probably got a lot stale shares, download latest 1.6.4 v and use --sendallstales parameter in bat, it will probably increase your effective hashrate

Doc, is there any quick way to know pool support your --sendallstales command. (U tell in previous post that some pool don't support and may lose hashrate/share, right?, correct me if i wrong).

I will test new ver.
 
ChillyRide
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 22
Merit: 0


View Profile
July 13, 2018, 11:44:01 AM
 #3404

Need some confirmation guys. New AMD drivers 18.7.1. With those one and SBR 1.6.4 I cant see any shaere found for hours with normalV7 algo. On haven works tho. On 18.3.4 and SBR 1.6.4 normalV& works ok. Anyone have problems with no share found and normalV& algo on newest drivers? Im on Vega64. Seems to be no card reboot needed like before.
doktor83
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1246
Merit: 611


View Profile WWW
July 13, 2018, 12:05:43 PM
 #3405

Hello
I have a few rigs & have tried SRB miner for a few days now ,the hashrate is high compared to XMR-STAK & xmring .The only problem is that on the pool side its showing a reduced hashrate of 10-15% .What till be the reason for this ?.
I have used the same port as XMR stak
Thanks

You probably got a lot stale shares, download latest 1.6.4 v and use --sendallstales parameter in bat, it will probably increase your effective hashrate

Doc, is there any quick way to know pool support your --sendallstales command. (U tell in previous post that some pool don't support and may lose hashrate/share, right?, correct me if i wrong).

I will test new ver.
 

If the pool pays for stale shares then you will benefit from using --sendallstales, if it's not accepting stales you will get that stale share rejected. So there is nothing for you to loose.
What can happen is if you are mining on low difficulty and you find a lot of shares / minute, and your pool does not accept stale shares, and a job switch occurs and miner sends all those shares from the previous job, and the pool rejects them, and because you had a lot of rejects in short time, it can ban you for a time. This is the worse that can happen, but on pools that have vardiff set OK, and you find approx 6-10 shares / minute you can only win with this option turned on.

SRBPolaris thread - HERE   |   SRBMiner-CN thread - HERE    |   SRBMiner-MULTI thread - HERE
http://www.srbminer.com
ripcurrent
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 161
Merit: 10


View Profile
July 13, 2018, 01:25:46 PM
 #3406

Anyone Using the miner on a RX580 4gb on the bittubev2. I cant seem to get the miner to run on it. I tried all different Intensity settings.
zeef
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 262
Merit: 0


View Profile
July 13, 2018, 01:36:33 PM
 #3407

Hello
I have a few rigs & have tried SRB miner for a few days now ,the hashrate is high compared to XMR-STAK & xmring .The only problem is that on the pool side its showing a reduced hashrate of 10-15% .What till be the reason for this ?.
I have used the same port as XMR stak
Thanks

You probably got a lot stale shares, download latest 1.6.4 v and use --sendallstales parameter in bat, it will probably increase your effective hashrate

Doc, is there any quick way to know pool support your --sendallstales command. (U tell in previous post that some pool don't support and may lose hashrate/share, right?, correct me if i wrong).

I will test new ver.
 


Thanks

If the pool pays for stale shares then you will benefit from using --sendallstales, if it's not accepting stales you will get that stale share rejected. So there is nothing for you to loose.
What can happen is if you are mining on low difficulty and you find a lot of shares / minute, and your pool does not accept stale shares, and a job switch occurs and miner sends all those shares from the previous job, and the pool rejects them, and because you had a lot of rejects in short time, it can ban you for a time. This is the worse that can happen, but on pools that have vardiff set OK, and you find approx 6-10 shares / minute you can only win with this option turned on.



Hi doktor,

We can see the stale shares in statistics pressing s in your miner right?
UnclWish
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1022
Merit: 252


View Profile
July 13, 2018, 02:53:06 PM
 #3408

I use 1.6.4 with --sendallstales option since 1.6.4 was released with nicehash heavy algo. No one stale share for all this time. It's normal? Recieved speed on nicehash less than speed in miner about 10-11%. It's abnormal I think. I look at period close to 24 hours.

Another one question: installing new drivers needs to rebuild srb kernel files?
doktor83
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1246
Merit: 611


View Profile WWW
July 13, 2018, 03:27:51 PM
 #3409

I use 1.6.4 with --sendallstales option since 1.6.4 was released with nicehash heavy algo. No one stale share for all this time. It's normal? Recieved speed on nicehash less than speed in miner about 10-11%. It's abnormal I think. I look at period close to 24 hours.

Another one question: installing new drivers needs to rebuild srb kernel files?

You can use nicehash+heavy way before 1.6.4, i don't know where do you get this info from. Stale shares are not sent when using nicehash cause nicehash rejects ALL stale shares, so no point in sending them. 10-11% is much i agree.

Don't have to rebuild kernels after changing drivers, miner will work, but i would suggest you to rebuild them to be sure you are totally compatible with the drivers.

SRBPolaris thread - HERE   |   SRBMiner-CN thread - HERE    |   SRBMiner-MULTI thread - HERE
http://www.srbminer.com
doktor83
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1246
Merit: 611


View Profile WWW
July 13, 2018, 03:49:54 PM
 #3410

Hi doktor,

We can see the stale shares in statistics pressing s in your miner right?

yes,
Accepted(Stale)/Total shares: 42(1)/42 (100.0%)

SRBPolaris thread - HERE   |   SRBMiner-CN thread - HERE    |   SRBMiner-MULTI thread - HERE
http://www.srbminer.com
zeef
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 262
Merit: 0


View Profile
July 13, 2018, 03:53:08 PM
 #3411

Hi doktor,

We can see the stale shares in statistics pressing s in your miner right?

yes,
Accepted(Stale)/Total shares: 42(1)/42 (100.0%)

Thanks
UnclWish
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1022
Merit: 252


View Profile
July 13, 2018, 04:00:12 PM
 #3412

I use 1.6.4 with --sendallstales option since 1.6.4 was released with nicehash heavy algo. No one stale share for all this time. It's normal? Recieved speed on nicehash less than speed in miner about 10-11%. It's abnormal I think. I look at period close to 24 hours.

Another one question: installing new drivers needs to rebuild srb kernel files?

You can use nicehash+heavy way before 1.6.4, i don't know where do you get this info from. Stale shares are not sent when using nicehash cause nicehash rejects ALL stale shares, so no point in sending them. 10-11% is much i agree.

Don't have to rebuild kernels after changing drivers, miner will work, but i would suggest you to rebuild them to be sure you are totally compatible with the drivers.
Ok, thanks. I got it.

1.6.4. builds other heavy srb kernels. It have size about 2Mb as for cn-v7. And speed is some lower. If use srb builded 1.6.3 speed good, and size of srb kernel about 4Mb.
doktor83
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1246
Merit: 611


View Profile WWW
July 13, 2018, 04:13:26 PM
 #3413

Ok, thanks. I got it.

1.6.4. builds other heavy srb kernels. It have size about 2Mb as for cn-v7. And speed is some lower. If use srb builded 1.6.3 speed good, and size of srb kernel about 4Mb.

i did not touch cl kernels from 1.6.3 to 1.6.4, so probably you built on one driver , now with another, and maybe the compiler unrolls differently, that would explain the increased size.

SRBPolaris thread - HERE   |   SRBMiner-CN thread - HERE    |   SRBMiner-MULTI thread - HERE
http://www.srbminer.com
livada
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 395
Merit: 0


View Profile WWW
July 13, 2018, 05:13:19 PM
Last edit: July 13, 2018, 06:57:26 PM by livada
 #3414

1.6.2 BC driver vs 1.64 with 18.3.4 driver
HEAVY and TUBE algo

GPU 0-1-4 = vega 56(64bios)samsung (56/8/2)setup
gpu 2 = vega 64 Liquid (60/8/2)setup
With BC driver 1.6.4 have more error
With 18.3.4 gpu go more overclock:)
1.6.4 have more HR
18.3.4 driver not need disable/enable vega , and not need start with 60int first.
but if use v7 algo and back to heavy  HBC memory not work.(need restart)

1.6.2 BC driver- this is maximal setup wtihout error
https://image.prntscr.com/image/14SysMMOQOS7zviWPlF-Yg.jpg

1.6.4. 18.43.4 driver without error
https://image.prntscr.com/image/A3SjEnciQ4C0yPzjnPuWPQ.jpg

we continue the test

This is NITRO+ vega 56 (hynix) stock bios. 1.8.34 driver not need enable/diable and not need first start with 60 int.

setup: 56/8/2.
With BC driver and 1.6.2  6*vega56 have 9000HR on heavya/tubethis is MAX setup without error.
https://image.prntscr.com/image/OZprQNZnRZeaKANVQADGkw.jpg
With 1.8.34 and 1.6.2 6*vega56 have 8250HR on heavya/tube
https://image.prntscr.com/image/nD9l8_AMTeqwAO1PQlHFGA.jpg
With 1.8.34 and 1.6.4 6*vega56 have 9150HR on heavya/tube
https://image.prntscr.com/image/Q0uhuB_qR5iIgC1oZW2v_Q.jpg
With 1.8.34 and 1.6.4 6*vega56 have 9230HR on heavya/tube MAX setup without error
https://image.prntscr.com/image/_5i2Iwj5SxmhLrd4gsN3fQ.jpg

and i try castXMR 1.2.5 with 1.8.34 driver. Setup is identical . i try int 7-8-9-19 but 8 is best for nitro vega 64.
https://image.prntscr.com/image/BTdIslYRQwqhOQVFwf9mwQ.jpg
livada
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 395
Merit: 0


View Profile WWW
July 13, 2018, 05:21:47 PM
 #3415

Hi doktor,

We can see the stale shares in statistics pressing s in your miner right?

yes,
Accepted(Stale)/Total shares: 42(1)/42 (100.0%)

Smiley yes. cryptoknight.cc accept stale shares Smiley

https://image.prntscr.com/image/eXbF2LQYQ3izJv78mZsUgw.jpg
Art Gar
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 20
Merit: 0


View Profile
July 13, 2018, 05:54:14 PM
 #3416

DAMN Wink
saw the post of new version..downloaded from first page = version 1.6.3 = to fast action from me
not it works...THX

You probably downloaded in those few minutes between when i uploaded it and updated the post here Cheesy

What is Latency in json? Is it ping?
UnclWish
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1022
Merit: 252


View Profile
July 14, 2018, 12:39:12 AM
 #3417

Ok, thanks. I got it.

1.6.4. builds other heavy srb kernels. It have size about 2Mb as for cn-v7. And speed is some lower. If use srb builded 1.6.3 speed good, and size of srb kernel about 4Mb.

i did not touch cl kernels from 1.6.3 to 1.6.4, so probably you built on one driver , now with another, and maybe the compiler unrolls differently, that would explain the increased size.
Size decreases. On 1.6.4 kernels builded with 18.7.1 are buggy. Speed is low, many compute errors. Now use 1.6.4 with srb kernels builded by 1.6.3 on 18.6 drivers...
chris718
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 9
Merit: 0


View Profile
July 14, 2018, 01:11:18 AM
 #3418

can SRBMiner support HYCON? a modified V7 algo, https://github.com/Team-Hycon,thanks!
plz support HYCON mining,THX!
Sharpeich
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 62
Merit: 0


View Profile
July 14, 2018, 05:46:23 AM
 #3419

can SRBMiner support HYCON? a modified V7 algo, https://github.com/Team-Hycon,thanks!
plz support HYCON mining,THX!

where did you see a word about minerable HYCON ?
doktor83
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1246
Merit: 611


View Profile WWW
July 14, 2018, 05:49:49 AM
 #3420

Ok, thanks. I got it.

1.6.4. builds other heavy srb kernels. It have size about 2Mb as for cn-v7. And speed is some lower. If use srb builded 1.6.3 speed good, and size of srb kernel about 4Mb.

i did not touch cl kernels from 1.6.3 to 1.6.4, so probably you built on one driver , now with another, and maybe the compiler unrolls differently, that would explain the increased size.
Size decreases. On 1.6.4 kernels builded with 18.7.1 are buggy. Speed is low, many compute errors. Now use 1.6.4 with srb kernels builded by 1.6.3 on 18.6 drivers...

If you take 1.6.4 and install 18.6.1 and let the miner build the binaries it would work good. The problem here is the 18.7.1 drivers.

SRBPolaris thread - HERE   |   SRBMiner-CN thread - HERE    |   SRBMiner-MULTI thread - HERE
http://www.srbminer.com
Pages: « 1 ... 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 [171] 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 ... 367 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!