Bitcoin Forum
January 22, 2022, 03:04:59 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 22.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 [170] 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 ... 365 »
  Print  
Author Topic: SRBMiner Cryptonight AMD GPU Miner V1.9.3 - native algo switching  (Read 235792 times)
doktor83
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1890
Merit: 621


View Profile WWW
July 12, 2018, 11:05:26 AM
 #3381

Log File:
[2018-07-12 12:54:55] Miner version: 1.6.3
[2018-07-12 12:54:55] Windows version: 10.0 build 17134
[2018-07-12 12:54:55] Video driver version: 24.20.11021.1000
[2018-07-12 12:54:55] config_parse: Invalid config file. Missing value is "cryptonight_type"

config.txt
{
}

start.bat
setx GPU_FORCE_64BIT_PTR 1
setx GPU_MAX_HEAP_SIZE 100
setx GPU_MAX_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1
setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
setx GPU_MAX_SINGLE_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
@echo off


SRBMiner-CN.exe --ccryptonighttype stellitev4 --cgpuid 0,1 --cgpuintensity 120,120 --cgputhreads 2,2 --cgpuworksize 16,16 --cpool stellite.ingest.cryptoknight.cc:16222 --cwallet xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.50000 --cpassword x --logfile 1.txt


..... :/

Do you see now what's wrong? I bolded it for you Smiley

SRBMiner-MULTI thread - HERE
http://www.srbminer.com
1642863899
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1642863899

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1642863899
Reply with quote  #2

1642863899
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1642863899
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1642863899

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1642863899
Reply with quote  #2

1642863899
Report to moderator
1642863899
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1642863899

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1642863899
Reply with quote  #2

1642863899
Report to moderator
doktor83
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1890
Merit: 621


View Profile WWW
July 12, 2018, 11:07:06 AM
 #3382

guys, so sorry i need to ask some silly question,

i use rx 570 4 gpu + srbminer + alloy coin

and already set double_threads: true.

but in srb miner only detect 4 gpu (previously on xmr stak total become 8 gpu)
is it correct like that in srbminer only 4 gpu in double_threads??

i got around 1700 H/s.
or it should be more than that?

or did i miss some config setting?

please advice.
thanks in advance guys!

https://imgur.com/a/eeCAA84



That is normal because it shows you the number of GPU's, not threads.
When miner starts you can see on top of window something like :

GPU0: Radeon RX Vega [gfx900] [8176 MB][Intensity 120.0][W: 8][T: 2][K: 1][BUS: 1]

The bolded part means : Threads: 2, so its all ok

SRBMiner-MULTI thread - HERE
http://www.srbminer.com
nordmann666
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 345
Merit: 16


View Profile
July 12, 2018, 11:11:12 AM
 #3383

Log File:
[2018-07-12 12:54:55] Miner version: 1.6.3
[2018-07-12 12:54:55] Windows version: 10.0 build 17134
[2018-07-12 12:54:55] Video driver version: 24.20.11021.1000
[2018-07-12 12:54:55] config_parse: Invalid config file. Missing value is "cryptonight_type"

config.txt
{
}

start.bat
setx GPU_FORCE_64BIT_PTR 1
setx GPU_MAX_HEAP_SIZE 100
setx GPU_MAX_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1
setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
setx GPU_MAX_SINGLE_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
@echo off


SRBMiner-CN.exe --ccryptonighttype stellitev4 --cgpuid 0,1 --cgpuintensity 120,120 --cgputhreads 2,2 --cgpuworksize 16,16 --cpool stellite.ingest.cryptoknight.cc:16222 --cwallet xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.50000 --cpassword x --logfile 1.txt


..... :/

Do you see now what's wrong? I bolded it for you Smiley

DAMN Wink
saw the post of new version..downloaded from first page = version 1.6.3 = to fast action from me
not now it works...THX
doktor83
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1890
Merit: 621


View Profile WWW
July 12, 2018, 11:12:23 AM
 #3384

DAMN Wink
saw the post of new version..downloaded from first page = version 1.6.3 = to fast action from me
not it works...THX

You probably downloaded in those few minutes between when i uploaded it and updated the post here Cheesy

SRBMiner-MULTI thread - HERE
http://www.srbminer.com
Gulftown
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1
Merit: 0


View Profile
July 12, 2018, 11:46:41 AM
 #3385

I have problem with latest version. V1.5.6 works well with 7970, 7950 and Vega 56, but Vega gives me ~1300Hs.

With V1.6.4 i got error.
mokrejbandita
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 24
Merit: 0


View Profile
July 12, 2018, 12:35:09 PM
 #3386

Hello there,
guys please can you share your hashrates on bittubev2 and with what intensity?

Here is mine:

vega 56 - int 55 - ~ 1300 H/s
rx570 4gb - int 29 ~ 620 H/s
rx480 4gb - int 29 ~ 620 H/s
rx480 8gb - int 41 ~ 850 H/s
rx580 4gb - int 29 ~ 630 H/s

I am running with automatic intensity.
Thank you.
doktor83
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1890
Merit: 621


View Profile WWW
July 12, 2018, 01:55:17 PM
 #3387

@doktor,

Is there any downside to killing the srb-miner executable using taskkill /f (it seems to not support gracefull exit using only taskkill without the force option)... What exactly is it doing when you close srb normally, and is it important??


Nope, no downsides, except it won't cleanup some leftovers, but who cares, the OS will  Grin

SRBMiner-MULTI thread - HERE
http://www.srbminer.com
DeshaCAM
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 10
Merit: 0


View Profile
July 12, 2018, 07:45:04 PM
 #3388

bittubev2

RX 580 nitro+ 8G (samsung)  cc/mc 1300/2050

int 54 ~ 1130 H/s
livada
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 416
Merit: 0


View Profile WWW
July 12, 2018, 11:45:08 PM
Last edit: July 13, 2018, 07:55:10 AM by livada
 #3389

1.6.2 BC driver vs 1.64 with 18.3.4 driver
HEAVY and TUBE algo

GPU 0-1-4 = vega 56(64bios)samsung (56/8/2)setup
gpu 2 = vega 64 Liquid (60/8/2)setup
With BC driver 1.6.4 have more error
With 18.3.4 gpu go more overclock:)
1.6.4 have more HR
18.3.4 driver not need disable/enable vega , and not need start with 60int first.
but if use v7 algo and back to heavy  HBC memory not work.(need restart)

1.6.2 BC driver- this is maximal setup wtihout error
https://image.prntscr.com/image/14SysMMOQOS7zviWPlF-Yg.jpg

1.6.4. 18.43.4 driver without error
https://image.prntscr.com/image/A3SjEnciQ4C0yPzjnPuWPQ.jpg
jsphshi
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1
Merit: 0


View Profile
July 13, 2018, 10:49:44 AM
 #3390

Hello
I have a few rigs & have tried SRB miner for a few days now ,the hashrate is high compared to XMR-STAK & xmring .The only problem is that on the pool side its showing a reduced hashrate of 10-15% .What till be the reason for this ?.
I have used the same port as XMR stak
Thanks
doktor83
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1890
Merit: 621


View Profile WWW
July 13, 2018, 10:58:29 AM
 #3391

Hello
I have a few rigs & have tried SRB miner for a few days now ,the hashrate is high compared to XMR-STAK & xmring .The only problem is that on the pool side its showing a reduced hashrate of 10-15% .What till be the reason for this ?.
I have used the same port as XMR stak
Thanks

You probably got a lot stale shares, download latest 1.6.4 v and use --sendallstales parameter in bat, it will probably increase your effective hashrate

SRBMiner-MULTI thread - HERE
http://www.srbminer.com
duyquang06
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 154
Merit: 0


View Profile
July 13, 2018, 11:06:04 AM
 #3392

Hello
I have a few rigs & have tried SRB miner for a few days now ,the hashrate is high compared to XMR-STAK & xmring .The only problem is that on the pool side its showing a reduced hashrate of 10-15% .What till be the reason for this ?.
I have used the same port as XMR stak
Thanks

You probably got a lot stale shares, download latest 1.6.4 v and use --sendallstales parameter in bat, it will probably increase your effective hashrate

Doc, is there any quick way to know pool support your --sendallstales command. (U tell in previous post that some pool don't support and may lose hashrate/share, right?, correct me if i wrong).

I will test new ver.
 
ChillyRide
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 22
Merit: 0


View Profile
July 13, 2018, 11:44:01 AM
 #3393

Need some confirmation guys. New AMD drivers 18.7.1. With those one and SBR 1.6.4 I cant see any shaere found for hours with normalV7 algo. On haven works tho. On 18.3.4 and SBR 1.6.4 normalV& works ok. Anyone have problems with no share found and normalV& algo on newest drivers? Im on Vega64. Seems to be no card reboot needed like before.
doktor83
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1890
Merit: 621


View Profile WWW
July 13, 2018, 12:05:43 PM
 #3394

Hello
I have a few rigs & have tried SRB miner for a few days now ,the hashrate is high compared to XMR-STAK & xmring .The only problem is that on the pool side its showing a reduced hashrate of 10-15% .What till be the reason for this ?.
I have used the same port as XMR stak
Thanks

You probably got a lot stale shares, download latest 1.6.4 v and use --sendallstales parameter in bat, it will probably increase your effective hashrate

Doc, is there any quick way to know pool support your --sendallstales command. (U tell in previous post that some pool don't support and may lose hashrate/share, right?, correct me if i wrong).

I will test new ver.
 

If the pool pays for stale shares then you will benefit from using --sendallstales, if it's not accepting stales you will get that stale share rejected. So there is nothing for you to loose.
What can happen is if you are mining on low difficulty and you find a lot of shares / minute, and your pool does not accept stale shares, and a job switch occurs and miner sends all those shares from the previous job, and the pool rejects them, and because you had a lot of rejects in short time, it can ban you for a time. This is the worse that can happen, but on pools that have vardiff set OK, and you find approx 6-10 shares / minute you can only win with this option turned on.

SRBMiner-MULTI thread - HERE
http://www.srbminer.com
ripcurrent
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 160
Merit: 10


View Profile
July 13, 2018, 01:25:46 PM
 #3395

Anyone Using the miner on a RX580 4gb on the bittubev2. I cant seem to get the miner to run on it. I tried all different Intensity settings.
zeef
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 295
Merit: 0


View Profile
July 13, 2018, 01:36:33 PM
 #3396

Hello
I have a few rigs & have tried SRB miner for a few days now ,the hashrate is high compared to XMR-STAK & xmring .The only problem is that on the pool side its showing a reduced hashrate of 10-15% .What till be the reason for this ?.
I have used the same port as XMR stak
Thanks

You probably got a lot stale shares, download latest 1.6.4 v and use --sendallstales parameter in bat, it will probably increase your effective hashrate

Doc, is there any quick way to know pool support your --sendallstales command. (U tell in previous post that some pool don't support and may lose hashrate/share, right?, correct me if i wrong).

I will test new ver.
 


Thanks

If the pool pays for stale shares then you will benefit from using --sendallstales, if it's not accepting stales you will get that stale share rejected. So there is nothing for you to loose.
What can happen is if you are mining on low difficulty and you find a lot of shares / minute, and your pool does not accept stale shares, and a job switch occurs and miner sends all those shares from the previous job, and the pool rejects them, and because you had a lot of rejects in short time, it can ban you for a time. This is the worse that can happen, but on pools that have vardiff set OK, and you find approx 6-10 shares / minute you can only win with this option turned on.



Hi doktor,

We can see the stale shares in statistics pressing s in your miner right?
UnclWish
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1470
Merit: 253


View Profile
July 13, 2018, 02:53:06 PM
 #3397

I use 1.6.4 with --sendallstales option since 1.6.4 was released with nicehash heavy algo. No one stale share for all this time. It's normal? Recieved speed on nicehash less than speed in miner about 10-11%. It's abnormal I think. I look at period close to 24 hours.

Another one question: installing new drivers needs to rebuild srb kernel files?
doktor83
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1890
Merit: 621


View Profile WWW
July 13, 2018, 03:27:51 PM
 #3398

I use 1.6.4 with --sendallstales option since 1.6.4 was released with nicehash heavy algo. No one stale share for all this time. It's normal? Recieved speed on nicehash less than speed in miner about 10-11%. It's abnormal I think. I look at period close to 24 hours.

Another one question: installing new drivers needs to rebuild srb kernel files?

You can use nicehash+heavy way before 1.6.4, i don't know where do you get this info from. Stale shares are not sent when using nicehash cause nicehash rejects ALL stale shares, so no point in sending them. 10-11% is much i agree.

Don't have to rebuild kernels after changing drivers, miner will work, but i would suggest you to rebuild them to be sure you are totally compatible with the drivers.

SRBMiner-MULTI thread - HERE
http://www.srbminer.com
doktor83
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1890
Merit: 621


View Profile WWW
July 13, 2018, 03:49:54 PM
 #3399

Hi doktor,

We can see the stale shares in statistics pressing s in your miner right?

yes,
Accepted(Stale)/Total shares: 42(1)/42 (100.0%)

SRBMiner-MULTI thread - HERE
http://www.srbminer.com
zeef
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 295
Merit: 0


View Profile
July 13, 2018, 03:53:08 PM
 #3400

Hi doktor,

We can see the stale shares in statistics pressing s in your miner right?

yes,
Accepted(Stale)/Total shares: 42(1)/42 (100.0%)

Thanks
Pages: « 1 ... 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 [170] 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 ... 365 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!