SRBMiner Cryptonight AMD GPU Miner V1.9.3 - native algo switching

[ViWe]

Does anyone can use high intensiity 100-110+ on 1.6.1 CN-v7 algo without speed drops?

No one tries CN-v7 on 1.6.1. on 8Gb cards? With intensity higher 100-100?

I use 118 intensity dual threads on 8gb cards CN-V7

RX580 8gb
Normal-v7: double threads, intensity 80, 1060+h/s
Lite-v: double threads, intensity 153, 2230+h/s
https://imgur.com/a/OoWoAEy

[1642506235]

1642506235

[dingdongtobias]

Does anyone can use high intensiity 100-110+ on 1.6.1 CN-v7 algo without speed drops?

No one tries CN-v7 on 1.6.1. on 8Gb cards? With intensity higher 100-100?

I use 118 intensity dual threads on 8gb cards CN-V7

how to hell can you go 118 and dual threads??

[heavyarms1912]

Does anyone can use high intensiity 100-110+ on 1.6.1 CN-v7 algo without speed drops?

No one tries CN-v7 on 1.6.1. on 8Gb cards? With intensity higher 100-100?

I use 118 intensity dual threads on 8gb cards CN-V7

how to hell can you go 118 and dual threads??

why not? here's a 120 hashing at 1050.  You can even go higher than 120.

[roma__11]

Wild Keccak then the most effective algorithm, on it vega gets from 0,00050000 BTC now, can learn about possibly create a normal miner?

[Ballscack]

Wild Keccak then the most effective algorithm, on it vega gets from 0,00050000 BTC now, can learn about possibly create a normal miner?

what coin is so profitable? and what software u use for vege? i get 2150hs v7 monero on vega 64 @ 1502 core 1100 mem low power mod

i get best results at with BXB-miner maby we can use it to optimize sbr miner?

https://ibb.co/fqmpc8

[roma__11]

Wild Keccak then the most effective algorithm, on it vega gets from 0,00050000 BTC now, can learn about possibly create a normal miner?

what coin is so profitable? and what software u use for vege? i get 2150hs v7 monero on vega 64 @ 1502 core 1100 mem low power mod
i get best results at with BXB-miner maby we can use it to optimize sbr miner?
https://ibb.co/fqmpc8

I know Purk,BBR ~ 0.00002000 BTC, Vega 6500-6900 Kh/c = 31 Purk = 0.00062000 BTC and Vega64 = 2400 CNv7 1100 mem = Maximum Graft 0.00037200. (It's right now)
Any Miner Wild Keccak which is now, very buggy, so I'll ask again, maybe make a good miner?

[Ballscack]

Wild Keccak then the most effective algorithm, on it vega gets from 0,00050000 BTC now, can learn about possibly create a normal miner?

what coin is so profitable? and what software u use for vege? i get 2150hs v7 monero on vega 64 @ 1502 core 1100 mem low power mod
i get best results at with BXB-miner maby we can use it to optimize sbr miner?
https://ibb.co/fqmpc8

I know Purk,BBR ~ 0.00002000 BTC, Vega 6500-6900 Kh/c = 31 Purk = 0.00062000 BTC and Vega64 = 2400 CNv7 1100 mem = Maximum Graft 0.00037200. (It's right now)
Any Miner Wild Keccak which is now, very buggy, so I'll ask again, maybe make a good miner?

2400 CNv7 how?? that is not posible on vega 64 only on the 16gb fe one

6x vega i get 35mh on keccak so bad...

[roma__11]

Wild Keccak then the most effective algorithm, on it vega gets from 0,00050000 BTC now, can learn about possibly create a normal miner?

what coin is so profitable? and what software u use for vege? i get 2150hs v7 monero on vega 64 @ 1502 core 1100 mem low power mod
i get best results at with BXB-miner maby we can use it to optimize sbr miner?
https://ibb.co/fqmpc8

I know Purk,BBR ~ 0.00002000 BTC, Vega 6500-6900 Kh/c = 31 Purk = 0.00062000 BTC and Vega64 = 2400 CNv7 1100 mem = Maximum Graft 0.00037200. (It's right now)
Any Miner Wild Keccak which is now, very buggy, so I'll ask again, maybe make a good miner?

2400 CNv7 how?? that is not posible on vega 64 only on the 16gb fe one

6x vega i get 35mh on keccak so bad...

Leave CNv7 Happens to 2900 H/s...
Tell me how  "Wild Keccak" gives 35 Mh/s I have more 6,5-6,9 Mh/s It was never..... (VEGA64 LIQUID)

[Ballscack]

Wild Keccak then the most effective algorithm, on it vega gets from 0,00050000 BTC now, can learn about possibly create a normal miner?

what coin is so profitable? and what software u use for vege? i get 2150hs v7 monero on vega 64 @ 1502 core 1100 mem low power mod
i get best results at with BXB-miner maby we can use it to optimize sbr miner?
https://ibb.co/fqmpc8

I know Purk,BBR ~ 0.00002000 BTC, Vega 6500-6900 Kh/c = 31 Purk = 0.00062000 BTC and Vega64 = 2400 CNv7 1100 mem = Maximum Graft 0.00037200. (It's right now)
Any Miner Wild Keccak which is now, very buggy, so I'll ask again, maybe make a good miner?

2400 CNv7 how?? that is not posible on vega 64 only on the 16gb fe one

6x vega i get 35mh on keccak so bad...

Leave CNv7 Happens to 2900 H/s...
Tell me how  "Wild Keccak" gives 35 Mh/s I have more 6,5-6,9 Mh/s It was never.....

2400cnv7 = imposible lol

anyways best v7 normal setting for vega 64 is 1502 core 1100 mem for me

[roma__11]

Stok Vega64 Liguid 1750/1200 core 1100/1200 mem.
Listen, I'm not working for CNv7.
Now I'm only interested in learning about the possibility of creating a normal miner for algo "Wild Keccak", and that's all !!!!

[UnclWish]

Does anyone can use high intensiity 100-110+ on 1.6.1 CN-v7 algo without speed drops?

No one tries CN-v7 on 1.6.1. on 8Gb cards? With intensity higher 100-110?

I use 118 intensity dual threads on 8gb cards CN-V7

I'm talking about 1.6.1 version. You post screen from 1.6.0. On 1.6.0 I can use 110+ intensity with 2 threds without problems too. But on 1.6.1 I have speed drops to 0 if intensity higher 99.

[lebuawu2]

Wild Keccak then the most effective algorithm, on it vega gets from 0,00050000 BTC now, can learn about possibly create a normal miner?

what coin is so profitable? and what software u use for vege? i get 2150hs v7 monero on vega 64 @ 1502 core 1100 mem low power mod
i get best results at with BXB-miner maby we can use it to optimize sbr miner?

I know Purk,BBR ~ 0.00002000 BTC, Vega 6500-6900 Kh/c = 31 Purk = 0.00062000 BTC and Vega64 = 2400 CNv7 1100 mem = Maximum Graft 0.00037200. (It's right now)
Any Miner Wild Keccak which is now, very buggy, so I'll ask again, maybe make a good miner?

2400 CNv7 how?? that is not posible on vega 64 only on the 16gb fe one

6x vega i get 35mh on keccak so bad...

Leave CNv7 Happens to 2900 H/s...
Tell me how  "Wild Keccak" gives 35 Mh/s I have more 6,5-6,9 Mh/s It was never..... (VEGA64 LIQUID)

"Keccak" and "Wild Keccak" is different algorithm, most profitable right now is "Wild Keccak" not "Keccak".

[REF Crypto]

I need to fix graft or add option to choose cryptonight / cryptonight v7 manually...please!

[lebuawu2]

Does anyone can use high intensiity 100-110+ on 1.6.1 CN-v7 algo without speed drops?

No one tries CN-v7 on 1.6.1. on 8Gb cards? With intensity higher 100-110?

I use 118 intensity dual threads on 8gb cards CN-V7

I'm talking about 1.6.1 version. You post screen from 1.6.0. On 1.6.0 I can use 110+ intensity with 2 threds without problems too. But on 1.6.1 I have speed drops to 0 if intensity higher 99.

I also feel there is some changes for intensity in CN-V7, normally with previous version my intensity 72 got stable hash rate, now with 1.6.1 got up and down hash rate.

[UnclWish]

Does anyone can use high intensiity 100-110+ on 1.6.1 CN-v7 algo without speed drops?

No one tries CN-v7 on 1.6.1. on 8Gb cards? With intensity higher 100-110?

I use 118 intensity dual threads on 8gb cards CN-V7

I'm talking about 1.6.1 version. You post screen from 1.6.0. On 1.6.0 I can use 110+ intensity with 2 threds without problems too. But on 1.6.1 I have speed drops to 0 if intensity higher 99.

I also feel there is some changes for intensity in CN-V7, normally with previous version my intensity 72 got stable hash rate, now with 1.6.1 got up and down hash rate.

Intensity 72 in 1.6.1 is especcial!!! It got speed to jump down to 875 and up to 1250. But average is still 925. On 1.6.0 with intensity 108 I has 985 on this card. But on 1.6.1 with intensity 108 I have speed 980 and drops to 0 so average speed is 600-700...

[Sgsg666]

Wild Keccak then the most effective algorithm, on it vega gets from 0,00050000 BTC now, can learn about possibly create a normal miner?

Ive read that Wild keccak uses less electricity for mining compared to eth? Can you post pics of your miner for vegas/rx's?

[heavyarms1912]

Does anyone can use high intensiity 100-110+ on 1.6.1 CN-v7 algo without speed drops?

No one tries CN-v7 on 1.6.1. on 8Gb cards? With intensity higher 100-110?

I use 118 intensity dual threads on 8gb cards CN-V7

I'm talking about 1.6.1 version. You post screen from 1.6.0. On 1.6.0 I can use 110+ intensity with 2 threds without problems too. But on 1.6.1 I have speed drops to 0 if intensity higher 99.

I also feel there is some changes for intensity in CN-V7, normally with previous version my intensity 72 got stable hash rate, now with 1.6.1 got up and down hash rate.

Intensity 72 in 1.6.1 is especcial!!! It got speed to jump down to 875 and up to 1250. But average is still 925. On 1.6.0 with intensity 108 I has 985 on this card. But on 1.6.1 with intensity 108 I have speed 980 and drops to 0 so average speed is 600-700...

this behavior exists for 8gb cards on Heavy but I have not encountered these fluctuations on CN-V7.

[roma__11]

Wild Keccak then the most effective algorithm, on it vega gets from 0,00050000 BTC now, can learn about possibly create a normal miner?

Ive read that Wild keccak uses less electricity for mining compared to eth? Can you post pics of your miner for vegas/rx's?

miner https://github.com/purkproject/cpuminer-multi-opencl/releases
There are 4 more, but they are older and buggy.
This is how the work begins:
https://thumb.ibb.co/k9SRQT/img_2018_06_24_23_07_18.png
https://thumb.ibb.co/d4dNzo/img_2018_06_24_23_08_06.png
here already works 2 instead of 4:
https://thumb.ibb.co/eRCXzo/img_2018_06_24_23_20_13.png
At the same time on a pool, a hasht only up to 16 Mh/s reaches instead of 26 Mh/s ...
Config:

@echo off
chcp 1251
c:
cd C:\MINING\MINING
OverDriveNtool -r01 -p01VEGA64S -r02 -p02VEGA64S -r03 -p03VEGA64S -r04 -p04VEGA64S -r05 -p05VEGA64S -r06 -p06VEGA64S -r07 -p07VEGA64S -r08 -p08VEGA64S -r09 -p09VEGA64S -r10 -p10VEGA64S -r11 -p11VEGA64S -r12 -p12VEGA64S
timeout /t 1
c:
cd C:\MINING\MINING\WILD_KECCAK
minerd -a wildkeccak_ocl --intensity=22 --device=1 -t 4 -o stratum+tcp://pool.purkproject.com:5555 -u PK2QDAdtFQ7NdTekcAthR8izW7MSjU9hTf7weZNqauQs72WaKad11eg5s5oxVZ83vwdgaAeujM39QLf KdLKsjFsh2exKmr8W1 -p x -k http://pool.purkproject.com/scratchpad.bin -l scratchpad.bin

https://thumb.ibb.co/eP1Zeo/img_2018_06_24_23_44_50.png
VEGA64 LIQUID
pool:
https://pool.purkproject.com/#
https://purk.fairpool.xyz

Ends with work in zero or cards one after another fall off, completely different times, people do reboots and more all sorts of crutches, but this turns prey into hell, lost profitability and everything, interest disappears ......

[doktor83]

Does anyone can use high intensiity 100-110+ on 1.6.1 CN-v7 algo without speed drops?

No one tries CN-v7 on 1.6.1. on 8Gb cards? With intensity higher 100-110?

I use 118 intensity dual threads on 8gb cards CN-V7

I'm talking about 1.6.1 version. You post screen from 1.6.0. On 1.6.0 I can use 110+ intensity with 2 threds without problems too. But on 1.6.1 I have speed drops to 0 if intensity higher 99.

I also feel there is some changes for intensity in CN-V7, normally with previous version my intensity 72 got stable hash rate, now with 1.6.1 got up and down hash rate.

Intensity 72 in 1.6.1 is especcial!!! It got speed to jump down to 875 and up to 1250. But average is still 925. On 1.6.0 with intensity 108 I has 985 on this card. But on 1.6.1 with intensity 108 I have speed 980 and drops to 0 so average speed is 600-700...

I never could go intensity 110 and 2 threads (that would mean you are using around 7GB vram). I even cant go over 65 with 2 threads cause video driver hangs instantly (blockchain drivers). So i am curious which drivers, clocks and straps are you guys using.
I have about 12x580 8g and a few more 570 8g, 470 8g cards and none of them does this crazy hash jumping you described in 1.6.1. So i really don't know what to think.

[UnclWish]

Does anyone can use high intensiity 100-110+ on 1.6.1 CN-v7 algo without speed drops?

No one tries CN-v7 on 1.6.1. on 8Gb cards? With intensity higher 100-110?

I use 118 intensity dual threads on 8gb cards CN-V7

I'm talking about 1.6.1 version. You post screen from 1.6.0. On 1.6.0 I can use 110+ intensity with 2 threds without problems too. But on 1.6.1 I have speed drops to 0 if intensity higher 99.

I also feel there is some changes for intensity in CN-V7, normally with previous version my intensity 72 got stable hash rate, now with 1.6.1 got up and down hash rate.

Intensity 72 in 1.6.1 is especcial!!! It got speed to jump down to 875 and up to 1250. But average is still 925. On 1.6.0 with intensity 108 I has 985 on this card. But on 1.6.1 with intensity 108 I have speed 980 and drops to 0 so average speed is 600-700...

I never could go intensity 110 and 2 threads (that would mean you are using around 7GB vram). I even cant go over 65 with 2 threads cause video driver hangs instantly (blockchain drivers). So i am curious which drivers, clocks and straps are you guys using.
I have about 12x580 8g and a few more 570 8g, 470 8g cards and none of them does this crazy hash jumping you described in 1.6.1. So i really don't know what to think.

What's the problem to use about 7Gb vram? I used 116-117 intensity on 1.6.0 version with 2 threads on RX 580 8Gb CN-v7 algo. This used 7.3Gb vram and give me about 1kh/s speed without drops and serious jumps. I can't get this speed with any other intensity...
I use latest AMD drivers 18.6.1, all works normal on 18.5.2.
On 1.6.1 intensity higher 100 causes speed jumps from 0 to 980. Other intensities on 1.6.1 (54,56,72,80,90,99) give for my card max 965 h/s.