roma__11
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 115
Merit: 0
|
 |
June 25, 2018, 08:16:44 PM |
|
Wild Keccak then the most effective algorithm, on it vega gets from 0,00050000 BTC now, can learn about possibly create a normal miner?
what coin is so profitable? and what software u use for vege? i get 2150hs v7 monero on vega 64 @ 1502 core 1100 mem low power mod i get best results at with BXB-miner maby we can use it to optimize sbr miner? https://ibb.co/fqmpc8I know Purk,BBR ~ 0.00002000 BTC, Vega 6500-6900 Kh/c = 31 Purk = 0.00062000 BTC and Vega64 = 2400 CNv7 1100 mem = Maximum Graft 0.00037200. (It's right now) Any Miner Wild Keccak which is now, very buggy, so I'll ask again, maybe make a good miner? 2400 CNv7  how?? that is not posible on vega 64 only on the 16gb fe one 6x vega i get 35mh on keccak so bad... Leave CNv7 Happens to 2900 H/s... Tell me how "Wild Keccak" gives 35 Mh/s I have more 6,5-6,9 Mh/s It was never..... (VEGA64 LIQUID)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Even in the event that an attacker gains more than 50% of the network's
computational power, only transactions sent by the attacker could be
reversed or double-spent. The network would not be destroyed.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
Ballscack
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 37
Merit: 0
|
 |
June 25, 2018, 08:20:18 PM |
|
Wild Keccak then the most effective algorithm, on it vega gets from 0,00050000 BTC now, can learn about possibly create a normal miner?
what coin is so profitable? and what software u use for vege? i get 2150hs v7 monero on vega 64 @ 1502 core 1100 mem low power mod i get best results at with BXB-miner maby we can use it to optimize sbr miner? https://ibb.co/fqmpc8I know Purk,BBR ~ 0.00002000 BTC, Vega 6500-6900 Kh/c = 31 Purk = 0.00062000 BTC and Vega64 = 2400 CNv7 1100 mem = Maximum Graft 0.00037200. (It's right now) Any Miner Wild Keccak which is now, very buggy, so I'll ask again, maybe make a good miner? 2400 CNv7  how?? that is not posible on vega 64 only on the 16gb fe one 6x vega i get 35mh on keccak so bad... Leave CNv7 Happens to 2900 H/s... Tell me how "Wild Keccak" gives 35 Mh/s I have more 6,5-6,9 Mh/s It was never..... 2400cnv7 = imposible lol anyways best v7 normal setting for vega 64 is 1502 core 1100 mem for me
|
|
|
|
roma__11
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 115
Merit: 0
|
 |
June 25, 2018, 08:27:38 PM |
|
Stok Vega64 Liguid 1750/1200 core 1100/1200 mem. Listen, I'm not working for CNv7. Now I'm only interested in learning about the possibility of creating a normal miner for algo "Wild Keccak", and that's all !!!!
|
|
|
|
UnclWish
|
 |
June 25, 2018, 10:25:05 PM |
|
Does anyone can use high intensiity 100-110+ on 1.6.1 CN-v7 algo without speed drops?
No one tries CN-v7 on 1.6.1. on 8Gb cards? With intensity higher 100-110? I use 118 intensity dual threads on 8gb cards CN-V7 I'm talking about 1.6.1 version. You post screen from 1.6.0. On 1.6.0 I can use 110+ intensity with 2 threds without problems too. But on 1.6.1 I have speed drops to 0 if intensity higher 99.
|
|
|
|
lebuawu2
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 176
Merit: 2
|
 |
June 25, 2018, 11:47:38 PM |
|
Wild Keccak then the most effective algorithm, on it vega gets from 0,00050000 BTC now, can learn about possibly create a normal miner?
what coin is so profitable? and what software u use for vege? i get 2150hs v7 monero on vega 64 @ 1502 core 1100 mem low power mod i get best results at with BXB-miner maby we can use it to optimize sbr miner?  I know Purk,BBR ~ 0.00002000 BTC, Vega 6500-6900 Kh/c = 31 Purk = 0.00062000 BTC and Vega64 = 2400 CNv7 1100 mem = Maximum Graft 0.00037200. (It's right now) Any Miner Wild Keccak which is now, very buggy, so I'll ask again, maybe make a good miner? 2400 CNv7  how?? that is not posible on vega 64 only on the 16gb fe one 6x vega i get 35mh on keccak so bad... Leave CNv7 Happens to 2900 H/s... Tell me how "Wild Keccak" gives 35 Mh/s I have more 6,5-6,9 Mh/s It was never..... (VEGA64 LIQUID) "Keccak" and "Wild Keccak" is different algorithm, most profitable right now is "Wild Keccak" not "Keccak".
|
|
|
|
REF Crypto
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 40
Merit: 0
|
 |
June 26, 2018, 01:55:40 AM |
|
I need to fix graft or add option to choose cryptonight / cryptonight v7 manually...please!
|
|
|
|
lebuawu2
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 176
Merit: 2
|
 |
June 26, 2018, 08:59:53 AM |
|
Does anyone can use high intensiity 100-110+ on 1.6.1 CN-v7 algo without speed drops?
No one tries CN-v7 on 1.6.1. on 8Gb cards? With intensity higher 100-110? I use 118 intensity dual threads on 8gb cards CN-V7 I'm talking about 1.6.1 version. You post screen from 1.6.0. On 1.6.0 I can use 110+ intensity with 2 threds without problems too. But on 1.6.1 I have speed drops to 0 if intensity higher 99. I also feel there is some changes for intensity in CN-V7, normally with previous version my intensity 72 got stable hash rate, now with 1.6.1 got up and down hash rate.
|
|
|
|
UnclWish
|
 |
June 26, 2018, 09:49:26 AM |
|
Does anyone can use high intensiity 100-110+ on 1.6.1 CN-v7 algo without speed drops?
No one tries CN-v7 on 1.6.1. on 8Gb cards? With intensity higher 100-110? I use 118 intensity dual threads on 8gb cards CN-V7 I'm talking about 1.6.1 version. You post screen from 1.6.0. On 1.6.0 I can use 110+ intensity with 2 threds without problems too. But on 1.6.1 I have speed drops to 0 if intensity higher 99. I also feel there is some changes for intensity in CN-V7, normally with previous version my intensity 72 got stable hash rate, now with 1.6.1 got up and down hash rate. Intensity 72 in 1.6.1 is especcial!!! It got speed to jump down to 875 and up to 1250. But average is still 925. On 1.6.0 with intensity 108 I has 985 on this card. But on 1.6.1 with intensity 108 I have speed 980 and drops to 0 so average speed is 600-700...
|
|
|
|
Sgsg666
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 113
Merit: 1
|
 |
June 26, 2018, 09:57:58 AM Last edit: June 26, 2018, 10:18:14 AM by Sgsg666 |
|
Wild Keccak then the most effective algorithm, on it vega gets from 0,00050000 BTC now, can learn about possibly create a normal miner?
Ive read that Wild keccak uses less electricity for mining compared to eth? Can you post pics of your miner for vegas/rx's?
|
|
|
|
heavyarms1912
|
 |
June 26, 2018, 01:45:42 PM |
|
Does anyone can use high intensiity 100-110+ on 1.6.1 CN-v7 algo without speed drops?
No one tries CN-v7 on 1.6.1. on 8Gb cards? With intensity higher 100-110? I use 118 intensity dual threads on 8gb cards CN-V7 I'm talking about 1.6.1 version. You post screen from 1.6.0. On 1.6.0 I can use 110+ intensity with 2 threds without problems too. But on 1.6.1 I have speed drops to 0 if intensity higher 99. I also feel there is some changes for intensity in CN-V7, normally with previous version my intensity 72 got stable hash rate, now with 1.6.1 got up and down hash rate. Intensity 72 in 1.6.1 is especcial!!! It got speed to jump down to 875 and up to 1250. But average is still 925. On 1.6.0 with intensity 108 I has 985 on this card. But on 1.6.1 with intensity 108 I have speed 980 and drops to 0 so average speed is 600-700... this behavior exists for 8gb cards on Heavy but I have not encountered these fluctuations on CN-V7.
|
|
|
|
roma__11
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 115
Merit: 0
|
 |
June 26, 2018, 03:34:37 PM |
|
Wild Keccak then the most effective algorithm, on it vega gets from 0,00050000 BTC now, can learn about possibly create a normal miner?
Ive read that Wild keccak uses less electricity for mining compared to eth? Can you post pics of your miner for vegas/rx's? miner https://github.com/purkproject/cpuminer-multi-opencl/releasesThere are 4 more, but they are older and buggy. This is how the work begins: https://thumb.ibb.co/k9SRQT/img_2018_06_24_23_07_18.pnghttps://thumb.ibb.co/d4dNzo/img_2018_06_24_23_08_06.pnghere already works 2 instead of 4: https://thumb.ibb.co/eRCXzo/img_2018_06_24_23_20_13.pngAt the same time on a pool, a hasht only up to 16 Mh/s reaches instead of 26 Mh/s ... Config: @echo off chcp 1251 c: cd C:\MINING\MINING OverDriveNtool -r01 -p01VEGA64S -r02 -p02VEGA64S -r03 -p03VEGA64S -r04 -p04VEGA64S -r05 -p05VEGA64S -r06 -p06VEGA64S -r07 -p07VEGA64S -r08 -p08VEGA64S -r09 -p09VEGA64S -r10 -p10VEGA64S -r11 -p11VEGA64S -r12 -p12VEGA64S timeout /t 1 c: cd C:\MINING\MINING\WILD_KECCAK minerd -a wildkeccak_ocl --intensity=22 --device=1 -t 4 -o stratum+tcp://pool.purkproject.com:5555 -u PK2QDAdtFQ7NdTekcAthR8izW7MSjU9hTf7weZNqauQs72WaKad11eg5s5oxVZ83vwdgaAeujM39QLf KdLKsjFsh2exKmr8W1 -p x -k http://pool.purkproject.com/scratchpad.bin -l scratchpad.bin https://thumb.ibb.co/eP1Zeo/img_2018_06_24_23_44_50.pngVEGA64 LIQUID pool: https://pool.purkproject.com/#https://purk.fairpool.xyzEnds with work in zero or cards one after another fall off, completely different times, people do reboots and more all sorts of crutches, but this turns prey into hell, lost profitability and everything, interest disappears ......
|
|
|
|
doktor83 (OP)
|
 |
June 26, 2018, 03:42:16 PM |
|
Does anyone can use high intensiity 100-110+ on 1.6.1 CN-v7 algo without speed drops?
No one tries CN-v7 on 1.6.1. on 8Gb cards? With intensity higher 100-110? I use 118 intensity dual threads on 8gb cards CN-V7 I'm talking about 1.6.1 version. You post screen from 1.6.0. On 1.6.0 I can use 110+ intensity with 2 threds without problems too. But on 1.6.1 I have speed drops to 0 if intensity higher 99. I also feel there is some changes for intensity in CN-V7, normally with previous version my intensity 72 got stable hash rate, now with 1.6.1 got up and down hash rate. Intensity 72 in 1.6.1 is especcial!!! It got speed to jump down to 875 and up to 1250. But average is still 925. On 1.6.0 with intensity 108 I has 985 on this card. But on 1.6.1 with intensity 108 I have speed 980 and drops to 0 so average speed is 600-700... I never could go intensity 110 and 2 threads (that would mean you are using around 7GB vram). I even cant go over 65 with 2 threads cause video driver hangs instantly (blockchain drivers). So i am curious which drivers, clocks and straps are you guys using. I have about 12x580 8g and a few more 570 8g, 470 8g cards and none of them does this crazy hash jumping you described in 1.6.1. So i really don't know what to think.
|
|
|
|
UnclWish
|
 |
June 26, 2018, 04:11:46 PM |
|
Does anyone can use high intensiity 100-110+ on 1.6.1 CN-v7 algo without speed drops?
No one tries CN-v7 on 1.6.1. on 8Gb cards? With intensity higher 100-110? I use 118 intensity dual threads on 8gb cards CN-V7 I'm talking about 1.6.1 version. You post screen from 1.6.0. On 1.6.0 I can use 110+ intensity with 2 threds without problems too. But on 1.6.1 I have speed drops to 0 if intensity higher 99. I also feel there is some changes for intensity in CN-V7, normally with previous version my intensity 72 got stable hash rate, now with 1.6.1 got up and down hash rate. Intensity 72 in 1.6.1 is especcial!!! It got speed to jump down to 875 and up to 1250. But average is still 925. On 1.6.0 with intensity 108 I has 985 on this card. But on 1.6.1 with intensity 108 I have speed 980 and drops to 0 so average speed is 600-700... I never could go intensity 110 and 2 threads (that would mean you are using around 7GB vram). I even cant go over 65 with 2 threads cause video driver hangs instantly (blockchain drivers). So i am curious which drivers, clocks and straps are you guys using. I have about 12x580 8g and a few more 570 8g, 470 8g cards and none of them does this crazy hash jumping you described in 1.6.1. So i really don't know what to think. What's the problem to use about 7Gb vram? I used 116-117 intensity on 1.6.0 version with 2 threads on RX 580 8Gb CN-v7 algo. This used 7.3Gb vram and give me about 1kh/s speed without drops and serious jumps. I can't get this speed with any other intensity... I use latest AMD drivers 18.6.1, all works normal on 18.5.2. On 1.6.1 intensity higher 100 causes speed jumps from 0 to 980. Other intensities on 1.6.1 (54,56,72,80,90,99) give for my card max 965 h/s.
|
|
|
|
altsay
|
 |
June 26, 2018, 06:43:24 PM |
|
- Hash monitor, if 5 minute average hash falls under the value you define, miner restarts itself
Feature request: This figure could be a preference. 5 minutes is too long for me, i want to make it 1.
|
|
|
|
RaidoP2
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 61
Merit: 0
|
 |
June 26, 2018, 07:48:59 PM |
|
I tried to mine Stellite with the 1.6.1 but the miner crashes after 1 or 2 jobs sent from the pool. Any idea what can cause this?
Also sometimes with regular v7 my rig stops sending shares, I won't get any errors and new jobs keep coming from pool but no result are sent back and it can go on for hours.
|
|
|
|
doktor83 (OP)
|
 |
June 26, 2018, 07:56:48 PM |
|
I tried to mine Stellite with the 1.6.1 but the miner crashes after 1 or 2 jobs sent from the pool. Any idea what can cause this?
Also sometimes with regular v7 my rig stops sending shares, I won't get any errors and new jobs keep coming from pool but no result are sent back and it can go on for hours.
just fixed this issue with jobs received but no results, some pools send blob 77 bytes instead of 76, it will be fixed in the next version in a few days. One of these pools is etn.spacepools.org, please send me other pools with this same problem so i can test/verify the fix. Regarding stellite, give me the pool and port so i can try.
|
|
|
|
RaidoP2
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 61
Merit: 0
|
 |
June 26, 2018, 08:11:09 PM |
|
I tried to mine Stellite with the 1.6.1 but the miner crashes after 1 or 2 jobs sent from the pool. Any idea what can cause this?
Also sometimes with regular v7 my rig stops sending shares, I won't get any errors and new jobs keep coming from pool but no result are sent back and it can go on for hours.
just fixed this issue with jobs received but no results, some pools send blob 77 bytes instead of 76, it will be fixed in the next version in a few days. One of these pools is etn.spacepools.org, please send me other pools with this same problem so i can test/verify the fix. Regarding stellite, give me the pool and port so i can try. Ah yes, it was etn.spacepools.org which I had issues with. Regarding Stellite I used eu.XTL.CryptoPool.Space:7777
|
|
|
|
doktor83 (OP)
|
 |
June 26, 2018, 08:18:42 PM |
|
I tried to mine Stellite with the 1.6.1 but the miner crashes after 1 or 2 jobs sent from the pool. Any idea what can cause this?
Also sometimes with regular v7 my rig stops sending shares, I won't get any errors and new jobs keep coming from pool but no result are sent back and it can go on for hours.
just fixed this issue with jobs received but no results, some pools send blob 77 bytes instead of 76, it will be fixed in the next version in a few days. One of these pools is etn.spacepools.org, please send me other pools with this same problem so i can test/verify the fix. Regarding stellite, give me the pool and port so i can try. Ah yes, it was etn.spacepools.org which I had issues with. Regarding Stellite I used eu.XTL.CryptoPool.Space:7777 ok i am mining 5 minutes on eu.XTL.CryptoPool.Space:7777 got 7 new jobs, but no crash, everything fine. Does it crash for you every time?
|
|
|
|
RaidoP2
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 61
Merit: 0
|
 |
June 26, 2018, 08:27:38 PM |
|
I tried to mine Stellite with the 1.6.1 but the miner crashes after 1 or 2 jobs sent from the pool. Any idea what can cause this?
Also sometimes with regular v7 my rig stops sending shares, I won't get any errors and new jobs keep coming from pool but no result are sent back and it can go on for hours.
just fixed this issue with jobs received but no results, some pools send blob 77 bytes instead of 76, it will be fixed in the next version in a few days. One of these pools is etn.spacepools.org, please send me other pools with this same problem so i can test/verify the fix. Regarding stellite, give me the pool and port so i can try. Ah yes, it was etn.spacepools.org which I had issues with. Regarding Stellite I used eu.XTL.CryptoPool.Space:7777 ok i am mining 5 minutes on eu.XTL.CryptoPool.Space:7777 got 7 new jobs, but no crash, everything fine. Does it crash for you every time? Yes, it crashes every time. Do you have any idea how to troubleshoot this issue?
|
|
|
|
doktor83 (OP)
|
 |
June 26, 2018, 08:28:57 PM |
|
I tried to mine Stellite with the 1.6.1 but the miner crashes after 1 or 2 jobs sent from the pool. Any idea what can cause this?
Also sometimes with regular v7 my rig stops sending shares, I won't get any errors and new jobs keep coming from pool but no result are sent back and it can go on for hours.
just fixed this issue with jobs received but no results, some pools send blob 77 bytes instead of 76, it will be fixed in the next version in a few days. One of these pools is etn.spacepools.org, please send me other pools with this same problem so i can test/verify the fix. Regarding stellite, give me the pool and port so i can try. Ah yes, it was etn.spacepools.org which I had issues with. Regarding Stellite I used eu.XTL.CryptoPool.Space:7777 ok i am mining 5 minutes on eu.XTL.CryptoPool.Space:7777 got 7 new jobs, but no crash, everything fine. Does it crash for you every time? Yes, it crashes every time. Do you have any idea how to troubleshoot this issue? turn on log file (add --logfile log.txt in .bat after the existing parameters), and please make a screenshot of this situation you described
|
|
|
|
|