SRBMiner Cryptonight AMD GPU Miner V1.9.3 - native algo switching

[doktor83]

This is claymore eth miner, the one that the whole world uses.

Reported : ~595 MHS
Average : ~540 MHS

That's 10% difference. Sometimes is even more.
If you understand what i want to say.

Yes, thanks for this

However, this is now what I am talking about

I am talking about that over several weeks period, where xmr stak shows 11.5kh/s for a vega rig and has exact that many hashes counted by the pool, and srb or cast have 12KH/s but 10 or even 20% less hashes counted by the pool. This is data over the days or weeks, not minutes or hours. I did not try claymore, i will just stick what works for me.

nordmann666 thanks for links for older versions. Maybe I will try 1.5 but if I remember correctly, I started using srbminer at about that version. few pages ago some people were already complaining about this, so I guess I am not the only "crazy" one. The hash difference is way to high for me to simply ignore, I prefer to go back to STAK where my rigs have 500 or 300 less hashing power but have 0 doubts about hashing.

i asked here and elsewhere but no one answered...your problem is 10%
i got waves an every pool....hashrate from 2000-5500hs up and down and up and down...with EVERY miner
BUT...average hash rate is 3,9 = what SRB shows me

so i dont care about reported hasrates - i want a stable miner without issues and SRB is stable (most time)

only thing i´m not happy about - more and more settings i dont know to handle (fragments?!!?) - SRB was easy to use...but gets more and more complicated (in my opinion)

There will always be differences in miner speed and what pool shows. Stale shares, hw errors, etc etc, lots of factors.
You said on one of your rigs is OK, pool showing approximately what miner shows. And you called that strange
I call strange those 20%, because that IS really much. Well, i'm not trying to convince anybody, you use what best works for you.

nordmann666, you don't have to worry about every setting and parameter, you probably don't need any of those.
It's still easy to use it, all you need is set intensity and turn on double_threads.

[1714294222]

1714294222

[1714294222]

1714294222

[1714294222]

1714294222

[1714294222]

1714294222

[Seruun91]

Good evenening guys,

i hope someone is able to help me.
Since 4 days the miner isn't showing me any hashrate and keeps crashing after 5 Minuts.

config.txt
{
"cryptonight_type" : "alloy",
"intensity" : 0,
"double_threads" : true
}

https://thumb.ibb.co/fmEjaT/SRBMiner_1_6_1_Fatal_Error2.png

Does anyone has an idea why that happens?

[vmozara]

If anybody actually read what I wrote you woukd see the problem is much deeper than normal hashrate fluctuations. And I am not the only one. How comes a miner with 12KHs (srbminer and cast) will have less hashes on the pool after 1 week, than the miner with 11.5KHs? (Stak)

[Mashy81]

If anybody actually read what I wrote you woukd see the problem is much deeper than normal hashrate fluctuations. And I am not the only one. How comes a miner with 12KHs (srbminer and cast) will have less hashes on the pool after 1 week, than the miner with 11.5KHs? (Stak)

It depends greatly on the pool and the day. Somedays I average above for the 24hrs and some days under.
Nanopool is far more stable and always the same or higher hashrate 24hr average.
Hashvault ok and cryptoknight.cc pool always less.
There are soo many factors. Look at the average over several days

[dingdongtobias]

If anybody actually read what I wrote you woukd see the problem is much deeper than normal hashrate fluctuations. And I am not the only one. How comes a miner with 12KHs (srbminer and cast) will have less hashes on the pool after 1 week, than the miner with 11.5KHs? (Stak)

Yes, thank you for your very deep analysis, you saved us from the evil 
Don't you think we can spot a huge hashrate difference if it occurs ourself?

[danskin]

Finally someone who knowledges the hash rate difference issue. I have 4 vega 56s. While SRBminer reports a steady 1850ish hash/s, pool only repots ~6.9Kish hash/s for the last two weeks (24 hour averages). So each card is reported to have an extra 100 hash/s on SRB. Tried XMRig AMD and hash rate is close to 24 hour average. SBR also seems to be much stabler then pool report/other miners. I really hope SRB isn't intentionally showing higher and more stable hash rate than reality.

[leonix007]

Good evenening guys,

i hope someone is able to help me.
Since 4 days the miner isn't showing me any hashrate and keeps crashing after 5 Minuts.

config.txt
{
"cryptonight_type" : "alloy",
"intensity" : 0,
"double_threads" : true
}



Does anyone has an idea why that happens?

picture is too small

I cant barely see whats the error


now I see it,

what your clock?

try to lower you GPU clocks

[4ward]

Good evenening guys,

i hope someone is able to help me.
Since 4 days the miner isn't showing me any hashrate and keeps crashing after 5 Minuts.

config.txt
{
"cryptonight_type" : "alloy",
"intensity" : 0,
"double_threads" : true
}



Does anyone has an idea why that happens?

picture is too small

I cant barely see whats the error

What if I told you that you can click on the image?

[vmozara]

It depends greatly on the pool and the day. Somedays I average above for the 24hrs and some days under.
Nanopool is far more stable and always the same or higher hashrate 24hr average.
Hashvault ok and cryptoknight.cc pool always less.
There are soo many factors. Look at the average over several days

It is not about the pool or the day

If after 2 weeks pool show that one rig has total of 14000000000 hashes and other ones have 13000000000 or even 11000000000, it means that some machines are hashing less than the others, and all of them are 6xVega with 12000H/s

It happens on supportxmr, it happens on nanopool, it happens on many others
I am not saying that somebody is stealing the hashes, because some machines are hashing well, but there must be some hardware or software difference that affects the miner or data sent by miner, simply because SRB and CAST have this issue and STAK doesn't

[leonix007]

Good evenening guys,

i hope someone is able to help me.
Since 4 days the miner isn't showing me any hashrate and keeps crashing after 5 Minuts.

config.txt
{
"cryptonight_type" : "alloy",
"intensity" : 0,
"double_threads" : true
}



Does anyone has an idea why that happens?

picture is too small

I cant barely see whats the error

What if I told you that you can click on the image?

Image has been loaded with correct links upon reply

the link previously posted is sort of out of pixels

anyways, already edited the post

[Sharpeich]

Please add Wild Keccak algo

[Mashy81]

It depends greatly on the pool and the day. Somedays I average above for the 24hrs and some days under.
Nanopool is far more stable and always the same or higher hashrate 24hr average.
Hashvault ok and cryptoknight.cc pool always less.
There are soo many factors. Look at the average over several days

It is not about the pool or the day

If after 2 weeks pool show that one rig has total of 14000000000 hashes and other ones have 13000000000 or even 11000000000, it means that some machines are hashing less than the others, and all of them are 6xVega with 12000H/s

It happens on supportxmr, it happens on nanopool, it happens on many others
I am not saying that somebody is stealing the hashes, because some machines are hashing well, but there must be some hardware or software difference that affects the miner or data sent by miner, simply because SRB and CAST have this issue and STAK doesn't

You are forgetting the luck factor. Also not even every card will get the same shares or hashrate.
At the end of the day if people can't work out which mining software they get the most out of they shouldn't be mining. SRB I get the most in my pocket. I also agree it is far more stable than xmr stak and cast.
I have also noticed that hardware errors and agressive overclocks will case lower excepted hashrate at the pools.

[Mashy81]

No one makes anyone use this software.
Big thanks to the Dev. For working hard and giving us this software

[UnclWish]

Does anyone can use high intensiity 100-110+ on 1.6.1 CN-v7 algo without speed drops?

[dragonmike]

Doktor, I assume the compute errors are overclock related. Do you know whether they are coming from too high core or mem values by any chances? On Polaris cards I can always check the memory errors  in HWinfo but that feature isn't enabled for Vega's HBM memory...

[livada]

It depends greatly on the pool and the day. Somedays I average above for the 24hrs and some days under.
Nanopool is far more stable and always the same or higher hashrate 24hr average.
Hashvault ok and cryptoknight.cc pool always less.
There are soo many factors. Look at the average over several days

It is not about the pool or the day

If after 2 weeks pool show that one rig has total of 14000000000 hashes and other ones have 13000000000 or even 11000000000, it means that some machines are hashing less than the others, and all of them are 6xVega with 12000H/s

It happens on supportxmr, it happens on nanopool, it happens on many others
I am not saying that somebody is stealing the hashes, because some machines are hashing well, but there must be some hardware or software difference that affects the miner or data sent by miner, simply because SRB and CAST have this issue and STAK doesn't

You are forgetting the luck factor. Also not even every card will get the same shares or hashrate.
At the end of the day if people can't work out which mining software they get the most out of they shouldn't be mining. SRB I get the most in my pocket. I also agree it is far more stable than xmr stak and cast.
I have also noticed that hardware errors and agressive overclocks will case lower excepted hashrate at the pools.

i test nanopool 1 hour .  Srbiner say 10900-11200HR
nanopool say: 10800-13000HR

Al ok with HR report. Mybe u use  BAD pool.
https://image.prntscr.com/image/1_dBnWPnTZy34hPG46NAAw.jpg


test on ROCK POOL heavy 2 hour
srbiner say 6150HR
ROCKpool say 5800-6300HR
again all ok with HR report
https://image.prntscr.com/image/EJ4nNrkqSpuNYjmaCyfrLA.jpg
-
https://image.prntscr.com/image/Esptqf-dTWe5J3cbFT-mag.jpg

[CharlieCox]

Just a short report. I had issues with Cast, the speed was good however it would simply stop hashing randomly after a few hours of mining. I switched to SRB last night. So far, so good. The configuration process was easy.

[heavyarms1912]

Doktor, I assume the compute errors are overclock related. Do you know whether they are coming from too high core or mem values by any chances? On Polaris cards I can always check the memory errors  in HWinfo but that feature isn't enabled for Vega's HBM memory...

There are also instance when OC settings that won't show BUS_error or compute error in SRBminer but would show up in xmr-stak.
Interestingly, the hashrates were quite low on pool side when such errors were happening.

[UnclWish]

Does anyone can use high intensiity 100-110+ on 1.6.1 CN-v7 algo without speed drops?

No one tries CN-v7 on 1.6.1. on 8Gb cards? With intensity higher 100-100?

[dingdongtobias]

Does anyone can use high intensiity 100-110+ on 1.6.1 CN-v7 algo without speed drops?

No one tries CN-v7 on 1.6.1. on 8Gb cards? With intensity higher 100-100?

no because we use 2 threads and 54-56 intensity on 580 8g