Bitcoin Forum
January 18, 2022, 04:55:46 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 22.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 [151] 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 ... 365 »
  Print  
Author Topic: SRBMiner Cryptonight AMD GPU Miner V1.9.3 - native algo switching  (Read 235786 times)
dingdongtobias
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 156
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 25, 2018, 04:18:11 AM
 #3001

If anybody actually read what I wrote you woukd see the problem is much deeper than normal hashrate fluctuations. And I am not the only one. How comes a miner with 12KHs (srbminer and cast) will have less hashes on the pool after 1 week, than the miner with 11.5KHs? (Stak)


Yes, thank you for your very deep analysis, you saved us from the evil  Grin
Don't you think we can spot a huge hashrate difference if it occurs ourself?
The network tries to produce one block per 10 minutes. It does this by automatically adjusting how difficult it is to produce blocks.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1642481746
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1642481746

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1642481746
Reply with quote  #2

1642481746
Report to moderator
danskin
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 12
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 25, 2018, 05:43:42 AM
 #3002

Finally someone who knowledges the hash rate difference issue. I have 4 vega 56s. While SRBminer reports a steady 1850ish hash/s, pool only repots ~6.9Kish hash/s for the last two weeks (24 hour averages). So each card is reported to have an extra 100 hash/s on SRB. Tried XMRig AMD and hash rate is close to 24 hour average. SBR also seems to be much stabler then pool report/other miners. I really hope SRB isn't intentionally showing higher and more stable hash rate than reality.
leonix007
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1008
Merit: 297


Grow with community


View Profile
June 25, 2018, 06:32:27 AM
Last edit: June 25, 2018, 06:45:40 AM by leonix007
 #3003

Good evenening guys,

i hope someone is able to help me.
Since 4 days the miner isn't showing me any hashrate and keeps crashing after 5 Minuts.

config.txt
{
"cryptonight_type" : "alloy",
"intensity" : 0,
"double_threads" : true
}



Does anyone has an idea why that happens?

picture is too small

I cant barely see whats the error


now I see it,

what your clock?

try to lower you GPU clocks

4ward
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 476
Merit: 18


View Profile
June 25, 2018, 06:34:51 AM
 #3004

Good evenening guys,

i hope someone is able to help me.
Since 4 days the miner isn't showing me any hashrate and keeps crashing after 5 Minuts.

config.txt
{
"cryptonight_type" : "alloy",
"intensity" : 0,
"double_threads" : true
}



Does anyone has an idea why that happens?

picture is too small

I cant barely see whats the error


What if I told you that you can click on the image?

vmozara
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 190
Merit: 59


View Profile
June 25, 2018, 06:39:08 AM
 #3005


It depends greatly on the pool and the day. Somedays I average above for the 24hrs and some days under.
Nanopool is far more stable and always the same or higher hashrate 24hr average.
Hashvault ok and cryptoknight.cc pool always less.
There are soo many factors. Look at the average over several days

It is not about the pool or the day

If after 2 weeks pool show that one rig has total of 14000000000 hashes and other ones have 13000000000 or even 11000000000, it means that some machines are hashing less than the others, and all of them are 6xVega with 12000H/s

It happens on supportxmr, it happens on nanopool, it happens on many others
I am not saying that somebody is stealing the hashes, because some machines are hashing well, but there must be some hardware or software difference that affects the miner or data sent by miner, simply because SRB and CAST have this issue and STAK doesn't










leonix007
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1008
Merit: 297


Grow with community


View Profile
June 25, 2018, 06:48:30 AM
 #3006

Good evenening guys,

i hope someone is able to help me.
Since 4 days the miner isn't showing me any hashrate and keeps crashing after 5 Minuts.

config.txt
{
"cryptonight_type" : "alloy",
"intensity" : 0,
"double_threads" : true
}



Does anyone has an idea why that happens?

picture is too small

I cant barely see whats the error


What if I told you that you can click on the image?

Image has been loaded with correct links upon reply

the link previously posted is sort of out of pixels

anyways, already edited the post
Sharpeich
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 62
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 25, 2018, 10:01:33 AM
 #3007

Please add Wild Keccak algo
Mashy81
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 226
Merit: 1


View Profile
June 25, 2018, 10:09:41 AM
 #3008


It depends greatly on the pool and the day. Somedays I average above for the 24hrs and some days under.
Nanopool is far more stable and always the same or higher hashrate 24hr average.
Hashvault ok and cryptoknight.cc pool always less.
There are soo many factors. Look at the average over several days

It is not about the pool or the day

If after 2 weeks pool show that one rig has total of 14000000000 hashes and other ones have 13000000000 or even 11000000000, it means that some machines are hashing less than the others, and all of them are 6xVega with 12000H/s

It happens on supportxmr, it happens on nanopool, it happens on many others
I am not saying that somebody is stealing the hashes, because some machines are hashing well, but there must be some hardware or software difference that affects the miner or data sent by miner, simply because SRB and CAST have this issue and STAK doesn't



You are forgetting the luck factor. Also not even every card will get the same shares or hashrate.
At the end of the day if people can't work out which mining software they get the most out of they shouldn't be mining. SRB I get the most in my pocket. I also agree it is far more stable than xmr stak and cast.
I have also noticed that hardware errors and agressive overclocks will case lower excepted hashrate at the pools.
Mashy81
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 226
Merit: 1


View Profile
June 25, 2018, 10:11:29 AM
 #3009

No one makes anyone use this software.
Big thanks to the Dev. For working hard and giving us this software
UnclWish
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1470
Merit: 253


View Profile
June 25, 2018, 10:43:40 AM
 #3010

Does anyone can use high intensiity 100-110+ on 1.6.1 CN-v7 algo without speed drops?
dragonmike
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1246
Merit: 556



View Profile
June 25, 2018, 11:33:30 AM
 #3011

Doktor, I assume the compute errors are overclock related. Do you know whether they are coming from too high core or mem values by any chances? On Polaris cards I can always check the memory errors  in HWinfo but that feature isn't enabled for Vega's HBM memory...
livada
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 416
Merit: 0


View Profile WWW
June 25, 2018, 12:23:49 PM
Last edit: June 25, 2018, 12:36:15 PM by livada
 #3012


It depends greatly on the pool and the day. Somedays I average above for the 24hrs and some days under.
Nanopool is far more stable and always the same or higher hashrate 24hr average.
Hashvault ok and cryptoknight.cc pool always less.
There are soo many factors. Look at the average over several days

It is not about the pool or the day

If after 2 weeks pool show that one rig has total of 14000000000 hashes and other ones have 13000000000 or even 11000000000, it means that some machines are hashing less than the others, and all of them are 6xVega with 12000H/s

It happens on supportxmr, it happens on nanopool, it happens on many others
I am not saying that somebody is stealing the hashes, because some machines are hashing well, but there must be some hardware or software difference that affects the miner or data sent by miner, simply because SRB and CAST have this issue and STAK doesn't






You are forgetting the luck factor. Also not even every card will get the same shares or hashrate.
At the end of the day if people can't work out which mining software they get the most out of they shouldn't be mining. SRB I get the most in my pocket. I also agree it is far more stable than xmr stak and cast.
I have also noticed that hardware errors and agressive overclocks will case lower excepted hashrate at the pools.


i test nanopool 1 hour .  Srbiner say 10900-11200HR
nanopool say: 10800-13000HR

Al ok with HR report. Mybe u use  BAD pool.
https://image.prntscr.com/image/1_dBnWPnTZy34hPG46NAAw.jpg


test on ROCK POOL heavy 2 hour
srbiner say 6150HR
ROCKpool say 5800-6300HR
again all ok with HR report
https://image.prntscr.com/image/EJ4nNrkqSpuNYjmaCyfrLA.jpg
-
https://image.prntscr.com/image/Esptqf-dTWe5J3cbFT-mag.jpg



CharlieCox
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 212
Merit: 12


View Profile
June 25, 2018, 12:50:54 PM
 #3013

Just a short report. I had issues with Cast, the speed was good however it would simply stop hashing randomly after a few hours of mining. I switched to SRB last night. So far, so good. The configuration process was easy.
heavyarms1912
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 771
Merit: 112



View Profile
June 25, 2018, 01:59:14 PM
 #3014

Doktor, I assume the compute errors are overclock related. Do you know whether they are coming from too high core or mem values by any chances? On Polaris cards I can always check the memory errors  in HWinfo but that feature isn't enabled for Vega's HBM memory...

There are also instance when OC settings that won't show BUS_error or compute error in SRBminer but would show up in xmr-stak.
Interestingly, the hashrates were quite low on pool side when such errors were happening.
UnclWish
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1470
Merit: 253


View Profile
June 25, 2018, 03:04:34 PM
 #3015

Does anyone can use high intensiity 100-110+ on 1.6.1 CN-v7 algo without speed drops?
No one tries CN-v7 on 1.6.1. on 8Gb cards? With intensity higher 100-100?
dingdongtobias
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 156
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 25, 2018, 03:08:00 PM
 #3016

Does anyone can use high intensiity 100-110+ on 1.6.1 CN-v7 algo without speed drops?
No one tries CN-v7 on 1.6.1. on 8Gb cards? With intensity higher 100-100?

no because we use 2 threads and 54-56 intensity on 580 8g
UnclWish
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1470
Merit: 253


View Profile
June 25, 2018, 03:22:17 PM
 #3017

Does anyone can use high intensiity 100-110+ on 1.6.1 CN-v7 algo without speed drops?
No one tries CN-v7 on 1.6.1. on 8Gb cards? With intensity higher 100-100?

no because we use 2 threads and 54-56 intensity on 580 8g
Not heavy? On normal CN v7? And what speed?
roma__11
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 115
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 25, 2018, 05:11:36 PM
 #3018

In "Wild Keccak" there are no plans to make a miner? all the rest is unstable (
coke15
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 176
Merit: 10


View Profile
June 25, 2018, 05:22:18 PM
 #3019



i test nanopool 1 hour .  Srbiner say 10900-11200HR
nanopool say: 10800-13000HR

Al ok with HR report. Mybe u use  BAD pool.



hi

i'm on nanopool for weeks
srbminer 56k/hs  ----->nanopool 53,5k/hs MAX.

something goes wrong...

on nanopool,i'm ALWAYS -10/-20% theorical earning....0-5% ok but -10/-20% no glop :/
heavyarms1912
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 771
Merit: 112



View Profile
June 25, 2018, 05:30:51 PM
 #3020

Does anyone can use high intensiity 100-110+ on 1.6.1 CN-v7 algo without speed drops?
No one tries CN-v7 on 1.6.1. on 8Gb cards? With intensity higher 100-100?

I use 118 intensity dual threads on 8gb cards CN-V7
Pages: « 1 ... 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 [151] 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 ... 365 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!