Bitcoin Forum
December 13, 2019, 05:04:01 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 0.19.0.1 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 [221] 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 ... 367 »
  Print  
Author Topic: SRBMiner Cryptonight AMD GPU Miner V1.9.3 - native algo switching  (Read 232048 times)
doktor83
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1204
Merit: 611


View Profile WWW
October 08, 2018, 10:05:22 AM
 #4401

thks for v8 dok.
intensity auto  for rx 550 2GB : 30 intensity } blue screen for me .
Max 27 /32 Woksize  
and rx 460 unlock 27/16 worksize


ill have to lower that then , 30 is good for 4gb Smiley

SRBPolaris thread - HERE   |   SRBMiner-CN thread - HERE    |   SRBMiner-MULTI thread - HERE
http://www.srbminer.com
1576213441
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1576213441

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1576213441
Reply with quote  #2

1576213441
Report to moderator
1576213441
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1576213441

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1576213441
Reply with quote  #2

1576213441
Report to moderator
1576213441
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1576213441

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1576213441
Reply with quote  #2

1576213441
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1576213441
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1576213441

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1576213441
Reply with quote  #2

1576213441
Report to moderator
1576213441
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1576213441

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1576213441
Reply with quote  #2

1576213441
Report to moderator
abg00
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 220
Merit: 1


View Profile
October 08, 2018, 10:45:42 AM
 #4402


ill have to lower that then , 30 is good for 4gb Smiley


rate low for rx570\8 on cn-heavy
was 1060 in 1.6.7 now 890-960 in 1.6.8
same config same drivers 18.3.4

in additional. remove kernel folder and recompile binary solve trouble
work 10 min and low rate again. back to 1.6.7
doktor83
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1204
Merit: 611


View Profile WWW
October 08, 2018, 10:57:45 AM
 #4403


ill have to lower that then , 30 is good for 4gb Smiley


rate low for rx570\8 on cn-heavy
was 1060 in 1.6.7 now 890-960 in 1.6.8
same config same drivers 18.3.4

in additional. remove kernel folder and recompile binary solve trouble
work 10 min and low rate again. back to 1.6.7


Wait 10-15 min for it to get to the max speed.
Nothing has changed for heavy algos in the code.

SRBPolaris thread - HERE   |   SRBMiner-CN thread - HERE    |   SRBMiner-MULTI thread - HERE
http://www.srbminer.com
abg00
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 220
Merit: 1


View Profile
October 08, 2018, 11:00:54 AM
 #4404


ill have to lower that then , 30 is good for 4gb Smiley


rate low for rx570\8 on cn-heavy
was 1060 in 1.6.7 now 890-960 in 1.6.8
same config same drivers 18.3.4

in additional. remove kernel folder and recompile binary solve trouble
work 10 min and low rate again. back to 1.6.7


Wait 10-15 min for it to get to the max speed.
wait 27 min rate low. back to 1.6.7
check on two rig

rx560\4 work stable with high rate on 1.6.8 cn-heavy
doktor83
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1204
Merit: 611


View Profile WWW
October 08, 2018, 11:02:50 AM
 #4405


ill have to lower that then , 30 is good for 4gb Smiley


rate low for rx570\8 on cn-heavy
was 1060 in 1.6.7 now 890-960 in 1.6.8
same config same drivers 18.3.4

in additional. remove kernel folder and recompile binary solve trouble
work 10 min and low rate again. back to 1.6.7


Wait 10-15 min for it to get to the max speed.
wait 27 min rate low. back to 1.6.7
check on two rig

rx560\4 work stable with high rate on 1.6.8 cn-heavy


interesting..and on 1.6.7 you get the 1000+ speed on all cards ?

SRBPolaris thread - HERE   |   SRBMiner-CN thread - HERE    |   SRBMiner-MULTI thread - HERE
http://www.srbminer.com
abg00
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 220
Merit: 1


View Profile
October 08, 2018, 11:14:23 AM
 #4406


interesting..and on 1.6.7 you get the 1000+ speed on all cards ?

doktor83
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1204
Merit: 611


View Profile WWW
October 08, 2018, 11:45:13 AM
Last edit: October 08, 2018, 11:57:05 AM by doktor83
 #4407


interesting..and on 1.6.7 you get the 1000+ speed on all cards ?




Ok going to re-check and test.

Can you test on bittube too?

SRBPolaris thread - HERE   |   SRBMiner-CN thread - HERE    |   SRBMiner-MULTI thread - HERE
http://www.srbminer.com
GKumaran
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 162
Merit: 10


View Profile
October 08, 2018, 12:24:04 PM
 #4408

Hey Doc, thc for update !!

Using Binary kernals on Vega 64:
v7 : HR up from 2130 to 2145
v8 : HR is 580 Huh
Is that normal, only 580 H/s? Cause i think the devs said approx 7% drop so was expecting at least 1950 h/s

I got the same HR result for v8 on both benchmark mode and mining on the test pools:

"pool": "killallasics.moneroworld.com:7777",
"difficulty": 10000,

{
            "device": "GPU0",
            "device_id": 0,
            "model": "Radeon RX Vega",
            "bus_id": 19,
            "kernel_id": 1,
            "hashrate": 593,
            "core_clock": 1630,
            "memory_clock": 1100,
            "temperature": 54,
            "fan_speed_rpm": 4576
},

GPU was on dual thread and auto worksize, auto intensity
doktor83
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1204
Merit: 611


View Profile WWW
October 08, 2018, 12:26:08 PM
 #4409

Hey Doc, thc for update !!

Using Binary kernals on Vega 64:
v7 : HR up from 2130 to 2145
v8 : HR is 580 Huh
Is that normal, only 580 H/s? Cause i think the devs said approx 7% drop so was expecting at least 1950 h/s

I got the same HR result for v8 on both benchmark mode and mining on the test pools:

"pool": "killallasics.moneroworld.com:7777",
"difficulty": 10000,

{
            "device": "GPU0",
            "device_id": 0,
            "model": "Radeon RX Vega",
            "bus_id": 19,
            "kernel_id": 1,
            "hashrate": 593,
            "core_clock": 1630,
            "memory_clock": 1100,
            "temperature": 54,
            "fan_speed_rpm": 4576
},

GPU was on dual thread and auto worksize, auto intensity

Yes something not ok, try setting by hand for example 120/16 2 threads

I really hurried to push the v8 version, so of course bugs are to be expected, and we still have time to fix them until the fork

SRBPolaris thread - HERE   |   SRBMiner-CN thread - HERE    |   SRBMiner-MULTI thread - HERE
http://www.srbminer.com
abg00
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 220
Merit: 1


View Profile
October 08, 2018, 12:29:49 PM
 #4410


Can you test on bittube too?

check rx550\4g on cn-v7
same trouble in 1.6.8
low rate
420-450 in 1.6.7
370-390 in 1.6.8


rx550\2g rate high in 1.6.8 was 460 now 490
doktor83
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1204
Merit: 611


View Profile WWW
October 08, 2018, 12:31:40 PM
 #4411


Can you test on bittube too?

check rx550\4g on cn-v7
same trouble in 1.6.8
low rate
420-450 in 1.6.7
370-390 in 1.6.8


rx550\2g rate high in 1.6.8 was 460 now 490

have you tried auto intensity for 550?

also it would be nice if you could write your settings

SRBPolaris thread - HERE   |   SRBMiner-CN thread - HERE    |   SRBMiner-MULTI thread - HERE
http://www.srbminer.com
abg00
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 220
Merit: 1


View Profile
October 08, 2018, 01:13:32 PM
 #4412


have you tried auto intensity for 550?

also it would be nice if you could write your settings
no
for 2gb 1.6.8
550
   { "id" : 6, "intensity" : 27,  "worksize" : 12, "double_threads" : true},
 GPU6 :    504 H/s [T: 49c, RPM: 0, CC: 1050 MHz, MC: 1950 MHz][BUS:4]
560
   { "id" : 7, "intensity" : 27,  "worksize" : 12, "double_threads" : true},
GPU7 :    488 H/s [T: 53c, RPM: 2635, CC: 1050 MHz, MC: 1850 MHz][BUS:2]

for 550 4gb 1.6.7
   { "id" : 0, "intensity" : 54, "double_threads" : true, "worksize": 12},
 GPU0 :    416 H/s [T: 51c, RPM: 2833, CC: 1090 MHz, MC: 2050 MHz][BUS:1]
same 550\4 in 1.6.8 only 380-390 h\s
GKumaran
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 162
Merit: 10


View Profile
October 08, 2018, 01:14:04 PM
 #4413

Hey Doc, thc for update !!

Using Binary kernals on Vega 64:
v7 : HR up from 2130 to 2145
v8 : HR is 580 Huh
Is that normal, only 580 H/s? Cause i think the devs said approx 7% drop so was expecting at least 1950 h/s

I got the same HR result for v8 on both benchmark mode and mining on the test pools:

"pool": "killallasics.moneroworld.com:7777",
"difficulty": 10000,

{
            "device": "GPU0",
            "device_id": 0,
            "model": "Radeon RX Vega",
            "bus_id": 19,
            "kernel_id": 1,
            "hashrate": 593,
            "core_clock": 1630,
            "memory_clock": 1100,
            "temperature": 54,
            "fan_speed_rpm": 4576
},

GPU was on dual thread and auto worksize, auto intensity

Yes something not ok, try setting by hand for example 120/16 2 threads

I really hurried to push the v8 version, so of course bugs are to be expected, and we still have time to fix them until the fork

No doc, still the same result.
My v8 config:
{
"cryptonight_type" : "normalv8",
"intensity" : 120,
"worksize" : 16,
"double_threads" : true
}

Benchmark results:
Stopping benchmark (run for 180 seconds)

Average speed: 2851.5 H/s
Shares found: 21

Abv test is for 6 Vega 64s
doktor83
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1204
Merit: 611


View Profile WWW
October 08, 2018, 01:36:49 PM
 #4414


have you tried auto intensity for 550?

also it would be nice if you could write your settings
no
for 2gb 1.6.8
550
   { "id" : 6, "intensity" : 27,  "worksize" : 12, "double_threads" : true},
 GPU6 :    504 H/s [T: 49c, RPM: 0, CC: 1050 MHz, MC: 1950 MHz][BUS:4]
560
   { "id" : 7, "intensity" : 27,  "worksize" : 12, "double_threads" : true},
GPU7 :    488 H/s [T: 53c, RPM: 2635, CC: 1050 MHz, MC: 1850 MHz][BUS:2]

for 550 4gb 1.6.7
   { "id" : 0, "intensity" : 54, "double_threads" : true, "worksize": 12},
 GPU0 :    416 H/s [T: 51c, RPM: 2833, CC: 1090 MHz, MC: 2050 MHz][BUS:1]
same 550\4 in 1.6.8 only 380-390 h\s

Intensity 54 too much with 2 threads. Why not 27 ?

SRBPolaris thread - HERE   |   SRBMiner-CN thread - HERE    |   SRBMiner-MULTI thread - HERE
http://www.srbminer.com
doktor83
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1204
Merit: 611


View Profile WWW
October 08, 2018, 02:09:40 PM
 #4415


No doc, still the same result.
My v8 config:
{
"cryptonight_type" : "normalv8",
"intensity" : 120,
"worksize" : 16,
"double_threads" : true
}

Benchmark results:
Stopping benchmark (run for 180 seconds)

Average speed: 2851.5 H/s
Shares found: 21

Abv test is for 6 Vega 64s

Try maybe worksize 32. I don't have vega64 to test with, but i have a 56, and the best hash for it is at 120/16, it should be around the same for 64 too.

SRBPolaris thread - HERE   |   SRBMiner-CN thread - HERE    |   SRBMiner-MULTI thread - HERE
http://www.srbminer.com
abg00
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 220
Merit: 1


View Profile
October 08, 2018, 02:39:20 PM
 #4416


have you tried auto intensity for 550?

also it would be nice if you could write your settings
no
for 2gb 1.6.8
550
   { "id" : 6, "intensity" : 27,  "worksize" : 12, "double_threads" : true},
 GPU6 :    504 H/s [T: 49c, RPM: 0, CC: 1050 MHz, MC: 1950 MHz][BUS:4]
560
   { "id" : 7, "intensity" : 27,  "worksize" : 12, "double_threads" : true},
GPU7 :    488 H/s [T: 53c, RPM: 2635, CC: 1050 MHz, MC: 1850 MHz][BUS:2]

for 550 4gb 1.6.7
   { "id" : 0, "intensity" : 54, "double_threads" : true, "worksize": 12},
 GPU0 :    416 H/s [T: 51c, RPM: 2833, CC: 1090 MHz, MC: 2050 MHz][BUS:1]
same 550\4 in 1.6.8 only 380-390 h\s

Intensity 54 too much with 2 threads. Why not 27 ?

27 is ok for 1.6.8 rx550\4gb rate 440 h\s
30 is not ok. bad rate
doktor83
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1204
Merit: 611


View Profile WWW
October 08, 2018, 02:53:33 PM
 #4417


have you tried auto intensity for 550?

also it would be nice if you could write your settings
no
for 2gb 1.6.8
550
   { "id" : 6, "intensity" : 27,  "worksize" : 12, "double_threads" : true},
 GPU6 :    504 H/s [T: 49c, RPM: 0, CC: 1050 MHz, MC: 1950 MHz][BUS:4]
560
   { "id" : 7, "intensity" : 27,  "worksize" : 12, "double_threads" : true},
GPU7 :    488 H/s [T: 53c, RPM: 2635, CC: 1050 MHz, MC: 1850 MHz][BUS:2]

for 550 4gb 1.6.7
   { "id" : 0, "intensity" : 54, "double_threads" : true, "worksize": 12},
 GPU0 :    416 H/s [T: 51c, RPM: 2833, CC: 1090 MHz, MC: 2050 MHz][BUS:1]
same 550\4 in 1.6.8 only 380-390 h\s

Intensity 54 too much with 2 threads. Why not 27 ?

27 is ok for 1.6.8 rx550\4gb rate 440 h\s
30 is not ok. bad rate


so what is the conclusion at the end?
1.6.8 hashing better on rx550 and rx560 cards ?

also where did you get intensity 30 from?
You are really confusing me here i don;t know even what algo are we talking about now.

550 4g should be ok on V7 with : 27/12/2
560 4g should be ok on V7 with : 27/8/2

550 4g should be ok on V8 with : 28/16/2
560 4g should be ok on V8 with : 29/32/2

SRBPolaris thread - HERE   |   SRBMiner-CN thread - HERE    |   SRBMiner-MULTI thread - HERE
http://www.srbminer.com
abg00
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 220
Merit: 1


View Profile
October 08, 2018, 03:10:26 PM
 #4418


so what is the conclusion at the end?
1.6.8 hashing better on rx550 and rx560 cards ?

also where did you get intensity 30 from?
You are really confusing me here i don;t know even what algo are we talking about now.

550 4g should be ok on V7 with : 27/12/2
560 4g should be ok on V7 with : 27/8/2

550 4g should be ok on V8 with : 28/16/2
560 4g should be ok on V8 with : 29/32/2


true.
but have trouble on cn-heavy with rx470\480\570\580 8gb card. plz check my config
   { "id" : 1, "intensity" : 58, "double_threads" : true},
on 1.6.7 ok and rate 1060
 GPU1 :    1027 H/s [T: 67c, RPM: 1465, CC: 1150 MHz, MC: 2030 MHz][BUS:2]
on 1.6.8 low rate
GPU1 :    875 H/s [T: 63c, RPM: 945, CC: 1150 MHz, MC: 2030 MHz][BUS:2]

GKumaran
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 162
Merit: 10


View Profile
October 08, 2018, 03:10:39 PM
 #4419


Yes something not ok, try setting by hand for example 120/16 2 threads

I really hurried to push the v8 version, so of course bugs are to be expected, and we still have time to fix them until the fork

Hey Doc,

Vega 64 - Cryptonight v8 analysis:

Using binary kernals : 583 h/s

Not Using Binary Kernals, Kernals compiled on each run and deleted
Driver: 18.5.1 GPU: 1600 Mem: 1100 Volt : 840mV
Intensity : 119 Worksize : 16 : 2019 H/s (94.338% on cn7)
Intensity : 119 Worksize : 32 : 1963 H/s (91.745% on cn7)
Intensity : 120 Worksize : 16 : 2025 H/s (94.626% on cn7)
Intensity : 120 Worksize : 32 : 1983 H/s (92.663% on cn7)
Intensity : 121 Worksize : 16 : 2032 H/s (94.953% on cn7)
Intensity : 121 Worksize : 32 : 1975 H/s (92.289% on cn7)
Intensity : 122 Worksize : 16 : 2038 H/s (95.234% on cn7)
Intensity : 122 Worksize : 32 : 1992 H/s (93.099% on cn7)
Intensity : 123 Worksize : 16 : 2043 H/s (95.467% on cn7)
Intensity : 123 Worksize : 32 : 1984 H/s (92.710% on cn7)
Intensity : 124 Worksize : 16 : 2049 H/s (95.748% on cn7)
Intensity : 124 Worksize : 32 : 2000 H/s (93.458% on cn7)
Intensity : 125 Worksize : 16 : Failed
Intensity : 125 Worksize : 32 : Failed
The above are avg HR from a run of 6 Vega 64s and the highest HR setting were tries multiple times for consistency.

Great work doc, so thats a 4.25% drop from v7 !! not bad considering devs said 7% drop  Cheesy Cheesy
doktor83
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1204
Merit: 611


View Profile WWW
October 08, 2018, 03:15:35 PM
 #4420


Yes something not ok, try setting by hand for example 120/16 2 threads

I really hurried to push the v8 version, so of course bugs are to be expected, and we still have time to fix them until the fork

Hey Doc,

Vega 64 - Cryptonight v8 analysis:

Using binary kernals : 583 h/s

Not Using Binary Kernals, Kernals compiled on each run and deleted
Driver: 18.5.1 GPU: 1600 Mem: 1100 Volt : 840mV
Intensity : 119 Worksize : 16 : 2019 H/s (94.338% on cn7)
Intensity : 119 Worksize : 32 : 1963 H/s (91.745% on cn7)
Intensity : 120 Worksize : 16 : 2025 H/s (94.626% on cn7)
Intensity : 120 Worksize : 32 : 1983 H/s (92.663% on cn7)
Intensity : 121 Worksize : 16 : 2032 H/s (94.953% on cn7)
Intensity : 121 Worksize : 32 : 1975 H/s (92.289% on cn7)
Intensity : 122 Worksize : 16 : 2038 H/s (95.234% on cn7)
Intensity : 122 Worksize : 32 : 1992 H/s (93.099% on cn7)
Intensity : 123 Worksize : 16 : 2043 H/s (95.467% on cn7)
Intensity : 123 Worksize : 32 : 1984 H/s (92.710% on cn7)
Intensity : 124 Worksize : 16 : 2049 H/s (95.748% on cn7)
Intensity : 124 Worksize : 32 : 2000 H/s (93.458% on cn7)
Intensity : 125 Worksize : 16 : Failed
Intensity : 125 Worksize : 32 : Failed
The above are avg HR from a run of 6 Vega 64s and the highest HR setting were tries multiple times for consistency.

Great work doc, so thats a 4.25% drop from v7 !! not bad considering devs said 7% drop  Cheesy Cheesy


That's my man, i really love it when someone takes time and tries himself something Smiley
So it looks like the binary kernel is faulty ? I will check that out.

Thank you for your efforts Smiley

edit:
And YES, the binary IS faulty. Great that i pushed the 1.6.8 version 10 days before the fork so we can smooth these kind of things out Smiley

SRBPolaris thread - HERE   |   SRBMiner-CN thread - HERE    |   SRBMiner-MULTI thread - HERE
http://www.srbminer.com
Pages: « 1 ... 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 [221] 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 ... 367 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!