Bitcoin Forum
February 29, 2024, 06:11:43 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 26.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 [153] 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 ... 1412 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Claymore's Dual Ethereum AMD+NVIDIA GPU Miner v15.0 (Windows/Linux)  (Read 6589596 times)
madmartyk
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2674
Merit: 1030


Yes I am a pirate, 300 years too late!


View Profile
June 27, 2016, 03:23:50 PM
 #3041


$10 over retail, but I don't like the July delivery date!!

Bitcoin addresses contain a checksum, so it is very unlikely that mistyping an address will cause you to lose money.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1709230303
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1709230303

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1709230303
Reply with quote  #2

1709230303
Report to moderator
1709230303
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1709230303

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1709230303
Reply with quote  #2

1709230303
Report to moderator
Trimegistus
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1564
Merit: 1027



View Profile
June 27, 2016, 03:29:16 PM
 #3042


$10 over retail, but I don't like the July delivery date!!


I don't think $284 is $10 over retail...

madmartyk
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2674
Merit: 1030


Yes I am a pirate, 300 years too late!


View Profile
June 27, 2016, 03:33:15 PM
 #3043


$10 over retail, but I don't like the July delivery date!!


I don't think $284 is $10 over retail...

2nd link says $239, I'm actually hoping for a gigabyte version

Trimegistus
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1564
Merit: 1027



View Profile
June 27, 2016, 03:43:59 PM
 #3044


$10 over retail, but I don't like the July delivery date!!


I don't think $284 is $10 over retail...

2nd link says $239, I'm actually hoping for a gigabyte version

Ok, those are two links to two different products

adamvp
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1246
Merit: 708



View Profile
June 27, 2016, 05:37:33 PM
 #3045

What is good  invalid rate for eth mining?  Sometimes i have almost 10% invalids per round Sad

I am looking for signature campaign Wink pm me
ps_jb
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 742
Merit: 500


View Profile
June 27, 2016, 05:57:58 PM
 #3046

What is good  invalid rate for eth mining?  Sometimes i have almost 10% invalids per round Sad

0% is good
Balbec
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 45
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 27, 2016, 06:14:48 PM
 #3047

What is good  invalid rate for eth mining?  Sometimes i have almost 10% invalids per round Sad

If pool is well operated and tuned you'll got 0% bad shares, because they become stale and good pools accept them too. If pool reject your share it means someone who have faster ping to pool's node have made the same right hash just before you or mined block just solve and becomes outdated. That is why 8x intensity better than 16x even with lower hashrate.

By the way, pool mining makes your hashrate obsolete. Sharerate is the thing.)
adamvp
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1246
Merit: 708



View Profile
June 27, 2016, 06:47:15 PM
 #3048

so I should modify
-ethi parameter to -4196 or sth??

I am looking for signature campaign Wink pm me
Claymore (OP)
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1610
Merit: 1325

Miners developer


View Profile
June 27, 2016, 07:02:32 PM
 #3049

so I should modify
-ethi parameter to -4196 or sth??

10% of rejects on ETH means that you have bad internet connection, or use bad pool, it is not related to miner settings.

Please read Readme and FAQ in the first post of this thread before asking any questions, probably the answer is already there.
List of my miners: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3019607
gollygosh
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 160
Merit: 100



View Profile
June 27, 2016, 07:19:12 PM
 #3050

http://hexus.net/tech/news/graphics/93998-amd-radeon-wattman-overclocking-tool-details-leak/

hawkfish007
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 895
Merit: 504


View Profile
June 27, 2016, 07:52:22 PM
 #3051


$10 over retail, but I don't like the July delivery date!!


I don't think $284 is $10 over retail...

2nd link says $239, I'm actually hoping for a gigabyte version

That's actually MSI brand, preordered a dozen hoping they will ship as soon as they are available.

For quality risers, splitters or 133 CFM fans, please visit my eBay listings,
http://www.ebay.com/sch/hawkfish007/m.html?_ipg=50&_sop=12&_rdc=1
Longsnowsm
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 868
Merit: 517


View Profile
June 27, 2016, 08:30:17 PM
 #3052

Any idea if these cards on B&H are reference cards or if they will include the better cooling options like the normal aftermarket manufacturers cards?
hawkfish007
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 895
Merit: 504


View Profile
June 27, 2016, 08:49:01 PM
 #3053

Any idea if these cards on B&H are reference cards or if they will include the better cooling options like the normal aftermarket manufacturers cards?

They are most probably reference design, after market ones should be available at a later date. My reference Nanos stays at 74C no matter what the ambient is without any external fan, so I am not worried much.

For quality risers, splitters or 133 CFM fans, please visit my eBay listings,
http://www.ebay.com/sch/hawkfish007/m.html?_ipg=50&_sop=12&_rdc=1
Longsnowsm
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 868
Merit: 517


View Profile
June 27, 2016, 09:15:28 PM
 #3054

Just a heads up on some of the leaked tests have indicated some heat issues.  So I thought I might mention it.  I would like to see more tests in the wild before I want to go crazy buying cards, or wait until the aftermarket manufacturers cards start to appear in the market.  Maybe you could post some results of your tests once you get your cards Hawkfish007? Smiley
hawkfish007
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 895
Merit: 504


View Profile
June 27, 2016, 09:37:38 PM
 #3055

Just a heads up on some of the leaked tests have indicated some heat issues.  So I thought I might mention it.  I would like to see more tests in the wild before I want to go crazy buying cards, or wait until the aftermarket manufacturers cards start to appear in the market.  Maybe you could post some results of your tests once you get your cards Hawkfish007? Smiley

Sure I should get enough to build 2 6 card rigs at release depending on B&H, and planning to preorder more from Newegg  when available with BTC. My Nanos maintained 74C even when my garage ambient was 115F. These cards supposedly use less wattage than Nano. You may be waiting a good month or two for aftermarket designs but who knows.

For quality risers, splitters or 133 CFM fans, please visit my eBay listings,
http://www.ebay.com/sch/hawkfish007/m.html?_ipg=50&_sop=12&_rdc=1
merc84
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 799
Merit: 1000


View Profile
June 27, 2016, 09:49:00 PM
 #3056

And strictly speaking, they're right. Any fork breaks the main idea of blockchain, making Ethereum NOT that declared on their main page.

The worst thing is that so called hacker may be wrong in general, but strictly complied with the terms of TheDAO contract. Any fork means that a 3rd-party changes the rules of the game on the fly in favor of someone just because some business made something wrong and lost some investments. Any investment is a risk, and they should learn the lesson, fix it and move on. Instead, due to conflict of interests being in both Ethereum foundation and TheDAO curators, they decided to prove the world that they are right to break own rules just because they lost some money due to own fault. Be that a smaller project that failed, no one would ever thought about any forks. But this one just "too big to fail", and that's sad.

No any polls and votes should be treated as the network consensus - they just mean that people trust to the founders without own investigation. If one said 'theft', they do not do own judgement. And just led by a false goal. Killing the whole Ethereum thing as a result.

I don't agree with the premise "people just trust the founders", I dare say there are enough intelligent individuals who can make up their own mind on the subject. A soft-fork is a change of the rules using the existing code that requires consensus, it really does not get more democratic or decentralized than that. If you don't agree with the soft fork u have various avenues to express that so that ur vote is counted. I would agree with Suprnova in case of a hard fork but not for this soft fork.
almond
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 407
Merit: 254


View Profile
June 27, 2016, 10:28:46 PM
 #3057

And strictly speaking, they're right. Any fork breaks the main idea of blockchain, making Ethereum NOT that declared on their main page.

The worst thing is that so called hacker may be wrong in general, but strictly complied with the terms of TheDAO contract. Any fork means that a 3rd-party changes the rules of the game on the fly in favor of someone just because some business made something wrong and lost some investments. Any investment is a risk, and they should learn the lesson, fix it and move on. Instead, due to conflict of interests being in both Ethereum foundation and TheDAO curators, they decided to prove the world that they are right to break own rules just because they lost some money due to own fault. Be that a smaller project that failed, no one would ever thought about any forks. But this one just "too big to fail", and that's sad.

No any polls and votes should be treated as the network consensus - they just mean that people trust to the founders without own investigation. If one said 'theft', they do not do own judgement. And just led by a false goal. Killing the whole Ethereum thing as a result.

I don't agree with the premise "people just trust the founders", I dare say there are enough intelligent individuals who can make up their own mind on the subject. A soft-fork is a change of the rules using the existing code that requires consensus, it really does not get more democratic or decentralized than that. If you don't agree with the soft fork u have various avenues to express that so that ur vote is counted. I would agree with Suprnova in case of a hard fork but not for this soft fork.

If there had been a cryptographic gap, in other words a transaction were erased or created that altered the blockchain, I would be in OC's camp.  But this soft fork is simply a change in the protocol.  Just like the soft fork for Homestead, so there's already been a softfork.

If there is a hard fork, I would probably continue with my eth investment program, but OC would be correct and his argument unassailable at that point.

I respect OC's current decision, nonetheless.  I've spent much mining time at Suprnova and one of the things that makes the site reliable and comfortable are OC's well considered ethics.

Freedom of the press is guaranteed only to those who own one
tolazy
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 196
Merit: 100


View Profile
June 28, 2016, 06:15:52 AM
 #3058

anyone have a link for catalyst 15.12 driver.

think i've seen someone talking about driver dll's they put in the claymore miner or have i missunderstand that
CoRpO
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 185
Merit: 100


View Profile
June 28, 2016, 06:28:10 AM
 #3059

anyone have a link for catalyst 15.12 driver.

think i've seen someone talking about driver dll's they put in the claymore miner or have i missunderstand that

There you go : http://www.techpowerup.com/218461/amd-releases-radeon-software-crimson-edition-15-12-whql
tolazy
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 196
Merit: 100


View Profile
June 28, 2016, 06:30:45 AM
 #3060

anyone have a link for catalyst 15.12 driver.

think i've seen someone talking about driver dll's they put in the claymore miner or have i missunderstand that

There you go : http://www.techpowerup.com/218461/amd-releases-radeon-software-crimson-edition-15-12-whql

thx.
Pages: « 1 ... 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 [153] 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 ... 1412 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!