madmartyk
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 2674
Merit: 1030
Yes I am a pirate, 300 years too late!
|
 |
June 27, 2016, 03:23:50 PM |
|
$10 over retail, but I don't like the July delivery date!! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If you see garbage posts (off-topic, trolling, spam, no point, etc.), use the "report to moderator" links. All reports are investigated, though you will rarely be contacted about your reports.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
Trimegistus
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1564
Merit: 1027
|
|
June 27, 2016, 03:29:16 PM |
|
$10 over retail, but I don't like the July delivery date!! I don't think $284 is $10 over retail... |
|
|
|
madmartyk
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2674
Merit: 1030
Yes I am a pirate, 300 years too late!
|
|
June 27, 2016, 03:33:15 PM |
|
$10 over retail, but I don't like the July delivery date!! I don't think $284 is $10 over retail... 2nd link says $239, I'm actually hoping for a gigabyte version |
|
|
|
Trimegistus
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1564
Merit: 1027
|
|
June 27, 2016, 03:43:59 PM |
|
$10 over retail, but I don't like the July delivery date!! I don't think $284 is $10 over retail... 2nd link says $239, I'm actually hoping for a gigabyte version Ok, those are two links to two different products |
|
|
|
|
adamvp
|
|
June 27, 2016, 05:37:33 PM |
|
What is good invalid rate for eth mining? Sometimes i have almost 10% invalids per round  |
I am looking for signature campaign  pm me |
|
|
|
ps_jb
|
|
June 27, 2016, 05:57:58 PM |
|
What is good invalid rate for eth mining? Sometimes i have almost 10% invalids per round 0% is good |
|
|
|
|
Balbec
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 45
Merit: 0
|
|
June 27, 2016, 06:14:48 PM |
|
What is good invalid rate for eth mining? Sometimes i have almost 10% invalids per round If pool is well operated and tuned you'll got 0% bad shares, because they become stale and good pools accept them too. If pool reject your share it means someone who have faster ping to pool's node have made the same right hash just before you or mined block just solve and becomes outdated. That is why 8x intensity better than 16x even with lower hashrate. By the way, pool mining makes your hashrate obsolete. Sharerate is the thing.) |
|
|
|
|
|
adamvp
|
|
June 27, 2016, 06:47:15 PM |
|
so I should modify
-ethi parameter to -4196 or sth??
|
I am looking for signature campaign pm me |
|
|
Claymore (OP)
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1325
Miners developer
|
|
June 27, 2016, 07:02:32 PM |
|
so I should modify
-ethi parameter to -4196 or sth??
10% of rejects on ETH means that you have bad internet connection, or use bad pool, it is not related to miner settings. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
hawkfish007
|
|
June 27, 2016, 07:52:22 PM |
|
$10 over retail, but I don't like the July delivery date!! I don't think $284 is $10 over retail... 2nd link says $239, I'm actually hoping for a gigabyte version That's actually MSI brand, preordered a dozen hoping they will ship as soon as they are available. |
|
|
|
|
Longsnowsm
|
|
June 27, 2016, 08:30:17 PM |
|
Any idea if these cards on B&H are reference cards or if they will include the better cooling options like the normal aftermarket manufacturers cards?
|
|
|
|
|
|
hawkfish007
|
|
June 27, 2016, 08:49:01 PM |
|
Any idea if these cards on B&H are reference cards or if they will include the better cooling options like the normal aftermarket manufacturers cards?
They are most probably reference design, after market ones should be available at a later date. My reference Nanos stays at 74C no matter what the ambient is without any external fan, so I am not worried much. |
|
|
|
|
Longsnowsm
|
|
June 27, 2016, 09:15:28 PM |
|
Just a heads up on some of the leaked tests have indicated some heat issues. So I thought I might mention it. I would like to see more tests in the wild before I want to go crazy buying cards, or wait until the aftermarket manufacturers cards start to appear in the market. Maybe you could post some results of your tests once you get your cards Hawkfish007?  |
|
|
|
|
|
hawkfish007
|
|
June 27, 2016, 09:37:38 PM |
|
Just a heads up on some of the leaked tests have indicated some heat issues. So I thought I might mention it. I would like to see more tests in the wild before I want to go crazy buying cards, or wait until the aftermarket manufacturers cards start to appear in the market. Maybe you could post some results of your tests once you get your cards Hawkfish007? Sure I should get enough to build 2 6 card rigs at release depending on B&H, and planning to preorder more from Newegg when available with BTC. My Nanos maintained 74C even when my garage ambient was 115F. These cards supposedly use less wattage than Nano. You may be waiting a good month or two for aftermarket designs but who knows. |
|
|
|
|
merc84
|
|
June 27, 2016, 09:49:00 PM |
|
And strictly speaking, they're right. Any fork breaks the main idea of blockchain, making Ethereum NOT that declared on their main page. The worst thing is that so called hacker may be wrong in general, but strictly complied with the terms of TheDAO contract. Any fork means that a 3rd-party changes the rules of the game on the fly in favor of someone just because some business made something wrong and lost some investments. Any investment is a risk, and they should learn the lesson, fix it and move on. Instead, due to conflict of interests being in both Ethereum foundation and TheDAO curators, they decided to prove the world that they are right to break own rules just because they lost some money due to own fault. Be that a smaller project that failed, no one would ever thought about any forks. But this one just "too big to fail", and that's sad. No any polls and votes should be treated as the network consensus - they just mean that people trust to the founders without own investigation. If one said 'theft', they do not do own judgement. And just led by a false goal. Killing the whole Ethereum thing as a result. I don't agree with the premise "people just trust the founders", I dare say there are enough intelligent individuals who can make up their own mind on the subject. A soft-fork is a change of the rules using the existing code that requires consensus, it really does not get more democratic or decentralized than that. If you don't agree with the soft fork u have various avenues to express that so that ur vote is counted. I would agree with Suprnova in case of a hard fork but not for this soft fork. |
|
|
|
|
|
almond
|
|
June 27, 2016, 10:28:46 PM |
|
And strictly speaking, they're right. Any fork breaks the main idea of blockchain, making Ethereum NOT that declared on their main page. The worst thing is that so called hacker may be wrong in general, but strictly complied with the terms of TheDAO contract. Any fork means that a 3rd-party changes the rules of the game on the fly in favor of someone just because some business made something wrong and lost some investments. Any investment is a risk, and they should learn the lesson, fix it and move on. Instead, due to conflict of interests being in both Ethereum foundation and TheDAO curators, they decided to prove the world that they are right to break own rules just because they lost some money due to own fault. Be that a smaller project that failed, no one would ever thought about any forks. But this one just "too big to fail", and that's sad. No any polls and votes should be treated as the network consensus - they just mean that people trust to the founders without own investigation. If one said 'theft', they do not do own judgement. And just led by a false goal. Killing the whole Ethereum thing as a result. I don't agree with the premise "people just trust the founders", I dare say there are enough intelligent individuals who can make up their own mind on the subject. A soft-fork is a change of the rules using the existing code that requires consensus, it really does not get more democratic or decentralized than that. If you don't agree with the soft fork u have various avenues to express that so that ur vote is counted. I would agree with Suprnova in case of a hard fork but not for this soft fork. If there had been a cryptographic gap, in other words a transaction were erased or created that altered the blockchain, I would be in OC's camp. But this soft fork is simply a change in the protocol. Just like the soft fork for Homestead, so there's already been a softfork. If there is a hard fork, I would probably continue with my eth investment program, but OC would be correct and his argument unassailable at that point. I respect OC's current decision, nonetheless. I've spent much mining time at Suprnova and one of the things that makes the site reliable and comfortable are OC's well considered ethics. |
Freedom of the press is guaranteed only to those who own one
|
|
|
|
tolazy
|
|
June 28, 2016, 06:15:52 AM |
|
anyone have a link for catalyst 15.12 driver.
think i've seen someone talking about driver dll's they put in the claymore miner or have i missunderstand that
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
tolazy
|
|
June 28, 2016, 06:30:45 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
