SRBMiner Cryptonight AMD GPU Miner V1.9.3 - native algo switching

[doktor83]

Log File:
[2018-07-12 12:54:55] Miner version: 1.6.3
[2018-07-12 12:54:55] Windows version: 10.0 build 17134
[2018-07-12 12:54:55] Video driver version: 24.20.11021.1000
[2018-07-12 12:54:55] config_parse: Invalid config file. Missing value is "cryptonight_type"

config.txt
{
}

start.bat
setx GPU_FORCE_64BIT_PTR 1
setx GPU_MAX_HEAP_SIZE 100
setx GPU_MAX_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1
setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
setx GPU_MAX_SINGLE_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
@echo off


SRBMiner-CN.exe --ccryptonighttype stellitev4 --cgpuid 0,1 --cgpuintensity 120,120 --cgputhreads 2,2 --cgpuworksize 16,16 --cpool stellite.ingest.cryptoknight.cc:16222 --cwallet xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.50000 --cpassword x --logfile 1.txt


..... :/

Do you see now what's wrong? I bolded it for you

[doktor83]

guys, so sorry i need to ask some silly question,

i use rx 570 4 gpu + srbminer + alloy coin

and already set double_threads: true.

but in srb miner only detect 4 gpu (previously on xmr stak total become 8 gpu)
is it correct like that in srbminer only 4 gpu in double_threads??

i got around 1700 H/s.
or it should be more than that?

or did i miss some config setting?

please advice.
thanks in advance guys!

https://imgur.com/a/eeCAA84

That is normal because it shows you the number of GPU's, not threads.
When miner starts you can see on top of window something like :

GPU0: Radeon RX Vega [gfx900] [8176 MB][Intensity 120.0][W: 8][T: 2][K: 1][BUS: 1]

The bolded part means : Threads: 2, so its all ok

[nordmann666]

Log File:
[2018-07-12 12:54:55] Miner version: 1.6.3
[2018-07-12 12:54:55] Windows version: 10.0 build 17134
[2018-07-12 12:54:55] Video driver version: 24.20.11021.1000
[2018-07-12 12:54:55] config_parse: Invalid config file. Missing value is "cryptonight_type"

config.txt
{
}

start.bat
setx GPU_FORCE_64BIT_PTR 1
setx GPU_MAX_HEAP_SIZE 100
setx GPU_MAX_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1
setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
setx GPU_MAX_SINGLE_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
@echo off


SRBMiner-CN.exe --ccryptonighttype stellitev4 --cgpuid 0,1 --cgpuintensity 120,120 --cgputhreads 2,2 --cgpuworksize 16,16 --cpool stellite.ingest.cryptoknight.cc:16222 --cwallet xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.50000 --cpassword x --logfile 1.txt


..... :/

Do you see now what's wrong? I bolded it for you

DAMN
saw the post of new version..downloaded from first page = version 1.6.3 = to fast action from me
not now it works...THX

[doktor83]

DAMN
saw the post of new version..downloaded from first page = version 1.6.3 = to fast action from me
not it works...THX

You probably downloaded in those few minutes between when i uploaded it and updated the post here

[Gulftown]

I have problem with latest version. V1.5.6 works well with 7970, 7950 and Vega 56, but Vega gives me ~1300Hs.

With V1.6.4 i got error.

[mokrejbandita]

Hello there,
guys please can you share your hashrates on bittubev2 and with what intensity?

Here is mine:

vega 56 - int 55 - ~ 1300 H/s
rx570 4gb - int 29 ~ 620 H/s
rx480 4gb - int 29 ~ 620 H/s
rx480 8gb - int 41 ~ 850 H/s
rx580 4gb - int 29 ~ 630 H/s

I am running with automatic intensity.
Thank you.

[doktor83]

@doktor,

Is there any downside to killing the srb-miner executable using taskkill /f (it seems to not support gracefull exit using only taskkill without the force option)... What exactly is it doing when you close srb normally, and is it important??

Nope, no downsides, except it won't cleanup some leftovers, but who cares, the OS will 

[DeshaCAM]

bittubev2

RX 580 nitro+ 8G (samsung)  cc/mc 1300/2050

int 54 ~ 1130 H/s

[livada]

1.6.2 BC driver vs 1.64 with 18.3.4 driver
HEAVY and TUBE algo

GPU 0-1-4 = vega 56(64bios)samsung (56/8/2)setup
gpu 2 = vega 64 Liquid (60/8/2)setup
With BC driver 1.6.4 have more error
With 18.3.4 gpu go more overclock:)
1.6.4 have more HR
18.3.4 driver not need disable/enable vega , and not need start with 60int first.
but if use v7 algo and back to heavy  HBC memory not work.(need restart)

1.6.2 BC driver- this is maximal setup wtihout error
https://image.prntscr.com/image/14SysMMOQOS7zviWPlF-Yg.jpg

1.6.4. 18.43.4 driver without error
https://image.prntscr.com/image/A3SjEnciQ4C0yPzjnPuWPQ.jpg

[jsphshi]

Hello
I have a few rigs & have tried SRB miner for a few days now ,the hashrate is high compared to XMR-STAK & xmring .The only problem is that on the pool side its showing a reduced hashrate of 10-15% .What till be the reason for this ?.
I have used the same port as XMR stak
Thanks

[doktor83]

Hello
I have a few rigs & have tried SRB miner for a few days now ,the hashrate is high compared to XMR-STAK & xmring .The only problem is that on the pool side its showing a reduced hashrate of 10-15% .What till be the reason for this ?.
I have used the same port as XMR stak
Thanks

You probably got a lot stale shares, download latest 1.6.4 v and use --sendallstales parameter in bat, it will probably increase your effective hashrate

[duyquang06]

Hello
I have a few rigs & have tried SRB miner for a few days now ,the hashrate is high compared to XMR-STAK & xmring .The only problem is that on the pool side its showing a reduced hashrate of 10-15% .What till be the reason for this ?.
I have used the same port as XMR stak
Thanks

You probably got a lot stale shares, download latest 1.6.4 v and use --sendallstales parameter in bat, it will probably increase your effective hashrate

Doc, is there any quick way to know pool support your --sendallstales command. (U tell in previous post that some pool don't support and may lose hashrate/share, right?, correct me if i wrong).

I will test new ver.
 

[doktor83]

Hello
I have a few rigs & have tried SRB miner for a few days now ,the hashrate is high compared to XMR-STAK & xmring .The only problem is that on the pool side its showing a reduced hashrate of 10-15% .What till be the reason for this ?.
I have used the same port as XMR stak
Thanks

You probably got a lot stale shares, download latest 1.6.4 v and use --sendallstales parameter in bat, it will probably increase your effective hashrate

Doc, is there any quick way to know pool support your --sendallstales command. (U tell in previous post that some pool don't support and may lose hashrate/share, right?, correct me if i wrong).

I will test new ver.
 

If the pool pays for stale shares then you will benefit from using --sendallstales, if it's not accepting stales you will get that stale share rejected. So there is nothing for you to loose.
What can happen is if you are mining on low difficulty and you find a lot of shares / minute, and your pool does not accept stale shares, and a job switch occurs and miner sends all those shares from the previous job, and the pool rejects them, and because you had a lot of rejects in short time, it can ban you for a time. This is the worse that can happen, but on pools that have vardiff set OK, and you find approx 6-10 shares / minute you can only win with this option turned on.

[ripcurrent]

Anyone Using the miner on a RX580 4gb on the bittubev2. I cant seem to get the miner to run on it. I tried all different Intensity settings.

[zeef]

Hello
I have a few rigs & have tried SRB miner for a few days now ,the hashrate is high compared to XMR-STAK & xmring .The only problem is that on the pool side its showing a reduced hashrate of 10-15% .What till be the reason for this ?.
I have used the same port as XMR stak
Thanks

You probably got a lot stale shares, download latest 1.6.4 v and use --sendallstales parameter in bat, it will probably increase your effective hashrate

Doc, is there any quick way to know pool support your --sendallstales command. (U tell in previous post that some pool don't support and may lose hashrate/share, right?, correct me if i wrong).

I will test new ver.
 

Thanks

If the pool pays for stale shares then you will benefit from using --sendallstales, if it's not accepting stales you will get that stale share rejected. So there is nothing for you to loose.
What can happen is if you are mining on low difficulty and you find a lot of shares / minute, and your pool does not accept stale shares, and a job switch occurs and miner sends all those shares from the previous job, and the pool rejects them, and because you had a lot of rejects in short time, it can ban you for a time. This is the worse that can happen, but on pools that have vardiff set OK, and you find approx 6-10 shares / minute you can only win with this option turned on.

Hi doktor,

We can see the stale shares in statistics pressing s in your miner right?

[UnclWish]

I use 1.6.4 with --sendallstales option since 1.6.4 was released with nicehash heavy algo. No one stale share for all this time. It's normal? Recieved speed on nicehash less than speed in miner about 10-11%. It's abnormal I think. I look at period close to 24 hours.

Another one question: installing new drivers needs to rebuild srb kernel files?

[doktor83]

I use 1.6.4 with --sendallstales option since 1.6.4 was released with nicehash heavy algo. No one stale share for all this time. It's normal? Recieved speed on nicehash less than speed in miner about 10-11%. It's abnormal I think. I look at period close to 24 hours.

Another one question: installing new drivers needs to rebuild srb kernel files?

You can use nicehash+heavy way before 1.6.4, i don't know where do you get this info from. Stale shares are not sent when using nicehash cause nicehash rejects ALL stale shares, so no point in sending them. 10-11% is much i agree.

Don't have to rebuild kernels after changing drivers, miner will work, but i would suggest you to rebuild them to be sure you are totally compatible with the drivers.

[doktor83]

Hi doktor,

We can see the stale shares in statistics pressing s in your miner right?

yes,
Accepted(Stale)/Total shares: 42(1)/42 (100.0%)

[zeef]

Hi doktor,

We can see the stale shares in statistics pressing s in your miner right?

yes,
Accepted(Stale)/Total shares: 42(1)/42 (100.0%)

Thanks

[UnclWish]

I use 1.6.4 with --sendallstales option since 1.6.4 was released with nicehash heavy algo. No one stale share for all this time. It's normal? Recieved speed on nicehash less than speed in miner about 10-11%. It's abnormal I think. I look at period close to 24 hours.

Another one question: installing new drivers needs to rebuild srb kernel files?

You can use nicehash+heavy way before 1.6.4, i don't know where do you get this info from. Stale shares are not sent when using nicehash cause nicehash rejects ALL stale shares, so no point in sending them. 10-11% is much i agree.

Don't have to rebuild kernels after changing drivers, miner will work, but i would suggest you to rebuild them to be sure you are totally compatible with the drivers.

Ok, thanks. I got it.

1.6.4. builds other heavy srb kernels. It have size about 2Mb as for cn-v7. And speed is some lower. If use srb builded 1.6.3 speed good, and size of srb kernel about 4Mb.