doktor83 (OP)
|
|
July 13, 2018, 03:27:51 PM |
|
I use 1.6.4 with --sendallstales option since 1.6.4 was released with nicehash heavy algo. No one stale share for all this time. It's normal? Recieved speed on nicehash less than speed in miner about 10-11%. It's abnormal I think. I look at period close to 24 hours.
Another one question: installing new drivers needs to rebuild srb kernel files?
You can use nicehash+heavy way before 1.6.4, i don't know where do you get this info from. Stale shares are not sent when using nicehash cause nicehash rejects ALL stale shares, so no point in sending them. 10-11% is much i agree. Don't have to rebuild kernels after changing drivers, miner will work, but i would suggest you to rebuild them to be sure you are totally compatible with the drivers.
|
|
|
|
doktor83 (OP)
|
|
July 13, 2018, 03:49:54 PM |
|
Hi doktor,
We can see the stale shares in statistics pressing s in your miner right?
yes, Accepted( Stale)/Total shares: 42( 1)/42 (100.0%)
|
|
|
|
zeef
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 301
Merit: 0
|
|
July 13, 2018, 03:53:08 PM |
|
Hi doktor,
We can see the stale shares in statistics pressing s in your miner right?
yes, Accepted( Stale)/Total shares: 42( 1)/42 (100.0%) Thanks
|
|
|
|
UnclWish
|
|
July 13, 2018, 04:00:12 PM |
|
I use 1.6.4 with --sendallstales option since 1.6.4 was released with nicehash heavy algo. No one stale share for all this time. It's normal? Recieved speed on nicehash less than speed in miner about 10-11%. It's abnormal I think. I look at period close to 24 hours.
Another one question: installing new drivers needs to rebuild srb kernel files?
You can use nicehash+heavy way before 1.6.4, i don't know where do you get this info from. Stale shares are not sent when using nicehash cause nicehash rejects ALL stale shares, so no point in sending them. 10-11% is much i agree. Don't have to rebuild kernels after changing drivers, miner will work, but i would suggest you to rebuild them to be sure you are totally compatible with the drivers. Ok, thanks. I got it. 1.6.4. builds other heavy srb kernels. It have size about 2Mb as for cn-v7. And speed is some lower. If use srb builded 1.6.3 speed good, and size of srb kernel about 4Mb.
|
|
|
|
doktor83 (OP)
|
|
July 13, 2018, 04:13:26 PM |
|
Ok, thanks. I got it.
1.6.4. builds other heavy srb kernels. It have size about 2Mb as for cn-v7. And speed is some lower. If use srb builded 1.6.3 speed good, and size of srb kernel about 4Mb.
i did not touch cl kernels from 1.6.3 to 1.6.4, so probably you built on one driver , now with another, and maybe the compiler unrolls differently, that would explain the increased size.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Art Gar
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 22
Merit: 0
|
|
July 13, 2018, 05:54:14 PM |
|
DAMN saw the post of new version..downloaded from first page = version 1.6.3 = to fast action from me not it works...THX You probably downloaded in those few minutes between when i uploaded it and updated the post here What is Latency in json? Is it ping?
|
|
|
|
UnclWish
|
|
July 14, 2018, 12:39:12 AM |
|
Ok, thanks. I got it.
1.6.4. builds other heavy srb kernels. It have size about 2Mb as for cn-v7. And speed is some lower. If use srb builded 1.6.3 speed good, and size of srb kernel about 4Mb.
i did not touch cl kernels from 1.6.3 to 1.6.4, so probably you built on one driver , now with another, and maybe the compiler unrolls differently, that would explain the increased size. Size decreases. On 1.6.4 kernels builded with 18.7.1 are buggy. Speed is low, many compute errors. Now use 1.6.4 with srb kernels builded by 1.6.3 on 18.6 drivers...
|
|
|
|
chris718
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 9
Merit: 0
|
|
July 14, 2018, 01:11:18 AM |
|
plz support HYCON mining,THX!
|
|
|
|
Sharpeich
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 62
Merit: 0
|
|
July 14, 2018, 05:46:23 AM |
|
plz support HYCON mining,THX! where did you see a word about minerable HYCON ?
|
|
|
|
doktor83 (OP)
|
|
July 14, 2018, 05:49:49 AM |
|
Ok, thanks. I got it.
1.6.4. builds other heavy srb kernels. It have size about 2Mb as for cn-v7. And speed is some lower. If use srb builded 1.6.3 speed good, and size of srb kernel about 4Mb.
i did not touch cl kernels from 1.6.3 to 1.6.4, so probably you built on one driver , now with another, and maybe the compiler unrolls differently, that would explain the increased size. Size decreases. On 1.6.4 kernels builded with 18.7.1 are buggy. Speed is low, many compute errors. Now use 1.6.4 with srb kernels builded by 1.6.3 on 18.6 drivers... If you take 1.6.4 and install 18.6.1 and let the miner build the binaries it would work good. The problem here is the 18.7.1 drivers.
|
|
|
|
doktor83 (OP)
|
|
July 14, 2018, 05:59:03 AM Last edit: July 14, 2018, 06:10:54 AM by doktor83 |
|
plz support HYCON mining,THX! I missed your previous post, sorry. I will look into it. edit : it's cryptonight v7, so you can use 'normalv7' to mine it.
|
|
|
|
UnclWish
|
|
July 14, 2018, 10:53:22 AM |
|
Ok, thanks. I got it.
1.6.4. builds other heavy srb kernels. It have size about 2Mb as for cn-v7. And speed is some lower. If use srb builded 1.6.3 speed good, and size of srb kernel about 4Mb.
i did not touch cl kernels from 1.6.3 to 1.6.4, so probably you built on one driver , now with another, and maybe the compiler unrolls differently, that would explain the increased size. Size decreases. On 1.6.4 kernels builded with 18.7.1 are buggy. Speed is low, many compute errors. Now use 1.6.4 with srb kernels builded by 1.6.3 on 18.6 drivers... If you take 1.6.4 and install 18.6.1 and let the miner build the binaries it would work good. The problem here is the 18.7.1 drivers. Yes, I understand it. Just wanted all to know that on 18.7.1 new builded kernels not optimal, but old kernels works fine.
|
|
|
|
chris718
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 9
Merit: 0
|
|
July 14, 2018, 01:43:28 PM Last edit: July 18, 2018, 12:10:06 AM by chris718 |
|
plz support HYCON mining,THX! I missed your previous post, sorry. I will look into it. edit : it's cryptonight v7, so you can use 'normalv7' to mine it. It's V7 fork, something modified,normal V7 miner can not work,the modified xmrig miner work fine,but...i like SRBminer more
|
|
|
|
zeef
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 301
Merit: 0
|
|
July 14, 2018, 02:27:31 PM |
|
Hi guys,
For cryptonight fast what should be the optimal settings for vega 56 and 64?
Double of heavy settings in intensity?
Thanks
|
|
|
|
SpceGhst
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 269
Merit: 4
|
|
July 14, 2018, 02:54:20 PM |
|
Just started using SRBMiner and have a quick question... If I change algos, say from CN7 to CNHeavy, do I need to delete the .srb files and let program recompile, or will the old .srb files work fine?
Thanks
|
|
|
|
MaxHa$h
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 37
Merit: 0
|
|
July 14, 2018, 03:00:15 PM |
|
Does SRB have any issues running 13 gpu's. Try to switch over a rig with the Asus b250ME w/ 13 rx550's it does the intial load, but then the screen where it would show all the cards then load kernals stays black with a blinking cursor
|
|
|
|
MaxHa$h
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 37
Merit: 0
|
|
July 14, 2018, 03:29:01 PM |
|
Does SRB have any issues running 13 gpu's. Try to switch over a rig with the Asus b250ME w/ 13 rx550's it does the intial load, but then the screen where it would show all the cards then load kernals stays black with a blinking cursor
have you try old version srb ? i thing new version any bug with rx550 series No just the current, I'll try 1.6.0 and see
|
|
|
|
UnclWish
|
|
July 14, 2018, 03:57:35 PM |
|
Just started using SRBMiner and have a quick question... If I change algos, say from CN7 to CNHeavy, do I need to delete the .srb files and let program recompile, or will the old .srb files work fine?
Thanks
If srb files created by version 1.6.3 or 1.6.4 it's no need to delete them.
|
|
|
|
|