SRBMiner Cryptonight AMD GPU Miner V1.9.3 - native algo switching

[pehoko]

Agree, do not use this miner if you don't like the fee ...use others or make your own miner.

[1714060869]

1714060869

[1714060869]

1714060869

[1714060869]

1714060869

[1714060869]

1714060869

[1714060869]

1714060869

[abg00]

recheck again. work fine

other trouble. bad share on r9 290(x) card. kernel 2 too
Pool rejected result 0x0002013C (rejected share: invalid result)

algo mox ?
every share invalid?
pool?

mox
100% rejected
crypto9coin.cf

on v7 work fine with kernel 1

I can't reproduce it, tried on a few rigs and kernel 2 everywhere works on mox algo.

check again
GPU0: AMD Radeon R9 200 Series [Hawaii] [8192 MB][Intensity 46.0][W: 8][T: 2][K: 2][BUS: 7]
GPU1: AMD Radeon R9 200 Series [Hawaii] [4096 MB][Intensity 43.0][W: 8][T: 2][K: 2][BUS: 8]
GPU2: AMD Radeon R9 200 Series [Hawaii] [4096 MB][Intensity 43.0][W: 8][T: 2][K: 2][BUS: 6]

[2018-08-04 11:47:55] Connected to crypto9coin.cf:62477
[2018-08-04 11:47:55] User logged in
[2018-08-04 11:47:55] Pool difficulty: 22222
[2018-08-04 11:47:55] Pool sent a new job (ID: 385523145366460)
[2018-08-04 11:48:02] Pool rejected result 0x0002826B (rejected share: invalid result)
[2018-08-04 11:48:03] Pool rejected result 0x000182FF (rejected share: invalid result)
[2018-08-04 11:48:05] Pool rejected result 0x00004895 (rejected share: invalid result)

log
[2018-08-04 11:50:13] hashrate: GPU0: 0 H/s [BUS:7]
[2018-08-04 11:50:13] hashrate: GPU1: 0 H/s [BUS:8]
[2018-08-04 11:50:13] hashrate: GPU2: 0 H/s [BUS:6]
[2018-08-04 11:50:13] hashrate: Total: 0 H/s
[2018-08-04 11:50:15] miner_result: Sending user result to pool
[2018-08-04 11:50:15] json_send: {"id":1,"jsonrpc": "2.0","method":"submit","params":{"id":"511865336680784","job_id":"118325158976949","nonce":"7f28c771","result":"95c64bcff0d41710a97ffad0aa7c65daaa8bbec5085e8cc0739967e3b6970200"}}
[2018-08-04 11:50:15] json_receive: {"id":1,"jsonrpc":"2.0","error":{"code":-1,"message":"Rejected share: invalid result"}}
[2018-08-04 11:50:15] miner_result: Pool rejected result 0x000297B6 (rejected share: invalid result)
[2018-08-04 11:50:16] miner_result: Sending user result to pool
[2018-08-04 11:50:16] json_send: {"id":1,"jsonrpc": "2.0","method":"submit","params":{"id":"511865336680784","job_id":"118325158976949","nonce":"157f1cc7","result":"c769157260fe9d1ff1f6e39e552b827fdbe1730ed09db9779fa21dbe83bf0100"}}
[2018-08-04 11:50:17] json_receive: {"id":1,"jsonrpc":"2.0","error":{"code":-1,"message":"Rejected share: invalid result"}}
[2018-08-04 11:50:17] miner_result: Pool rejected result 0x0001BF83 (rejected share: invalid result)
[2018-08-04 11:50:19] Stopping miner process

Maybe You are idiot here and not set "cryptonight_type" : "mox" in config?

realy. tnx. get v7 config and not change
rig work. tnx

[prashanta]

hints:

if you go away intensity on zero it will play safe, so in lots of instances you can increase that value to get better outcomes
For higher consequences set double_threads to real, and depart intensity on zero
if you get an blunders that asserts it may’t create scratchpad buffer, you have to decrease depth
largest intensity placing gained’t usually come up with the great hashrate. experiment and discover the nice placing in your GPU.

[livada]

Agree, do not use this miner if you don't like the fee ...use others or make your own miner.

OR you dont read  my post if you angry where i ask why fee.......

or all stop ask why miner dont work with....(i dont read this- go use other miner)
or all stop ask why miner have bug in watchdog and GPU core clock....(i dont read this- go use other miner)
or all stop ask why miner not use forked coin...(i dont read this- go use other miner)
or stop post like :miner work better with driver 18.((i dont read this- go use other miner I want a smaller HR:)  )

mybe is best CLOSE this topic?? and nobody will ever ask anything and all happy?

I do not think that's good. And you?

[abg00]

He paбoтaeт QRL нe нa oднoм пyлe

write config here

yвepeн чтo v7 включeнo? тaм oбычный aлгo y мoнeты

[pehoko]

Agree, do not use this miner if you don't like the fee ...use others or make your own miner.

OR you dont read  my post if you angry where i ask why fee.......

or all stop ask why miner dont work with....(i dont read this- go use other miner)
or all stop ask why miner have bug in watchdog and GPU core clock....(i dont read this- go use other miner)
or all stop ask why miner not use forked coin...(i dont read this- go use other miner)
or stop post like :miner work better with driver 18.((i dont read this- go use other miner I want a smaller HR:)  )

mybe is best CLOSE this topic?? and nobody will ever ask anything and all happy?

I do not think that's good. And you?

So you are the smart guy who found that fee is not 0.85% but 20%? Author must close topic immediately! We all are in big waiting for Your Gorgeous Miner with 0.86% fee (real) and few little minor bugs!

[livada]

Agree, do not use this miner if you don't like the fee ...use others or make your own miner.

OR you dont read  my post if you angry where i ask why fee.......

or all stop ask why miner dont work with....(i dont read this- go use other miner)
or all stop ask why miner have bug in watchdog and GPU core clock....(i dont read this- go use other miner)
or all stop ask why miner not use forked coin...(i dont read this- go use other miner)
or stop post like :miner work better with driver 18.((i dont read this- go use other miner I want a smaller HR:)  )

mybe is best CLOSE this topic?? and nobody will ever ask anything and all happy?

I do not think that's good. And you?

So you are the smart guy who found that fee is not 0.85% but 20%? Author must close topic immediately! We all are in big waiting for Your Gorgeous Miner with 0.86% fee (real) and few little minor bugs!

yea. im smart but you stupid. why read my post? just ignore my post and be smart.

why ask this:

What is wrong kernel 2 is set?
... solved with newer driver but rig hangs badly on start, other miners working very bad (no 3d) so I am backing to my old driver.

Go use other miner and stop ask

[vmozara]

I love this so much. When I was questioning something regarding hashrate, I was made fun of by some guys. Now, the same guys become clowns because of fee 

[pehoko]

Clowns are two here - some retards spamming topic with idiotic conclusion and arguing with author and other people. There are many here in this forum  ... just ignore, absolutely useless.

[livada]

I do not argue with dev (with DEV I'm writing to PM).. I fight with idiots like you are.

[ViWe]

I do not argue with dev (with DEV I'm writing to PM).. I fight with idiots like you are.

I supported you partly, in the sense that I do not agree with Dok's calculations, but for me it ends here.
@Dok: I honestly appreciate your complete openness on how the devfee is levied, you have put it in the release notes and explained it here. This works for me, thank you for your efforts in making this a great miner.

[livada]

I do not argue with dev (with DEV I'm writing to PM).. I fight with idiots like you are.

I supported you partly, in the sense that I do not agree with Dok's calculations, but for me it ends here.
@Dok: I honestly appreciate your complete openness on how the devfee is levied, you have put it in the release notes and explained it here. This works for me, thank you for your efforts in making this a great miner.

I ended up on the last page but the stupid kid provoke me a stupid comment
I agree with you. This is currently the best miner that exists

[dingdongtobias]

I love this so much. When I was questioning something regarding hashrate, I was made fun of by some guys. Now, the same guys become clowns because of fee 

I love you still come back here your little soul was insult and you feel you must grab every situation to tell that again and again.

[pehoko]

I do not argue with dev (with DEV I'm writing to PM).. I fight with idiots like you are.

Well, if your main purpose here is to "fight with idiots" then you are real idiot.

[Art Gar]

Agree, do not use this miner if you don't like the fee ...use others or make your own miner.

OR you dont read  my post if you angry where i ask why fee.......

or all stop ask why miner dont work with....(i dont read this- go use other miner)
or all stop ask why miner have bug in watchdog and GPU core clock....(i dont read this- go use other miner)
or all stop ask why miner not use forked coin...(i dont read this- go use other miner)
or stop post like :miner work better with driver 18.((i dont read this- go use other miner I want a smaller HR:)  )

mybe is best CLOSE this topic?? and nobody will ever ask anything and all happy?

I do not think that's good. And you?

So you are the smart guy who found that fee is not 0.85% but 20%? Author must close topic immediately! We all are in big waiting for Your Gorgeous Miner with 0.86% fee (real) and few little minor bugs!

livada is absolutely right. The miner is not stability, Claymore one time start - and no need any action to rise up hashrate, there is no compare this miners. This miner is need to restart 100500 times to rise up hashrate. So this scheme of dev fee not fair for miners.
I like SRB, but I have to use another one. Good luck to dev to make the fastest and most stable miner.
Just remember that the miner needs stability, hashrate and profit

[dopper]

please help me solve this problem

one of my vega cards shuts down randomly. i've tried everything and i couldn't find why, it's not overheating, not overclocked too much, it can shut in a few minutes after miner start or after 24-80 hours, hr drops to 0

sbr monitors hs and tries to restart itself but hangs on loading kernels, because that card needs to be restarted
if i use "restart_devices_on_startup" after devcon restart i get CL_OUT_OF_HOST_MEMORY when creating clCreateCommandQueue for DeviceID 0 (Thread 0) error, so i have to use switch-radeon-gpu from cast_xmr (it works fine)

and sbr seems to disrespect my reboot-windows.bat

i need sbrminer to restart card not using devcon or restart pc

driver 18.3.4 win 10 1709

start.bat

setx GPU_FORCE_64BIT_PTR 1 >nul
setx GPU_MAX_HEAP_SIZE 100 >nul
setx GPU_MAX_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1 >nul
setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100 >nul
setx GPU_MAX_SINGLE_ALLOC_PERCENT 100 >nul

cd C:\Mine\cast_xmr-vega
switch-radeon-gpu -G 0,1 --hbcc=off --largepages=on autorestart --admin
timeout /t 2

cd C:\Mine
OverdriveNTool.exe -p1srb1 -p2srb2
timeout /t 1

cd C:\Mine\SRBMiner
start SRBMiner-CN.exe --sendallstales --config configv7.txt --pools poolsxmr.txt

configv7

{
"cryptonight_type" : "normalv7",
"intensity" : 112,
"worksize" : 16,
"double_threads" : true,
"min_rig_speed" : 1900,
"min_rig_speed_duration" : 30,
"reboot_script" : "reboot-windows.bat",
}

reboot-windows.bat (it doesn't start when card goes off)

taskkill /im SRBMiner-CN.exe /f

setx GPU_FORCE_64BIT_PTR 1 >nul
setx GPU_MAX_HEAP_SIZE 100 >nul
setx GPU_MAX_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1 >nul
setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100 >nul
setx GPU_MAX_SINGLE_ALLOC_PERCENT 100 >nul

cd C:\Mine\cast_xmr-vega
switch-radeon-gpu -G 0,1 --hbcc=off --largepages=on fullrestart --admin
timeout /t 2

cd C:\Mine
OverdriveNTool.exe -p1srb1 -p2srb2
timeout /t 1

cd C:\Mine\SRBMiner
start SRBMiner-CN.exe --sendallstales --config configv7.txt --pools poolsxmr.txt

[doktor83]

and sbr seems to disrespect my reboot-windows.bat

How do you mean it disrespects it?

If you put "reboot_script" : "filename to a batch file in miner directory" (reboot-windows.bat) to config.txt, the watchdog will run that script on failure (and not try to restart the miner itself)

[dopper]

How do you mean it disrespects it?

as you see in my bat file i expect it to taskkill sbrminer, restart gpu, apply overdriven ini and start sbrminer again. it never happens. if card goes off, sbrminer just restarts itself in the same window and hangs on loading kernels.

[doktor83]

How do you mean it disrespects it?

as you see in my bat file i expect it to taskkill sbrminer, restart gpu, apply overdriven ini and start sbrminer again. it never happens. if card goes off, sbrminer just restarts itself in the same window and hangs on loading kernels.

Does it start the .bat at all ? I see you have it in the config set.

Do you see something like "Reboot script reboot-windows.bat started..." before the miner restarts itself?

[livada]

Agree, do not use this miner if you don't like the fee ...use others or make your own miner.

OR you dont read  my post if you angry where i ask why fee.......

or all stop ask why miner dont work with....(i dont read this- go use other miner)
or all stop ask why miner have bug in watchdog and GPU core clock....(i dont read this- go use other miner)
or all stop ask why miner not use forked coin...(i dont read this- go use other miner)
or stop post like :miner work better with driver 18.((i dont read this- go use other miner I want a smaller HR:)  )

mybe is best CLOSE this topic?? and nobody will ever ask anything and all happy?

I do not think that's good. And you?

So you are the smart guy who found that fee is not 0.85% but 20%? Author must close topic immediately! We all are in big waiting for Your Gorgeous Miner with 0.86% fee (real) and few little minor bugs!

livada is absolutely right. The miner is not stability, Claymore one time start - and no need any action to rise up hashrate, there is no compare this miners. This miner is need to restart 100500 times to rise up hashrate. So this scheme of dev fee not fair for miners.
I like SRB, but I have to use another one. Good luck to dev to make the fastest and most stable miner.
Just remember that the miner needs stability, hashrate and profit

I not say this. SrBMiner is currently the best miner. My post is ironical post.